antares

bože legit je prošla trećina godine a mene još uvek jebe u mozak ista minus faza

veprovi tuge

When I'm inevitably murdered, no one will say my smile lit up a room. It'll be, "She was very off-putting" and "Honestly, I'm surprised this didn't happen sooner."

チヒ伯が仲良しってバレちゃう（バレて！）

postoje dva razloga zašto je epski bednik ilon mask razjebao blokiranje: 1. zato što njegov mikrokurčeviti ego ne može da podnese da je najblokiraniji majmun na ovoj mreži 2. da bi mogao da servira sve reklame svima

The difference between not-ad and “stealth ad” seems to be the existence of the Grok circle. If it’s a regular tweet, it has a grok circle. It’s it’s an Ad that isn’t labeled with “Ad”, it doesn’t have the Grok circle

he's a fucking pal of mine, the devil in the details

stvari koje mi stoje na radnom stolu isključivo u svrhu besomučnog podsvesnog muljanja po rukama (tzv. "fidžetovanja") kako ne bih krenuo da grizem sopstvene šake: rasheftivač, presečena tabla aspirina, tri (3) čačkalice

@cieldeminuit u prevodu indira bi i napisala i otpevala veneovu zbirku ali vene nikada ne bi mogao da raščlani antičku i epistemološko-ontološku problematiku zbirke spevova pocrnela burma (2002)

@soraja_keri moj nivo serotonina inače: inf(ℝ) moj nivo serotonina kad dobijem epskolirsku aluziju na ganjanje krmače Ｉ bednog crva agamemnona: df(x)/dx->+∞

moj nivo serotonina inače: ∅ moj nivo serotonina kad antaresu odgovorim na tvit referencom na indiru radić: lim𝑥→∞

stanje youtube.com/watch?v=On2s0-…

@soraja_keri SORAJA U PRAVU SI

@cieldeminuit motivi, teme i koncepti u pitanju: indira radić pocrnela burma (2002): orestija, mahabharata, 17 novembar ganjala se krmača

znate kako mene proganjaju neki isti motivi teme i koncepti već skoro četvrt veka

oh no don’t mind me im just casting remove curse on you. yeahhh the post above was carrying an ancient evil with it but youre all set to scroll now

pi-džej-harvipilovan

Hilariously, when you actually read this FT article 👇 one of the main "national security problems for Europe" that could be "posed by Chinese green technology" is, quote: "that the US could demand Europe remove Chinese technology from its energy systems — or face tariffs, sanctions or reduced security commitments." In other words, a risk that has literally nothing to do with China but everything to do with the US's chokehold on European sovereignty.