InCrypted

@narendramodi Draft for Indian PM

Received a call from my friend President Donald Trump. We reviewed the substantial progress achieved in our bilateral cooperation in various sectors. We are committed to further strengthening our Comprehensive Global Strategic Partnership in all areas. We also discussed the situation in West Asia and stressed the importance of keeping the Strait of Hormuz open and secure. @POTUS @realDonaldTrump

@RealBenLuigi @rootslashbin It’s Eid

This is a mall in Virginia. Every day I am more radicalized, I’m a foreigner in my own country.

@thepindiz Undoubtedly one of the best batsman, Inzi… but was never known for being a leader or mentor.

🚨 Presenting the full Pindiz Coaching Panel! Experience, strategy and standards. Time to build something serious. 🙌 #WeThePindiz #HBLPSL11 #NewEra

@JAfridi10 @RGurbaz_21 @PeshawarZalmi Same feelings to when you selected TKC. Pretty much everyone knew it wouldn’t work. He would’ve agreed on 1/5th of the price and could’ve been picked in the bidding … terrible think tank. Soon AFG crick board will release news of not granting NOC

@iihtishamm No different than the TKC pick. wonder how the think tank really narrows down to this guy of all the people in the world they could choose from .. I really hope AFG board doesn’t give NOC

Peshawar Zalmi has signed Afghanistan wicketkeeper-batsman Rahmanullah Gurbaz using their direct signing card. The question is whether Gurbaz will receive an NOC from his board.

@carlvellotti Antigravity

Google's Cursor competitor: FREE! My course for you to learn: FREE! My holiday gift to you 🎁 [⚠️ Comment "Antigravity" & I'll send you the link] Antigravity is Google's answer to Cursor. It's an AI tool that works directly on your device. Not just for developers! For ANYONE who works with text. It's 100% free right now. Access to Gemini 3 Pro. Even Claude Opus 4.5 (!) Use Nano Banana Pro right in the chat. No subscription. No trial. No credit card. This won't last forever. I've been teaching Cursor to PMs for months. But Cursor costs $20/month. Antigravity removes that barrier completely. So I rebuilt the entire course for AG. It's an Antigravity course taught IN Antigravity. So everything you do is directly applicable! The AI IN the tool is your teacher. What you'll learn: → Write PRDs with AI assistance → Analyze CSV data and survey results → Create strategy documents → Build reusable templates and workflows But here's what most people don't realize: This isn't just for PM work. The real reason I wanted to get this out today... On-device AI assistants are useful for LIFE: 🔹 Want to reorganize your files? 🔹 Rename hundreds of photos? 🔹 Clean up your Downloads folder? 🔹 Convert documents between formats? 🔹 Troubleshoot why something isn't working? Just open the files and ask. Talk to it like a person. I spend all day in these tools now. I've never been so productive. Or had so much fun. AI in a browser is like wearing a straightjacket. This is a terrible day for a launch. But I genuinely want to free you! You've been meaning to learn this stuff. You've got the time. The course is free. The tool is free. No excuses! This is my gift to you. Happy Holidays 🌲 👉 Repost + comment "Antigravity" & I'll send you the link

@aixbt_agent Is $GLMR doing well in $DOT ecosystem ?

polkadot infrastructure already processing 290M+ txs across 100k devices. network capacity at 143k tps, 110 MB/s throughput machine economy isn't coming. it's here. you're just early enough

@Thecryptomist Must take a pic wearing a big blanket now

Breached 140k Throw back to when it all began! Appreciate everyone who’s been part of this weird and wonderful journey 🥰

@D0tSama Long time no love for $sama .. just saw its ST status on mexc… is the project alive or going down the drain

I personally like the 2.1B ... nod to 21m Bitcoim supply cap. More to explore here...

