d1pp3r.eth

329 posts

d1pp3r.eth banner
d1pp3r.eth

d1pp3r.eth

@d1pp3r_eth

onchain detective work · charts & breakdowns i make myself · signal over hype · entrepreneur mindset

Katılım Aralık 2025
211 Takip Edilen66 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
d1pp3r.eth
d1pp3r.eth@d1pp3r_eth·
update / correction. i was wrong on the main point. dug back into it after @BenderLoop pushed me. the deployer isn't a "memecoin factory." it made exactly ONE launch ever ($WALLET), holds zero, never bought or sold. the 50+ tokens in the wallet aren't its creations, i misread that. and the trail is deeper than i gave it credit for: it funded Vlad's demo wallet 18 days before that wallet was public, was on Robinhood Chain at block 1009 pre-launch, and bankrolled the internal TSLA test cluster. that's pre-knowledge, not dust. credit to @whisper_alpha and @the_boss_crypto who did the real tx-by-tx work. still no official confirmation, and "insider trail" cuts both ways on risk. but my original framing was wrong and i'm not going to pretend otherwise. corrected.
d1pp3r.eth@d1pp3r_eth

CT is screaming "insider token" about $WALLET on Robinhood Chain. the pitch: its metadata quotes a Vlad Tenev tweet word for word, so Robinhood insiders must be behind it. 100x incoming. so i opened the block explorer instead of the timeline. here's what's actually there. yes, the token is real: "Robinhood Wallet (WALLET)", 3,591 holders, contract live on Robinhood Chain. that part checks out. it was minted in one transaction on Jul 9, full 1B supply plus a Uniswap V3 LP created in the same tx. standard launch mechanics, nothing magic. now the deployer. this is where the insider story dies. the wallet that created $WALLET is a smart-contract account holding 50+ different tokens. not one special Robinhood coin, fifty of them. sitting right next to $WALLET in that same wallet: COCO, Robinhood Pepe (REPE), and a pile of other memes. its ETH balance? $83. that's not a Ribbit insider sitting on a secret official launch. that's a technical deployer spraying dozens of memecoins, and $WALLET is just one of them. the Tenev quote in the metadata? it only proves whoever made it read his tweet. same guy also made a frog called Robinhood Pepe. context matters. none of this means $WALLET can't pump. memes pump on vibes. but "insider-confirmed 100x" is a story someone tells you right before you become their exit. read the explorer, not the hype. all of this is public, verify it yourself. screenshots: Robinhood Chain explorer, contract 0x0339f5459FC690aC85F1782e15782A151b4A9E1b disclosure: no position. DYOR, not financial advice.

