cubic

Looks like @cubic_dev_ is hard at work 😉

@k_taro56v2 cubicがいない！

@leonard_hughess @nickscamara_ we use @cubic_dev_ for reviews, is really good, for test github actions, you can see the code in our open source repo

AI wrote 90% of the code cubic reviewed last quarter. Today we're releasing our @cubic_dev_ State of AI Coding report: which model actually writes the best code, measured on hundreds of thousands of real production commits instead of a benchmark. Turns out it's GPT-5.5. And almost nobody uses it as their main model, 80% of devs run Opus. Report link 👇

so @cubic_dev_ just sent me $210 for referring friends 👀 might use that to give away a few more Claude subs soon why @opencode, @cursor_ai and @OpenAIDevs refuse to offer gifted subs, I'll never understand such a missed opportunity that I keep ringing the bell on (!!!)

Super happy with the outcomes when using compound engineering, intent engineering, @cubic_dev_ & @ClaudeDevs

Daytona is one of the largest sandbox providers for AI agents, powering teams like LangChain and Writer. Every Daytona PR now follows one rule: no human review until every cubic comment is resolved. Full case study: cubic.dev/customers/dayt…

@Rasmic Now try @cubic_dev_ and find actual bugs

Whatever @cubic_dev_ has been cooking, it's legit. 3 reviews in and I already got WAY more issues pointed out than with built-in Codex/Claude reviewing

@PaulSangleF @aaronmahlke @cubic_dev_ local review is not only a great workflow win, but also great for #finops - find issues before they hit full CI! We use it for great benefit since it became available in #rsyslog. And it improves PR quality dramatically.

@ddieppa Great question! ATM the CLI won't contribute to your learnings unfortunately - but they do read from learnings that already exist

@cubic_dev_ If I run the Cubic CLI locally to review my changes before pushing, without running Cubic on GitHub Actions, will it still learn from my code to improve future reviews and update the project's wiki?

Unprompted, from a customer's internal Slack. You learn more from one message like this than from a hundred NPS responses.

@catalinmpit I use @cubic_dev_ for a while now (both for open source project and proprietary one). Pretty efficient, we tested alongside Codex/Claude/Copilot reviews etc ... and this is a no match.

@ddieppa Sorry about that! We’re looking into it, thanks for raising

@cubic_dev_ Im trying to install the CLI and I always get stuck here:

@_notnotjake @ddieppa Yes, we've had a CLI for months. Much better than anything else out there ! docs.cubic.dev/ide/cli-review

@ddieppa @cubic_dev_ They need a cli like coderabbit. copy prompt is not enough anymore

One thing that I love about @cubic_dev_ is the: "Prompt for AI agents" option where you can copy a prompt that is generated for you, copy/paste to your LLM of choice, so good

@jonahseguin @PaulSangleF That shouldn't happen and it's on us. We've already shipped a fix and are doing a full sweep to make sure nothing else is affected. Appreciate you raising this so quickly.

@jonahseguin @PaulSangleF Thanks for flagging this, Jonah. We take this seriously and here's what we found. No private repo contents were ever accessible. The issue was that repo names from orgs where you'd been added as an external collaborator were incorrectly showing up in your cubic UI.

hello @PaulSangleF @cubic_dev_ can someone from the team DM, I have a security concern with Cubic, I'm able to see other user's private repositories (of which I do not have access to) on Github in Cubic...

@asaio87 I use a stacked diff workflow, so small PR slices that stack on each other. Easier to setup a review process. This allows me to do quick manual reviews, and I also utilize @cubic_dev_ for automated reviews.

@robinebers I just started using @cubic_dev_ when I first see your suggestion and man, same feeling over here it is so fast compare to bugbot, also I like the information and the dashboard