Daniel Wattenberg

270 posts

Daniel Wattenberg

Daniel Wattenberg

@danwattenberg

Author, "Decatur's Wake"

Washington, DC Katılım Nisan 2016
513 Takip Edilen315 Takipçiler
Daniel Wattenberg
Daniel Wattenberg@danwattenberg·
@TimothyHorrigan @JoeBiden @KamalaHarris Partly right. The point is they would never say something remotely like this for fear of the outcry. In contrast, Trump is using the severity of the outcry and his indifference to it to dramatize for the IRGC the credibility of his threatened action.
English
0
0
0
16
Daniel Wattenberg
Daniel Wattenberg@danwattenberg·
President Trump's warning that "a whole civilization will die tonight" if the Iranian regime doesn't meet US terms has predictably scandalized the full spectrum of correct opinion in the US, which was likely the very purpose of his post. The IRGC is betting that domestic US political pressure will force Trump to scale back his war aims and make a quick exit from the conflict. Reaction to his post has just demonstrated for the Iranian war leadership that he can do pretty much whatever he wants and his base won't abandon him and his opponents can say whatever they will — i.e. he's a war criminal bent on genocide — and he won't be deterred. @realDonaldTrump" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTru
English
1
0
0
37
Gregs iPinions
Gregs iPinions@Gregs_iPinions·
@FoxNews @TimCamp03 It was a ridiculous move not to submit the DHS funding bill for unanimous consent decree. This would have forced the Democrats to vote no, and put them on the record, which could have been used in midterms. Republicans have no game! No surprise, given the lack of leadership.
Gregs iPinions tweet media
English
3
8
16
377
Fox News
Fox News@FoxNews·
BREAKING: Senate adjourns until Thursday as DHS shutdown drags on with no agreement with House
Fox News tweet media
English
285
183
450
349.3K
Daniel Wattenberg
Daniel Wattenberg@danwattenberg·
@TimothyHorrigan You’ve missed a few of my allusions recently, so let me return the favor: Why do you refer to the scenario you describe here as a “Led Zeppelin” tactic?
English
1
0
0
29
(((Timothy Horrigan)))
(((Timothy Horrigan)))@TimothyHorrigan·
@danwattenberg My favorite theory is: this is a classic example of the "Led Zeppelin" negotiating gambit. Trump led w/ a totally unacceptable choice which will be immediately shot down. Trump will follow by offering a 2nd bad choice which is a slight improvement over the 1st. (1/2)
English
2
0
0
49
Daniel Wattenberg
Daniel Wattenberg@danwattenberg·
@EricLDaugh Did the White House know Paul was an unalterable “No” and was itching for this kind of direct public confrontation with Mullin? I thought rationale for nominating him was that he was supposed to sail through the confirmation process as a member of the Senate “club.” Are you sure there aren’t more Republican defectors waiting in the chute? What happened?
English
0
0
0
96
Eric Daugherty
Eric Daugherty@EricLDaugh·
🚨 JUST NOW: Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) doubles down on trying to tank Markwayne Mullin's nomination as DHS Secretary "I went through hell! Anyone who thinks that's commendable is unfit to lead law enforcement!" "It's not just that, it's him jumping up saying he'd fight somebody there." Despite Paul's relentless opposition, Democrat JOHN FETTERMAN would cancel out his vote and get him confirmed.
English
348
132
625
45.5K
Daniel Wattenberg
Daniel Wattenberg@danwattenberg·
@josh_hammer Viable third option: Think like Tucker. EVERYBODY is talking about him (again) and clicking on that video.
English
0
0
2
231
Josh Hammer
Josh Hammer@josh_hammer·
There are two main possibilities about what’s going on in the Tucker/CIA video, and they both involve 2028: (1) Tucker really is stupid enough to communicate with the Iranians and to think he could still lobby Trump on Iran policy. In this scenario, Trump really did play 4-D chess and Tucker really did inadvertently help get his Iranian friends killed. In this scenario, the most likely source of the administration’s leak to Tucker about the CIA communication interception is the DNI office. Why? Because Tulsi harbors outside-shot 2028 ambitions and has an interest in knifing JD—and what better way to knife JD than through the comically compromised Tucker? (2) Tucker is a psychopathic liar who made the whole damn thing up, much as he did about the Ben Gurion Airport passport interdiction hoax. In this scenario, Tucker is merely doing what I’ve been saying he is doing for two years now—waging a shadow war against Trump and MAGA, accusing Trump of selling out his America First mission, and laying the groundwork even further for his own 2028 run (whether that’s inside or outside the GOP tent). I don’t see a viable third option.
English
181
166
1.2K
147.6K
Daniel Wattenberg
Daniel Wattenberg@danwattenberg·
@MegynKellyShow @esaagar Couldn’t be clearer. Case in point: when Lincoln dropped atomic bombs on Atlanta to force Lee’s surrender at Appomattox in 1865.
English
1
0
2
597
The Megyn Kelly Show
The Megyn Kelly Show@MegynKellyShow·
.@esaagar: "Let's be very clear: 'Unconditional surrender' requires dropping Atomic bombs. It requires a full-style occupation... It means you break the back of the enemy and completely destroy their capacity, their will to fight, occupy them, and impose your martial will upon their soul."
English
507
130
1.2K
371.4K
Daniel Wattenberg
Daniel Wattenberg@danwattenberg·
@nypost Muslims in Israel enjoy unimpeded freedom of worship, which is more than you can say for Christians in Newsom’s California during COVID.
English
19
0
16
2.1K
Michael Beschloss
Michael Beschloss@BeschlossDC·
Here is a photo of random late-1970s students at Phillips Academy (Andover) now being offered on eBay. Anyone look familiar?
Michael Beschloss tweet media
English
517
106
3K
1.5M
eve
eve@eveforamerica·
Watch how Bill walks and just stops in the middle of the sidewalk. He must have whatever Joe has. Sad people.
English
2.9K
650
6.6K
4.8M
Life on Skis
Life on Skis@lifeonskis_·
if you can't risk it, don't join them
English
169
617
4.8K
1.5M
Daniel Wattenberg
Daniel Wattenberg@danwattenberg·
Tucker cites the larger number of Christians residing in Qatar than those living in Israel to insinuate that Qatar is therefore more tolerant of Christianity than is Israel — while omitting the essential context: the former are noncitizen migrant laborers effectively without political or (beyond their circumscribed enclaves) religious freedoms, while the latter are full Israeli citizens. In logical terms, his argument is equivalent to claiming that Mississippi circa 1857 was far more racially liberal than were contemporaneous Maine or Minnesota, because Mississippi was home to a far greater number (both absolute and proportional) of African-Americans than either of them.
HonestReporting@HonestReporting

