Christina

26.6K posts

Christina banner
Christina

Christina

@cmolnick

Katılım Kasım 2010
155 Takip Edilen649 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Christina
Christina@cmolnick·
The farm I grew up on. The trees have grown. The barn is new.
Christina tweet media
English
15
2
83
2.5K
Alexander Mercouris
Alexander Mercouris@AMercouris·
The importance of this news is being underestimated. In my opinion it is epoch making. China is apparently telling its refiners to ignore US sanctions and to conduct their business in disregard of them. In other words it is telling them that if the US comes for them because they are violating US sanctions, they have China's back. If that expands to include other Chinese businesses, and sooner or later it surely will, the US sanctions era is over. The US remains an enormous consumer market, but China holds the high cards. It is both the 'workshop of the world' and increasingly its high tech research institute and laboratory, and it is also rapidly becoming a major source of global investment capital. Trading with the US remains profitable and attractive, but not trading with China is not an option, even for the United States. It goes beyond saying that if China opposes US sanctions they become unenforceable. It means that they become impossible, and the whole structure which has been created around them must end. Fyodor Lukyanov, who is very well connected in Moscow, is saying the Chinese are undertaking a review to assess whether the US is, as the Russians say, 'agreement incapable'. If so then this decision points to the outcome. @RnaudBertrand @AXChristoforou @TheGrayzoneNews @RealPepeEscobar @thecyrusjanssen youtube.com/watch?v=PZmepe…
YouTube video
YouTube
English
85
741
2.3K
164K
Christina retweetledi
Kevork Almassian
Kevork Almassian@KevorkAlmassian·
Tarik Cyril Amar pushes back against the idea that the U.S. war on Iran is some brilliant 4D chess strategy to redesign the petrodollar system or reroute global energy flows. His point is simple: these theories assume a level of rationality, secrecy, and flawless execution that the actual American system no longer seems capable of producing. Tarik argues that people often reach for hidden master plans because they cannot accept the disturbing possibility that American policy is increasingly shaped by irrationality, Israeli influence, institutional decay, and a commander-in-chief who is not executing genius strategy but improvising chaos. Sometimes the explanation is not 4D chess. Sometimes the empire is simply losing control. .@TarikCyrilAmar .@SyrianaAnalysis
English
52
248
868
52.4K
Christina
Christina@cmolnick·
We never learn our lessons. Let’s keep doing this and wonder why our world is in chaos. Or is that the plan?
ColonelTowner-Watkins@ColonelTowner

