Salman Dawar

243 posts

Salman Dawar banner
Salman Dawar

Salman Dawar

@d4war21

Travel|History|MMA

Pashtunkhwa Katılım Ağustos 2018
143 Takip Edilen284 Takipçiler
Salman Dawar
Salman Dawar@d4war21·
@hillchildd They surely will like they did previous year. Chukail, Janshai, Taip, Beshai won’t be the same like they did in past.
English
1
0
0
10
Tariq
Tariq@hillchildd·
@d4war21 Aww je. But I fear the tourist flow in Eid will spoil.
English
1
0
0
25
Tariq
Tariq@hillchildd·
Taip Si Baan (Taip meadows) Mankial - Swat Valley.
Tariq tweet media
Suomi
2
2
8
196
Salman Dawar retweetledi
Arif Hasan Akhundzada
Arif Hasan Akhundzada@AkhundzadaArif·
Nisar Muhammad's example should ideally lead to Pashtun-Tajik unity in a new Eastern Iranian Federation in this region, that will soon emerge after the defeat of Western imperialism and it's deep rooted noxious political and geographic effects here....but instead some misguided people are rushing, with flimsy and inaccurate information, to trumpet how a Pashtun was the "Founder of Modern Tajikistan". Nothing could be further from the truth. There was not one such founder; none were Pashtuns, even if we measure them by attitude alone; and the real founder if any, was Soviet Russia which provided the overarching guidance and influence for this formation. Just as Russia guided the formation of Soviet Tajikistan in the 1920s, Russia (and China) will now guide the formation of a new Eastern Iranshahr, where Tajiks, Pashtuns and Baloch and other Iranians can live in stable and civilised and organic coexistence with each other.
Arif Hasan Akhundzada tweet media
English
0
2
10
441
Salman Dawar
Salman Dawar@d4war21·
@AkhundzadaArif I agree on this, if we have to be subject of control or rule, we need to change & left outdated hilly traditions otherwise we will continue to be used between super & regional powers.
English
0
0
2
61
Arif Hasan Akhundzada
Arif Hasan Akhundzada@AkhundzadaArif·
Yes, you are right -- but then as I have said in my comment above -- there are certain Iranics who like to inflate their history beyond the logical proportion of how they really existed in the larger Iranic framework: Pashtun Iranics were part of a larger Iranshahr they never ruled, and cannot still rule -- because as long as they remain unsettled and wild mountain tribes, they may never be subject to control, but to become a real ruler one has to adopt certain characteristics that are repugnant to raw Pashtunwali. Ego and forcefulness may fuel domination, but they don't constitute statecraft, which is a far more nuanced and sophisticated affair, like a game of chess where loss and gain are treated equally and in order. And what you say about the Dalazaks is totally wrong. The Hindushahis preceded the Swatis who ruled from 1190 to 1520 and were a wild tribe of raiders and marauders who lived on the sidelines of Peshawar Valley. Like your friends, you have totally ignored the real history of the region, and are contributing to its concealment. The leaders of Tajikistan are st*pid idi*ts in announcing Nisar Muhammad's role in the fashion that they have, because they are apparently unaware of how Pashtuns will treat such news and react to it. It is like throwing pieces of food to barking strays, and that is not the desired or civilised reaction. No Pashtun can become the father of Tajikistan. Don't kid yourselves. Nisar Muhammad was successful because he went there and fitted himself in agreeably and consciously. And he did so because he knew something. He never once mentioned Pashto or Afghan nationhood while serving there. He even left his local wife behind and married another.
English
1
1
2
166
Salman Dawar
Salman Dawar@d4war21·
Come on Akhunzada saib, you know that every Iranic would choose Dushanbe over Ashgabat, Tashkent & Baku, like an aware Pashtun would choose Tajik over Turkmen, Uzbek & Azeri. Nasir was born in 1897, while Peshawar Valley was part of Dalazak territory since 11th century until
Arif Hasan Akhundzada@AkhundzadaArif

Part of what Dr. Sahib-Nazar Moradi has said below, I too have said in this connection: that ostensibly, Nisar Muhammad was a Yusufzai Afghan; but as I have pointed out, the Yusufzais absorbed a large number of Swatis (Tajiks) after their conquest of Swat and Peshawar Valley in the 16th Century -- and at the time that Nisar Muhammad lived (early last century), a lot of these "Yusufzai" people were still aware of their distinct origins. The fact that Nisar Muhammad, who called himself a communist -- did not settle in Tashkent, Ashgabat, Baku, or elsewhere in the Caucasus, or in Moscow or Leningrad -- is itself very significant: that he chose Tajikistan and allied his identity with that Soviet republic till his early death in 1937.... I have yet to probe this matter to my satisfaction, but as I said in another post below yesterday, the results of the work I have conducted into local history tends to show Pashtuns-Afghans in a different light compared to what they think of themselves or how they appear. Things are not at all that easy or direct to pronounce, regarding the origins of many people now regarded offhandedly as Pashtuns, even though a Pashtun would typically like one to believe they were. Even if Nisar Muhammad was a Pashtun, Pashtuns are the residents of eastern Iranshahr and have lived on its peripheries since time immemorial -- living in a state system ruled by Farsi speakers even if the Pashtuns lived in wild autonomy, the zoo that they inhabited was still owned by the Persian state. Even "Afghanistan," founded by the Abdali (Durrani) dynasty as a result of the freak assassination of Nader Shah Afshar in 1747 -- answers the description of a wild tribal empire ruled by a Persianate court, first at Kandahar and then Kabul. The Durranis who style themselves as Pashtuns-Afghans, are still very particular about their Persian culture, and even now the Durrani Saddozai and Barakzai families living in Peshawar and elsewhere in Pakistan, regard Pashto and its tribal culture with an alien condescension. They still speak Persian at home among themselves, albeit with a Pakistani accent, or they speak Urdu. That should be enough proof for our insistent and impudent "Pashtun nationalists."