5/ Then comes Qatar. Carlson appears stunned to learn that Christians in Qatar are confined to a fenced church compound. Facts: Qatar • Approx 350,000 Christians • Zero Christian citizens • About 6 churches in a restricted compound • No crosses on exteriors • No church bells Israel • Approx 184,000 Christian citizens • Around 300 churches • Public Easter processions • Church bells ring freely One is religious freedom. One is tolerated migrant labor. Carlson cites Wikipedia. Then admits he doesn’t know.

English
0
0
1
236
Ryan Rozbiani
Ryan Rozbiani@RyanRozbiani·
JUST IN 🇺🇸🇮🇱: Tucker Carlson went to Israel for Interview, Refused to Enter Country Tucker visited Israel briefly on Wednesday to interview US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee, focusing on claims about the treatment of Christians in Israel and the wider region. He conducted the interview inside Ben Gurion Airport and refused to exit the airport complex, leaving a few hours later. Source: JP
Ryan Rozbiani tweet media
English
339
668
4.6K
2M
Daniel Wattenberg
Daniel Wattenberg@danwattenberg·
@elonmusk What do you expect? Other drivers see a driverless vehicle and (wisely) get the hell out of your way.
English
0
0
0
19
Daniel Wattenberg
Daniel Wattenberg@danwattenberg·
Weren’t Trump-style economic nationalists fiercely opposed to Japanese investment in the US back in the ’90s, fearing the erosion of US economic sovereignty? (I’m all for it, incidentally.) zerohedge.com/markets/trump-…
English
0
0
1
81
Daniel Wattenberg
Daniel Wattenberg@danwattenberg·
When you respond to a light quip (about spelling/phonemes!) with a literal-minded rant about white conservative ethnocentrism, you sound kind of unhinged. But since you've jarringly racialized and politicized a modest stab at humor, I should probably note that the two people Caldwell reports as mispronouncing "Mamdani" (Andrew Cuomo and Letitia James) are both Democrats, and one of the two is black.
English
0
0
0
15
(((Timothy Horrigan)))
(((Timothy Horrigan)))@TimothyHorrigan·
@danwattenberg @ClaremontInst The basic rule for white rightwingers is: dark skinned people's names are (supposedly) always impossible to pronounce, unless they have vanilla anglo-saxon names. (And maybe not necessarily even then: "Kamala Harris" was constantly mispronounced in 2024.)
Durham, NH 🇺🇸 English
2
0
0
44
Daniel Wattenberg
Daniel Wattenberg@danwattenberg·
“The consonant sequence ‘md’ being practically non-existent in English, Mamdani’s surname is easy for a lot of people to mispronounce,” writes my old friend Chris Caldwell in the Claremont Review of Books @ClaremontInst. You agree? I mean, every Tom, Dick and Harry uses that consonant sequence.
English
2
0
1
221