
Col ✝ 🇦🇺 🏴
7.5K posts

Col ✝ 🇦🇺 🏴
@cmclark63
Random bloke. Lives in Australia, mate. Pronouns: His Lordship, Sir. No DMs - not interested in cryptocurrency, sexbots, or tinfoil hat stuff.
Katılım Nisan 2013
1.2K Takip Edilen430 Takipçiler

@RoadknightThe @Ausbobsmit Remember when the Great Satan Tony Abbott winked at someone? Suggested that a female candidate may have a bit of sex appeal? The media moved to DEFCON 1!
English

@griswold @johnloeber A starmonger would have a fairly niche market!
English

@RoadknightThe A property developer could probably make a killing buying up Tuvalu, if the locals have been conned into leaving.
English

It's just another Climate Scam.
In the four decades to 2014, Tuvalu's total land area grew by 73 hectares, or 2.9 per cent.
90+% of island nations have increased in size or stayed the same.
The ABC needs to look at its own Fact Checking.
See:
abc.net.au/news/2018-12-1…

English
Col ✝ 🇦🇺 🏴 retweetledi

@IAMthWHEATofGOD @LizzieMarbach @needGod_net That is true, too. I have no objection when the money/goods are donated willingly. A cathedral gives people a sense of awe and reverence. It's just that sometimes the money was extracted unfairly - like the sale of indulgences that set Luther off.
English

That's actually a very reasonable perspective.
It might make you happy that people donated their time, energy, and resources all to the glory of God.
Nobility would donate land to the Church as well to allow peasants to farm it and eat / generate income.
By the time the Church was plundered in the 16th century, it was an organization that placed great value on labor and did not allow usuary, and it had 1600 years of stored labor as resources.
These built the greatest cathedrals, crafted the finest bibles, and was a new and greater Davidic Kingdom.
Remember in the OT they used gold and silver for lamb's blood, imagine how much more the Church would use gold for the flesh & blood of the lamb of God.
I won't say that there were not obvious corruptions that took place, because corrupt men try to use the truth for their own gains- and still do.
But that is a small part of the story, not the entire picture.
The Church was, and still is the largest charity on the planet. It spearheaded hospitals, universities, orphanages, care for widows, the disabled, prisoner rights, ect.
Your instincts on charity are correct, but the Catholic Church not only serves the poor, but lavishes our Lord with expensive nard!
English

@IAMthWHEATofGOD @LizzieMarbach @needGod_net And then there's the question of whether the injunction "Do not store up for yourselves treasures on earth" (Mat. 6:19) applies to the church as a whole.
English

@IAMthWHEATofGOD @LizzieMarbach @needGod_net I'm a little torn on this. I appreciate magnificent churches, but I also wonder who paid for it and whether they could afford to, given that the most beautiful churches were built when most of the population were below the poverty line.
English
Col ✝ 🇦🇺 🏴 retweetledi

@LizzieMarbach @needGod_net All those gold-framed pictures and jeweled icons don't pay for themselves, you know!
English

@OVTweetmarck Col ✝ 📷 📷
I remember. Some of your posts got a bit dark. Glad it worked out!
English

@PaulineHansonOz Can Grover identify as a 10 year old so she isn't legally liable?
English

The Giggle v Tickle decision on woman's rights is due to be handed down momentarily: youtube.com/live/1tQcSbAtA…

YouTube
English

@GozewijnGoossen @RaminNasibov Vikings reached America long before that - 11th century or so, and between the 9th and 10th centuries were in Greenland. I hadn't heard about St Brendan (mentioned on this thread).
English

@cmclark63 @RaminNasibov The Maori reached Aoteraoa halfway the 14th century. That is before the Europeans reached North America.
English

@rabbriansamuel In Romans 14, Paul makes it clear that people have different ways of showing devotion to God. I guess this was Paul's - it is what he was raised with and accustomed to. It shouldn't be seen as normative for the rest of us (particularly not us gentiles!).
English