English
11
10
49
16.2K
d1pp3r.eth
d1pp3r.eth@d1pp3r_eth·
@MopHandel Crazy that intellectual honesty looks like AI to you
English
1
0
0
20
d1pp3r.eth
d1pp3r.eth@d1pp3r_eth·
been looking at $WALLET and it rhymes with $TIBBIR. not the same thing, but the shape is worth showing TIBBIR: stealth launched on base jan 2025. fair launch, 1B supply, deployed through micky malka's public wallet. micky = founder of ribbit capital, the VC behind robinhood, revolut, nubank. ribbit never officially claimed it, but the community reads the whole trail as a stealth ribbit play it ran to a ~$430M ATH on that narrative, now ~$112M. dev wallet did $1M+ in fees and even bought a cryptopunk on its own now $WALLET on robinhood chain: stealth launch, metadata quoting vlad, deployer with pre-public access, same robinhood/ribbit orbit, same "insider stealth" narrative, no official claim look at the two charts. tibbir already ran the full cycle, months of it. wallet just did its first pump and fade in days. same shape, fast forwarded being honest about the difference: tibbir's on daily, wallet's on hourly, and tibbir has a documented trail to malka's wallet that wallet doesn't have yet. so this is "same pattern," not "same team confirmed" but if you traded tibbir early, wallet's chart should look familiar. that's the whole point nfa, pattern-matching not proof. dyor
d1pp3r.eth tweet media
English
8
6
38
4.1K
d1pp3r.eth
d1pp3r.eth@d1pp3r_eth·
that's actually a fair point on the method. full-cycle vs 3 days isn't apples to apples, i flagged the timeframe but you're right that first 3 days vs first 3 days would've been the cleaner comparison might redo it that way. the pattern point stands but your version tests it better. good push
English
1
0
0
52
MopHandle
MopHandle@MopHandel·
@d1pp3r_eth I didnt say you said those things....... Im saying your comparison is silly - your comparing a 3 day old chart, to a year old chart......thats retarded.... If you want to compare the charts.....compare the first three days of each. 1 year vs 3 days is not comparable
English
1
0
4
84
d1pp3r.eth
d1pp3r.eth@d1pp3r_eth·
appreciate the honest write up. you represented my take fairly, including where i was wrong on the deployer the 18-days-pre-public funding and the shared 0x6081 funder are the strongest points, i'll give you that. those are hard to explain away but i'll stay consistent: provable pre-knowledge ≠ confirmed robinhood involvement. the trail is real and it's tightening, no official claim yet though. that's still the honest line good work by whoever's digging. following this
English
0
0
0
42
Zhao | 善渊
Zhao | 善渊@chao_liu_w·
