ilias

275 posts

ilias

ilias

@curiousity_path

npub1jwt4k7atq2ky6uv8my2s70rsw9mf72vfpy9fhyn4paq9kfsq2upqqr23qa

Katılım Nisan 2024
57 Takip Edilen17 Takipçiler
ilias
ilias@curiousity_path·
@lex139173 @r0ktech If you’re using these tools to get lef/right opinions, you’re using them the wrong way.
English
1
0
67
2K
lex
lex@lex139173·
@curiousity_path @r0ktech if you want any non leftwing opinion grok is the only viable option and its not even that bad, i think its better than deepseek and gemini
English
4
0
11
2.5K
ilias
ilias@curiousity_path·
@kshvbgde Am I the only one who felt that claude was really dumbed down today?
English
0
0
1
65
keshav
keshav@kshvbgde·
Claude Sonnet and Opus usage limits went back to normal after they dropped support for OpenClaw
English
69
81
4.1K
359K
Harris Lee
Harris Lee@HarrisL74560491·
@Platypuss_10 Then, the Su35 is in a perfection position to be shot down.
English
19
0
45
15.3K
Chauhan
Chauhan@Platypuss_10·
One of the Greatest Footage of all time - F-16 intercepting a Russian Tu-95 gets "headbutted" by a Russian Su-35!
English
109
736
7.4K
1.1M
ilias
ilias@curiousity_path·
@ShaykhSulaiman Never forget, France was instrumental in Libya.
English
0
0
0
73
Sulaiman Ahmed
Sulaiman Ahmed@ShaykhSulaiman·
BREAKING: MACRON ON IRAN: Iran is a very bad regime no discussion about that. I disagree with them on a lot of topics. But I don’t believe that we will fix the situation just by bombings or by military operations. Look at what happened with this type of operation in Iraq, in Afghanistan, in Libya, we never delivered. Never. Even after 20 years. So you have to respect the sovereignty of people. If people want to change a regime, they want to react, step up, they can do so.
English
102
262
1.6K
124.9K
RT
RT@RT_com·
TUCKER CARLSON SOFT-LAUNCHING CANADA 51ST STATE?! 'Our most CRITICAL ALLY — IGNORED, HUGE oil reserves, OPPRESSING its own CITIZENS...' 'NOT a SOVEREIGN COUNTRY — DEFINITELY could argue for REGIME CHANGE' 'If anyone needs liberation… IT'S THE CANADIANS!'
English
1.4K
2.5K
10.4K
558.5K
Harrison Faulkner
Harrison Faulkner@Harry__Faulkner·
Pierre Poilievre says Canada should not develop nuclear weapons. Q: Do you think Canada should have nuclear weapons? Poilievre: I don't see a need for that. I don't know what we would get from it. We don't have any desire to threaten anyone with nuclear weapons, so I don't see a purpose for that right now.
English
124
52
643
87.6K
ilias
ilias@curiousity_path·
@xomoc @Harry__Faulkner “So why give ‘em back? Safety, cash, and pressure.” And the fact that it’s not theirs. By that logic, Turkey can call dibs on the nukes that the US currently has on their territory.
English
1
0
0
23
Garry Horn
Garry Horn@xomoc·
Ukraine had Soviet nukes. Like, the world’s third-largest arsenal just sitting there: missiles, warheads, bombers. Ukraine didn’t really control ’em—Russia had the codes—but they were on Ukrainian soil. So why give ‘em back? Safety, cash, and pressure. Ukraine couldn’t afford upkeep, feared accidents, wanted Western ties. Russia wanted ‘em gone too. Talks dragged—Trilateral Statement in ninety-four, then the big one: Budapest Memorandum. December fifth, nineteen ninety-four. Clinton, Yeltsin, Ukraine’s Kuchma sign it. Ukraine joins non-proliferation treaty, ships everything to Russia for scrap. In return? Russia, US, UK promise: no threats, respect borders, no force. Ukraine gets aid, fuel from recycled uranium.
English
1
0
0
46
ilias
ilias@curiousity_path·
@xomoc @Harry__Faulkner Ukraine didn’t give up its nukes, those were soviet nukes positioned in Ukraine.
English
1
0
1
42
Garry Horn
Garry Horn@xomoc·
I dont belive we could secure a nuclear weapon long enough to use it effectively against the USA. There is the example of Ukraine giving up nukes and later being attacked and maybe they could have supported the maintenance and security of nuclear weapons, I dont believe Canada is able to do that. More importantly even if we could I think it is foolish to pursue this path it solves nothing. Better in my opinon to persue our goals through means that might actually bear fruit, being an trustworthy agent of dialogue.
English
2
0
2
2.6K
Johnny
Johnny@Johnny119934·
Ronaldo X Dua Lipa
Português
113
171
3.2K
953.3K
ilias
ilias@curiousity_path·
@itestinprd @yacineMTB The best use case that I found for claude so far, is that if you have a large workload of small tasks of a similar nature and you’re able to come up with a strict architecture and validation flow, you can save a lot of time, and I mean months.
English
1
0
0
24
Cory Chesebro
Cory Chesebro@itestinprd·
@yacineMTB I didn't believe this until recently, and found it to be absolutely true. Simple dashboards, done easily. Anything you need to actually use your brain for and have long horizon memory? Trash.
English
1
0
1
539
kache
kache@yacineMTB·
If you are doing anything serious you very quickly see the limits of these new AI models
English
330
498
9.3K
386.9K
ilias
ilias@curiousity_path·
@LottoLabs A 3 rtx 3090s build (although ram prices are still crazy) and ssh from a used thinkpad.
English
0
0
1
41
Lotto
Lotto@LottoLabs·
Max M5 128 for 7.5k Or this for 4K?
Lotto tweet media
English
40
1
36
15.4K
ilias
ilias@curiousity_path·
@ShadowofEzra Does Hegseth know how many nations are actually north of the equator? And what does he mean by sovereign nation?
English
0
0
0
39
Shadow of Ezra
Shadow of Ezra@ShadowofEzra·
Pete Hegseth says Donald Trump has drawn a new strategic map from Greenland to the Gulf of America, calling it “Greater North America.” He says every sovereign nation north of the equator is not part of the Global South, but part of the security perimeter in this great neighborhood we all live in. "We call this map the Greater North America.”
English
2.3K
3.2K
10.1K
2.1M
BRICS News
BRICS News@BRICSinfo·
JUST IN: 🇺🇬🇮🇱 Uganda's Military Chief says "any talk of destroying or defeating Israel will bring us into the war. On the side of Israel." "If Tehran dares hit us with missiles. We shall retaliate with our own missiles."
BRICS News tweet mediaBRICS News tweet media
English
6.2K
3.2K
24.8K
3.5M
ilias
ilias@curiousity_path·
@DanielLDavis1 The proposed deal is a very good deal for the US, and a bad one for Iran. Iran will need reparations now, as well as a credible enforcement mechanism. Missile program limitations should not even be mentioned. There should be no restriction on civilian use nuclear infrastructure
English
0
0
0
38
Daniel Davis Deep Dive
Daniel Davis Deep Dive@DanielLDavis1·
These are a very interesting set of terms. They do not correspond well to the defiant terms President Trump declared on February 28 when he announced the start of this war: “We're going to destroy their missiles and raze their missile industry to the ground. It will be totally again obliterated. We're going to annihilate their navy. We're going to ensure that the region's terrorist proxies can no longer destabilize the region or the world and attack our forces…” In these 15 points, there is no mention of missile capacity until some “future time,”, no mention of their navy – most of which remains underground and still fully intact – and no discussion of the 400 kg of reprocessed material. There is also no mention of control of the Strait of Hormuz. Most of these terms Trump could’ve gotten on February 26, when Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner met with the Uranian delegation under the auspices of the Oman Foreign ministry. The cost for this poor decision to choose war, thus far, is 13 dead Americans, 241 wounded Americans, $200 billion in supplementals, the damage or destruction of 17 US military bases or sites in the Middle East, and the Gerald R Ford limping into port, where it will be tied up for over a year in repairs. Our allies have been severely harmed, especially Qatar and the UAE. It is far from certain Iran will accept these terms, but it will not be lost on anyone that Trump rejected the deal on a golden platter before the war started, which could have saved everyone’s life and facilities. This will unequivocally be viewed as a strategic loss to the United States. That being said, I am 100% in agreement with reaching a settlement on any terms we can get at this point, to limit the damage. Should we also reject this diplomatic opportunity and launch any sort of ground operation with the US Marines and 82nd airborne division troops assembling in the region, the cost to the United States will be incalculable.
Sulaiman Ahmed@ShaykhSulaiman

