CoPi
995 posts
@chenreason Robinhood是Trump Account的首发券商，但不等于以后它也一直是唯一一个可以开这种账户的券商。其他券商会跟进的
中文
$HOOD 昨天财报出来，很多朋友可能跌的难受死了，希望下面的内容可以给些安慰。
先说结论，如果你是因为加密牛市买的 HOOD，昨天这份财报确实让人难受。加密收入腰斩，股价跌了10+%，加上年初以来已经跌了快40%，从去年10月的高点153美元算起，现在只剩71美元出头，真的腰斩了。
但如果你是因为金融操作系统的逻辑买的，这份财报其实没那么糟。
CEO在财报电话会上说了一句很关键的话：「我不想再讨论比特币价格了。」
虽然加密收入从2.52亿跌到1.34亿，但公司总营收还能涨15%。
此外还有几个大家应该关注的点：公司在赚钱，Q1净利润3.46亿美元，同比涨3%。用户还在存钱进来，177亿美元的净存入，年化22%增长。Gold会员430万，这些是每月付费的高价值用户。银行业务从几乎为零到20亿存款，速度惊人。
并且美国财政部选了 Robinhood 做 Trump Accounts 的唯一券商。是5500万孩子的投资账户，这是一个二十年的渠道绑定。
所以，真正的风险不是这份财报，而是这个问题：加密市场什么时候回暖？
如果你相信比特币下半年会反弹，那 HOOD 现在的价格可能是个机会。如果你觉得加密冬天才刚开始，那后面还有漫漫长夜...
中文
想问一个台湾开车罚单的问题:
是不是部分县市区的测速探头极多，举报狂魔极多？
我在台湾住了4年了，90%的罚单都是同一个地方开出的，它甚至不是我的常驻地，举报的比例约为4成。
中文
今天是 AI 界非常重要的一天……
Elon 對 Sam Altman / OpenAI 的官司在奧克蘭聯邦法院正式開庭！
目前美國加州北區聯邦地方法院正在進行陪審團選拔，開庭陳詞預計明天（星期二）開始。這場民事陪審團審判預計會持續 2～4 週，由法官 Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers 做出最終裁決。
官司起源如下：
1️⃣ 2015 年，Elon 與 Sam Altman 等人共同創辦 OpenAI，當初定位為非營利組織，使命是「安全、開放地開發人工通用智能（AGI），造福全人類」。這家公司本不該追求利潤或被封閉式企業控制。Elon 是早期最大金主，捐款約 3800～4400 萬美元（占早期種子資金約 60%），並提供運算資源與招募人才。
2️⃣ 2018 年，Elon 因對公司方向及微軟日益增加的影響力有異議，離開董事會。
3️⃣ 之後 OpenAI 從微軟拿下數十億美元投資，改組為帶有「營利部門」的結構（從「利潤上限」逐步走向完全商業化），走向封閉源碼。ChatGPT 爆紅後，公司估值暴增至目前約 8520 億美元，最近剛完成重組——營利實體仍向非營利基金會負責。
Elon 指控 Altman、Brockman 與 OpenAI 違反創立時的慈善信託與協議，將公司變成「致富機器」，優先讓內部人士與利潤獲利，而非原本的使命。這是欺騙行為。
這場官司最早於 2024 年 11 月提告，後撤回，2026 年初重新提起。上週五（4 月 24 日），Elon 主動撤銷「詐欺」指控，讓案子聚焦在「使命違反」與「不當得利」。
Elon 希望從 Sam 和 OpenAI 拿回的包括：
•巨額賠償：金額高達 1000 億美元以上（報導指出約 1340 億美元），全部捐給非營利/慈善部門，Elon 自己一分錢都不拿。
•可能解散或重組公司，恢復原本的非營利使命。
•領導層更換（例如將 Altman、Brockman 踢出關鍵職位）。
OpenAI 反擊稱：Elon 當年其實知道並支持商業化，甚至曾考慮與 Tesla 合併或自己掌控公司。這場官司根本是 Elon 的 xAI 為了競爭而發動的「破壞行動」，出於對 OpenAI 成功的嫉妒。
這場審判對整個 AI 世界至關重要。
Elon 一直警告：以利潤為導向、封閉源碼的 AGI 非常危險。這是他親手創辦、2018 年離開後，現在要強制執行「造福人類」原始使命的最後機會。
如果 Elon 大勝，OpenAI 的估值、即將到來的 IPO、與微軟的合作、市場主導地位都將重挫，也會迫使全球最領先的 AI 實驗室改變經營方式，影響整個 AI 競賽與未來法規。
Sam Altman 根本不值得信任來掌握 AGI 的未來，這場審判正好證明 Elon 當初為什麼要跟他鬥。
這就是那個 2023 年被自己董事會以「不夠坦誠」為由開除，後來又爬回去，把「開放給全人類」的非營利承諾，變成微軟金援、封閉源碼、價值數千億美元獲利機器的人。
當初出錢、出願景的是 Elon，他想讓 AI 安全、造福所有人，而不是變成億萬富翁的內部俱樂部。
如果 Altman 能事後改寫規則，就等於告訴全世界：「使命導向的科技只是行銷口號」。
Elon 不是為了自尊或競爭，他是真的想在「利潤凌駕人類」的 AGI 變得無法阻擋之前，守住最後一道防線。
這對那個「真正想了解宇宙」而不是只想賺錢的人來說，是非常個人的戰鬥。
人類需要 Elon 贏。
站在 Elon 這一邊！🚀
Teslaconomics@Teslaconomics
Today is the start of a very important day in the AI world... the trial between Elon and Sam/OpenAI begins today in Oakland Federal Court. The jury selection is happening right now in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California and opening arguments are expected Tuesday. The civil jury trial is projected to last 2-4 weeks, with Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers making the final call. So let me tell you why this fight all came about. 1/ In 2015 Elon co-founded OpenAI with Sam Altman and others as a nonprofit to develop artificial general intelligence safely and openly for the benefit of all humanity... this was supposed to NOT be for profit or for closed corporate control. Elon was a major early funder, contributing around $38-44 million (~60% of early seed funding) plus resources like compute and recruiting. 2/ Then, Elon left the board in 2018 over disagreements for the direction of the company and Microsoft’s growing role of the company. 