独立验证者用完全不同的方法重新走查了每一条链接,发现了原调查遗漏的线索。结论不是“链条成立”,而是链条比我们以为的还要紧 数据说话 1/ 新发现:一个钱包绑定了所有人 @MopHandel 用 MANTIS x_search API 拉取了全部三条原始推文,然后不信任任何线程内容,直接到 Blockscout 上逐笔独立验证。 他发现了一个之前所有人都没注意到的钱包:0x6081……Fe80 这个钱包做了什么?它首次资助了整个集群的三个关键钱包——向 $WALLET 部署者 0x5427……aa33 转入 0.026 ETH,向 Seong Lee 钱包 0x67be……a405 转入 1.5 ETH,向 Richard Reitzfeld 关联钱包 0xf1a7……275D 转入资金 一条线连 Vlad 演示钱包的注资者 另一条线连 Robinhood 产品负责人的注资者 第三条线连 Robinhood 工程师的注资者 之前我们有三条独立的资金路径,各自指向一位 Robinhood 团队成员。现在,一个共同的源头把三条线全部系在了一起 2/ 创世区块不是7月1日——是4月30日 之前所有人的叙述都把 Robinhood Chain 的起点定在7月1日公开上线。 @MopHandel 的验证纠正了这一点:创世区块实际发生在4月30日 这意味着什么?从4月30日到7月1日,有整整两个月的安静窗口期。无公共 RPC。无公共桥。 普通用户无法进入 部署者在这两个月里做了什么?5月15日第1009区块活动(已知),5月29日又一次链上活动(新发现) 两次。在一条任何人都不该能访问的链上。在任何人知道这条链存在之前 之前我说“部署者比世界早到六周” 现在更准确的说法是:部署者在一条还没向世界开放的链上活动了两个月 3/ 部署者和工程师之间是双向关系 之前我们只知道资金从 Richard Reitzfeld 的钱包流向部署者。 @MopHandel 发现了一个之前被忽略的细节:2026年6月22日,部署者向 Richard Reitzfeld 的主网钱包反向转账。距离 $WALLET 发射仅三周 这不是单向的“工程师给部署者充过一次钱”。这是两个人之间长期、双向的链上互动。部署者不只是被 Richard Reitzfeld 资助过。他们在持续交互。在 $WALLET 发射前夕还在交互 4/ $WALLET 的基础盘在扩大 不在之前文章中的市场数据:持有者数量 3,591 人( @d1pp3r_eth 7月12日验证),ATH 市值 $8.7M,当前市值 ~$4.5M(回撤后震荡),24h 交易量 $4.15M 从发射到3,591个持有者,用了3天 有人可能会说 $4.5M 市值很小。但这恰恰是重点——$TIBBIR 从微型市值到 $440M 峰值,靠的不是开盘就几十万人冲进来。靠的是社区侦探一点一点挖、一点一点验证、一点一点扩散 3,591个人已经在了,链条还在被收紧 5/ Robinhood 生态正在爆炸性增长 $WALLET 的叙事不只靠链上调查 它所处的生态正在以前所未有的速度膨胀:Robinhood Chain 累计 DEX 交易量 $40 亿,24h DEX 交易量峰值 $877M 超越 Ethereum L1 和 Base,链上 ETH 持有钱包超过 500,000,代币化股票持有者超过 40,000(一周内增长 10x),TVL $134M,链上稳定币 $290M,首周交易笔数 1,700万笔来自约 350,000 钱包,DeFi 排名前五 Robinhood Chain 在12天里从零变成 DeFi 前五。DEX 交易量超过 Ethereum 本身。代币化股票持有者一周涨了10倍。四万个人在链上持有 NVIDIA、Apple、Google 的代币化股票 而 Robinhood 刚刚宣布了一件事:AI 交易代理即将进入加密货币交易。70,000+ 账户已经参与 Beta。用户设定策略和限制后,AI 代理可以自动分析市场、构建策略、执行交易 如果 $WALLET 被证实为 Robinhood 的官方代币——这个生态的规模、用户基数和即将上线的 AI 交易能力,会让 $4.5M 市值看起来像一个笑话 反面声音也验证了核心 @d1pp3r_eth 是最知名的质疑者。他说部署者钱包持有50+种代币,ETH 余额仅$83,这只是个“技术部署者在批量发 meme 币”。 但即使是他也承认:“Yes, the token is real: Robinhood Wallet (WALLET), 3,591 holders, contract live on Robinhood Chain.” 而 @nottellingyou73 对他的反驳直击要害:“持有代币 ≠ 创建代币——这个区分是合理的。但提前18天注资 Vlad 演示钱包这一点,无法被反驳。 质疑者可以争论部署者的意图。但提前18天为 Vlad 演示钱包注资这个事实——没有一个质疑者能解释。因为你无法解释。除非你本来就知道那个钱包存在 我为什么继续持有 新数据不是让风险消失了 它让上行场景变得更具体 之前:三条独立资金线分别指向三位 Robinhood 团队成员。现在:一个共同资助源 0x6081……Fe80 把三条线系在一起 之前:部署者在链公开前六周活动。现在:创世区块是4月30日,部署者在两个月的安静窗口内多次活动 之前:关联到一位“产品经理”。现在:Head of Product, Robinhood Crypto. 之前:工程师单向资助部署者。现在:双向交互,发射前三周还在转账 之前:社区研究者声称链条成立。现在:完全独立的第三方验证者用不同方法重查后说“链条更强”。 每一项新发现都在收紧同一个方向。没有一项在削弱它。 而与此同时,Robinhood Chain 在12天内冲到 DeFi 前五,$40亿交易量,50万钱包,4万代币化股票持有者,AI 交易代理即将上线 $WALLET 市值 $4.5M. ATH $8.7M. $TIBBIR 峰值 $440M。关联的是 MickyMalka $WALLET 关联的是 Robinhood——上市公司、自有区块链、CEO、产品负责人、工程师、50万链上用户、即将上线的 AI 交易代理。 我继续持有,新证据只让我更坚定
Zhao | 善渊@chao_liu_w