BREAKING: U.S PROPOSE 15 POINT PLAN TO IRAN TO END THE WAR 1. Removal of all sanctions on Iran. 2. US assistance in advancing and developing a civilian nuclear project (electricity generation). 3. Removal of the threat of sanctions being reimposed. 4. Iran’s nuclear programme is frozen under a defined framework. 5. Enriched uranium to remain, but under supervision and agreed limits. 6. Missile programme to be addressed at a later stage, with limits on quantity and range. 7. Use of nuclear programmes restricted to civilian/defensive purposes only. 8. Development of existing nuclear capabilities halted. 9. No further expansion of enrichment capabilities. 10. No production of weapons-grade nuclear material on Iranian soil. 11. All enriched material to be handed over to the IAEA within an agreed timeline. 12. Natanz, Isfahan and Fordow to be taken out of use (destroyed). 13. International monitoring and verification mechanisms enforced. 14. Gradual implementation tied to compliance. 15.Additional regional and security understandings between the parties.

English
88
103
407
66.4K
ilias
ilias@curiousity_path·
@FroemelAndy @ShaykhSulaiman It’s a bad deal. Remove the mention of missile program, anything related to the destruction of civillian nuclear use infrastructure, then it’s a decent deal if there is a mechanism in place to prevent the next US president or this one from violating it.
English
0
0
2
61
Andy froemel
Andy froemel@FroemelAndy·
@ShaykhSulaiman This is a great deal. This is the end of the greater Israel project and stops a disastrous American invasion. I hope Trump and Iran agree to it.
English
8
0
14
1.8K