Neeraj pandey

youtube.com/watch?v=ZpCjZE… Life changing meditation video of all time @hmalviya9

@CageIsAlliKnow Would you dm me, Need to talk

The cage is all I know

NEW: Former Pump.fun employee claims the team ran bots that sold right before coins bonded, with profits reinvested due to lack of funding

Great proposal by @UmbraPrivacy Right now, the Meteora pool is badly balanced. ➝ There’s a lot of UMBRA and very little USDC. That creates weak trading conditions. They plan to pull everything out, reset it, and rebuild a healthier pool. ➝ At the same time, they carve out 1M UMBRA to sell directly to selected, aligned investors through OTC deals. ➝ One fund, Theia, already committed $ 300K at $0.45 (paying a premium vs the ~$0.41 current price). If price goes down, they still won’t sell below the $0.41 floor. ➝ After removing liquidity, they rebuild a new pool with ~500K UMBRA and matching USDC. The pool becomes balanced instead of one-sided. ➝ Any excess UMBRA from the extraction gets burned. Any unsold portion of the 1M OTC allocation also gets burned. ➝ All USDC raised goes to the treasury, except what’s needed to seed the new pool. ➝ If the withdrawal doesn’t cover both the 1M OTC allocation and the ~500K for the new pool, they can mint additional UMBRA (capped to the required total).

health is wealth

@AmelkaUstine @kkashi_yt Nope,but what seems easy on screenshots requires deep expertise

@cryptonomics123 @kkashi_yt Bundle?

13 hours ago, multiple wallets ran arbitrage trades on $ANB They turned less than $1 into $60K–$696K+ in a single trade. Multiple times. $ANB went from ~$67M MC down to ~$30M MC. How it worked: $ANB had two pools on Meteora at the same time: 1. A Meteora DAMM v2 pool where $ANB was priced lower. 2. A Meteora DLMM pool where $ANB was priced higher. The bots ran a program called “Arbitrage Bot” / MEV bot to: Buy $ANB on the lower-priced Meteora DAMM v2 pool Sell those same tokens on the higher-priced Meteora DLMM pool Turning less than $1 to $60K–$696K per trade. Two routes were used: $USDC → $ANB → $USDC $USDC → $ANX → $ANB → $USDC Same result either way. Buy on the lower-priced Meteora pool, sell on the higher-priced one. $ANB is the token of Ant_fun_trade but so far nothing mentioned on their twitter yet. Nothing mentioned by them on Twitter so far. Data from solscan transactions and dex trade history.

@hmalviya9 made a arb bot

i created a claude skill yesterday which helped me understanding a generative artwork which went up like 20x in less than 24 hours. thats just one of 12 skills i created. and i will create more. i'm a spiritual head.

Thesis: This century will be about turning fate into choice. Death - Biotech Low intelligence - Neurotech Physical appearance - Gene editing Cancer - CRISPR Disability - Bionics Infertility - IVF Food insecurity - Lab-grown produce Investing in ‘controllable choices’ for previously ‘uncontrollable fates’ will yield trillions in value.

The right person who reads this post will make millions. These are the 3 biggest cultural events to print money in 2026 if you're in AI & crypto. 1. World Cup (biggest sporting event) 2. SpaceX IPO (biggest IPO in history, Elon meme value) 3. GTA6 (most hyped game ever)

Follow @navalpodcast. We are posting more clips there.

@JimmyOrdinals @GunWifonSol @0xlenn @printr So you are an American tout.

@GunWifonSol @0xlenn @printr The fuck is a tout. I’m american.

New podcast on vibe coding - A Return to Code. A Return to Coding 00:20 The Personal App Store 03:17 Vibe Coding Is a Video Game with Real-World Rewards 06:22 Pure Software Is Uninvestable 10:33 A Place for Each Model 14:22 AI Is Eager to Please 17:57 Why Math and Coding? 22:10 The Beginning of the End of Apple’s Dominance 24:17 Coding Agents As Customer Service Reps 27:55

This interview made my next crypto buys stupidly obvious. I just sat down with @hosseeb to discuss the biggest opportunity in crypto right now. The biggest winners of the next 2 years will be from this sector, and the world hasn't caught on yet. Pure alpha - watch here:

if you scared to take a chance, how the fuck we gon get rich?

