Pusit❤️Zuleika4Ever

They say that during Fall, you should go for fuller whites with a bit of oak aging..but you just don’t care when when you are in Napa! Taste all you can.. cheers!! #bestlife #napavalley #DontDrinkAndDrive

‘IT JUST FELT OFF SEEING HER MEMORY ASSOCIATED WITH FAKE NEWS PEDDLERS’ IC Mendoza and his family received an apology from Sen. Juan Miguel “Migz” Zubiri after the latter used the name of the former’s late grandmother, Inday Badiday, to describe the supposed “circus” in the Senate. READ MORE: inqnews.net/ICMendozaZubiri

@SenImeeMarcos nakakaDiri ka po talaga sa ngalan ng Boto KSP ka- ayan pahiya ka tuloy sayang nag pa edit ka pa ng kaCheapang Video na yan!!!

bwhahahaha yuko na please

@kikopangilinan dumi talaga ni imee kung kelan tumanda kadiri!!!

𝗖𝗟𝗘𝗔𝗥𝗟𝗬, 𝗗𝗜𝗦𝗜𝗡𝗙𝗢𝗥𝗠𝗔𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡 𝗛𝗔𝗦 𝗡𝗢 𝗣𝗟𝗔𝗖𝗘 𝗜𝗡 𝗧𝗛𝗜𝗦 𝗖𝗛𝗔𝗠𝗕𝗘𝗥. The sowing of intrigues has no place in this plenary hall. Fake news has no place in this plenary hall. 𝗪𝗲 𝘀𝗵𝗼𝘂𝗹𝗱 𝘀𝗲𝗲𝗸 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘁𝗿𝘂𝘁𝗵 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗺 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗳𝗮𝗰𝘁𝘀 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗺 𝗱𝗶𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝘃𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗼 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗽𝗮𝗴𝗮𝗻𝗱𝗮.

@gmanews lalo hahaba ang baba ng sinungaling na Babalina

PANOORIN: Reaksyon ni Sen. Migz Zubiri habang nagpepresenta si Sen. Imee Marcos ng umano’y isinasagawang hakbang para sa term extension at charter change. Si Sen. Zubiri ang naghain ng mosyon na alisin ito sa record ng Senado. PANOORIN: bit.ly/SenatePlenaryS…

@MikeeGulla madaaaaam hinahamon ka ng sis in law mong babalina labaaaan na

Madam, bilisan ang kilos.

@dailynetizen24 hahahaha paano ka na Mengay kinalubog mo na naman to

Ang hamon ni Sen. Migz Zubiri kay Babalina matapos mag-present ng ala-PGMN high school project propaganda hit piece: ‘GUSTO MO LABASAN NG BAHO?’ "INDAY BADIDAY NA BA TAYO?!" Sen. Zubiri SINUPALPAL ang ala-PGMN propaganda at HIGH SCHOOL PROJECT ni Babalina na gumamit pa ng DISTORTED VOICEOVER.

iba si Madam

coming soon: Laoag Barangay Tanod Night Shift end of your political career @SenImeeMarcos Kacheapan ng propaganda video ni Daryl Yap hahahahha

