CryptoPatrick

633 posts

CryptoPatrick

CryptoPatrick

@cryptopatrick

Mathematics Undergrad @ChalmersUniv 🇸🇪 🦀 Digital Economics | Ai | Seamless Global Systems

Katılım Mayıs 2015
499 Takip Edilen221 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
CryptoPatrick
CryptoPatrick@cryptopatrick·
Patrick's Law "An organism can only create artifacts which are less intelligent than itself."
English
1
0
10
10.3K
CryptoPatrick
CryptoPatrick@cryptopatrick·
Do you think that a remailer-inspired design could work? where the source code is split up into chunks and each chunk is sent to a different model, so that no model has enough to generate the gist of the idea in the source, and the aggregation of translated chunks is then done on the local client?
CryptoPatrick tweet media
English
0
0
0
4
Jeremy Chone
Jeremy Chone@jeremychone·
Been coding all day with DeepSeek V3 Pro (#rustlang). Virtually free compared to Flash 3.5 and GPT-5.5, so it is very good. 1.5x to 2x slower than GPT-5.5, but at 20x to 30x cheaper, I am okay. This is where parallelism is a benefit. #WorkbenchCoding #zcoder
English
2
0
3
217
CryptoPatrick
CryptoPatrick@cryptopatrick·
@jeremychone Thank you! Perhaps I'll try vibe coding something which will break up a larger code base into smaller chunks that can be individually ported with a weaker model, merged, and then tested for correctness. Thanks! I'll have a look at Gemma-sized models.
English
1
0
0
14
Jeremy Chone
Jeremy Chone@jeremychone·
@cryptopatrick I think it will be a little short. With 16 GB included, you won’t be able to run medium-sized models, only Gemma-sized ones. Now 1k LOC is low, so that could be an interesting exercise. But it won’t be time-effective.
English
1
0
1
20
CryptoPatrick
CryptoPatrick@cryptopatrick·
@dbreunig Perhaps something like: icaris - hubris and ungrounded confidence in one's ability, which eventually meets a harsh reality, upon close inspection by the bright light of truth.
English
0
0
0
159
CryptoPatrick
CryptoPatrick@cryptopatrick·
@badlogicgames Just wanted to say thank you for sharing these 'recommended reading' tweets - they always popup when I sit down to drink my morning coffee at campus - a great way to start the day.🕺
CryptoPatrick tweet media
English
0
0
1
36
CryptoPatrick
CryptoPatrick@cryptopatrick·
@ObhishekSaha I'm more concerned about LLMs slowly turning mathematicians into Weight Technicians, and eventually into on-call therapists for depressed AI math agents.😀
English
1
0
7
1.5K
Abhishek Saha
Abhishek Saha@ObhishekSaha·
A mathematician in 2023: This ChatGPT thing is cute and can talk! 2024: It's stupid though and can't really think 2025: It can solve Olympiad problems and any test I set my undergraduate students. Not so useful for deep real maths yet. 2026: Wow it can prove some actual real theorems. But it also makes a lot of slop and it's real hard to tell them apart. 2027: It's like having an army of supersmart, super-knowledgeable junior researchers always at my disposal. 2028: What am I here for? Am I even needed for mathematical progress?(For many mathematicians, the answer will be no) 2029: Wait. Remember what Hardy wrote? "The mathematician’s patterns, like the painter’s or the poet’s must be beautiful; the ideas like the colours or the words, must fit together in a harmonious way. Beauty is the first test: there is no permanent place in the world for ugly mathematics." And this thing doesn't really understand beauty. I am still needed to direct it towards beauty. 2030: Half the Millennium problems and many major open problems have been proven. Unending research directions have opened up. I need to understand what has happened. 2031: And to set future research directions based on my personal vision of importance and beauty. This is a magical time. We are doing things together we never thought possible 2040: Hello, is anyone out there?
Daniel Litt@littmath

Assuming models have complete advantage over human mathematicians in all areas of math (IMO not guaranteed in 15 years, but likely enough), this seems to be a question about the shape of society. Arguably the answer is not at all special to math--presumably the answer is basically the same for all knowledge work (and maybe all professions?). I think in this world the most likely background situation is that humans are not really useful for proving theorems, but nonetheless lots of basic and understandable questions remain open, including many that are open today (since I think these have basically unbounded difficulty). And lots of other questions of basic interest have been resolved. So human activities might include (1) trying to understand solutions, (2) trying to understand progress and obstructions to resolving open questions, (3) (non-rigorously) understanding mathematical phenomena. In all these activities, the purpose of the human is to serve as a locus of understanding. There's an obvious question as to why we would pay someone to do this. One plausible answer is that maybe we want to avoid complete disempowerment--at a minimum we might want people to understand what they can about what the AIs are doing--which requires development of human capital.

