Epistemic Trespasser3

51.4K posts

Epistemic Trespasser3 banner
Epistemic Trespasser3

Epistemic Trespasser3

@colonialbot3

Third time is a charm account

Katılım Mayıs 2024
1K Takip Edilen862 Takipçiler
Thomas Massie
Thomas Massie@RepThomasMassie·
We should have known what they were up to when they renamed it from the Department of Defense to the Department of War.
English
3K
8.4K
63.4K
1.4M
Epistemic Trespasser3
Epistemic Trespasser3@colonialbot3·
this guy and every founding father would have made JD eat lead for suggesting that america be based on a papal encyclical. you know it. i know it. everyone knows it.
GIF
English
0
0
0
18
Epistemic Trespasser3 retweetledi
Aristonkle
Aristonkle@ParanoidPol·
I think this is the wrong take for the following reason. Reporting indicated that the Israeli plan for regime change included a Kurdish offensive to further destabilize the regime in the opening weeks of the war. Reporting further indicated that this plan was somehow “leaked” to the Turks who then kiboshed the plan by going to Trump, with some reporting that JD himself had leaked it after Trump approved the plan (link below). Put differently, if the reporting is accurate, JD did some of or all of the following: - He opposed the Kurdish op - He or people reporting into him went to the Turks to stop it - This was done despite Trump previously approving it This means that the plan that Mossad thought had the greatest chance of succeeding didn’t see the light of day. There’s no reason to do this other than trying to prevent regime change which was clearly an intended outcome from the outset despite the hesitation to say the words.
H.A. Hazony@HAHazony

JD's view has always been that US/IL relations should be based on mutual interest. This is literally the same thing that he said on @joerogan . This is what @michaeljknowles said on his show the other day. JD clearly views Israel as an ally--relation of shared interests.

English
6
14
87
4.8K
Epistemic Trespasser3
Epistemic Trespasser3@colonialbot3·
@BlakeKresses @upintheskies2 @DeborahDou11570 i am an american. my ancestors fought on both sides of the civil war. that out of the way I will repeat what our canadian friend has said: shapiro did a whole show taking on vance's position on this and did not mention a single thing about immigration.
English
0
0
0
5
Blake Kresses
Blake Kresses@BlakeKresses·
NeoCons and Libertarians are slandering JD Vance as a “socialist” because they fundamentally believe that securing the border and stopping mass migration are socialist policies. Neocons are too scared to oppose Trump directly, but many Lolberts will be honest about this.
English
31
26
419
16.6K
Epistemic Trespasser3
Epistemic Trespasser3@colonialbot3·
the new liturgical practice on the right is for its priests like tucker to concoct increasingly retarded, poorly evidenced conspiracy theories to absolve communists of crimes and blame jews, to which its laity respond with fulsome and unquestioning litanies of their allegiance to the idea in the comments. the idea that israel would kill a president for libbing out over nukes is to ignore the long history of american presidents and state departments libbing out over israel related things to no consequence, before and after kennnedy. it is also just patently insane given the possibility of american retaliation.
Ounka@OunkaOnX

Tucker just dropped a nuke: Israel involved in JFK's assassination, and the files have been buried for 63 years-with Tom Cotton personally blocking release.

English
1
1
7
138
Epistemic Trespasser3
Epistemic Trespasser3@colonialbot3·
given that X and tiktok are der sturmer, this is like the idiots who say jews lied about the holocaust to gain power via overwhelming sympathy, as if anyone actually cared about the holocaust until they could use its lesson against the jews in gaza and the jews only. the jews of pre-holocaust europe would have laughed in the face of anyone suggesting that the way to the heart of the gentiles is to complain about or inflate their antisemitic crimes.
Max 📟@MaxNordau

Absolutely WILD for Megyn Kelly to say that Israel is the biggest manipulator of X, TikTok, and Instagram. Has Mom ever logged onto X, TikTok, and Instagram?

English
0
0
0
47
QuantPunch aka Uncle Sam's Bad Hombre
Its bc antisemitism served as monocausal explanation to incomprehensibly complex phenomena. Hence it its prevalence among dimwits & who feel elevated to a higher level of comprehension by it, as if it unlocks some (the only!) key to the universe.
Noam@Searcherseek

One thing to emphasize in removing the mystique of antisemitism is how much if a one-trick-pony these people are. "You know the key to understanding random thing in the news? You guessed it again: Da Jews." The most repetitive, boring, uninsightful people around.

