Chris Harrsch
710 posts

Chris Harrsch
@chrisharrsch
Digital Assets @Nasdaq | Prev Custody @Gemini | Applied Physics MS & Computer Engineering BS @NJIT Savant of esoteric knowledge.

The Cari announcement sparked a debate about institutional blockchain infrastructure. Much of it focuses on technical architecture. But first, consider the business case of proprietary vs. open standard. Governance of proprietary networks like Canton or Tempo is going to be controlled by a small group with disproportionate voting weight. It's "permissionless", but to join you have to submit a Google Form with opaque admission criteria. It's unclear who decides. Over time, the most influential participants will set the terms of access and pricing. If you're a bank evaluating this today, you recognize the pattern from SWIFT and Visa: early incumbents locking in structural advantages while late joiners absorb the cost. This is what we hear from banks. Everyone wants to build their own SWIFT-killer. Nobody wants join someone else's SWIFT-killer. Ethereum is the only settlement layer where that dynamic can't take hold, because no single entity can capture it. It's the only place where every participant can permanently trust that no future coalition will rewrite the rules against them. That's what makes Ethereum the only game-theoretical equilibrium as a global settlement layer for institutional finance that works long term.

"Large players will never agree to build on another large player’s infrastructure, which is why Ethereum is the only option." Robbie asks ZK inventor Alex (@gluk64) how much credence he gives companies building their own L1s. Do JP Morgan, NYSE, and Circle all want to operate on their own networks, or will Ethereum become the neutral infrastructure that everyone can agree on?







JUST IN: 🇺🇸 SEC approves Nasdaq rule to allow tokenized stocks & securities trading.






Microsoft appears to be using AI slop to promote Windows 11 features that don’t look real. Yes, it looks like Microsoft’s marketing team can’t even capture a screenshot in Windows 11 to promote a basic feature like the Snipping Tool or the desktop. Microsoft proudly says the AI-slop screenshot of Windows 11 was generated using Copilot. In the image, the UI feels off, the details also don’t line up, and some of the so-called features don’t even look like the real UI of Windows 11. That’s the bigger problem with AI-generated marketing. That said, I wouldn’t be surprised if this is partly a marketing strategy to promote Copilot itself 🤷♂️

















