clinton cunningham

2.6K posts

clinton cunningham banner
clinton cunningham

clinton cunningham

@clinton_cunning

Founder & Lead Agent Wrangler @ https://t.co/XTj5ZoloWJ | SWE + Ex-Big4 | Shipping AI in FinServ + Showing you how 🇦🇺 Dangerously skipping permissions

Australia Katılım Ağustos 2008
813 Takip Edilen642 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
clinton cunningham
clinton cunningham@clinton_cunning·
SaaSpocolypse. Claude Code Head of Product: "So I think everyone can see this future where the models are extremely smart and can do almost everything... ...in which case you actually don't need that complicated product. You can actually just have a text box again... ...where you tell the model what you want. 
It's so smart that it can add any tool or add any inspiration that it needs, get the jobs done."
Lenny Rachitsky@lennysan

Claude Code's Head of Product: "The hardest PM skill right now is how to be the right amount of AGI-pilled."

English
0
0
0
67
clinton cunningham
clinton cunningham@clinton_cunning·
Announcing you are 'headless' is just a fancy way of saying you have an API.
English
0
0
0
6
clinton cunningham
clinton cunningham@clinton_cunning·
This is the whole thing, this is what is happening: "The models are good enough now, where most bad output is user error not technology error. And a major contributor to user error is bad context management."
Alex Lieberman@businessbarista

Just co-led an AI training for 20 execs from one of the largest financial institutions in the world. We covered a lot of ground from how LLMs work to what an agent is and how to transform your work, but here were the biggest aha moments for the group. 1. Historically, leaders had to think about allocating budget for headcount and software. Now, token budget must be a serious consideration. Do you set limits per employee? How do you measure the ROI on your token budget? How much budget do you allocate to which employees? How do employees know which models to use to most efficiently spend tokens? 2. The models are good enough now, where most bad output is user error not technology error. And a major contributor to user error is bad context management. To have clean context hygiene you need to understand what the context window is, why separation of concerns is important, and how tactically to treat context like a precious resource. 3. A skill is a scary word. It’s nothing more than an SOP. If you asked an intern to write a one page document breaking down their step-by-step process for building a great deck, you’ve created a skill. A skill is a long prompt that codifies a repeatable process, can be edited as you see fit, and helps to generate more predictable output that meets your standards. 4. Saying you use AI gets you style points. But the real unlock is in process mapping. During the workshop, we asked every exec to write out one of their/their teams key processes step by step and place an E (eliminate), A (automate), or D (delegate) next to each step. The exercise not only revealed opportunities for AI, but also existing inefficiencies that have gone undetected. 5. Claude Cowork opened their eyes. Many people still see AI as a chat-based supercharged Google. They may have heard the phrase “agent,” but they assume it’s sophisticated tech reserved for engineers. Cowork is the layperson’s gateway drug to agents, showing the possibility of building web apps, ai workflows, and live artifacts in a single place. 6. Every company talks about the “bad guys”slowing down AI transformation: legal, compliance, and IT/security. One of the most powerful choices leadership can make is flipping the script and making them the heroes of the transformation story. Help them understand the risks of doing nothing, work with them to make calculated bets, and celebrate them publicly when they partner to drive transformation with speed. 7. Getting an AI system to perform requires four things to go right: picking the right model, teaching it the right process, providing the right context, and establishing the right guardrails. Most people assume the right model is 99% of it, they don’t think enough about giving the right context, and they don’t realize the right guardrails make things like hallucinations and mistakes less dangerous.

English
1
0
0
6
clinton cunningham
clinton cunningham@clinton_cunning·
@rohit4verse Rare I would disagree with a16z, but this was only applicable a month or two ago. Claude CoWork + Codex Workspaces steamrolled the Harness, now 'any user' has the harness and they just bring themselves. 12 months time every 'ai agent harness' is dissolved.
English
0
1
0
287
Rohit
Rohit@rohit4verse·
a16z just dropped the billion-dollar opportunities in AI for 2026. three partners. three theses. same underlying bet. Marc Andrusko: the prompt box is dying. next-gen apps observe what you're doing and act on your behalf. TAM shifted from $ 400B software spend to $ 13T labor spend. market got 30x bigger. Stephanie Zhang: stop designing for humans. start designing for agents. agents read every word on the page. visual hierarchy stops mattering. GEO is the new SEO. Olivia Moore: voice agents ate the phone in 2025. healthcare, banking, recruiting, 911 calls. voice AI beats humans on compliance every single time. some companies now slow their agents down to sound human. every thesis converges on the same layer. the harness around the model is where the leverage compounds. full breakdown of how the shift happened below.
Rohit@rohit4verse

