Dr Claire Methven O'Brien

4.3K posts

Dr Claire Methven O'Brien banner
Dr Claire Methven O'Brien

Dr Claire Methven O'Brien

@claire_ob1

Personal account. Proud Fifer. Human rights. Free speech. Sex is real.

Katılım Kasım 2010
1.6K Takip Edilen4.3K Takipçiler
Hazel-rahhh
Hazel-rahhh@DaughterDad79·
@claire_ob1 I REALLY want to hope that this bodes really well for the Tickle v. Giggle appeal, but I'm ignorant about the Aussie legal system. What do you think?
English
1
0
0
90
Dr Claire Methven O'Brien
Dr Claire Methven O'Brien@claire_ob1·
A lucid decision from Australia's Federal Court today in Lesbian Action Group Inc v Australian Human Rights Commission [2026] FCA 432. TLDR: 1) Sex is immutable. 2) The prohibition on sex discrimination under national equality laws and the scope of exemptions from it are to be interpreted in light of the wider human rights, equal treatment and social interests and objectives that provided the original rationale for their enactment. 3) This applies even in relation to the interpretation of such laws and exemptions by *national human rights institutions*. 4) The end.
Lesbian Action Group@ActiveLesbians

So, the judgment is out and the we are VERY happy! judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judg… We are so grateful to our legal team and all the wonderful supporters on X, here in Australia and around the world! More to follow! XX

English
6
61
181
15K
Dr Claire Methven O'Brien
Dr Claire Methven O'Brien@claire_ob1·
@ScottishJenbel The decision is only intelligible on this basis. If the contrary were true, there would have been no issue of sex discrimination requiring an exemption.
English
1
0
18
541
Dr Claire Methven O'Brien
Dr Claire Methven O'Brien@claire_ob1·
The decision is only intelligible on this basis. If the contrary were true, there would have been no issue of sex discrimination requiring an exemption.
Jen🐧🐧@ScottishJenbel

@claire_ob1 @joannaccherry It is a good result but I’m struggling to see in the judgment where it found sex is immutable. I’d love it to be true though so can you point to where I missed that?

English
1
2
13
1.1K
Dr Claire Methven O'Brien retweetledi
Dr Claire Methven O'Brien retweetledi
Dr Claire Methven O'Brien retweetledi
#MenAtWork
#MenAtWork@MenAtWork_MC·
I’d like to organise a few gatherings, in Scotland, Northern Ireland, Ireland, Wales, England (North, South, East, West) for people who are involved in working with boys and young men. Practical and constructive approaches If that’s you, get in touch Ta
English
3
18
29
1.2K
Dr Claire Methven O'Brien
Dr Claire Methven O'Brien@claire_ob1·
It would be quite wrong for the state to deny people access to public employment for refusing positively to affirm demonstrable untruths embodying a contested political ideology which while promoted by parties of government was inconsistent with fundamental constitutional principles and minimum international standards of human rights protection. That would be something that could only happen under an authoritarian regime and never in a liberal democracy bound by the rule of law and where freedom of thought, conscience and religion was not just treasured, but legally protected. Wait. What? archive.ph/2026.03.13-193…
Dr Claire Methven O'Brien tweet media
English
13
103
306
6.1K
Dr Claire Methven O'Brien
Dr Claire Methven O'Brien@claire_ob1·
What to say? Perhaps this: Collecting sex-disaggregated data on violence against women is already a legal duty. An international legal duty. Under a [checks notes] human rights treaty the UK is a party to and that someone who, like Baroness Chakrabarti, was formerly director of a [checks notes] national 'human rights' NGO called Liberty might be expected to be aware of. Utter travesty. For some, the betrayal of women's #humanrights seems to know no bounds. See further: claireob1.substack.com/p/recording-th… @SonyaDouglas
Conservatives for Women@CforWomenUK

@ProfAliceS @Fox_Claire @WomensRightsNet Baroness Chakrabarti spoke firmly in favour of self-ID. What to say....