In short, the CIA did not act alone, local actors and British intelligence played roles, but primary documents prove it planned, directed, and executed the operation as official U.S. policy. The National Security Archive (nsarchive.gwu.edu) hosts the key collections publicly. The evidence that the CIA (in collaboration with British MI6) orchestrated and directed the 1953 overthrow of Iranian Prime Minister Mohammad Mossadegh is extensive, primary-source-based, and comes directly from declassified U.S. government records. These include internal CIA operational histories, planning memos, and official State Department compilations. The operation was codenamed TPAJAX (or Operation Ajax). It was motivated by Mossadegh’s nationalization of the British-controlled Anglo-Iranian Oil Company and U.S. fears of Soviet influence via Iran’s Tudeh (communist) party during the early Cold War. nsarchive2.gwu.edu Primary Declassified CIA Documents Confirming Direct Involvement: The strongest evidence is from the CIA’s own internal records, which were withheld for decades but released through Freedom of Information Act requests and mandatory declassification reviews: CIA’s mid-1970s internal history, The Battle for Iran (declassified in stages, with key sections released in 2013): This explicitly states: “The military coup that overthrew Mosadeq and his National Front cabinet was carried out under CIA direction as an act of U.S. foreign policy, conceived and approved at the highest levels of government.” It describes the operation as a response to the risk of Iran falling “open to Soviet aggression.” This is widely regarded as the CIA’s first formal public acknowledgment of its role. nsarchive2.gwu.edu Donald N. Wilber’s Clandestine Service History: Overthrow of Premier Mossadeq of Iran, November 1952–August 1953 (written March 1954 by a lead CIA planner; partially declassified starting in 2000): This ~200-page account details the full planning and execution. Wilber (with British officer Norman Darbyshire) outlined a joint U.S.-UK plot involving propaganda, bribery of Iranian politicians, military officers, and journalists; hiring mobs and “toughs” to stage pro-Shah demonstrations; false-flag operations; and coordination to persuade the Shah to issue firmans (decrees) dismissing Mossadegh and appointing General Fazlollah Zahedi as prime minister. Kermit Roosevelt (CIA Near East Division chief) was the on-the-ground operational leader. The history covers the initial failed attempt (August 15–16, when Mossadegh’s forces arrested key plotters) and the successful second phase on August 19, which relied on CIA-funded crowds, military units, and control of Tehran radio. nsarchive2.gwu.edu Kermit Roosevelt’s contemporaneous memos (declassified and posted by the National Security Archive): These show real-time coordination, including requests for funds to bribe Majlis (parliament) deputies, plans with Zahedi, and propaganda efforts to portray Mossadegh as losing control or allied with communists. One example (July 1953) discusses expending money to sway deputies and precise assignment of roles. nsarchive2.gwu.edu Additional CIA documents (“Zendebad, Shah!” internal study from 1998, further declassified later) analyze the operation’s bureaucracy, confirm the shift to a “political operation” after the initial failure, and detail tactics like mobilizing pro-Shah demonstrators and exploiting divisions in Mossadegh’s coalition. cia.gov U.S. Government Releases and Broader Context 2017 State Department Foreign Relations of the United States (FRUS) retrospective volume on Iran 1951–1954: This 1,000+ page collection includes declassified records on planning and implementation of TPAJAX, confirming high-level approval (President Eisenhower, CIA Director Allen Dulles, etc.) via National Security Council channels. It supplements earlier volumes that had whitewashed U.S./British roles. nsarchive.gwu.edu Tactics detailed across documents: CIA assets hired mobs (including known Tehran gangsters) for pro-Shah riots on August 19; ran a propaganda campaign (radio broadcasts, leaflets, planted articles); bribed officials; and coordinated with the Shah’s court and military. The total cost was modest by CIA standards (around $1 million initially authorized, with broader estimates up to ~$5 million including related activities). Most operational files were destroyed in the early 1960s, but surviving records and participant accounts fill the gaps. en.wikipedia.org Later acknowledgments: In 2023, the CIA publicly described the coup as “undemocratic” for the first time in a podcast. Historians such as Stephen Kinzer (All the Shah’s Men), Mark Gasiorowski, and Ervand Abrahamian have cross-verified these records with Iranian sources. theguardian.com Notes on Debates and Nuance: The initial August 15–16 coup attempt did fail, and Mossadegh had alienated some domestic supporters (e.g., clergy like Ayatollah Kashani, bazaaris, and parts of the military) through his policies and a controversial referendum dissolving parliament. Some revisionist accounts emphasize these internal factors. However, declassified U.S. records consistently show that CIA planning, funding, propaganda, and on-the-ground direction (especially Roosevelt’s improvisation after the first failure) were decisive in turning the tide on August 19 and installing Zahedi. The U.S. and UK governments had long sought Mossadegh’s removal after oil nationalization talks collapsed. en.wikipedia.org

English
0
0
2
4
Christina
Christina@cmolnick·
@TheDuranReal What a world where our leaders raise their hands and say “Me! Me! Take my money and flush it down the drain!”
English
3
0
6
106
The Duran
The Duran@TheDuranReal·
Starmer wants the UK to join the EU-backed €90B loan to Ukraine. Brexit was supposed to free the UK from EU obligations. Seems the UK is back underwriting them.
The Duran tweet media
English
38
84
309
6.7K
Christina retweetledi
Mike Lee
Mike Lee@BasedMikeLee·
Democrats are okay with Democrat U.S. Senate candidates having Nazi tattoos It makes sense After all, Hitler was a socialist
English
293
867
4.9K
74.9K
Christina
Christina@cmolnick·
@jeffreytucker Sang those in music class. Mr. Rabble was a great piano player and singer. ❤️
English
0
0
1
106
Jeffrey A Tucker
Jeffrey A Tucker@jeffreytucker·
Accidentally hopped on the wrong train headed to my destination – the fancy train instead of the plain one. I was never caught, so lived the life of a hobo for three hours. I quickly learned "Oh Susannah" and "She'll Be Coming 'Round the Mountain" to inhabit my new identity.
English
5
4
134
5.3K
Christina retweetledi
Chay Bowes
Chay Bowes@BowesChay·
The relentless horror of the modern battlefield Ukrainain infantry attempt load an injured comrade onto a buggy for evacuation after a failed counter attack near Kupiansk. They are seen and struck in seconds. This is what Von Der Liar and Starmer wants for your family. Ready?
English
75
300
1.1K
27.5K
Valerie
Valerie@4ever2runval96·
Has anyone else recently received a DM stating this?…
Valerie tweet media
English
1
1
1
44
Christina retweetledi
Christina retweetledi
Daniel Davis Deep Dive
Daniel Davis Deep Dive@DanielLDavis1·
Thing is, Mr. Hansen, individuals don’t get to pick and choose which laws are constitutional and which or not. That has to go through judicial process, otherwise we have the condition which exists today: there is no law. If you or the president get to unilaterally declare what is constitutional and what is not – without going through the US Supreme Court – then you have not only violated the constitution and our laws, but the judicial branch as well. The law is what it is, and as it unambiguously states, it prohibits the president from using military forces unless Congress has authorized it, or we have been attacked – and neither of those things happened prior to 28 February. Therefore, you can hate the law, you can disagree with it, you can even believe it to be unconstitutional, but you can’t change it just by your words or the president’s words. Those are facts, not opinions.
Jim Hanson@JimHansonDC

