Cryptsy

2.2K posts

Cryptsy banner
Cryptsy

Cryptsy

@crypsty

#Cryptocurrency #bitcoin

Katılım Ocak 2014
72 Takip Edilen80 Takipçiler
︎ ︎venom
︎ ︎venom@venom1s·
Why is Urdu made compulsory in Hyderabad Metro? English is different because we are forced, and now the narrative has changed so much that English is linked to education and class. Now why force Urdu too? Isn't Hyderabad a Telugu city? Even if it's for non-Telugu speakers, Hindi and English are more than enough, right?
English
91
530
1.9K
53.7K
Cryptsy
Cryptsy@crypsty·
@nicksrightpod Green card is based on country of birth and not the citizenship
English
0
0
0
11
hyperboreanchud88
hyperboreanchud88@Agarthasneed·
@Codex_India6 Indians have very little manners around noise pollution. This video was filmed in Brampton Ontario.
English
4
8
35
979
Codex_Indîa
Codex_Indîa@Codex_India6·
Pure cringe and zero civic sense. Every other street in Australia is filled with these Bollywood clowns. Zero awareness, full volume and blocking public spaces.
English
65
131
827
18.7K
Cryptsy
Cryptsy@crypsty·
@guyfelicella Etransfer is bank account to bank account! and those third party apps are wallets ..serves no purpose other than an extra layer and additional headaches and risks
English
0
0
0
66
guyfelicella🇨🇦🍁
guyfelicella🇨🇦🍁@guyfelicella·
Canada: “I sent the money.” “Got it.” America: “Download these 4 apps and wait 3 business days.” 🇨🇦🤣 Nothing better than Etransfer.
corey dale@ripcordca

@TateHackert Etransfer is horrible compared to the US apps

English
135
567
10.6K
452.4K
Cryptsy
Cryptsy@crypsty·
@Prominent_Bryan Etransfer is bank account to bank account.Venmo and PayPal are wallets ..a layer between two parties! Zelle is the cousin of etransfer/interac
English
0
0
0
73
Bryan Breguet
Bryan Breguet@Prominent_Bryan·
I will never understand why Canadians insist e-transfer is better It isn't. It's always more annoying to use than the US system (or what they have in the rest of the world) I'm not saying interac e-transfer is terrible or unusable but it is objectively less convenient than Venmo, especially if you don't already have this person in your contacts It's weird how defensive Canadians are on this. Weird elbows up stuff. But it's always from people who have never experienced the system in the rest of the world
corey dale@ripcordca