3/ Later, OpenAI took billions from Microsoft, restructured with a for-profit arm, initially “capped profit,” now more commercial... went closed-source in practice, and exploded in value with ChatGPT. FYI, the current valuation of OpenAI now sits at ~$852 billion and the company recently completed restructuring with a for-profit entity reporting into a nonprofit foundation. Now, with the trial, Elon is saying Altman, Brockman, and OpenAI breached the founding charitable trust and agreement by turning it into a “wealth machine” that prioritizes profits and insiders over the original mission. He claims they deceived him about their plans... This lawsuit was originally filed in November 2024, was withdrawn, and then revived in early 2026. And just this Friday, April 24, Elon voluntarily dropped the fraud claims to “streamline” the case and keep the jury focused on the mission issue... proceeding on breach of charitable trust and unjust enrichment. This is what Elon is looking to get back from Sam and OpenAI: a/ substantial damages, with stakes in the $100B+ range, with many reports saying it's in the range of ~$134B and the winnings will be given to the nonprofit/charity arm and will NOT benefit Elon personally b/ possible unwinding/restructuring to restore the original nonprofit mission c/ leadership changes (e.g., getting rid of Altman/Brockman from key roles). On the other side, OpenAI is claiming: a/ Elon knew about and once supported commercialization steps, saying he even explored merging with Tesla or gaining control himself b/ OpenAI calls the suit competitive sabotage from rival Elon's company xAI and says this is driven by jealousy over OpenAI’s success This is SUCH an important trial in the world of AI... people may not fully understand. The reason is bc Elon has repeatedly warned that profit-driven, closed-source AGI is very dangerous. This is his chance to enforce the original “benefit humanity” mission he helped create and walked away from in 2018. A big win will hurt OpenAI’s valuation, upcoming IPO plans, Microsoft partnership, and market dominance/customer perspective of the company... and this will also force real changes in how the world’s leading AI lab operates, influencing the entire AI race and future regulations. For me, Sam Altman straight up CANNOT be trusted with the future of AGI, and this trial proves why Elon was right to fight it. This is the same guy who got fired by his own board in 2023 for not being “consistently candid,” then crawled back in and turned the nonprofit “open for humanity” promise into a closed-source, Microsoft-bankrolled profit machine worth hundreds of billions. Elon was the one who put up the early cash and vision to keep AI safe and beneficial for all of us... not to create a trillion-dollar insider club. If Altman gets away with rewriting the rules after the fact, it sets a dangerous precedent that mission-driven tech is just marketing fluff. I believe Elon isn’t doing this for ego or rivalry... he’s really doing it bc someone has to hold the line before profit-over-people AGI becomes unstoppable. This one’s personal for the man who actually wants to understand the universe instead of just cashing in on it. Humanity needs Elon to win. And that's who I'm rooting for!