English
2
104
237
8.6K
Dr Claire Methven O'Brien retweetledi
For Women Scotland
For Women Scotland@ForWomenScot·
Like Claire and Isabelle Kerr we are concerned about the risks of coercion and abuse. This isn't about the principles of allowing people this choice, but the risks in a world where women, disabled people, the elderly etc are, too often, victims of abuse.
Dr Claire Methven O'Brien@claire_ob1

Personal view: In the context of assisted dying, the residual risk of abuse should be zero. Can this ever be achieved? I don't know. But everything I've seen in Scotland over recent years tells me it will be very far from that here for the foreseeable future.

English
1
27
99
3K
Dr Claire Methven O'Brien
Dr Claire Methven O'Brien@claire_ob1·
As in other matters it will be the poor, the disabled, the isolated and women at greatest risk of having their lives ended against their will. Systems of medical and legal oversight have of late compellingly demonstrated their weaknesses. The risks are known and they are unacceptable.
English
0
19
45
2K
Dr Claire Methven O'Brien
Dr Claire Methven O'Brien@claire_ob1·
Personal view: In the context of assisted dying, the residual risk of abuse should be zero. Can this ever be achieved? I don't know. But everything I've seen in Scotland over recent years tells me it will be very far from that here for the foreseeable future.
English
6
24
61
6.6K
Dr Claire Methven O'Brien
Dr Claire Methven O'Brien@claire_ob1·
He is right
GIF
J Stewart@triffic_stuff_

🚨BOMBSHELL EXPOSÉ: TREVOR PHILLIPS RIPS LID OFF LABOUR'S GROOMING GANGS COVER-UP 💣 Keir Starmer and the Labour Party Sabotaging National Inquiry to Hide Racial Targeting of White Girls and Decades of Failure in Their Own Councils In a devastating intervention, Sir Trevor Phillips has blown the whistle on what he calls a deliberate political cover-up at the heart of Britain's grooming gangs scandal. The former Equality and Human Rights Commission chair accuses Labour of sabotaging the national inquiry because of its explosive racial implications — and because so much of the abuse took place under Labour-controlled councils that did nothing to stop it. “The government clearly never wanted these two things to be put together,” Phillips declared. He points to Labour's efforts to downplay “the intersection of race and sexual predation,” insisting the perpetrators deliberately targeted victims because they were white and outside the groomers' community. “These children are chosen because of their race. They are chosen because they are white and because they’re outside the community of the groomers.” Phillips highlights the chilling uniqueness of these crimes: unlike typical child abuse kept hidden, grooming gangs operate in plain sight — with perpetrators knowing they are shielded. “The other thing is these people know that they are protected. They’re protected politically, they’re protected by social workers, they’re protected by local police. That is the scandal here.” He pulls no punches on why a full reckoning has been avoided: “Much of this took place in local Labour councils and the authorities who were supposed to be watching over this, stopping it, monitoring it and all the rest of it were controlled by those councils and they did nothing.” This is not just institutional failure — it's a politically motivated shield thrown over horrific, racially aggravated sexual exploitation that went on for years under Labour's watch. Right now, they deserve justice — and Britain deserves the full, fearless national inquiry that has been denied for far too long.

English
0
0
3
346
Dr Claire Methven O'Brien
Dr Claire Methven O'Brien@claire_ob1·
Worse even than this, however, is the deep and insidious damage done to the ideal of democracy itself when state institutions nakedly affirm the subversion of truth to propaganda. Nothing could be less progressive or emancipatory. It does not advance the cause of human rights. On the contrary, it places it in deep moral jeopardy.
English
0
5
29
1K
Dr Claire Methven O'Brien
Dr Claire Methven O'Brien@claire_ob1·
In the wake of recent events, Havel's tale remains salient, but not for the reasons Carney claimed. When public authorities, such as the police, publish false information about the biological sex of offenders, in Havel's words, they are taking part in rituals they know to be false. They are living within a lie. In the case of violent crime, this directly undermines #humanrights because it corrupts data essential to monitoring the character and prevalence of offending and the efficacy of preventive measures - data on which the public, furthermore, rely to form views about and navigate the risks attendant on social life. Relatedly, lying about the sex of perpetrators denies victims and their families the effective and impartial investigation that, where violence is lethal, the right to life requires - as well as the fairness of any criminal proceedings.
English
2
18
61
1.3K