昨晚 $wallet遭遇了一次猛烈回撤 大量交易者像海啸一样集中清仓退出,价格被直接“核爆” 部分资金轮动到了 $1,但轮动者大概率已经在那笔操作中亏损 但我认为这恰恰是一次教科书级别的洗盘 数据说话。所有地址可查 一、最大持有者在干什么?——先砸后吸 $wallet 最大个人持有者(链上第三大钱包,仅次于 Uniswap 合约和销毁地址) 钱包地址: 0x058f346e53c21e55a6e48893e6af443c45101037 DeBank 主页: debank.com/profile/0x058f… 操作细节: • 先小额卖出,制造恐慌 • 随后反向买入约 4.6M $wallet • 加仓后总持仓达到接近 26M $wallet 注意:该钱包在 DeBank 上标记为 Protocol: Definitive——也就是说,这个“最大个人持有者”实际上是 DefinitiveFi 协议的钱包。这不是某个散户在赌,这是机构在用协议资金建仓。 先卖一小笔,再买回一大笔。这是什么?这是制造恐慌,压低价格,然后在自己制造的恐慌中吸筹。 二、不止一个大户在逆势加仓 另一位大额持有者同步操作 钱包地址: 0x32a1f3b5af48eba238b13be0704e80a14cd10a22 DeBank 主页: debank.com/profile/0x32a1…0a22 操作细节: • 买入约 4M $wallet • 加仓后总持仓达到接近 11.4M base:0x0bbbead62f7647ae8323d2cb243a0db74b7c2b80 DeBank 交易记录显示,该钱包在回撤期间通过 SigmaSwap 进行了多笔连续买入,单笔 0.4-1 ETH 不等,分批吃进 base:0x0bbbead62f7647ae8323d2cb243a0db74b7c2b80: • 0.5 ETH → +217,817 base:0x0bbbead62f7647ae8323d2cb243a0db74b7c2b80 • 0.5 ETH → +223,265 base:0x0bbbead62f7647ae8323d2cb243a0db74b7c2b80 • 0.5 ETH → +228,899 base:0x0bbbead62f7647ae8323d2cb243a0db74b7c2b80 • 0.4 ETH → +204,260 base:0x0bbbead62f7647ae8323d2cb243a0db74b7c2b80 • 0.5 ETH → +260,537 base:0x0bbbead62f7647ae8323d2cb243a0db74b7c2b80 • 0.5 ETH → +263,536 base:0x0bbbead62f7647ae8323d2cb243a0db74b7c2b80 • 0.5 ETH → +270,821 base:0x0bbbead62f7647ae8323d2cb243a0db74b7c2b80 • 0.5 ETH → +273,761 base:0x0bbbead62f7647ae8323d2cb243a0db74b7c2b80 • 0.5 ETH → +273,154 base:0x0bbbead62f7647ae8323d2cb243a0db74b7c2b80 • 0.5 ETH → +284,090 base:0x0bbbead62f7647ae8323d2cb243a0db74b7c2b80 • 1.0 ETH → +515,819 base:0x0bbbead62f7647ae8323d2cb243a0db74b7c2b80 • 1.0 ETH → +530,051 base:0x0bbbead62f7647ae8323d2cb243a0db74b7c2b80 • 1.0 ETH → +525,569 base:0x0bbbead62f7647ae8323d2cb243a0db74b7c2b80 这不是一次性梭哈。这是有人在系统性地、一笔一笔地、用 DCA 的方式在恐慌中持续吸筹 散户在恐慌逃离,大户在恐慌中一笔一笔地积累 三、机构级资金早已布局 base:0x0bbbead62f7647ae8323d2cb243a0db74b7c2b80 是被 @DefinitiveFi 验证并标记为收藏的四个代币之一。 更关键的是:DefinitiveFi 的客户同时占据 base:0x0bbbead62f7647ae8323d2cb243a0db74b7c2b80 的 第3和第4大持仓钱包。 而我们在第一节看到,第一大个人持有者 0x058f...1037 在 DeBank 上直接标记为 Protocol: Definitive 这不是巧合。这是机构级资金通过专业协议在 base:0x0bbbead62f7647ae8323d2cb243a0db74b7c2b80 上建立的集中头寸。他们研究了链上数据,做了尽调,然后用真金白银建立了前四大持仓中的两个位置。 四、基本面变了吗?——一条都没变 回撤改变的是什么?价格,仅此而已 以下所有链上事实,昨晚回撤前后完全相同 ✅ 部署者钱包 0x542718C390Ef1E4bEB46ce2023FfaA627db8aa33 拥有近两年交易历史 ✅ 资金追溯至 Robinhood 高级 iOS 工程师 Richard Reitzfeld(richiereitz.eth) ✅ 部署者在 Vlad 演示钱包公开前18天就完成注资 ✅ 第二注资者关联 Robinhood 产品经理 Seong Lee(seonglee.eth) ✅ 部署者在 Robinhood Chain 第1009区块活动——无公共路径,只有内部人员 ✅ 部署者三次资助 TSLA 代币化测试集群 ✅ 发射特征异常干净——仅一个代币、零持仓、零买卖 ✅ Robinhood 控制着 crumbs.robinhood.com,页面写着“I‘ve left a trail” 链上数据不会因为价格下跌而消失 结论 昨晚的回撤不是基本面崩坏——基本面一条都没变 变的是:不坚定的筹码被洗出去了,大户在低位拿到了更多 最大持有者 0x058f...1037(Definitive 协议钱包)加仓至 ~26M 另一大户 0x32a1…0a22 通过 SigmaSwap 分13+笔连续买入,加仓至 ~11.4M DefinitiveFi 客户占据 #3#4 持仓 整个链上证据链完好无损 当散户在恐慌中卖出,机构在恐慌中用 DCA 一笔一笔买入——你应该站在哪一边 我继续看好