@TateHackert Etransfer is horrible compared to the US apps

English
576
19
491
1.1M
Cryptsy
Cryptsy@crypsty·
@Tablesalt13 Who cares ! We have seen US power in Iran war ..how badly they got humiliated
English
0
0
0
72
Tablesalt 🇨🇦🇺🇸
‼️MAJOR BREAKING: The Pentagon suspends the 86 year old Permanent Joint Board on Defense (PJBD) with Canada to reassess its benefits to shared North American defense, as per The Bureau
English
109
256
1.8K
68.8K
Cryptsy
Cryptsy@crypsty·
@kalaBaman He is autistic/ special needs person .Her mother takes care of him and she paid .
English
0
0
0
46
🪬
🪬@kalaBaman·
An Indian Hіndu, who grabs a container from the shelf, eats directly out of it, and then puts the leftovers back on the shelf. 🤮
English
26
63
208
6.3K
Cryptsy
Cryptsy@crypsty·
@Qais_99k2 You should have gone to a real school .Arbitration courts don’t give judgement.It is just an opinion and can not be enforced!
English
0
0
0
59
🇵🇰 قـيـس بـن حـارث 🇸🇦
🚨Breaking News:🔥 Humiliation for India, Victory for Pakistan.🇵🇰💪🏻 The International Court of Arbitration has once again backed Pakistan’s rightful stance on the Indus Waters Treaty.💦 India’s attempts to weaponize water have failed miserably.🤝 Our rivers, our rights.💧🏆
🇵🇰 قـيـس بـن حـارث 🇸🇦 tweet media
English
418
59
246
10.5K
Cryptsy
Cryptsy@crypsty·
@Qais_99k2 Pakistani should know it is arbitration court for private dispute resolution.they don’t give any judgements,but only opinion and awards,which can not be enforced
English
0
0
0
11
Cryptsy
Cryptsy@crypsty·
@GovtofPakistan ARBITRATION COURTS HAVE NO AUTHORITY TO PASS JUDGEMENT. The awards can not be enforced
English
0
0
1
461
Government of Pakistan
Government of Pakistan@GovtofPakistan·
The Government of Pakistan notes with utmost satisfaction the Court of Arbitration’s Supplemental Award Concerning Maximum Pondage, handed down on 15 May 2026, in the Indus Waters Treaty proceedings arising from the Ratle Hydroelectric Plant and the Kishenganga Hydroelectric Project design disputes. The Award affirms Pakistan’s central position that the Treaty places substantive limits on India’s water-control capability on the Western Rivers. These limits are not formalities. They apply at the planning and design stage and cannot be satisfied merely by a later assurance of operational restraint. Pondage for a Run-of-River Plant must be justified by real project needs, actual expected operation, site hydrology, hydraulic conditions, power-system requirements, and the information and explanation required under the Treaty. Building on the Court’s General Issues Award of 8 August 2025, the Supplemental Award gives practical effect to the standard that installed capacity and anticipated load must be realistic, well-founded and defensible. Installed capacity must correspond to actual expected operation, hydrologic and hydraulic data, and Treaty requirements. Anticipated load must correspond to actual expected operation and to the projected needs of the power system the plant is intended to serve. This addresses a core Treaty concern. India cannot justify increased Pondage through imagined capacity, artificial load curves, unrealistic peaking assumptions, or bare assertions of compliance with Paragraph 15 release limits. Paragraph 15 remains an operational constraint, but it is not a substitute for an evidence-based justification of the water-control capacity sought. Any different operating pattern must be supported by specific information and underlying data produced by India. The Award also strengthens Pakistan’s review rights. India must provide Pakistan with sufficient information and explanation to assess Treaty compliance. If India fails to do so, it fails to carry its burden of establishing that the proposed maximum Pondage satisfies Paragraph 8(c) of Annexure D. The Court further confirmed that any applicable minimum-flow obligation must be taken into account in calculating Pondage required for Firm Power where such obligation exists and is not otherwise satisfied. Paragraph 15 release requirements do not automatically satisfy such an obligation. Pakistan also notes the Court’s earlier holding that the awards of a Court of Arbitration are final and binding on the Parties and have otherwise controlling legal effect for subsequent Treaty bodies on relevant questions of Treaty interpretation. Pakistan will place these interpretations before the Neutral Expert process, consistent with Treaty procedures and applicable confidentiality arrangements. Pakistan remains committed to the Indus Waters Treaty, its dispute-resolution procedures, and the peaceful settlement of water-related differences. Pakistan will continue to protect its rights under the IWT and will pursue every lawful and diplomatic means to ensure that hydroelectric projects on the Western Rivers are designed and operated strictly within Treaty limits. The Award is a strategic consolidation of Pakistan’s Treaty position: maximum Pondage must be realistic, evidence-based, hydrologically grounded, power-system justified, Treaty-compliant, and incapable of inflation through artificial assumptions.