I never said President Trump technically adhered to the War Powers Act, I said he played it perfectly. By submitting a letter within 48 hours of beginning hostilities and declaring them ended in less than 60 days, he mitigated claims he was ignoring it. He also pointedly claimed it is unconstitutional and reserved his rights to use his Commander in Chief Art. II authority as he sees fit. You give the game away by quoting the Act itself which unconstitutionally restricts the Art. II authority with these restrictions you note that exist nowhere in the Constitution or any SCOTUS decision. One: Congress has declared war Two: Congress has authorized it ahead of time Three: the United States has been attacked. That is a pure attempted usurpation of power by one branch from another. No President has accepted those and none ever should. The idea that 535 political operatives should have to agree before the US President can act as Commander in Chief is absurd. Why make him CinC if he was subordinate to Congress. Just think how impotently mad you're going to be when President Trump bombs Iran again next week since, as I said, he wisely reset the clock on the WPA.

English
18
53
229
12.5K
Massimo
Massimo@Rainmaker1973·
A research revealed that roughly one in five CEOs and senior executives displays clinically significant psychopathic traits. This rate is strikingly similar to the prevalence found among prison populations. According to findings presented at the Australian Psychological Society’s annual congress, approximately 21% of high-level professionals exhibit strong psychopathic characteristics. That’s dramatically higher than the 1% to 4% seen in the general population. These so-called “successful psychopaths” often rise to the top by using charm, confidence, and strong social skills. Yet the same traits, a lack of empathy, superficial relationships, and a tendency toward manipulation, can lead to unethical decision-making and long-term harm to organizations. Forensic psychologist Nathan Brooks, who led the study with researchers from Bond University and the University of San Diego, points to flawed hiring practices as a key factor. Many companies focus heavily on skills and experience while overlooking dangerous personality traits. The researchers recommend implementing more thorough personality assessments during recruitment to screen for toxic characteristics. By prioritizing character alongside competence, organizations can better protect their culture and future from leaders who deliver short-term gains at the expense of long-term integrity. [Brooks, N., Fritzon, K., & Croom, S. Corporate Psychopathy: Highlighting the Importance of Personality Screening in the Recruitment Process. Australian Psychological Society Annual Congress]
Massimo tweet media
English
187
860
2K
107.4K
Christina
Christina@cmolnick·
@TheDuranReal It does indeed look bleak and our leaders don’t care. They are still getting rich.
English
0
0
1
63
Christina
Christina@cmolnick·
@MarioNawfal Wow. They are betting on humiliating a mad man. Dangerous.
English
1
0
0
133
Mario Nawfal
Mario Nawfal@MarioNawfal·
🇮🇷🇺🇸 The IRGC thinks it has Trump cornered. Their framing is the U.S. has two options left: Military action, or a deal. The IRGC calls the military option "impossible" and the diplomatic option "bad." The logic Iran wants the world to accept: the U.S. is out of moves, and whatever comes next happens on Tehran's terms. Whether that's true depends entirely on whether Trump agrees with their math. Source: Al Jazeera
Mario Nawfal tweet mediaMario Nawfal tweet media
Mario Nawfal@MarioNawfal

🇪🇺🇮🇷 The Iran war is even changing where the rich take their yachts. Marinas in Barcelona, Mallorca, and the French Riviera are having a strong season because yacht owners are avoiding the eastern Mediterranean, where the Iran conflict has made one of the world's most popular luxury sailing routes feel too close to a war zone. The money that used to go east is going west, and the western Med is cashing in. Source: Bloomberg

English
90
107
580
221.6K
Chay Bowes
Chay Bowes@BowesChay·
Ukraine has a plan.
Chay Bowes tweet media
English
53
65
229
5.5K