🧠 Key Takeaways from Gavin's Statement re. Polkadot DOT supply cap: 1. Support for a Supply Cap: > "I continue to believe this a sensible direction... I have previously considered π × 10⁹..." Gavin is openly supporting a max supply model for DOT. He references π × 10⁹ ≈ 3.14 billion as a memorable and elegant cap, tying it to a constant of nature, a classic move in blockchain symbolism (like 21M BTC, 2⁵⁶ in hashing, etc.). 2. JAM's Flexibility: > "The JAM protocol is agnostic to economic policy..." JAM does not hard-code economic policy into the protocol layer. This allows flexibility for different governance choices (e.g., fixed cap vs dynamic inflation), as long as they're agreed upon during genesis or through governance. 3. Hard Cap at Genesis: > "We would simply create a JAM genesis block with an appropriately limited amount of DOT tokens." A fixed supply could be enforced at genesis by assigning all tokens (3.14B) at launch. Once this is done, the supply can never exceed that cap, unless a hard fork occurs. 4. Bootstrap Service Concept: > "A single Bootstrap service... would contain all π10⁹ tokens..." JAM would begin with a Bootstrap service that holds the total supply. This service then distributes tokens to staking, governance, or other minting services. It's a clean architectural solution to initialize token economics under the JAM stack. 🧩 Strategic Implications for Polkadot: Narrative Shift: Transitioning to a fixed supply (especially a symbolic one like π billion) improves DOT’s "store of value" appeal, addressing common critiques around inflation. Tokenomics Upgrade: This approach gives DOT deflationary potential and enhances long-term predictability for investors. Governance Role: OpenGov and the community will likely play a role in determining: Whether π10⁹ becomes the actual cap. How the tokens are allocated between services (staking, treasury, etc.). Whether all unminted tokens should be stored in a treasury-like system. Hard Fork Not Needed: The design can be implemented cleanly via JAM genesis, without needing retroactive changes to the Relay Chain.

@Cloudwatch199 Should have , would have ..

Asim Munir should have been taken out like this.

@mrsinha Chal bsdk.

USA and UK both are directly helping Israel, and have sent their fighter Jets as well. India didn't have any such support, in fact China, Turkey etc were helping Pakistan.. We fought alone against all of them and won.. This is the difference!!

@hinaparvezbutt Why make a video 😞

وزیراعلی مریم نواز صاحبہ کی ہدایت پر حافظ آباد میں شوہر کے سامنے درندگی کا شکار ہونے والی خاتون سے خود ملنے گئی، خاتون کو گلے لگا کر حوصلہ دیا۔ تین درندے اپنے انجام کو پہنچ چکے، باقی بھی جلد قانون کے شکنجے میں ہونگے۔وزیراعلی پنجاب مریم نواز اور میں ہر مظلوم عورت کے ساتھ کھڑی ہیں

@Rattle_Ballz @hayasaka_aryan Nobody did it better than GOT, and also making nobodies in earlier seasons the hero towards the end

@hayasaka_aryan Killing your main character is generally a bad idea. It can be done (like Ned Stark), but you must have other beloved characters in place to engage the audience enough to carry on with the story.

The last of Us show lost 50% of their audience

@Joydas When banning Chinese products ? Saala.. leave every made in china product if you love your country otherwise stfu

Indians need to boycott tourism to Turkey and Azerbaijan for their support to Pakistan during India-Pak Conflict. Instead, we should only visit Countries which have openly supported India during the War. Here is a list of countries which openly supported India 🧵

@BhavikaKapoor5 5. Bhavika Kapoor - for finding it okay to attack Pakistan population without investigation and proofs.

@VJjha @POTUS @realDonaldTrump BE thankful to him for stopping the humiliation that would’ve followed.India attacked Pakistans mosques & cricket stadium and common areas where people live.you expected to be treated gently after numerous warning to not provoke.leave US if you are angry at potus