bhhhahah eena mocha Mengay!!! @SenImeeMarcos

Five posts in a single day from the Chinese Embassy? That alone tells the world who is truly rattled by facts, transparency, and international law. A state genuinely confident in its legal position does not spend 24 hours flooding social media with repetitive propaganda disguised as legal arguments just to answer one Philippine Coast Guard officer. THE LAW AND THE FACTS are clear: the 2016 South China Sea Arbitral Award is final and binding under Article 296 of UNCLOS and Article 11 of Annex VII of UNCLOS. 1. On China’s 2006 Article 298 Declaration. The Embassy keeps invoking China’s 2006 declaration under Article 298 of UNCLOS as if this magically exempted China from all arbitration. It did not. The Philippines deliberately structured its case to avoid questions of territorial sovereignty and maritime boundary delimitation. The Tribunal carefully examined China’s Article 298 declaration and ruled in its October 2015 Award on Jurisdiction that the Philippine submissions concerned the interpretation and application of UNCLOS — matters fully subject to compulsory dispute settlement under Part XV of the Convention. UNCLOS is not subject to the CCP’s propaganda system. In fact, the Tribunal even declined jurisdiction over certain matters involving military activities precisely to respect Article 298 and China’s 2006 declaration. So the claim that the Tribunal “ignored” China’s declaration is simply false. The Tribunal studied it extensively — and still ruled that it had jurisdiction. 2. On the “Nine-Dash Line” China cannot rewrite UNCLOS by drawing arbitrary dashes on a map. The Tribunal ruled that China’s so-called “historic rights” claim within the nine-dash line is incompatible with UNCLOS and therefore without legal effect. UNCLOS comprehensively allocates maritime entitlements through territorial seas, Exclusive Economic Zones, and continental shelves. There is no legal basis in UNCLOS for a state to claim almost an entire semi-enclosed sea merely because it wishes to do so. Changing the terminology from “nine-dash line” to “adjacent waters” does not change the legal reality. 3. On Bajo de Masinloc and Philippine Fishermen The Tribunal affirmed that Filipino fishermen possess traditional fishing rights at Bajo de Masinloc (Scarborough Shoal), and that China unlawfully interfered with those rights. What deeply concerns many observers is how Beijing now portrays Filipino fishermen operating near their own coasts as “provocateurs,” while Chinese Coast Guard and maritime militia vessels operate thousands of nautical miles from mainland China inside the Philippine Exclusive Economic Zone under Article 57 of UNCLOS. That inversion of reality is precisely why the international community increasingly distrusts Beijing’s narrative. 4. On Transparency The Philippines releases footage because we have nothing to hide. If China believes the videos are misleading, then Beijing is free to release complete and unedited footage from its own vessels or even embed independent journalists from credible media entities. Yet time and again, China prefers vague accusations over full transparency. Facts do not fear sunlight. The uncomfortable truth for Beijing is this: the legal debate ended in 2016. What remains is China’s refusal to comply with a binding ruling issued under a treaty that China itself shaped and ratified. A country cannot selectively obey UNCLOS only when convenient. International law is not a buffet. And the irony is difficult to miss: Beijing lectures others about respecting sovereignty and territorial integrity while simultaneously threatening Taiwan daily, harassing Southeast Asian fishermen in their own EEZs, and deploying coercive maritime tactics across the South China Sea. The world can see the contradiction clearly. No amount of repetition, propaganda, or coordinated social media posts can overturn the plain text of UNCLOS or erase the 2016 Arbitral Award.

good!!

@GManicurist @inquirerdotnet agree

@inquirerdotnet Biggest achievement: TATAY mo PINAKA KULONG! BWHAHAHAHAH

Baste Duterte: Marcos has no achievements as president trib.al/mwjEzAi

"PATALSIKIN NA LAHAT SILA, THE [SENATE] MAJORITY" Nakiisa sa protesta ngayong Linggo, Mayo 24, ang ekonomista at dating NEDA director general Winnie Monsod sa Ninoy Aquino Monument sa Makati City. | via @francisorcio

agree

@limbertqc baka gusto maging tanog sa Davao City

Ano naman ang paki ng Briton na ito? Dutertard iyan. 🤬

@PGMNOfficial social climber si Franco Mabanta hahahhaa

Melvin Matibag is again using the machinery of the state in a case centered on free speech, this time targeting Reina Mercedes, Isabela Vice Mayor Jeryll Harold Respicio over remarks posted on social media. The Cybercrime Investigation and Coordinating Center filed complaints before the NBI on Friday, May 22, over Respicio’s alleged “seditious statements” on social media. CICC Executive Director Renato “Aboy” Paraiso and Presidential Communications Office Undersecretary Precious Hipolito-Castelo led the filing. Paraiso said the complaints being considered include inciting sedition, inciting rebellion, unlawful use of means of publication and unlawful utterances. Matibag said the NBI would issue a subpoena to Respicio as part of its case buildup before making a recommendation and possibly filing a complaint before the Department of Justice. Matibag cited a transcription in which Respicio allegedly asked an audience whether they were willing to revolt. “Ito ang tanong na seryoso, kapag hindi na gumagana ang foundational principle ng ating Constitution na demokrasya, ano ang sagot? Rebolusyon,” Matibag said, quoting Respicio’s alleged remarks. Matibag claimed the elements of the alleged crimes were present, saying “pasok lahat.” He added that Respicio could also face disbarment because he is a lawyer. “All our rights come with corresponding responsibilities,” Matibag said. In response, Respicio fired off a furious remark against Matibag, calling him “a f**king large piece of s**t.” This follows Matibag’s actions against free speech and free press involving PGMN, whose founder and CEO Franco Mabanta, along with four associates, were accused in an extortion plot orchestrated by former House Speaker Martin Romualdez. The same state machinery now being used against Respicio is the same machinery used to punish PGMN for preparing to expose corruption involving Romualdez, the most corrupt politician of the 21st century.

@sejoalzir exactly! ayan ginigil si Sara na matabil ang dila

Nanahimik si Madam pero tinawag niyong butod, bangagera, smuggler, at iba pa. Nakakalimutan niyong New Yorker siya—alam niya ang magmatigas, alam niya ang makabagong kaisipan sa luma, at higit sa lahat, progresibo at forward-thinking ang mindset ni Madam. Himas-rehas kayo ngayon.

Kumusta raw ang iyong konsensiya, @piacayetano? 😂😁🤭

Arleen Medina bakit tingin walang basbas ng INC yan..DDS ka nga tanga ka eh