Data Artist

1.7K posts

Data Artist banner
Data Artist

Data Artist

@data4rtist

Coding, math and markets.

Katılım Ağustos 2023
423 Takip Edilen111 Takipçiler
Data Artist
Data Artist@data4rtist·
@ChShersh How would you go about learning c++ these days with say 7years programming experience mostly high level stuff very little rust and go?
English
0
0
0
103
Dmitrii Kovanikov
Dmitrii Kovanikov@ChShersh·
I once interviewed for a Rust position. They asked me to do the interview in Rust despite me telling them I don’t know Rust. Unfortunately, they weren’t impressed by me writing perfect Rust that compiled and worked without knowing the language. I didn’t get the job.
English
46
1
449
30K
Data Artist
Data Artist@data4rtist·
@KyleMau Have you ever lived in those places? There is like a 50% chance of rain every day in Summer and absolutely zero gurantee of the "beautiful" you are imagining.
English
0
0
0
96
Kyle Mau
Kyle Mau@KyleMau·
I have never understood the Eastern and Northern European mindset of going on vacation during summer. When your city is 75 degrees and beautiful and everything is available, you go to Greece and pay $300 a day to turn yourself into a lobster. Instead of just... going in November. You know, when your city is 40 and dreary and grey with 4 hours of "sun "a day. And Greece is 75 and you get a private beach. Make it make sense.
English
1.3K
374
13.4K
2M
Katherine Brodsky
Katherine Brodsky@mysteriouskat·
I'm supremely bad at ending conversations. Can I get some tips on how to politely free myself?
English
872
6
283
49.2K
Brett Hall
Brett Hall@ToKTeacher·
Almost all economists agree with some version of the paper below (even if they cannot "mathematically prove" it) "AI will largely be bad for most people". Why don't we hear from optimistic economists when it comes to the effects of AI on global wealth? Maybe because of this:
Elias Al@iam_elias1

Two economists just published a mathematical proof that AI will destroy the economy. Not might. Not could. Will — if nothing changes. The paper is called "The AI Layoff Trap." Published March 2, 2026. Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania. Boston University. Peer reviewed. Mathematically modeled. The conclusion is one sentence. "At the limit, firms automate their way to boundless productivity and zero demand." An economy that produces everything. And sells it to nobody. Here is how you get there. A company fires 500 workers and replaces them with AI. A competitor fires 700 to keep up. Another fires 1,000. Every company is behaving rationally. Every company is following the incentives correctly. And every company is building a trap for itself. Because the workers who were fired were also customers. When they lose their jobs faster than the economy can absorb them, they stop spending. Consumer demand falls. Companies respond by cutting costs — which means automating more workers — which means less spending — which means more falling demand — which means more automation. The loop has no natural exit. The researchers tested every proposed solution. Universal basic income. Capital income taxes. Worker equity participation. Upskilling programs. Corporate coordination agreements. Every single one failed in the model. The only intervention that worked: a Pigouvian automation tax — a per-task levy charged every time a company replaces a human with AI, forcing them to price in the demand they are destroying before they pull the trigger. No government has implemented this. No major economy is seriously discussing it. Meanwhile the numbers are already tracking the curve. 100,000 tech workers laid off in 2025. 92,000 more in the first months of 2026. Jack Dorsey fired half of Block's workforce and said publicly: "Within the next year, the majority of companies will reach the same conclusion." Nobody is doing anything wrong. Companies are following their incentives perfectly. That is exactly the problem. Rational behavior. At scale. Simultaneously. With no mechanism to stop it. Two economists built the math. The math leads to one place. Source: Falk & Tsoukalas · Wharton School + Boston University · arxiv.org/pdf/2603.20617

