Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Paul
688 posts
Paul
@PaulSangleF
Founder at https://t.co/UUeydPyIis (YC X25) AI code reviews for complex codebases
San Francisco Katılım Temmuz 2013
4K Takip Edilen1.5K Takipçiler
Paul retweetledi
@ferron_web if bugbot and @cubic_dev_ are silent
so am i
🤫
English
Paul retweetledi
Excited to share that @lmnrai has raised $3M to build open-source observability for long-running AI agents.
Laminar is how companies like @browser_use, @OpenHandsDev, and Rye see what their agents are doing, understand why they fail, and spot patterns across millions of runs.
English
English
all code review startups should use @nozomioai because what the fuck is that??
the reason Nia’s most popular use case is in software engineering is that web search alone will not save your agents from hallucinating API docs.
if you are a code review company, i am willing to give you $1,000 worth of credits so you can try and roast our product.
English
Paul retweetledi
Paul retweetledi
Paul retweetledi
One of cubic's best features is that it dynamically reads the relevant docs for the code you're reviewing.
Glad to see cubic right at the top of the leaderboard 🚀
Mikeysee@mikeysee
I tested 9 code review bots on @convex code to see which would be best, the results were actually quite surprising!
English
Paul retweetledi
If you're using AI tools and care about complete error coverage, optimization, and security, you absolutely must use @cubic_dev_ Pro and codebase scan. I can't even tell you how much tokens and hassle this saved.
English
Review 2 PRs for $37 this morning. Took 9 minutes on a 8 line template change, removing some unnecessary info, got a tiny nitpick out of it. Then 30 mins on a 15 file (+331/-153) PR where it missed the actual bug introduced, which manual review found quickly. Turning off for now.
Claude@claudeai
Introducing Code Review, a new feature for Claude Code. When a PR opens, Claude dispatches a team of agents to hunt for bugs.
English
Paul retweetledi
English
Paul retweetledi
Paul retweetledi
Maybe its just me, but I'm not sure why more players in the code review space aren't focusing on the steps *before* the pr. I want to know about bugs in my code before I push them to github, personally. @cubic_dev_ is doing great in this area
English
Paul retweetledi
anthropic once again with ridiculous pricing
why anyone would use this when there is @cursor_ai BugBot and @cubic_dev_ is beyond
these will do an arguably better job due to access to OpenAI models, while saving money
Claude@claudeai
Code Review optimizes for depth and may be more expensive than other solutions, like our open source GitHub Action. Reviews generally average $15–25, billed on token usage, and they scale based on PR complexity.
English
Paul retweetledi
Just merged in a PR by an openclaw bot for @inboxzero_ai.
After getting analyzed by @cubic_dev_.
What a world we're living in.
English
Just added @greptile to my @garryslist repo and... wow how did Iive without you Greptile?
English
introducing @nozomioai sync.
your local files, searchable by AI agents.
notes, code, imessage, browser history, spreadsheets - all indexed.
four commands to set up. real-time sync. privacy first.
English
Alright jig is up, @superset_sh is joining @ycombinator 🟧
We're 3 ex-YC CTOs building the IDE for the AI agents era. We're helping every engineer run 100 agents in parallel.
If you're a former founder, come join us!
@saddle_paddle @avimakesrobots
English