English
7
11
109
27.8K
Valerio Capraro
Valerio Capraro@ValerioCapraro·
Finally, a big name has the courage to tell it: we are nowhere near AGI. Demis Hassabis, CEO of Google DeepMind and Nobel laureate for AlphaFold, put it neat and clear: "Today's systems are nowhere near [AGI]. Doesn't matter how many Erdős problems you solve… I think it's far, far from what a true invention, or someone like Ramanujan, would have been able to do." This is the elephant in the room that many AI enthusiasts prefer not to see, or are actively trying to hide. Erdős problems are well defined, often combinatorial, on finite spaces. They are exactly the kind of problems on which current AI can achieve spectacular performance with a lot of compute and knowledge. A neural network can search a huge graph of possibilities. It can recombine existing knowledge at unprecedented scale. It can discover surprising solutions inside an already defined conceptual space. But true invention is something else. True invention is not only solving a problem. It is inventing new objects, new dimensions, new connections. It is inventing new problems. From resolving to inventing there is a discontinuity that we don't know how to bridge. We are making extraordinary tools. But we are nowhere close to AGI.
Valerio Capraro tweet media
English
284
434
2.2K
407.8K
∫aiden
∫aiden@Telekinetic18·
Differential geometry is probably the highest leverage skill to have right now
English
13
31
434
514.5K
CryptoPatrick
CryptoPatrick@cryptopatrick·
US made corresponding technology already exists – drone swarm control and intel mesh with use of AI for target acquisition and improved coordination to penetrate heavily contested Electromagnetic Warfare environments, enabling artillery systems to engage targets with increased hit prob..
CryptoPatrick tweet media
English
0
0
0
8
Mykhailo Rohoza
Mykhailo Rohoza@MykhailoRohoza·
Ukraine has just deployed a battlefield technology that feels like a mix of science fiction and a game of Call of Duty. According to The Times, the Armed Forces of Ukraine have introduced a new system that radically changes the rules of modern warfare. A single operator can now control an entire swarm of drones in real time, see the battlefield through artificial intelligence, receive instant targeting data, and coordinate strikes with sniper-level precision. What once required dozens of personnel and hours of planning can now reportedly happen within seconds. Russian troops are already referring to it as “the Ukrainian digital hell.”
Mykhailo Rohoza tweet media
English
344
3.1K
11.5K
381.8K
CryptoPatrick
CryptoPatrick@cryptopatrick·
Would love to see her play at a lower pace and for the offence to get her even more CnS looks, rather than creating her own shots by getting to her spots after a pass. Anyone who has followed her career knows that Fudd has the potential to become the best perimiter shooter the W has ever seen. However, with Fudd's many knee-injuries and the high pace of play seen in the clip, I'm worried that she's going to re-injure her knees.
English
3
1
6
2.5K
Women’s Hoops Network
Women’s Hoops Network@WomensHoops_USA·
Azzi Fudd tonight 🔥 • 12 points • 3 assists • 6/9 FG
English
51
1.2K
7.8K
235K
NIK
NIK@ns123abc·
🚨 Google DeepMind CEO Sir Demis Hassabis: “Today’s systems, are nowhere near [AGI]. Doesn’t matter how many Erdős problems you solve… I think it’s far, far from what a true invention or someone like a Ramanujan would have been able to do” it’s over for the Erdős hype
English
169
391
4.1K
643.9K
CryptoPatrick
CryptoPatrick@cryptopatrick·
@HemantDotDev Tim hit the snooze button on Apple's "Think Different" alarm. 🥱😴
English
1
0
1
21
CryptoPatrick
CryptoPatrick@cryptopatrick·
@starsallialign Maybe he's balancing two opposites - keeping the fans happy, but also keeping an elite weapon healthy. Azzi hopefully has a long career in front of her and there's no need to rush things - everyone knows she's a generational player.
English
0
0
6
1.6K
Spencer
Spencer@wade_bowen716·
@cryptopatrick @WomensHoops_USA A number one pick shouldn't need an offense built to hide limitations; if she can't create efficiently, the hype might already exceed reality today
English
1
0
0
27
CryptoPatrick
CryptoPatrick@cryptopatrick·
@JustDeezGuy "Not NEARLY enough practitioners today understand this." Well, how many would be enough?
English
1
0
1
21
Paul Snively
Paul Snively@JustDeezGuy·
MacKay is indispensable for explicitly connecting information theory and machine learning—that what’s learned are axioms, i.e. compressed information, and rules of inference decompress information. Not NEARLY enough practitioners today understand this.
Abhinav Upadhyay@abhi9u

I originally learned it from a data compression textbook in college. From ML connection pov, the David MacKay book is well renowned (freely available) There is also a small focused book just on information theory from James Stone. Managing gigabytes also covers it but very much an applicattion book in compression related areas. I think there are many other books/tutorials published on arxiv.

English
3
1
44
3K
Ayyuce Demirbas 🍀
Ayyuce Demirbas 🍀@demirbasayyuce·
A History of the Brain: From Stone Age surgery to modern neuroscience. I only have 70 days until I leave for the US to start my PhD. I’m trying to finish reading all my physical books. I can’t take them with me because luggage space is tight and books are simply too heavy. The worst part is that I can’t stop buying new ones. I bought 6 physical books last month. I really need to switch to e-books immediately.
Ayyuce Demirbas 🍀 tweet media
Goodreads@goodreads

It's Friday! What are you reading this weekend?

English
2
1
13
1K
CryptoPatrick
CryptoPatrick@cryptopatrick·
Yeah, the fact that he's reached full extension and the right hand is nowhere near under the ball should mean he's not transfering power into the ball as well as he could be - but it's hard to tell from one single photo - great shooters can handle lots of challenging (suboptimal) shot-types, with the no-dip three being one. Guide hand looks fine to me.
English
0
0
0
118
Sheldon Wohlman | Utility Sports
Here’s the load up for his shot. Notice his guide hand (his left hand; you’re right looking at this) is too forward in its positioning and will impact the spin preventing backspin His dominant hand being on the side of the ball (especially at this point of his shot) is undoubtedly awful
Sheldon Wohlman | Utility Sports tweet media
English
3
0
8
13.3K
ish
ish@vennictus·
@cryptopatrick this was probability and statistics, done now.
English
1
0
1
22
ish
ish@vennictus·
one last 3 hr thinking session and I'm free from this slavery for the next 2 months... so much caffeine and sleep deprivation that I'm genuinely tweaking rn...
ish tweet media
English
3
0
32
875
WNBA
WNBA@WNBA·
Can't run from admin @paigebueckers1 🤣 📺 DAL-ATL | 7:30pm/ET on ION
English
21
271
3.4K
95K