CM

289 posts

CM banner
CM

CM

@clinmean

PhD Biologist | BD and Investment Analyst | It is never boring with biotech 🧬📈📉

Katılım Ocak 2019
996 Takip Edilen429 Takipçiler
CM
CM@clinmean·
$KALV what a rollercoaster I had with this company- investing prior to ph3, seeing the data PR that was my bull case, and being shocked when the stock crashed when market opened at the same day CPI data came in hot. Years forward, there was the shitshow around the approval, and then market was nitpicking their initial earnings reports. I always thought they have a good drug, and it’s a sweet ending for the KalVista’a team (and for me :))
Adam Feuerstein ✡️@adamfeuerstein

Chiesi buying $KALV for $27 / share or $1.9B chiesi.com/en/media-hub/p…

English
2
0
12
1.4K
Bios_n_Techs
Bios_n_Techs@Bios_n_Techs·
$IMMX Added on this dip. Mgmnt executing well with enrollment of BLA-enabling trial complete on time. NEXICART-2 topline data jn Q3. Top notch CMO (ex-Merek & J&J) hired.
English
1
0
1
712
CM
CM@clinmean·
$AVTX My read is that it looks like Almata have no much confidence. Also, based on the 8K and the choice of cash vs stock is controlled by AVTX. The buyout payment ($5.125M) is: “payable either in cash, Parent (AVTX) Common Stock or in a combination thereof as determined in Parent’s sole discretion”
English
0
0
0
540
CM
CM@clinmean·
All in all, $ANL should go up
English
0
0
6
565
CM
CM@clinmean·
@hannibalspeaks But this why Lutikizumab was trending positive because most patients were more severe (Hurley stage 3), 100% TNF-non responders, high AN at baseline. And as long as $AVTX don’t enroll similar population, less likely to show stat-sig HiSCR75 effect
English
1
0
1
455
Specialsituationz
Specialsituationz@hannibalspeaks·
This is somewhat substantiated with the Lutikizumab data which showed very high reduction in tunnels. These are late lesions and therefore this mechanism is suited most to advanced Hurley stage 3 patients.
English
2
0
3
763
CM retweetledi
Raffaele Colombo
Raffaele Colombo@raffcolo·
Is ADC stability paramount to ADC success? How should stability be correctly assessed? What are some common assumptions and mistakes regarding ADC linker stability? We tried to address these questions and more in our recent @Annals_Oncology review! annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-…
Raffaele Colombo tweet media
English
4
33
113
23K
CM
CM@clinmean·
@hannibalspeaks That could be that HiSCR75 won’t capture IL-1 inhibition effect, as it would be more concentrated in draining tunnels (?)
English
1
0
3
380
Specialsituationz
Specialsituationz@hannibalspeaks·
What does this graph show and why is it relevant to $AVTX ?
Specialsituationz tweet media
English
2
0
10
5.3K
CM
CM@clinmean·
@Gantosj Welcome back, Joe!
English
0
0
1
117
Joe
Joe@Gantosj·
$CRDL is on fire after breaking out the "flag" formation, & continue with a long green candlestick formed yesterday, while the whole market was RED! That tells me things are happening behind the scene, or a large fund just keeps buying accumulating & buying all the ASK in the market!
Joe tweet media
Joe@Gantosj

Despite Trump's announcement yesterday & the RED markets, $CRDL continues its strong momentum, hitting my 2nd target at $1.48. Next levels: the 52W-High at $1.59, followed by the $1.70 resistance line.

English
1
3
10
3.1K
CM
CM@clinmean·
BIIB BDCA2 Ab litifilimab in CLE Lupus from AAD 2026. $TRAX has ANB101/ BDCA2 modulator in ph1 (acquired from CNTA)
CM tweet media
Indonesia
0
0
2
325
CM
CM@clinmean·
$FBRX $TRAX CD122 might be the cleanest way to shut down T-cell–driven disease. If IL-2 drives activation and IL-15 sustains it, blocking IL-15 alone is inherently partial (Teva / Novartis), though it helps de-risk the pathway. What’s interesting now is how FBRX vs TRAX are approaching it in CeD: • FBRX → does blocking CD122 hold the system under active injury? • TRAX → can it prevent and potentially repair mucosal damage? Different questions, same underlying thesis. Both at low EV. FBRX: ARGX backing + vitiligo (clean efficacy read setup); TRAX: SC + differentiated design (CeD data Q4) Feels underfollowed.
English
2
0
15
2.2K
CM
CM@clinmean·
@badinvestor99 Tell it to Novartis, Incyte, Teva/Royalty Pharma and Argenx
English
1
0
0
221
BadInvestor9
BadInvestor9@badinvestor99·
@clinmean EOE? Also celiac is one of those diseases that doesn’t really need treatment unless you have RCD so you don’t really have a benchmark to compare to. Vitiligo makes sense but all the CD122 posturing just seems to be trying to fit a drug into a narrative that doesn’t really exist.
English
1
0
1
139
CM
CM@clinmean·
@badinvestor99 I wouldn’t call Celiac, Vitiligo, and EoE a niche. Neither IL-2 and IL-15 dependent immune activation in these indications.
English
1
0
0
170
BadInvestor9
BadInvestor9@badinvestor99·
@clinmean Feels more like “find a niche and sell the story”
English
1
0
0
199
CM
CM@clinmean·
@Biohazard3737 Interesting to see whom from the pts with inadequate response to anti-TNFs, anti-IL-12/23s, anti-IL-23p19s classes regained response with the IL23p19/ TNFa fixed dose; meaning, can same class ‘a’ non-responder regain response to ‘a’ in a fixed dose?
English
0
0
2
509
Peter T
Peter T@Jn66039675·
@Biohazard3737 Has DUET data been announced? I can't find anything
English
1
0
0
701
CM retweetledi
Stephen Ayers
Stephen Ayers@meremrtl·
Nektar's $NKTR REZOLVE-AA "patient funnel" explained 1/ Not a straight all-comers trial. The 52-week data came through a highly selective funnel. Here’s the step-by-step breakdown (based on Nektar’s own releases):
English
2
1
29
9K
CM
CM@clinmean·
$NKTR unbelievable- they took the non responders into 16wks extension!!! this is not a maintenance study as we don't know whether the 5/33 maintained their response. How is this can be compared with Jaki??
English
2
0
2
986
CM
CM@clinmean·
$NKTR let’s break it down. At high dose initial 36wks, 5/33 (15.6%) were SALT20 responders. Then they took 13pts to 16wks extension w/ 4 new responders (31%). 27.6% at wk52 overall. How is the overall calculated? Who are exactly the 13pts that were included in the extension?
English
1
0
11
3.8K