Responsible Citizen

918 posts

Responsible Citizen

Responsible Citizen

@citizen2891

Katılım Mart 2008
463 Takip Edilen133 Takipçiler
Responsible Citizen
Responsible Citizen@citizen2891·
@konichivalue @criticalurban What is the point of the bet? To illustrate that bikes are more time-efficient in Tokyo than cars? And that cars are more time efficient than buses and trains?
English
0
0
0
9
critical urbanism
critical urbanism@criticalurban·
Cars move people, and nothing else moves people more efficiently than cars because nothing else can take people between unique locations on demand. Mass transit is limited by fixed locations and schedules. Bicycles are too slow and exposed to the elements. They're a joke.
Pablo Torres@Pableux

@criticalurban You should be thinking about how to move people, but instead, you're focused on how to move cars. Btw, cars are extremely inefficient: they are parked 95% of the time. Most of the fuel is consumed just to move the vehicle's own weight. Cars promote sedentarism. Your metrics:

English
115
13
172
12.7K
Responsible Citizen
Responsible Citizen@citizen2891·
@jonbrooks You can rest assured that the buyers are there, whomever they happen to be If they aren’t, the companies building those homes will be out of business in no time
English
0
0
0
36
Jon Brooks
Jon Brooks@jonbrooks·
Florida has a wealth divide problem. We build $700k “luxury” homes… in a state where much of the workforce makes $15/hour. Who exactly is the next marginal buyer? That’s the only question that matters.
English
31
11
110
4.2K
Responsible Citizen
Responsible Citizen@citizen2891·
@dethwing @leedrutman I still think this is untenable. In this hypothetical system, it’s possible that the top 3 candidates will get 98% of votes because they are super popular in the State and the other e.g. 30 are elected with a combined 2%.
English
0
0
0
11
Nick Imholte
Nick Imholte@dethwing·
@citizen2891 @leedrutman There are many ways to do it. You're describing a closed party system. I can see some downsides to it. Here's another way. Switch the primary and the general. In the primary, you for a party. Those results are calculated and each party assigned seats. Then in the general (1/2)
English
2
0
0
29
The Election Center
The Election Center@ElectionCenter_·
Just goes to show how little care for the law this Supreme Court has shown. Not to mention this part shows they put partisan interests first before protections for minorities. They basically say minorities can only have districts if they elect republicans or are 50-50 in partisanship.
Michael Li 李之樸@mcpli

The utter incoherence of Callais is captured in this paragraph (pg. 36). Under Callais, plaintiffs have to show you could draw a Black-majority district that would elect Julia Letlow, a white Republican. That defeats the purpose of the claim, which is to end vote dilution.