We evaluate coins all wrong. We love to talk about protocol revenue like we’re analyzing stock market tickers. “Look at the fees.” “Look at the revenue.” “Look at the fundamentals.” Cool. But these are not shares of a company. Most protocols do not pay dividends. Most tokens do not entitle holders to cash flow. Most “governance” is an illusion of shareholder rights, except without the shareholder rights. So why are we larping as TradFi analysts? If a token captures no revenue, controls no meaningful value, and gives holders no enforceable economic claim, then protocol revenue may be great for the protocol, great for insiders, great for validators, great for market makers… But what exactly is it doing for the token holder? That is the question nobody wants to ask. “Utility” gets thrown around the same way. Utility for whom? Utility for the average holder? Utility for the protocol? Utility for the team? Utility for liquidity providers? Utility for insiders who already own the supply? Utility only for the scarce few B2B customers? Because "utility" without broad usage is not a scaleable argument for adoption. A protocol can be useful while its token is structurally useless. A chain can have activity but yet gas fees are so low it doesn't even matter if everyone uses that chain. Not when a $50 purchase of the native coin can be a lifetime of gas fees for the average user. A governance token can have billions in FDV while giving holders the sacred right to vote on proposals that insiders, foundations, delegates, and whales already effectively control. That is not ownership. The real question is not, “Does this protocol make money?” The real question is: Does the token own anything? Does it control anything? Does value actually flow back to the asset? Is there a structural reason the token must appreciate if the protocol succeeds? Or are you just donating exit liquidity to people who figured out token design better than you did? The next phase of crypto valuation needs to move past surface-level “revenue” hype and start asking harder questions about ownership, control, value capture, dilution, supply structure, and who actually benefits when the machine works. Because in crypto, the protocol can win while the token holder loses. And once you see that, you stop asking, “What does this protocol do?” You start asking, “What does this token own?” If a token: Does not act as a scarce store of value Does not have a case for mass-market utility Does not share revenue with holders Then: Be aware you are only bidding on the belief that other bidders will come after you to make the price go up. If you find yourself doing mental gymnastics about what a token actually is in order to justify your bullish posture, it may be time to reevaluate your trade thesis. 🫡 From the depths — The White Whale 🐋

@ocrxa @masterprintr @PrintrDeployr Are these the deployer wallets?

@masterprintr great, ignore your in house deployer and support these max extractor devs they extracted 100k from this while @PrintrDeployr is at 250k

You can now route creator fees to any X user on Printr built by Printr community

@MidCurveMortal Yeah, it's down bad, but I think @printr and @masterprintr intentions are good, trying to fix the trenches. They are at intial phase, we should not be too harsh on them.

Breaking: Top Printr eco token $BELIEF down 60% after it was discovered that it’s entire holderbase was athiest

@MadMaxx_eth How much sol did you send?

But study the irony from millions of memes, I chose the one that turns out to be a rug, a crime, and content material for CT. You can't make this up.

@WhiteWhaleLabs hey @WhiteWhaleLabs, share your thoughts regarding @printr

Has it really come down to this? Not which DeFi protocol has the best security or ops teams but who can get bailed out if stuff goes wrong? Don’t get me wrong - I’m genuinely happy AAVE customers look like they will be made whole. But it sets a very inconsistent standard when the crypto community deems on protocol “too big to fail” because it would be disastrous to the community but a few hundred million here and there from smaller protocols is just a “tough luck” scenario. Why can’t we slow the F down and agree that not every silly asset or asset with a wrapper should be accepted as collateral.

Now this, man, what a shame to be surrounded by these bastards @seyong @tryfomo