English
3
0
9
781
Salman Dawar
Salman Dawar@d4war21·
they were ousted by Yousafzai in 16th century, as you know Gibari Sultanate was based in Swat not Peshawar Valley & if Nisar would’ve been a Pashtunised Tajik he would announced his origins the same way you did.
English
1
0
2
106
Salman Dawar retweetledi
Hayat Preghal🇨🇦
Hayat Preghal🇨🇦@HayatPreghal·
بالکل کاش یہ بات گل خانوں کو سمجھ آجائے ۔۔!
اردو
5
24
98
4.2K
Salman Dawar
Salman Dawar@d4war21·
@paharisher Smashed for Afghans(Pashtuns) & overthrew for Sikhs.. Going thru his account, I can only smell hatred towards Pashtuns, seems he is Punjabi trying to portray himself as Hazarewal.
Salman Dawar tweet mediaSalman Dawar tweet media
English
1
0
5
170
pahari sher
pahari sher@paharisher·
@d4war21 maybe its martyrdom in his opinion because suris were percieved as usurpers and acctually some of the same gakkhars descendants are from hazara. stop spamming jeet everywhere because u dont like them
English
1
0
3
160
Salman Dawar
Salman Dawar@d4war21·
@x0x0lic His tweets are mostly liked & retweeted by Punjabi nat accounts.
English
1
0
2
97
Furiosa
Furiosa@x0x0lic·
@d4war21 This guy is such a pashtun hater. I won't be surprised if he is running punjabi nat accounts
English
1
0
5
166
Salman Dawar
Salman Dawar@d4war21·
@PakiSwift @Pashtun_world Hazara is not a region, it’s a division. Asghar Khan was a Pashtun from Pashtunkhwa not Hazara, don’t try to enforce ur fake identity on us.
English
0
0
4
73
Shay 🇵🇰 #FixKarachi
Shay 🇵🇰 #FixKarachi@PakiSwift·
@Pashtun_world He contested elections from Abbotabad his entire life, so did his sons including the one who is MNA rn. Asghar Khan was a Pashtun from Hazarewal, that was the point.
English
3
0
9
527
Salman Dawar
Salman Dawar@d4war21·
@Afzaalhabib2 Seems we’ve much to disagree upon & it can’t be sort out here, I texted you in dm, we can hv a 📞, see u there.
English
0
0
4
93
Sardar Afzaal Karlal🇵🇰🇵🇸
@d4war21 We did not start this movement at the behest of any Punjabi or any Pahari rather this movement was started because Hazara was denied its rightful dues. ​In fact, Punjabis, Sindhis, and Pashtuns used to come to Baba Haider Zaman and tell him to stop this movement
English
1
0
1
131
Salman Dawar
Salman Dawar@d4war21·
The 1931 census is not relevant to 2026, even though it was linguistically based. We won’t mind if u people who r ethnically Pahari, had separate province but we won’t allow an inch of Pashtun land to be added in that province. Ur movement was created by Punjab, supported by
Salman Dawar tweet media
Rahat Hazarwi@_hazarewal

“Pashtuns are a majority in Hazara” is a lie spread by Pakhtunkhwa’s intelligentsia to try stifle our movement & keep our people repressed. Hazara’s last tribal census took place in 1931, in which Pashtuns, with a pop. of 54,544, comprised a meagre minority of only 8%.- [1/2]

English
9
5
19
1.4K
Salman Dawar
Salman Dawar@d4war21·
ethnic Pahari tribes for dividing Pashtunkhwa, otherwise u people were never suppressed, even today u have better facilities, education & stability than d majority of other areas.
English
3
0
3
236
Salman Dawar
Salman Dawar@d4war21·
@Afzaalhabib2 Karlals had only 9 Jagirdaris while Pashtun tribes had more than 60 Jagirdaris. Yes Abbottabad is a Pahari majority district, we don’t mind Pahari majority tehsils in Abbottabad or other districts to be added in AJK or Potohar.
English
4
0
1
313
Sardar Afzaal Karlal🇵🇰🇵🇸
@d4war21 "Ethinically pashtun are majority in hazara"next level of cope We owned more lands than any tribe in abbottabad We karlals owned entire galliyat and some areas in bakot and 2-3 union council of havelian and Pashtun arent majority in hazara
English
2
0
14
397
Salman Dawar
Salman Dawar@d4war21·
@KotliSher Hindko is a language not an ethnicity, many Pashtuns speaks Hindko that doesn’t make them Hindkowan. Whether you call us invaders o settlers now we’re the majority. North is historically Dards land, you people e.g Awan, Karlal, Gujjar, Abbasi, Ghakhar etc are settlers.
English
5
2
21
1.1K
Khan
Khan@KotliSher·
@d4war21 Hazara is Hindkowan land & some of it is dardic. Pashtuns are invaders there. 1951 census: 81.7% Hindkowan 2023 census: 56% Hindkowan It has never been majority Pashtun stop your lies. If it wasn’t for Pakistan you’d be uncivilised like your brothers across the border.
English
3
2
36
632