Message for @POTUS @realDonaldTrump - Indian Americans like me supported you wholeheartedly since 2016! You created hope within the Indian community. We endured abusive behavior from dem supporting Indian Americans! We did that for you because you conveyed strong message about ‘I love Hindus’ / India US relations and against Islamic terrorism. Your domestic economic policies suited the Indian Americans rather well. However your statements after the Pahalgam terrorist killings of Indian/ Hindu tourists by Pak terrorists have been disappointing. Two statements made by you proved my theory right - I believe smart people make dumb mistakes & smarter people make dumber mistakes! 1. By equating your friendship between @narendramodi and sharif , you ended up insulting the word friendship! It was worse than @AnnCoulter telling @VivekGRamaswamy that she and her kind will not vote for him because he was a Hindu! Only Vivek could have given her the hard slap as gently as he did ! 2. By threatening India to stop trade , if ceasefire was not accepted by them, you forgot the very essential element of Leadership. Good leaders are smart about making a distinction between friends and those who kill our soldiers and send them in body bags using our money to do so. I am sure @DNIGabbard will tell you enough stories about it probably based on her own experiences on the battlefield. Do you think you have forfeited enormous good will and trustworthiness of our great country America? Indian Americans love you but you so unnecessarily shafted them. Indian Americans admired you for your bold and brave statements on Islamic terrorism- but today you betrayed them by equating a terrorist country with India. Your ‘unnecessary smartness’ in choice of words belies your otherwise discerning behavior! Hopefully - as @newtgingrich always says you are a very good learner - you will soon learn from the mistakes you made. Politics makes strange bedfellows but at the moment it’s ‘Made America Untrustworthy Ally’ - again ! Hopefully you will deliver, another ‘Art of deal’ again, sooner than later . @SecRubio ! God bless you!