One thing that is both biblically factual and admittedly difficult to reconcile is that Paul participated in Temple sacrifices decades after his conversion.
In Acts 21, Paul returns from a missionary journey and meets with James and the elders in Jerusalem. James tells Paul that many thousands of Jews have believed in Yeshua, and that they are all zealous for the Torah (Acts 21:20).
At the same time, rumors had spread that Paul was teaching Jews to forsake Moses, avoid circumcision, and abandon the customs (Acts 21:21).
To publicly refute those accusations, James tells Paul to join four men who are under a vow (Acts 21:23). These men would have been Jewish Christians. Otherwise, why would they be traveling with James?
The vow was certainly a Nazirite vow, because the men shaved their heads at the completion of the vow, in accordance with the Torah.
Acts 21:24:
Take them along and purify yourself together with them, and pay their expenses so that they may shave their heads.
Numbers 6:18:
The Nazirite shall then shave his consecrated head of hair at the entrance of the tent of meeting, and take the consecrated hair of his head and put it on the fire which is under the sacrifice of peace offerings.
Acts 21:26 says:
“Then Paul took the men, and the next day, after purifying himself together with them, he went into the temple giving notice of the completion of the days of purification, until the sacrifice was offered for each one of them.”
This demonstrates several important points:
1. Paul purified himself before entering the Temple and participating in the offering process. Ritual purification was required for approaching the Temple in a state of cleanness, which involved immersion in water (this is where baptism comes from).
2. These Jewish Christians completed their Nazirite vow with the required sacrifices, in accordance with Book of Numbers 6.
In addition, Acts 18:18 indicates that Paul himself had previously taken a Nazarite vow, which would have required a sacrifice at its conclusion:
“At Cenchreae he had his hair cut, for he was under a vow.”
This very well could have been the same vow that he concluded with the four men in Acts 21.
I am not unaware that this creates tension. Hebrews firmly teaches that Yeshua’s sacrifice was final and sufficient, offered once for all.
Yet the plain reading of Acts shows that while the Temple was still standing, Paul and others continued to participate in Temple practices, including the offering associated with the completion of a Nazirite vow.
Scripture must be allowed to speak for itself, even when the full implications are difficult to reconcile.
And Scripture explicitly states that Paul continued to keep the whole of Torah throughout his life.
Acts 21:24:
“...but that you yourself also walk orderly and keep the Torah.”
English
Col ✝ 🇦🇺 🏴 retweetledi

Powerful
Kyle Orton@KyleWOrton
#Russia: in a village not far from Moscow in 2008, a local was asked why the population was so antisemitic: "It is because the Jews have a secret vegetable they eat so they don’t become alcoholics like the rest of us. And they refuse to share that vegetable with anyone else."
English

@farmingandJesus The man in Mark 9:24: 'Lord, I believe; help thou my unbelief'.
English

Who do you identify with most in the scriptures?
I would say the woman and the well
Ok and n Jael 🤓 #tentSpike
English

@PraiseBeToGod77 Praying (Baptist, but still counts! 🙂). 'Wait for the LORD; be strong and take heart and wait for the LORD' (Psalm 27:14).
English

@TheOtherPaul2 Right, no other denomination ever gets criticised! 😀
English

Papist apologist: Isn't it interesting that the Easterns, Orientals, and Protestants all love to sing kumbaya while trashing us. It's almost like we're the true Church or something.
Oriental apologist: Isn't it interesting that the 6 million Chalcedonian schisms love to sing kumbaya while trashing us. It's almost like we're the true Church or something.
Protestant apologist: Isn't it interesting that the Ecclesialists all love to sing kumbaya while trashing us. It's almost like we're part of the true Church or something.
You guys aren't special.
Benjamin Michael@RealBenMichael
Isn’t it interesting that the Roman Catholic, Oriental Orthodox, and Protestant influencers all love sing kumbaya together while trashing the Orthodox Church. It’s almost like we’re the true Church or something.
English

@railmaps @RaminNasibov From what I've heard, the Cook Islands is the most likely source - there are local legends about their departure and the languages are similar. As you say, Australian Aboriginals are an entirely different case.
English

@cmclark63 @RaminNasibov Some think of Australia and New Zealand as having very similar human histories. But whilst people have been in Australia for 60,000 years or so, they have been in NZ for only about 700 years. And the first people in New Zealand didn't come from Australia, they came from the east.
English


















