Daniel F Rodriguez

@michaeljknowles You both should talk about leaving the daily wire. Both together have a stronger brand

For the next 45 minutes, we’re having a cigar and solving all the problems. What should we cover? AUA!

@MattWalshBlog @TPUSA It's time this pair ditches the dailywire with Ben Shapiro in it. They are both more powerful

Really enjoyed the event last night. Extremely energetic crowd. A lot of interesting questions in the Q&A, too. Very encouraging experience all around. Thank you, @TPUSA. As a side note, Idaho was one of the two US states I’d never visited. Now I just need someone to invite me to Hawaii for something.

If I had walked on to the stage and kicked the shit out of Brian Shaprio it would have been less embarrassing than what Rachel did to him.

@jacksonhinklle You can't be this dumb 😒

🇨🇳 The kind of apartment a $480 rent can get you in Shenzen, China.

@SassySouthBlond Yeah, it took you 2 weeks to make up this chart... this how mentally ill and dumb you are

@danieldelaossa Wow, did you think that up all by yourself? This dumb blonde can do a bunch of research you cucks fail to do. Keep simping for degenerates.

The running joke is Andrew married that black woman. While Rachel was pregnant. Debunk marriage records from Woshoe County. Post my debunk you promised Jimmy. I’ll wait.

@ShieldsClips You're basically a retard with only personal attacks

One more lost debate

@TheBrianShapiro Wow Brian is mentally ill

Fucking hilarious

@ConceptualJames The only retard here is you

Two retards fighting on the Internet forever is the future of politics.

@paleochristcon @UBERSOY1 Indeed he would

@UBERSOY1 I would wreck you in 15 minutes.

Andrew Wilson is a dumb guy’s idea of a professional debater

HIJAB'S CAREER ENDING SELF-OWN. 😂 He WHEEZES into the microphone over the definition of Furqan, BUT DOESN'T REALIZE THE TORAH IS CALLED FURQAN In Surah 2:53 / 21:48 😂😂😂

@jakerattlesnk @LeahLibresco @LilaGraceRose @Rach4Patriarchy @savannafstone @Kathy4Truth @Rach4Patriarchy Won't need savanna

I think @LeahLibresco or @LilaGraceRose would be excellent candidates to debate whether women should be able to vote, on the pro 19th side. On one side - @Rach4Patriarchy and @savannafstone have accepted to argue for the abolition of the 19th. On the other, @Kathy4Truth has accepted the challenge and we are looking for one more debater. It’s shaping up to be a great panel.

@MocklerHQ @adammocklerr What does that have to do with the argument ? you absolute idiot

I like how all the guys in this room are trying to pretend they don't watch porn just so they can stand on their insane talking points 😂 @adammocklerr

@ubiquitousnewt What a crockpot you're, go visit a psychiatrist. What a lier

I wouldn't describe Rachel or Andrew Wilson as an authority on stable motherhood or relationships. She has 5 children to 3 different Fathers. One man abandoned her and his two kids over vague “personal issues.” The next Father was a criminal drug abuser who abandoned her and their one child fleeing legal trouble. Only Andrew Wilson gave her the trad family she now preaches. But he only committed to her after he was able to confirm the kids were his via DNA testing. What does that suggest about the dynamic? Rachel has shown self awareness and knows how her blended family looks, downplaying it as “youthful mistakes”. But mistakes these are not. This a well documented, multi year, behavioural pattern of maladaptive mate selection; serial monogamy with successively dysfunctional, low stability males, resulting in three different fathers for five children, two periods of single motherhood, and one tragic child fatality. And yet, she and Andrew think they are best placed to be critics of modern women and they are ab authority of what benevolent, stable family life should be like. Rachel and Andrew have built their entire brand shaming modern women for low partner standards, serial monogamy, single motherhood, and multiple baby daddies, the exact life she lived. Hypocrisy on full display. What kind of man is drawn to such a woman like Rachel Wilson to begin with? Well, Andrew is a bit of a bastard isn't he. Andrew Wilson’s core traits are abrasive high conflict dominance, arrogance paired with defensive aggression, and a rigid insistence on his unchallenged authority. You can see repeatedly by from his debate footage that he is irritable, rude, and bullying in style. Yes, he can be sharp and logical but he routinely shifts to personal attacks, insults, and verbal aggression when he perceives his authority or family is directly challenged. I don't think he can organically evoke genuine deference or voluntary submission from a desirable, respectable, agentic, and stable woman. Such a woman has independent, better mating options and would probably reject the unilateral “he is in charge of everything” authority because it clashes with her core traits. Rachel, shaped by a pattern of suboptimal mate selection and multiple children, has limited mating alternatives. So she explicitly conforms. She states on record that submission means “you submit to your husband in all things,” that Andrew holds charge of everything, and that she performs total domestic service because his dependability finally enabled the homemaking role her prior partners could not. He secures what he needs through a partner whose baggage makes compliance the rational exchange for security. They portray this trade off via a christian redemption narrative they co brand. Interesting.

@PiscoLitty You're the one running coward, accept the debate @paleochristcon

HAHAHAHA ANDREW WILSON BLOCKED ME (coward fuck ran 🏃)

@ConceptualJames You're as dumb as the term woke right you made up

Thinking about making a list of Libertarians I'm smarter than and publishing it for the world to see.

1. Dean Withers is a coward who only wants to pubstomp easy unskilled "can" opponents. 2. Jubilee has a left-leaning bias, and so LOVES to procure easy unskilled opponents for their left-wingers. Meanwhile, they will always stack as hard as they can against right-wingers. You see this across all their formats. 3. Emily Wilson is NOT a debater and barely conservative (she is pro-choice). Meanwhile, Dean PROFESSIONALY debates (he is live nearly every day debating for hours) and, annoying though he is, is skilled. To use a boxing term, Emily is a can. 4. This is also at least the 3rd time these 2 have debated. Why Emily keeps serving herself up to be destroyed by Dean to make the "conservative" position look terrible is certainly suspect.

@notsoErudite ANDREW also bullies intellectuals, and pretend intellectuals and also YouTubers like you idol Destiny ohh and also pretend Christian debaters as yourself.

Bro, have you watched your own show? You're main cohost is Andrew Wilson, who bullies OnlyFans models while you and your audience cheer it on. Maybe pipe down on this one, chief.

@ConceptualJames You mean you don't debate anyone on the right cause you're really a leftist

We don't debate Dave. We laugh at Dave.