
Colleen
8.9K posts








Karen Read v Everybody As expected... Judge Casper denies Proctors motion


















More lawyer AI misuse: In appellate brief, counsel cited 9 cases, 6 of them "cited either for nonexistent quotations or propositions of law not attributable to them." Counsel admitted that gAI "was used as a research and drafting aid, and quotations and legal propositions were not independently verified ...." Court: "Using generative artificial intelligence to generate legal briefs and then simply cite-checking them bears no resemblance to the competent practice of law." "Law is a profession. ... A person who uses generative artificial intelligence in lieu of reading, writing, and talking about the law—the very processes by which a lawyer acquires and retains the specialized knowledge and skills required of the professions—risks losing claim to the title of lawyer." Sanctions: $8,044.25 in attorneys' fees.

Zoom information for Karen’s Motion hearing this afternoon @suspiciousauce @trialchannel_