English
4
9
88
4.9K
Responsible Citizen
Responsible Citizen@citizen2891·
@RajLakra You fail to see that the constitution ITSELF is intended to be a check on “democracy” It disallows Congress and States from doing tons of shit that they otherwise would based on simple majorities of the day
English
0
0
0
8
Responsible Citizen
Responsible Citizen@citizen2891·
@tomfgoodwin The great thing is all the folks in the bottom categories can switch tomorrow to do the stuff at the top
English
1
0
0
174
Tom Goodwin
Tom Goodwin@tomfgoodwin·
I mean in some ways it's a good thing, but the labor rates in Miami are nuts. - Person to use chainsaw for 2 hours- $300-800 - General garden laboring - $60+ per hour - Cleaning $50+ per hour -HVAC repair $150 per hour Meanwhile - Brand manager- $20 per hour - Qualified Architect - $30 per hour - Office manager - $22 per hour
English
14
1
29
11K
Florida Data Geek ✝️🇺🇦🇬🇱
I still say the best way America can make up for Jim Crow is to give all Black voters double votes. If you can trace your ancestry to slave and Jim Crow. 2x vote! “Oh that’s reverse racism” - yeah and I don’t give a fuck. Double vote! Double vote!
English
9
1
30
1.7K
Responsible Citizen
Responsible Citizen@citizen2891·
@dethwing @leedrutman This is untenable IMO. Vote for an abstract entity who then gets to choose the individuals who cast the vote on my behalf? That sounds like a terrible idea, just with the pretextual benefit that the party ratios will more closely align with the votes cast
English
2
0
0
37
Nick Imholte
Nick Imholte@dethwing·
@citizen2891 @leedrutman Right. You would vote for a party rather than a person. Then each party gets a number of seats proportionally to their vote percentage.
English
1
0
0
40
Responsible Citizen
Responsible Citizen@citizen2891·
@MappingFL Fair Districts will be challenged (and should) for congressional districts. States cannot override federal law which as interpreted effectively makes it near impossible to draw districts considering race as a factor
English
0
0
0
171
Florida Data Geek ✝️🇺🇦🇬🇱
Sticking with Florida for a moment The Callais decision is NOT what DeSantis wanted. He insisted the court would strike down the use of race entirely and hence invalidate Florida’s own racial protections That didn’t happen. Means Florida’s Fair Districts are still the law
English
27
147
958
49.1K
Responsible Citizen
Responsible Citizen@citizen2891·
@MappingFL To be fair they should have just banned the use of race in any “effects/outcomes” legislation
English
0
0
0
4
Jacquelyn Melinek
Jacquelyn Melinek@jacqmelinek·
Airlines are such a scam. > I'm booking an @AmericanAir flight > I get a ticket that includes seat selection > Go to seat page > Only middle seats are free - window or aisle will cost more on top of the charge paid to pick a seat Can't make this up. Just ridiculous.
Jacquelyn Melinek tweet media
English
626
274
6.7K
1.1M
Responsible Citizen
Responsible Citizen@citizen2891·
@opress57 @leedrutman Explain the criteria for achieving the so called “proportionality” in a way that completely disregards race and is still constitutional.
English
0
0
1
97
Responsible Citizen
Responsible Citizen@citizen2891·
@dethwing @leedrutman With what criteria of proportionality within the state? It must be something completely disregards race to be even constitutional
English
2
0
0
106
Rei Samuelsson Saito
Rei Samuelsson Saito@konichivalue·
@citizen2891 @criticalurban Because the city isn't clogged by cars because 90% travel by metro, foot or bike... Also, I bet you $100 dollars I can get to any building within the 23 wards faster on my bike than you can with a car
English
1
0
0
42
Responsible Citizen
Responsible Citizen@citizen2891·
@the_transit_guy For the population density in Texas, it makes a lot of sense to expand freeways instead of building mass transit for long distances
English
1
0
0
92
Hayden
Hayden@the_transit_guy·
Could be any city in Texas but we actually need to widen I-45 and I-35 instead.
Hayden tweet media
English
21
39
788
13.4K
Responsible Citizen
Responsible Citizen@citizen2891·
@konichivalue @criticalurban It is highly time-inefficient. Take a city like Tokyo. I can get nearly anywhere in a 5km radius faster by car than by train. Did it dozens of times, measured door to door not station to station
English
1
0
1
39
Florida Data Geek ✝️🇺🇦🇬🇱
@jbello1969 Florida’s fair districts amendments have their own protections for districts that are found to perform for minority voters. Districts don’t even need to be 50%. If a district has shown it performs for a racial minority group, it must be protected.
English
1
0
8
234
Florida Data Geek ✝️🇺🇦🇬🇱
And let’s be clear. That is not the affect of the ruling. While the VRA is weakened, it is not eliminated And most importantly - this ruling did nothing on Florida’s own unique racial protection requirements. Those are still the law Which protects the Hispanic-maj #fl09
Gary Fineout@fineout

Inbox: Gov. DeSantis' general counsel sends a new letter to House and Senate talking about the La redistricting case. Says the ruling means that Fair Districts minority protection requirement can no longer be followed. The memo does not discuss the partisan intent language ...

English
2
17
119
11.3K
Responsible Citizen
Responsible Citizen@citizen2891·
@bradncpa That’s the type of people who will max out credit cards to get all the miles and points. Brilliant strategy.
English
1
0
1
101
Brad Nelson | CPA & Fractional CFO
A client spent $500,000 to avoid paying $200,000 in tax. He bought a loader his business could use. But he bought it to depreciate it. So it sat in a field. Unused. I advised against it. He did it anyway. Bonus depreciation and Section 179 exist for a reason. But the deduction is supposed to follow the business need. Not replace it. If you wouldn't buy it without the tax benefit, the tax benefit isn't a good enough reason to buy it. Zeroing out your tax bill by burning cash on equipment you never touch is a terrible way to build wealth. All that does is move money from your bank account to a field. Spending a dollar to save forty cents is a bad strategy and never worth it.
English
30
3
93
22.2K