中文
新任美联储主席凯文沃什的持仓，过去一年保守估计是腰斩，币价平均都跌了一半多😅
至于 $BTC ，是一个都没有😂
这么相信山寨季的钻石手老韭菜，也是不多了😁
中文
English
The only thing more ridiculous than this lawsuit is spending $6 million on a banana duct-taped to a wall. We are incredibly proud of the @worldlibertyfi team…
Zach Witkoff@ZachWitkoff
Justin Sun’s recent lawsuit against @worldlibertyfi is a desperate attempt to deflect attention from Sun’s own misconduct. His claims are entirely meritless, and World Liberty looks forward to getting the case thrown out promptly. He engaged in misconduct that required World Liberty to take action to protect itself and its users. World Liberty will continue to take all necessary steps to protect its community.
English
Today, I filed a lawsuit in California federal court against World Liberty Financial to protect my legal rights as a holder of $WLFI tokens.
I have always been—and remain—an ardent supporter of President Trump and his Administration’s efforts to make America crypto friendly. This lawsuit does not change how I feel about President Trump or the Trump Administration.
Unfortunately, certain individuals on the World Liberty project team have been operating the project in a manner that goes against President Trump’s values. They wrongfully froze all of my tokens, stripped me of my right to vote on governance proposals, and have threatened to permanently destroy my tokens by “burning” them—all without any proper justification. I do not believe President Trump would condone these actions if he knew about them.
I have tried in good faith to resolve this situation with the World Liberty project team without resorting to litigation. But the project team has refused my requests to unfreeze my tokens and restore my rights as a token holder. They have left me with no choice but to turn to the courts.
All I want is to be treated the same as every other early investor who received tokens—no better, no worse.
I also want the community to know that I strongly oppose the new governance proposal World Liberty published on April 15.
If it passes, token holders who do not “affirmatively accept” its terms—including a requirement that 10% of all advisor tokens be permanently burned—will have their tokens locked indefinitely.
For early purchaser tokens, the proposal imposes a two-year cliff followed by a two-year vesting schedule—and again, for those who do not affirmatively accept, their tokens are locked indefinitely.
This proposal is bad for the community, but because World Liberty has frozen my early investor tokens, I cannot vote them for or against the proposal.
I believe in fairness, transparency, and the principles that make crypto powerful. I will continue to fight for those principles. 🙏
English
Lighter has again bought back 81K $LIT.