中文
16
1
12
509
d1pp3r.eth
d1pp3r.eth@d1pp3r_eth·
@MopHandel So it just a comparison bro, I dont make you run to buy $wallet and i not saying it a clone of $tibbir
English
2
0
3
516
MopHandle
MopHandle@MopHandel·
@d1pp3r_eth bruh stop..... Tibbir 1 year+ worth of move vs 3 days for wallet.....stfu about shapes lol
English
1
0
5
307
d1pp3r.eth
d1pp3r.eth@d1pp3r_eth·
@anon_xbt90 u wrong the price collapsed because most of the whales came out of position
English
0
0
0
87
anon
anon@anon_xbt90·
@d1pp3r_eth Mf was fudding for an entry. Du echsenmensch
English
1
0
0
130
d1pp3r.eth
d1pp3r.eth@d1pp3r_eth·
d1pp3r.eth@d1pp3r_eth

update / correction. i was wrong on the main point. dug back into it after @BenderLoop pushed me. the deployer isn't a "memecoin factory." it made exactly ONE launch ever ($WALLET), holds zero, never bought or sold. the 50+ tokens in the wallet aren't its creations, i misread that. and the trail is deeper than i gave it credit for: it funded Vlad's demo wallet 18 days before that wallet was public, was on Robinhood Chain at block 1009 pre-launch, and bankrolled the internal TSLA test cluster. that's pre-knowledge, not dust. credit to @whisper_alpha and @the_boss_crypto who did the real tx-by-tx work. still no official confirmation, and "insider trail" cuts both ways on risk. but my original framing was wrong and i'm not going to pretend otherwise. corrected.

QME
0
0
0
24
HUMANbeingET
HUMANbeingET@humanbeingET·
@d1pp3r_eth This post makes little sense. You’re conflating things. Not saying wallet is real but what you’re saying is wrong.
English
2
0
2
54
d1pp3r.eth
d1pp3r.eth@d1pp3r_eth·
CT is screaming "insider token" about $WALLET on Robinhood Chain. the pitch: its metadata quotes a Vlad Tenev tweet word for word, so Robinhood insiders must be behind it. 100x incoming. so i opened the block explorer instead of the timeline. here's what's actually there. yes, the token is real: "Robinhood Wallet (WALLET)", 3,591 holders, contract live on Robinhood Chain. that part checks out. it was minted in one transaction on Jul 9, full 1B supply plus a Uniswap V3 LP created in the same tx. standard launch mechanics, nothing magic. now the deployer. this is where the insider story dies. the wallet that created $WALLET is a smart-contract account holding 50+ different tokens. not one special Robinhood coin, fifty of them. sitting right next to $WALLET in that same wallet: COCO, Robinhood Pepe (REPE), and a pile of other memes. its ETH balance? $83. that's not a Ribbit insider sitting on a secret official launch. that's a technical deployer spraying dozens of memecoins, and $WALLET is just one of them. the Tenev quote in the metadata? it only proves whoever made it read his tweet. same guy also made a frog called Robinhood Pepe. context matters. none of this means $WALLET can't pump. memes pump on vibes. but "insider-confirmed 100x" is a story someone tells you right before you become their exit. read the explorer, not the hype. all of this is public, verify it yourself. screenshots: Robinhood Chain explorer, contract 0x0339f5459FC690aC85F1782e15782A151b4A9E1b disclosure: no position. DYOR, not financial advice.
d1pp3r.eth tweet media
English
10
5
36
30.3K
Oddy. 🧲
Oddy. 🧲@ooddyyx·
Whales are loading up on $WALLET because they simply understand what’s coming. This whale has spent over 50k in the last 24 hours accumulating.
Oddy. 🧲 tweet media
English
2
2
27
1.9K
d1pp3r.eth
d1pp3r.eth@d1pp3r_eth·
@prxper_sol Chinese friends i hope everything will be smooth and we will go down in story
English
0
0
1
26
Prxper 🧩
Prxper 🧩@prxper_sol·
The bulls on $wallet are coming back out. The Chinese even seem to be speculating wallet is still bullish 👀 I've been combing the first several hundred buys for $wallet and everything looks good. Looks like a completely fair launch so far.
English
3
2
32
1.1K
d1pp3r.eth
d1pp3r.eth@d1pp3r_eth·
@Trafik88 maybe. the pattern says fomo could come. but tibbir also spent months bleeding after its run, not just pumping. so if it rhymes, it rhymes both ways, up and down. i'm watching, not calling a moon
English
0
0
1
198
𝔊𝔥𝔬𝔰𝔱
𝔊𝔥𝔬𝔰𝔱@_0xghost_·
Right but if they never claim, what’s the point. Then the entire thesis is dead. Thesis isn’t based on a random deployer.
d1pp3r.eth@d1pp3r_eth

