
Matt Clearing
267 posts




If I lived in Makerfield, I would not vote for Andy Burnham. He is a better spoken than Starmer, but will bring us to the same place. I would vote Green for a brighter future. Let me explain,.. 🔗 open.substack.com/pub/harryeccle…






Makerfield was Andy Burnham’s back up plan. For Robert Kenyon, it’s his home. This battle will be David Vs Goliath.

***EXCLUSIVE*** Andy Burnham fully rules out changing Rachel Reeves’ fiscal rules if he becomes PM At the weekend his team had left it open whether he might change them in future But tonight his spokesperson tells Bloomberg he is explicitly ruling out any changes to the existing fiscal rules AND crucially Burnham is now also ruling out exempting defence spending from the fiscal rules to spend more on the military He had floated that idea in a Bloomberg interview a few weeks ago but his spokesperson tonight says he won’t pursue it This is a big attempt by Burnham’s campaign team to reassure markets who were spooked on Friday by his potential premiership But it may risk disappointing some on the left who had hoped for a more radical fiscal policy It may also mean tax rises are the likely main revenue raiser in the event Burnham wants to increase spending




One of the most effective bits of political communication on the left I’ve seen in a long time. A message and a powerful messenger.



🚨 NEW: The Green Party has confirmed they will stand a candidate in the Makerfield by-election


Andy Burnham now now says: 1. I will stick to Rachael Reeves’ fiscal rules. 2. I will not seek to rejoin the EU. Two U-turns in one day. What exactly would he do differently?





🚨 NEW: Andy Burnham responds to Reform's Luke Campbell praising him "I would say the same about Luke. We need a bit more decency in politics and much less vitriol"