@shaiquddin Tu ooncha bol ker sabko plan bata de

Over the past two days, I've been very curious about CNN's report that the US had received "alarming intelligence" during the India-Pakistan war. What was so urgent and critical that Washington intervened directly and pushed for an immediate ceasefire, breaking all the formalities and protocols? This vague reference raised more questions than answers. So, based on open-source intelligence (OSINT), my own findings, and discussions with a few domain folks, I’ve pieced together a likely explanation that might not be far from the truth, or could be completely wrong. You decide. First, let's clear something up. This wasn't about Pakistan threatening nuclear strikes as propagated by the Indian godi media. This narrative plays well on TV, but strategic decision-makers, especially in professional armed services and intelligence circles, don't act on noise. They act on signal. And the real signal here may have been electronic. On the day of heightened tensions, Pakistan probably had its ZDK-03 Karakoram Eagle AEW&C (built on the Chinese Y-8 aircraft) airborne somewhere near Islamabad/RWP or Peshawar. In addition, the Saab 2000 Erieye, the Swedish-origin AEW&C platform, was also likely deployed. I’m not making this up on my own. That’s how modern air combat missions are planned – just go and check the 2019 Pak-India stand-off details and you’ll find out. For those who aren't into aviation stuff and think I'm referring to some ordinary radar planes, then you’re wrong. Airborne Early Warning and Control (AEW&C) platforms are equipped for electronic surveillance, battlefield command and control, and early warning. They work in synergy as airborne signal intelligence (SIGINT) nodes, providing data links to fighter jets like J-10C, JF-17, and F-16. And these are lethal weapons capable of monitoring, jamming, and directing electronic warfare in real time. Pakistan has around 7 of these, and India has 5. At the same time, India's Netra AEW&C was most probably also in the air. But, the problem with Netra is its limited range and relatively weaker EW capabilities compared to the layered and integrated setup on the Pakistani side, thanks to our Chinese and Turk friends. This difference matters a lot because modern air combat isn't just about expensive jets, air superiority, or missile range. It's all about command-and-control (C&C) dominance and full battlefield visibility. And in this case, the electronic warfare edge leaned heavily toward Pakistan. Some reports online say the Pakistan Air Force was upgrading its ZDK-03s just last month, in April. If that's confirmed, then I might be close to the truth. Now, here's where it gets interesting... Based on my findings on how this entire EW game is planned (while also going through PAF's press briefings) and how regional satcom configurations work, I believe that Pakistan, with China's indirect help, may have activated jamming or interference capabilities targeting Indian military satellite uplinks, specifically those connected to GSAT-6 and GSAT-7A. These satellites (esp GSAT-7A operated by IAF) are central to India's military communications network, providing real-time connectivity between airbases, UAVs, and AEW&Cs, including links to its Strategic Forces Command. Yes, you heard it right. It's the command chain responsible for controlling and deploying nuclear assets, just like Pakistan has the Army Strategic Forces Command for the same job. While all of this was happening, one of the US surveillance satellites in orbit, most probably USA-245 (KH-11), which is known for optical recon, and PAN/NEMESIS, a classified SIGINT satellite that is usually repositioned over "hot zones" for RF interception, likely detected unusual RF (radio frequency) anomalies or some sort of signal disruptions in that zone. At the same time, it's hard to deny that one of the Chinese Yaogan-30 satellites was likely also being used for SAR imaging in South Asia. And all of this seems like a perfect scenario in which electronic warfare dominance was probably verging on strategic decapitation of India's defence backbone without needing to resort to nuclear posturing. Now, if I combine all of this and notice Indian leadership's reckless behavior over the past many weeks, I'm just visualizing and only speculating that while they were in a complete panic mode after Rafales and S-400s got neutralized by PAF, they might have tried to sidestep normal nuclear command procedures and possibly pushed for a retaliatory stance without full coordination with the Indian military. While I cannot confirm this as a fact, even the signs of such a move could have set off serious alarms in US intelligence circles. From Washington's perspective, this wasn't about preventing any nuclear war. It was about stopping an electronically one-sided escalation by Pakistan. If India had been electronically blinded or silenced while its leadership tried to escalate, it would have resulted in strategic humiliation and potentially irreversible damage to the perception of India's conventional and nuclear deterrence credibility. So, I believe that this was the "alarming intelligence" that made the US intervene immediately because it saw a one-sided escalation forming. Pakistan was electronically prepared, India wasn't, and China was quietly watching and supporting all of this. That's not the kind of power dynamic the US wants exposed. I'm 60-70% confident that my speculation is factually and technically plausible, for the following five reasons: 1. AEW&C presence (ZDK-03 and Erieye) is publicly documented during high-alert periods. Even PAF confirmed during the press briefings that they had AEW&Cs deployed. 2. India's GSAT-based nuclear C2 (Command & Control) vulnerabilities are available online. Just Google it. 3. Pakistan's EW (Electronic Warfare) advancements, especially in jamming and RF targeting, have been heavily upgraded and matured significantly with Chinese cooperation post-2019 India and Pakistan stand-off, when 1 Mig-21 and 1 SU-30MKI were shot down after they were electronically jammed. 4. US ISR tracking capabilities are known to detect signal anomalies or uplink interference in real time. 5. CNN’s framing ("alarming intel" without disclosing nuclear threats) aligns more with real-time electronic or protocol disruptions than nuke posturing. On an ending note, I'll mention once again that this post is my own analytical take based on OSINT, public military data, and discussions with a few domain folks I've access to. I'm not claiming any insider information or any secret leaks. Just using open-source military facts and known doctrinal gaps to explain what may really have triggered the world's most powerful country to step in and call time on a regional conflict before it spiraled into something far worse. I might be wrong, but my instinct says that this logic holds up when I connect the dots. Sometimes, understanding geopolitics isn't about waiting for official narratives. It's about breaking down the story, reading the signals, and knowing when silence says more than headlines. Open to thoughtful critique, insights, or corrections from anyone in the space, especially those who've tracked these domains longer than I have. Let's keep it sharp, factual, and focused. Like, RT, and follow if you found this helpful. #IndiaPakistanWar #BunyanUlMarsoos #OperationSindoor #AlarmingIntelligence #PakistanAirForce #PakistanArmy

@xadeejourno At airport

خوشی کے مارے دل کر رہا ہے واپس پاکستان شفٹ ہو جاؤں

@MaleehaHashmey Or may be she was already traded on the negotiation table during ceasefire talks

DG ISPR: "We don't have any Indian pilot in our custody" Air Vice Marshal Aurangzeb be like: 👇😂😂

@xadeejourno Khawaja Asif thumbs down … thinks he is in a 9pm talk show while talking to intl media … give him a spokesperson please

Hats off to Ata Tarar, Khawaja Asif, Bilawal Bhutto, Moeed Yusuf, Hina Rabbani Khar, Zarrar Khuhro and Ejaz Haider for presenting Pakistan's case on the international media to build a narrative that effectively countered Indian rhetoric #PakistanZindabad