English
1
1
8
176
Epistemic Trespasser3
Epistemic Trespasser3@colonialbot3·
"neocon" is to vance what "racist" was to obama.
Insurrection Barbie@DefiyantlyFree

It is not an accident that nobody can seem to have a serious conversation about JD Vance’s actual positions. Every time a legitimate criticism is raised, the criticism is never answered. The person making it is simply branded an establishment Republican, a neocon, a Never Trumper, or some other label meant to make the underlying argument disappear. That is the problem. My concern right now is not even primarily JD Vance. It is the political operation surrounding him, which appears determined to prevent any honest examination of his policies, his philosophy of government, or whether his positions are actually conservative. I can defend Trump’s policies within the bounds of constitutional conservatism. I can explain why a policy is lawful, why it serves the national interest, where the government’s authority comes from, and what limits still restrain it. I do not need to call every critic a traitor in order to make the case. But when it comes to Vance, too many of his defenders refuse to make the case at all. They do not explain why the policy is conservative. They do not explain how it fits within limited government, civil liberties, federalism, or constitutional restraint. They simply attack the person asking the question. That should concern everyone. Calling every critic a Never Trumper, neocon, or establishment Republican does not answer whether Vance’s economic policies are conservative. It does not answer whether his approach to executive power is constitutional. It does not answer whether postliberalism is compatible with the American founding. It does not answer whether his foreign policy reflects ordinary restraint or a much broader ideological break with constitutional conservatism. Labels are not arguments. And a political movement that cannot defend its policies without discrediting everyone who questions them is not demonstrating confidence. It is demonstrating weakness. The conversation is going to happen anyway. The only question is whether Vance’s supporters are willing to engage it honestly, or whether they intend to keep treating scrutiny itself as betrayal. That does not bode well with me, because conservatives should be able to defend their ideas without demanding immunity from criticism.

English
0
0
4
47
Epistemic Trespasser3
Epistemic Trespasser3@colonialbot3·
I have been thinking a lot about this very thing lately, for personal and intellectual reasons - personal because I have in the past succumbed to the absolutist regime and intellectual because it reminds me of hegel's position that "reason" is embedded in the laws of the state and thus giving up one's own son to the state for his crimes and execution is consonant with the progress of spirit's self-realization. The parent should feel nothing but participation with the universal order. Kierkegaard, the only true Christian of Europe ever, was disgusted by this and that disgust prompted his own human centered philosophy of faith.
English
0
0
0
4
🦌 the fool
🦌 the fool@kilovh·
They know that one day it will be the rules or the person, and if the person matters enough it will have to be the person over the rules, and they refuse to learn anything from this remarkable and extraordinary fact.
English
2
0
1
49
🦌 the fool
🦌 the fool@kilovh·
I've realized that the form of bad faith that most annoys me is when in commitment to being utterly predictable tribal bores people refuse to bring any of the complexities of their personal human relationships to the public sphere.
English
1
0
3
213
Max Abrahms
Max Abrahms@MaxAbrahms·
Countless observers of international affairs have pointed out that Iran seems to attack every Arab country but has not been targeting Israel. The conventional wisdom is that Iran is afraid of Israel. But my question is whether Iranian leaders have tried to publicly justify this target aversion (which could easily change).
English
5
1
21
1.6K
Epistemic Trespasser3 retweetledi
QuantPunch aka Uncle Sam's Bad Hombre
Webbon happens when you unchain neolithic farmers and teach them how to read. The biggest catastrophe in western civilization was the premature liberation of its slave caste. These people are bred to grow wheat, cabbage, and carrots. Not to utter their pontifications in public.
Joel Webbon@JoelWebbon

I would never “write the Jews out of the scriptures”. They play a vital role… the bad guys. They perverted the Law, killed the Prophets, persecuted the Apostles, and crucified Christ. And after rejecting their Messiah, he spiritually returned in AD70 and… you know the rest.

English
0
3
16
321
Epistemic Trespasser3
Epistemic Trespasser3@colonialbot3·
attacking iran was the right call because signaling that you will never attack Iran is just as likely to result in a failure to "secure peace" (whatever that means). Did you think that Iran built up the largest conventional military in the region, with a constellation of regional proxies imperiling trade across the globe even before the war, and with offensive ballistic missiles aimed at everyone to "secure peace." Do you think the peace that you could ever secure in this context would be anything other than a munich moment?
Patrick Casey@restoreorderusa

Diplomacy failed to secure peace, so we're back to bombing, which will probably fail to topple the Iranian regime, render it more amenable to negotiations, or open the Strait. At this point, I don't see how anyone could argue attacking Iran was the right call.

English
0
0
0
110
Epistemic Trespasser3 retweetledi
Luai Ahmed
Luai Ahmed@JustLuai·
Israel, Israel, Israel, Israel. Gaza, Gaza, Gaza, Gaza. Genocide, genocide, genocide. You Western morons. Your grandchildren are going to live under tyrannical Islamic dictatorships that execute them for making memes about Mohammed. Continue obsessing over Israel.
English
736
2.4K
13.7K
178.7K
Jase
Jase@_Jase_C_·
@drBalls0 @AssalRad Read the phucking date. There was no conflict and Israel still murdered children in record numbers. WITH NO HAMAS
Jase tweet media
Panton Hill, Victoria 🇦🇺 English
1
0
11
238