English
271
453
1.4K
158.6K
Cryptsy
Cryptsy@crypsty·
@iihtishamm Arbitration courts can make opinions,but can not pass any judgments .Arbitration is a private dispute resolution process when 2 parties approach the court!
English
0
0
1
758
Ihtisham Ul Haq
Ihtisham Ul Haq@iihtishamm·
Pakistan wins major legal ruling in Indus Waters case Under the Indus Waters Treaty, a Court of Arbitration ruled in Pakistan’s favour on India’s Kishanganga and Ratle projects, reaffirming rules on western rivers. 🇵🇰🇮🇳
English
124
351
3.4K
83.6K
Cryptsy
Cryptsy@crypsty·
@Tiju0Prakash Arbitration courts don’t pass any judgements nor they have legal authority to do so .Please Google it if you don’t know the law
English
0
0
0
556
Tejasswi Prakash
Tejasswi Prakash@Tiju0Prakash·
Modi ji's 'masterstroke' of suspending Indus Water Treaty has backfired spectacularly. International Court of Arbitration just ruled against India, backing Pakistan's case on illegal suspension. Supplemental award issued in Pak's favour after hearings. Instead of strong diplomacy & isolating Pak, we have more isolation & legal defeats.
English
128
360
1.7K
73.8K
Cryptsy
Cryptsy@crypsty·
@MEAIndia Arbitration court is private dispute resolution process ,it tries settle disputes if both parties approach it .They can’t issue any judgments .Ir is like a village jirga in Pakistan
English
0
0
0
114
Randhir Jaiswal
Randhir Jaiswal@MEAIndia·
Our response to media queries on matters pertaining to the illegally constituted so-called Court of Arbitration ⬇️ 🔗 bit.ly/4tC3kCk
Randhir Jaiswal tweet media
English
123
790
3K
90.5K
Cryptsy
Cryptsy@crypsty·
@GabbbarSingh bad news for them. Swatch will be selling them for next 6 months and they will produce these plastic watches till the last buyer. Nobody will pay premium
English
1
0
0
616
Gabbar
Gabbar@GabbbarSingh·
All these guys are running to buy a Rs 41,000 watch. You might argue, they look like the 3rd pillion rider of a Splendour in a Small town, how can they afford to buy this watch? They can’t. But they know, it’s sought after, so they will resell for profit
English
289
240
3.9K
1.1M
Cryptsy
Cryptsy@crypsty·
@junaidalirehan2 Idiot ! India never exited chabahar port .India exited chabahar to Afghanistan railway project !
English
0
0
0
159
Ali
Ali@junaidalirehan2·
Iran handed over, its chabahar port to India & when America exerted a little pressure on India, India backed out, now Iranian Foreign minister once again offered India to take the port, meanwhile Pakistan even after saving their ungrateful asses gets hugs only.
English
75
56
375
22.2K
Jason Jones
Jason Jones@JasonJonsy·
@SanDiegoKnight Americans must boycott any business employing H1-B, OPT or equivalent work visas given so easily to Indians!
English
3
0
6
540
Hany Girgis
Hany Girgis@SanDiegoKnight·
Starbucks makes ~73% of its entire global revenue from the United States 🇺🇸 But now they’re opening their FIRST corporate office in India… for tech jobs. To “cut $2 billion in costs.” Another American company selling out our kids’ future. While American customers keep the lights on. @Eric_Schmitt @RepGosar @realDonaldTrump @RepOgles @RepEliCrane
Hany Girgis tweet mediaHany Girgis tweet mediaHany Girgis tweet media
English
337
1.8K
7.1K
132.8K
Cryptsy
Cryptsy@crypsty·
@VishalBhargava5 Tell BIMARU states to control population. Every southern states will follow this ,when there is no incentive for controlling population ,when states which bred like pigs are rewarded
English
0
0
0
178
Vishal Bhargava
Vishal Bhargava@VishalBhargava5·
DINK’s are doing it wrong. Andhra Pradesh is now doing it wrong. Hope other states don’t follow. The incentive should be in the form of tax benefits - like Indonesia does it. This will encourage our best earning population to have more children.
NDTV@ndtv

#BREAKING | Andhra Pradesh announces cash incentive for third, fourth child @KP_Aashish reports

English
206
956
5.4K
210.6K
Cryptsy
Cryptsy@crypsty·
@DrNimoYadav When population control is not incentivized,every southern state will do this !
English
0
0
0
206
Dr Nimo Yadav 2.0
Dr Nimo Yadav 2.0@DrNimoYadav·
One of the BJP-ruled states, in a country of 150 crore people, has announced cash incentives for having a third and fourth child.
NDTV@ndtv

#BREAKING | Andhra Pradesh announces cash incentive for third, fourth child @KP_Aashish reports

English
73
283
2.4K
113.2K
Cryptsy
Cryptsy@crypsty·
@ndtv @KP_Aashish Yes good idea..there is incentive for south states for controlling population,when BIMARU states are not advantage by breeding like pigs
English
0
0
0
400
NDTV
NDTV@ndtv·
#BREAKING | Andhra Pradesh announces cash incentive for third, fourth child @KP_Aashish reports
English
1.2K
629
3.2K
2.3M