Charles Marohn

The worst kind of development is not low-density sprawl. It's high-density configured to be unwalkable and unservable by public transit. High-density = high traffic, and this guarantees all that traffic is in cars. Sadly the US exported this idea all over the world.

Finch went with all three of Gobert, Randle and Reid for 8 minutes in the 1st half -- and they won those minutes 22 to 11 (+11). Naz-at-the-3 is the plan without Edwards, DiVincenzo, Dosunmu and Anderson.

This is my favorite Wolves lineup that doesn't include Ant. Jaden at the 2 is epic.

I've written for the last decade about the educational divide in the US, but culturally there is now a large divide between generations — specifically those over sixty versus basically everyone else. The sixty-plus cohort (Boomers which I'm at the very tail end of) have a lot more certainty that they've discovered the Truth — or the high point, and often end point, of many things. From music (rock will always be here), to fashion (why would anyone wear anything but blue jeans), to politics (liberal democracy with emancipation from all forms of obligation as a human Telos). Younger people are much more uncertain and relativistic. They don't accept the claim that it's been solved, and the Boomers' rigidity and religious-like certainty seems to them either laughably naive or arrogantly condescending. The Boomers see everyone else as having fallen away from the path to historical perfection they paved, and are uniformly angry about that. What most of the Boomers miss is that the younger generation is living in the world they built — of hyper-individuality, of smashing of prior norms, and of moral relativism. This post-truth, post-gatekeeping, hyper-partisan world is an endpoint of their worldview, and yet they are angry about it.

View from Glen Taylor’s seats:

Mike Conley on if he was trying to start trouble at the end of the game passing it up to Jaden McDaniels “(Laughs) nah that was a slip up, that’s all on me I take the blame… as soon as I threw it I looked and I was like “ah it’s Jaden” I almost put my hands on my head and I was like “maybe he won’t” and then as soon as I saw him when the ball kind of bounced a couple times “it’s over man” you can even see me like lower my head”

LOOKA AT JADEN MCDANIELS HE'S LOVING THIS HE'S AIN'T SCARED OF NIKOLA JOKIC LLLMMAAOO

WATCHING ON REPEAT TBH

Scott Foster is officiating Game 3 of Wolves-Nuggets tonight

@leiftree @ChristopherHine Let's go!

@ChristopherHine @clmarohn I love Jaden McDaniels, all my homies love Jaden McDaniels

Jaden McDaniels, deadpan delivery, on what worked for the Timberwolves offensively. Jaden: Go at Jokic, Jamal, all the bad defenders. Tim Hardaway, Cam Johnson, Aaron Gordon, their whole team.” Q: They’re all bad defenders? Jaden: “Yeah, they’re all bad defenders.”

@Chris_arnade Chris, it's financing. This is a product that can be standardized enough to securitize really cleanly. There's tons of liquidity and about 30 firms that build 80% of these, so it's just a standardized product that has found the money vein to tap.

Why does all of new development in America cities look exactly like this? Not complaining as much as must be something regulatory— as if it is lowest cost blueprint to threading bureaucratic regulatory maze

If I had the time to flesh this all out, I'd do a book on how American cities manage virtually everything at the wrong scale, and this accounts for about 80% of our routine issues. Policy wonks want to policy wonk everything; designers like me see everything as a design problem. But what I've become convinced of is we have a basic management problem. I find this to be really difficult to communicate, so bear with me (which would be the point of writing something out, right?) Smaller cities and towns have their limitations, but their local governments are intimately familiar with issues in town, know their constituents closely and are generally very accessible. As cities grow larger, the population of districts also grows. Sometimes to very large numbers. My district in my city has over 80,000 people in it - represented essentially by 2 people. Bear in mind there are entire towns of half that size with a City Council of 5-12 people. So there's that aspect - the political side. Then there's the day to day management side. As cities grow, they grow like corporations used to grow - vertically and siloed. It becomes harder and harder for lay people to know who to call, who does what, etc etc. I've seen a number of workarounds tried, with good managers and not so good ones. But fundamentally I see a systems problem - people just get farther and farther away from constituents and needs. One result is many very localized issues just don't get dealt with well at all. Everyone in the process seems to default to solving problems at the scale of the whole city, when in fact most issues are hyper-local. That hyper-local scale gets problem-solvers in the form of BIDs, CIDs, Place-management organizations, like mine. And these groups often do a great job - because again they operate at a fine scale and are accessible. But parts of the community without those groups, just generally don't get their issues solved. This is but one part of a much longer thought train, but over and over again I've seen how we have countless issues because of lack of management at the right scale - a more localized one. And those issues then metastasize and become much bigger fights. Much of this is rooted in the very 20th century idea that consolidation of governments and annexations would lead to management efficiencies. Because that was the mentality of much of society at the time. Might've sounded good in a textbook or a seminar, but it just hasn't worked. My gut tells me so much of cities would work 1000% better if we had smaller-scale, localized governance and management. I feel like people instinctively know this or sense it, but we can't figure out how to communicate it well or solve for it.

Count the number of voters in the top and bottom images.

In the 1960s, US highway engineers planned to used atomic explosions to flatten parts of the Rocky Mountains for highway construction.

Recommend this podcast. I've tuned into loads of Chuck Marohn podcasts over the years, so much was familiar — but the questions and conversation flow were really good. Worth a listen, especially if you have never heard @clmarohn speak before.

We don’t have a transportation funding problem. We have a venue problem. It’s time to declare the Interstate construction era complete and redefine the federal role. New white paper + live discussion Thursday strongtowns.org/event/virtual-…

@JonathanSteckly Ultimately, we will continue to be frustrated by outcomes if we define the housing market in only one dimension (supply), instead of defining it in at least two (supply + finance).

@JonathanSteckly Not sure where to start -- couldn't read it all, sorry -- but if you're a ST member, you should come to the new Commons we've launched and have this conversation with others. Just DM me and I can get you the member link for it.

For years, housing debates have leaned on a simple promise: build enough homes and prices will fall. It’s an appealing idea. Technical problem. Technical fix. Anyone on this site has seen the rigid enforcement of a simplistic narrative on housing. Oh, the tweets I could dunk.