x.com/i/article/2044…

English
28
92
692
167.1K
clinton cunningham
clinton cunningham@clinton_cunning·
Two things most founders building AI SaaS haven't figured out yet: 1. Customers don't need AI. They need people who understand AI to change their business. 2. The businesses aren't worth changing (other than the consulting fees). The only viable path is to rebuild the business from a clean slate.
English
0
0
0
16
clinton cunningham
clinton cunningham@clinton_cunning·
@trentjhughes The old IT can do this and has the distribution. The 'new IT guy' aka vibe coder wont have the patience to deal with small customers.
English
0
0
1
75
Trenton Hughes
Trenton Hughes@trentjhughes·
Business that will be big in the next 2 years: The AI guy for local businesses On call to fix, build & optimize their AI Charge $750/month per client 50 clients $37,500 a month $450,000 a year Businesses will need this This is the new IT guy
English
45
14
308
22.6K
clinton cunningham
clinton cunningham@clinton_cunning·
It's by customer demand, I'm there -> customers don't need AI, they need people who understand AI to change their business. There is another step after that will soon start to dawn... it's not worth upgrading/implementing AI. The only viable way is to start from a clean slate and rebuild the business model.
English
0
1
2
321
arian ghashghai
arian ghashghai@arian_ghashghai·
Almost all of my positions selling some kind of AI/agentic SaaS tool have (either by foresight or customer demand) pivoted to some kind of business model where they “forward deploy” to the customer first and then sell the system they create back to them as SaaS. 99% of “normie” businesses have 0 idea how to use AI tools to achieve their business goals Imo most VCs are still behind on understanding this
Aaron Levie@levie

If you read this and don’t understand why it’s happening it’s an opportunity to reset your understanding of how the real world works. The real world will need a ton of help actually getting agents going in the enterprise. Companies have legacy tech stacks they need to modernize, data in tons of fragmented tools, knowledge that isn’t captured or digitized, and change management needed to actually utilize agents effectively. And they have to do all this while still running their business day-to-day, unlike startups. This is why there is so much opportunity for companies (software or services) to actually deploy agents in specific domains and workflows. This remains a big opportunity for both existing services providers but also tons of new startups as well. Every new technology wave produces a new era of consulting firms that can deliver on that technology. It’s also why the FDE model is going to be alive and well for a long time because companies will want to have their vendor actually help drive the change management and implementation for their new workflows. The people aren’t going away. Far from it.

English
27
18
401
57.9K
clinton cunningham
clinton cunningham@clinton_cunning·
what happens to all those language/framework based meetup communities? Python/Java/JS/React etc. no real point for specialisation anymore, so no point to have a community, right?
English
1
0
1
23
Samay
Samay@Samaytwt·
Unpopular opinion: "AI makes everyone a developer" is true the same way "cameras makes everyone a photographer"
Samay tweet media
English
692
2.9K
25.9K
854.2K
Rand
Rand@rand_longevity·
ideally everybody gets put on social security as universal basic income we tax all ai/robotic labour and use that to fund everything
English
220
31
320
13.8K
Bryan Johnson
Bryan Johnson@bryan_johnson·
idk if I can keep this up you guys. I just got one more to do: a five min warm eye compress before bed. I do endless things every day. From the moment I wake up to bedtime, and even when I'm sleeping, I'm always doing something and measuring it. It never ends. Help.
English
1.9K
79
7.7K
950.6K
Polymarket
Polymarket@Polymarket·
JUST IN: Microsoft commits to A$25,000,000,000.00 investment in Australia to build AI infrastructure & train workers.
English
212
123
1.9K
586.7K
Satya Nadella
Satya Nadella@satyanadella·
To mark the broad rollout of Agent Mode in Copilot, we had some fun recreating an iconic 90s Excel ad: same ad, smarter Excel.
English
220
289
3.4K
376K
clinton cunningham
clinton cunningham@clinton_cunning·
@claudeai Feature Request for Claude Desktop -> Organise Projects / Chats / Skills etc into 2 level (min) deep folders. 40 years of working with file explorers not going to erode overnight, please support my OCD and give me some folders to organise. Thank you
English
0
0
0
19
@jason
@jason@Jason·
We started an AI founder twitter group... reply with "I'm in" if you're a founder and want to be added
English
11K
135
4.6K
890.1K
clinton cunningham
clinton cunningham@clinton_cunning·
@weswinder We force humans to do it everyday, and they reach for a calculator when they need to calculate anything above 100… LLMs no different when given the tools
English
0
0
0
152
Wes Winder
Wes Winder@weswinder·
hot take: we will look back and realize that forcing llms to be deterministic was a mistake
English
46
10
338
45.1K
Chris Williamson
Chris Williamson@ChrisWillx·
Capitalism’s one-two punch. “There’s something about a soulless job that makes you crave mindless entertainment, and that’s the combination that slowly kills you.” — @DylanoA4
English
42
42
476
34.1K