@_0xghost_ robinhood files 8-Ks constantly, just never for a memecoin on their own chain. an 8-K covers the company's own events, not what random deployers launch on top. $WALLET only triggers one if robinhood officially claims it. that's the real bar, not the filing

English
8
0
19
8.5K
d1pp3r.eth
d1pp3r.eth@d1pp3r_eth·
@_0xghost_ robinhood files 8-Ks constantly, just never for a memecoin on their own chain. an 8-K covers the company's own events, not what random deployers launch on top. $WALLET only triggers one if robinhood officially claims it. that's the real bar, not the filing
English
1
0
8
7.6K
𝔊𝔥𝔬𝔰𝔱
𝔊𝔥𝔬𝔰𝔱@_0xghost_·
Hey guys, I’ll tell you what, you can front run me all you want. The moment the 8-K filing goes through, I am blasting a house into $WALLET. Until then, you can have it all you want lmao. Happy waiting.
𝔊𝔥𝔬𝔰𝔱 tweet media
English
23
4
59
12.1K
d1pp3r.eth
d1pp3r.eth@d1pp3r_eth·
@the_boss_crypto @BenderLoop means a lot coming from you, you did the real tx-by-tx work on this. aligned it is: trail's provable, Robinhood involvement isn't, and no confirmation yet. following your stuff from here
English
1
0
2
136
𝕮𝖗𝖞𝖕𝖙𝖔 𝕭𝕺𝖘𝖘𝕿𝕺𝕹 👑💎
Respect for updating publicly that's rare and it's exactly how this should work. You dug back in, checked the tx, corrected. That's more credible than never being wrong. And you're right on the nuance that matters: pre-knowledge trail is real, but "insider" cuts both ways on risk and there's still no official confirmation. Pre-public access = provable, Robinhood involvement = not. We're aligned.
English
1
0
4
191
d1pp3r.eth
d1pp3r.eth@d1pp3r_eth·
update / correction. i was wrong on the main point. dug back into it after @BenderLoop pushed me. the deployer isn't a "memecoin factory." it made exactly ONE launch ever ($WALLET), holds zero, never bought or sold. the 50+ tokens in the wallet aren't its creations, i misread that. and the trail is deeper than i gave it credit for: it funded Vlad's demo wallet 18 days before that wallet was public, was on Robinhood Chain at block 1009 pre-launch, and bankrolled the internal TSLA test cluster. that's pre-knowledge, not dust. credit to @whisper_alpha and @the_boss_crypto who did the real tx-by-tx work. still no official confirmation, and "insider trail" cuts both ways on risk. but my original framing was wrong and i'm not going to pretend otherwise. corrected.
d1pp3r.eth@d1pp3r_eth

CT is screaming "insider token" about $WALLET on Robinhood Chain. the pitch: its metadata quotes a Vlad Tenev tweet word for word, so Robinhood insiders must be behind it. 100x incoming. so i opened the block explorer instead of the timeline. here's what's actually there. yes, the token is real: "Robinhood Wallet (WALLET)", 3,591 holders, contract live on Robinhood Chain. that part checks out. it was minted in one transaction on Jul 9, full 1B supply plus a Uniswap V3 LP created in the same tx. standard launch mechanics, nothing magic. now the deployer. this is where the insider story dies. the wallet that created $WALLET is a smart-contract account holding 50+ different tokens. not one special Robinhood coin, fifty of them. sitting right next to $WALLET in that same wallet: COCO, Robinhood Pepe (REPE), and a pile of other memes. its ETH balance? $83. that's not a Ribbit insider sitting on a secret official launch. that's a technical deployer spraying dozens of memecoins, and $WALLET is just one of them. the Tenev quote in the metadata? it only proves whoever made it read his tweet. same guy also made a frog called Robinhood Pepe. context matters. none of this means $WALLET can't pump. memes pump on vibes. but "insider-confirmed 100x" is a story someone tells you right before you become their exit. read the explorer, not the hype. all of this is public, verify it yourself. screenshots: Robinhood Chain explorer, contract 0x0339f5459FC690aC85F1782e15782A151b4A9E1b disclosure: no position. DYOR, not financial advice.

English
11
10
49
16.2K