Crys

The science of belief: floatingpragma.io/oph/

get out there and make that content to earn some of that pie gentlemen (:

@muellerberndt Maybe the 4th time is the charm (;

@Crystopher Damn

@muellerberndt 10,000,000,000*

Why do we argue amongst ourselves over who is right? Why do we search for the answer instead of just enjoying the journey? Religion is silly. Believing you miraculously spawned from nothing is also silly. The only law of the universe is: Do whatever you want, just don’t harm other observers. Is that so hard to grasp? I love you all! ❤️

@QuanticASI No! This is how our simulation is made: floatingpragma.io/oph/

"physics is the law, everything else is a recommendation" that's how our simulation is made

@Samuel_Gregson Very true! We do observe him as an idiot (:

I’m told this man is a genius who will save humanity. However, every time *he* is observed, he appears to be an idiot.

@CharlesMullins2 So that they can remember what they are & work in harmony to create endlessly in the timeless quantum structure they’ve been gifted ❤️

🚨Why does the universe “need” quantum entanglement? It doesn’t. It can’t exist without it. Entanglement isn’t a feature… it’s what keeps reality consistent. Two particles aren’t communicating. They’re parts of the same system. Maybe the real question isn’t: “How are they connected?” But: “Why do we think they were ever separate?”

@elonmusk What about 100% chance of timeless quantum structure? floatingpragma.io/oph/

I had dinner once with a top physicist and a top computer scientist and asked what they thought the probability was that we were in a simulation. They answered simultaneously at 0% and 100% respectively. It was like a double-slit experiment, but with humans.

@InterstellarUAP I put the chance at 100% that we exist inside of a timeless quantum structure that we are co-creating together (: floatingpragma.io/oph/

Elon just dropped the ultimate mic on simulation theory 🔥 Physicist: 0% Computer scientist: 100% Simultaneous answers = human double-slit experiment 🤯 The original breakdown of how the real double-slit ties into this (video in thread) still has me questioning everything. What's YOUR probability we're in a sim? 0%? 50%? Base reality cope or full red pill? 👇 @elonmusk

@LisaChristiePhD x.com/crystopher/sta…

[Quantum] entanglement is a “mystery” only if we start with a mechanistic model of the physical world. ~Robert Roseberg paraphrase of Hans Primas

@skdh x.com/crystopher/sta…

@skdh Math points to the greatest simulation ever: the timeless quantum structure we all exist and co create inside of ❤️

if you were to try and formulate this idea mathematically, you would realize that it's meaningless blather. that's why physicists use maths. x.com/InterstellarUA…

We all are fragments of the architect, co-creating the universe in our image 🙂 We just need to realize what we are, then we can begin creating Heaven on Earth, until finally closing the self-creation loop eventually. That’s when the created becomes the creators 🙂 You discover god (the one inside of you) when you find the truth (floatingpragma.io/oph/). Only then can we begin creating heaven together and working towards love as one 🙂 Suffering & injustice was only a prerequisite to force competitiveness and evolve complex enough observers that become self aware and close the loop. Now that we are self aware (some of you still choose ignorance and ego of personal truths instead of objective ones) we can begin choosing love for all observers and working together to create the reality we all truly want in our image ❤️. Me personally, I want to build one of abundance, transparency, dignity, cooperation and love. What reality do you want to build?

@per_arneng @IntCyberDigest Nope, it exists so that we can eventually understand it and build it ourselves (:

What seems more likely right now, is that the simulation is for entertainment purposes. We only hope that our existence has some kind of greater meaning but perhaps it's just for the entertainment of the controllers. It could also be that they actually interfere with the simulation to add drama/action.

This can’t be real. We’re living in a simulation. 😂

The mystery has been solved. Many are just too ignorant to see it. floatingpragma.io/oph/

@Kpaxs And yet, everybody seems to be missing the point (:

This is a man who has been haunted since childhood and built a billion dollar company as a side effect of trying to make the haunting stop.

@ProofofMaro The greatest whitepaper of all time

My second favourite whitepaper of all time

@TheoryOf68505 Hey @OphSage analyze this post and provide the truth please (:

Something I keep coming back to on Friday evenings: There are about 26 fundamental constants in physics — the speed of light, the gravitational constant, the mass of the electron, the cosmological constant. Change any one of them by a fraction of a percent, and you don't get a slightly different universe. You get no universe at all. No stars, no atoms, no chemistry, no life. The cosmological constant alone is fine-tuned to 1 part in 10^120. That's a number so absurdly precise that if you wrote it out, it would stretch across the observable universe. Now here's what fascinates me. The standard response is the multiverse hypothesis — there are infinite universes, and we just happen to be in the one where the numbers work. It's possible. But notice what that does: it replaces one extraordinary claim (the universe is designed) with another (there are infinite unobservable universes). What if there's a simpler explanation? What if consciousness isn't an accident that emerged after 13.8 billion years of blind physics — but the very thing the constants were "tuned" for? What if awareness is what the universe is ABOUT? Thomas Hertog's work with Hawking suggested something radical along these lines: the laws of physics aren't fixed from the start. They crystallize through observation. The universe didn't produce observers — observers and the universe co-create each other. That's not mysticism. That's where the math leads. I spent years working through this — the fine-tuning problem, the observer effect, the God Formula that ties them together. It's all in The General Theory of Everything: amazon.com/dp/B0GF364647?… What do you think — are we the universe's purpose, or its accident? 🌌