ajey.lit (Perp Dex arc)@ajey_eth
Lighter has bought back 171K $LIT. The team has done the biggest buyback of this week today. In the last 7 days, they have bought back around 453K $LIT, and now the treasury account holds 10.75M $LIT. That’s it. Lighter 🕯️
English
房租 15000
手機+網路 2500
水電瓦斯 2000 (夏天抓3000)
交通 1000
三餐 12000
回診 3000
貓 2000
保險 2500
訂閱 1000
保健食品(3個月) 7000/3=2333
= 43333
謝謝各位 🤣
貓宮結乃Vtuber 10/16生日 17:00@yunochan1016
有沒有台北人現身說法
中文
@JLaw16231746 @OttoHuang120 正是復興民族這個落後的觀點導致該民族落後，在歷史上已經被無數驗證，民族的復興是治理良好的副產物，是治理不好的首要任務
中文
@cooker73200 @QuanLujun 你美团看的是什么？我说的一个凉菜一碗烩面24，你怎么不看，我说的宫保鸡丁盖浇饭15你怎么不看，这是正常人自己中午晚上要吃的。美团上面价格都高百分之10几，知道为什么不？不知道问问grok
中文
这可能是 2026 年最「合规」的一场 3 亿美元惨案
今日早间，Kelp DAO @KelpDAO 遭遇攻击，2.93 亿美元的资产被黑客从跨链桥抽走，并迅速转入 Aave @aave 、Compound 等协议借出真金白银撤场。
但这事儿最惊悚的地方不在于金额，而在于：所有协议的代码都没有漏洞🤷♀️🤷
以下是关于这场「代码没坏，但钱没了」的 DeFi 灾难，你需要知道的真相：
1. 消失的 3 亿美元，不在代码里
通常黑客是找代码 Bug，但这次黑客找的是「配置参数」。
Kelp DAO 使用了 LayerZero 的 DVN（去中心化验证网络）机制，这本是个安全组件。但 Kelp 主动选择了「1-of-1」的配置：意味着只要攻破唯一一个节点，黑客就能伪造任何跨链消息❗️❗️
即使 Slither 或 Mythril 这种顶级代码审计工具，也检测不出这种部署时的参数错误。
于是，黑客通过伪造的跨链消息，凭空变出了 11.6 万枚 rsETH，然后冲进 Aave 当作抵押品。
2. Aave 的「平庸之恶」：为了竞争，牺牲冗余
为什么黑客能从 Aave 借走那么多钱？因为 Aave 的治理系统在过去半年里，亲手把防线拆了😀😀
为了和对手竞争，Aave 把 rsETH 的贷款价值比（LTV）推到了 93%。这意味着你存 100 块的货，能借走 93 块的钱。相比之下，其他协议只给 70% 左右。
治理提案里全是「保持竞争优势」、「增加协议收入」，却没有任何一份风险报告警告过：rsETH 背后那个跨链桥到底安不安全？
3. 风险管理人的「空窗期」
说到这事就更巧了（不过也可能是黑客专门挑的这个时期下手）
长期为 Aave 站岗的风险管理团队 Chaos Labs 在 4 月 6 日刚离职（理由是给的钱少、活儿太杂）。而新接手的 LlamaRisk 在事发前 9 天，刚以「链上数据健康，利用率正常，流动性充足」为由调高了 rsETH 的供应上限。
链上数据只告诉了现在生意多火爆，覆盖不到的是：rsETH 到达 Aave 之前，穿越了一道什么样的桥。
4. 谁在最后买单？
黑客卷走了 2.36 亿美元的 WETH 撤场，给 Aave 留下了一堆由于攻击导致脱锚、无法清算的 rsETH 烂账。
Aave 的保险库里只有约 5000 万美元，而剩下的约 1.5 亿美元缺口，将由那些存入 WETH、只是想赚点利息的普通用户分摊💔💔
据 @EmberCN 监测，受此次事件影响，今日从 Aave 撤离的资金量已超 66 亿美元。
这不仅是一个数字，更是安全溢价的集体清算。当 Aave 的安全「金身」被打破，统一型借贷市场的系统性盲区，正被大资金重新贴上风险标签。
中文
@cooker73200 @QuanLujun 你自己去每个省份实地走走看看，就拿我居住的省会城市郑州，房价1万左右一平方，物价比如中午一个菜一份烩面总共24，或者宫保鸡丁盖浇饭15，你要说台湾物价比中国便宜3分之一那确实不错，有机会了去感受下。谢谢你的分享
中文