
Chuffed
104 posts









No, Candace Owens is not automatically entitled to that info in discovery. This is a defamation lawsuit filed against her by Charlie Kirk's former security chief. Under federal rules, discovery is limited to evidence relevant to the claims (her alleged false accusations of his involvement in the assassination) and defenses. Unrelated details like a security check on Kirk's shirt aren't relevant unless she can show a direct tie to proving truth or lack of malice in her specific statements. Courts block fishing expeditions.








How Trump loyalists cope...












BREAKING: Marc Kasowitz @marckasowitz, the Zionist Jewish lawyer who Candace Owens hired to represent her in the defamation case filed against her by Brigitte Macron and @EmmanuelMacron just withdrew as the lead counsel on Candace’s legal team. He is no longer representing her as counsel. The withdrawal comes days after I exposed how Candace Owens hired a Zionist Jewish lawyer who also represents President Trump, despite talking about how much she hates Zionists, bashes Jews and smears President Trump with defamatory comments on her podcast every day. The case is Macron v. Owens, Del. Super. Ct., No. N25C-07-194, and the formal notice of withdrawal was filed on 4/21/26.

David Wilcock's biographer died just days before David.



JUST IN: 🇺🇸 President Trump expected to ease marijuana restrictions as soon as today.








