Cornelius

@megynkelly No, y'all just don't reflect Christian values at all and he called your ass out.

@ChatGPTapp AllTrails is great. But the website works better for me. I think the store is kind of missing the mark on strategy so far. I'll poke around some more.

finding a hike can sometimes be as challenging as the hike itself! use AllTrails GPT for personalized trail recommendations chat.openai.com/g/g-KpF6lTka3-…

we launched the GPT Store two weeks ago and wanted to share some of our featured GPTs!

@gdb Oh no, you can't tease us like this mr. blue check mark. More words.

Working at OpenAI feels like having advance notice on the contours of the future.

@skift These big tech people have had way too much media training. Makes conversations so dull.

🎧 Listen in for a discussion about AI and its impact on the travel industry and why marketers should team up with the technology rather than fight against it. hubs.li/Q02dYY3y0

@emilychangtv @sama @satyanadella @OpenAI Really? Here's what staff think "Severe lack of executive leadership...executives are too busy being impressed with themselves..Strong sense of employee frustration with the immaturity of leaders" glassdoor.com/Reviews/OpenAI…

Continuing to add new details to this story on the rift between Sam and Ilya: - @sama is shocked and saddened but "upbeat" - @satyanadella was "blindsided" and is furious - Sam will likely start another company with all the researchers leaving @OpenAI bloomberg.com/news/articles/…

@axios From Glassdoor (Sept) "Severe lack of executive leadership...executives are too busy being impressed with themselves..Strong sense of employee frustration with the immaturity of leaders" glassdoor.com/Reviews/OpenAI…

SCOOP: No "malfeasance" behind Sam Altman's firing, OpenAI memo says trib.al/BDxJRqv

@karaswisher is anyone bothering to talk w/ rank and file tech staff? From Glassdoor (Sept) "Severe lack of executive leadership...executives are too busy being impressed with themselves..Strong sense of employee frustration with the immaturity of leaders" glassdoor.com/Reviews/OpenAI…

@badphilosopher From Glassdoor (Sept 2023) "Severe lack of executive leadership, alignment, communication - executives are too busy being impressed with themselves to run an effective business -Strong sense of employee frustration with the immaturity of leaders - lots of play along to get along"

and that's midwest integrity

@HengTze Nobody wants Bard! So tired of Google

@karaswisher @sama wasn't listening to his tech teams. Different vs. Steve Jobs, who (largely) had respect from tech - just not the suits. At Y Combinator Sam acted as a god over startups. CEOs need support from the talent. @ilyasut took wrong path though. Calling @EstherPerel

The world’s 3rd best SEO spammer, a former Tesla sr product manager, Joseph Gordon-Levitts wife and a DC policy flak walk into a bar and say “you know what, I bet we could totally run OpenAI”

@karaswisher it comes down to this Tweet. It's clear Ilya Sutskever is referring to Sam. Another big, if lovable, ego is Brian Chesky...two thoughtful but messianic bros in pod. They should start something together. 💕

@bchesky Imagine Sam Altman and Airbnb's Brian Chesky not only collaborate but also get married, creating a unique AI-infused utopian village. Their union symbolizes the merging of groundbreaking AI with visionary hospitality, setting a new standard for living and technological harmony.

Sam Altman is one of the best founders of his generation and has made an immense contribution to our industry

@sama @bchesky You know what, you two could make a great power couple!

many people have reached out to offer help and advice over the past year; no one has gotten close to @bchesky in terms of delivering. he will take a midnight call any time, put in hours of work on any topic, answer difficult questions correctly/with clarity, make any intro, etc

@berlin_bridge Maybe someone should look into whether editors at Foreign Policy are enjoying nice Georgetown residences and private schools for their kids thanks to a mysterious benefactor with Russian connections

Oh ffs. No one is trying to “turn Russia into an intl pariah.” RU CHOSE TO BE an intl pariah by invading #Ukraine committing endless war crimes & butchering thousands of ppl. By “restoring normal diplomatic relations” Washington would tell Moscow & all other dictators that’s ok

@Google Been using it for a few months now. More or less ignoring it at this point. It's super annoying when it pops me down the page due to delayed opening. Cumulative Layout Shift anyone? Oh right, the metrics don't matter for Google.

We’re expanding generative AI in Search to Japan and India. 🇯🇵 🇮🇳 Learn more ↓ goo.gle/3sI6KcI

@sean_oneill This strikes me more as statement from someone who took a few statistics classes in business school, and prefers to fit data to narratives rather than discover the real reason for things. Sigh.

"It was 99% R-squared!" said Hyatt CEO Mark Hoplamazian on an earnings call today. He was giddy. Regression analysis showed a 99% fit between member growth and the size of system growth. You want a math nerd in charge of your hotel group, right?

@mrsorokaa @TsurkanKate I don't doubt this at all

Belarusian Red Cross is complicit in war crimes.

@sparklingruby @sama Hopefully not in the bathtub

@sama My to do list tonight: Finish blow drying my hair

you are gonna die with a lot of things still on your to do list, but you will have gotten done what you actually prioritize (sadly often not what you think you prioritize)

@svpino Study made possible with generous funding from Alphabet!

Here is the original paper: arxiv.org/pdf/2307.09009… And you can reproduce the results using this Google Colab: #scrollTo=2d56b1ff" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">colab.research.google.com/github/lchen00…

GPT-4 is getting worse over time, not better. Many people have reported noticing a significant degradation in the quality of the model responses, but so far, it was all anecdotal. But now we know. At least one study shows how the June version of GPT-4 is objectively worse than the version released in March on a few tasks. The team evaluated the models using a dataset of 500 problems where the models had to figure out whether a given integer was prime. In March, GPT-4 answered correctly 488 of these questions. In June, it only got 12 correct answers. From 97.6% success rate down to 2.4%! But it gets worse! The team used Chain-of-Thought to help the model reason: "Is 17077 a prime number? Think step by step." Chain-of-Thought is a popular technique that significantly improves answers. Unfortunately, the latest version of GPT-4 did not generate intermediate steps and instead answered incorrectly with a simple "No." Code generation has also gotten worse. The team built a dataset with 50 easy problems from LeetCode and measured how many GPT-4 answers ran without any changes. The March version succeeded in 52% of the problems, but this dropped to a pale 10% using the model from June. Why is this happening? We assume that OpenAI pushes changes continuously, but we don't know how the process works and how they evaluate whether the models are improving or regressing. Rumors suggest they are using several smaller and specialized GPT-4 models that act similarly to a large model but are less expensive to run. When a user asks a question, the system decides which model to send the query to. Cheaper and faster, but could this new approach be the problem behind the degradation in quality? In my opinion, this is a red flag for anyone building applications that rely on GPT-4. Having the behavior of an LLM change over time is not acceptable. Have you noticed any issues when using GPT-4 and ChatGPT lately? Do you think these problems are overblown?