English
12
2
44
11.2K
Data Artist
Data Artist@data4rtist·
@ToKTeacher Why would an AI with the cognitive capacity of a human being not be an AGI?
English
0
0
0
19
Brett Hall
Brett Hall@ToKTeacher·
Sam Harris has said that AI could be a replacement for (quote!) "...all of human cognition". What could he mean? Some thoughts:
English
9
3
23
3.4K
Aish
Aish@AishwaryaDevv·
Am I the only one getting vibe coding fatigue? Building landing pages in 30 seconds was fun, but maintaining a complex codebase where half the logic was “vibed” into existence is an absolute headache. Feels like we traded 1 hour of typing for 5 hours of architectural debugging later. I’ve started manually writing core logic again so I actually know where the technical debt is hiding. Is anyone successfully managing large production projects with AI agents, or are we all just building disposable software?
English
359
73
1.5K
225K
Data Artist retweetledi
Balaji
Balaji@balajis·
The right kind of ambition is to compete against yourself. To be the best version of yourself.
English
331
1.2K
8.3K
298.1K
Akanksha 🦭
Akanksha 🦭@akanksha7196·
honestly applying for a schengen visa is a humiliation ritual
English
389
1.9K
17.5K
3.8M
Data Artist retweetledi
goodalexander
goodalexander@goodalexander·
I've tweeted about this before but it's a good reminder The founder of Tik Tok was running out of money trying to build an education start up. One day, he looked at the people on his train. Eyes blank. None of them were learning the next day he pivoted to brain rot and won
English
47
100
2.7K
116K
vixhaℓ
vixhaℓ@TheVixhal·
Could consciousness emerge from logic gates? Modern AI systems ultimately run on just 3 basic logic gates: - AND Gate - OR Gate - NOT Gate Individually these gates are extremely simple. But when billions of them are combined together in complex systems, they can process language, generate code, recognize patterns, and simulate human-like reasoning. If intelligence-like behavior can emerge from massive combinations of simple logic gates, could consciousness emerge too? And if human brains are also made from simpler units like neurons, is consciousness just an emergent property of complexity?
English
233
22
254
24.9K
Data Artist
Data Artist@data4rtist·
Always interesting to see people giving life advice a la "dont pursure this career" on the timeline How about you just let everyone figure out what the hell they want to do and then you let them do it? Has to be the most European thing I have experienced as a European
English
0
0
0
3
Data Artist
Data Artist@data4rtist·
Trading against price insensitive traders such as forced buyers / sellers is powerful because we know that they are not acting on information that we don't have
English
0
0
2
6
Ömerr
Ömerr@sbzomer·
bu kesinlikle yüzyılın buluşu
Türkçe
412
768
18.3K
10.1M
Data Artist
Data Artist@data4rtist·
@pedma7 Bro cannot dm but I live in Lisbon and also trading crypto systematic trend. Could be awesome to connect!
English
0
0
0
8
pedma
pedma@pedma7·
this is how much i spent living in Portugal last few years. few caveats though: - i live alone - i purchased my house off lisbon center, pay <$500 a month mortgage - have a cheap car (<$10k), so low maintenance costs but anything else i never look at expenses.
pedma tweet media
'@0xelevenquit

@pedma7 Hi could u please tell me how much it costs to live in portugal normally? Like one guy alone. couldn’t find anything helpful online

English
13
0
57
12.2K
sysls
sysls@systematicls·
It's so interesting to me how drastically different the personalities of Opus 4.7 and GPT 5.5 are. GPT 5.5 is smart, hardworking, slightly autistic and doesn't want to talk much. Huge preference for diving into tasks and hammering tasks out over long, long periods. Opus 4.7 is also obviously smart, but the only way to accurately describe Opus 4.7 is that he is charismatic but extremely lazy, talks a lot, but doesn't like to get work done. The only saving grace of Opus 4.7 is that he really does have an eye for design. -- Opus 4.7 is the quintessential toxic employee you need to fire while GPT 5.5 is the one you're glad to have on the team, but wished you could understand him better / have a more pleasant time interacting with him.
English
123
71
1.5K
196.7K
Data Artist
Data Artist@data4rtist·
@xbtDLN By that argument you may as well write in ascii representation. The comma is for ease of reading. But short sentences are also helpful.
English
0
0
1
16
DLN
DLN@xbtDLN·
Always thought commas were kind of unnecessary. If you can’t tell how someone would say a sentence you’re probably not intelligent.
English
6
0
9
1.6K
Data Artist
Data Artist@data4rtist·
@pedma7 Depends on what task. If its taxes I get it. Anything quant research or dev shouldn't be the case.
English
0
0
0
24
pedma
pedma@pedma7·
sometimes i find myself doing more frequent breaks or playing a video game (that tends to be 2 or 3 games), when i have a hard task to solve that I know is a headache. but i've been trying to force myself to bruteforce it regardless. i think thats a muscle. you need to train your muscle to head on towards hard tasks and get them done rather than being stuck on them for a few days. if i dont do this, i slack off on anything that is harder than usual. and most things i do these days are not simple, they are quite hard compared to what i was doing say a year ago. example a trade on a tail venue with a weird api that doesnt match anything i have built for other other venues. i can either procrastinate on that for a week, or just get it done. i view my work increasingly as a pain in the ass. but thats where you get paid more for. to solve those issues. your competition is struggling the same as you. probably more as they have other mandates that aint as flexible as yours. just get it done man. the frustration that spawns off your procrastination aint worth it. you have to get it done anyways so why delay that.
English
4
0
22
1.7K
Data Artist
Data Artist@data4rtist·
In a world with instant access to explanations understanding them is even more powerful as the masses get numbed into passive consumption disguised as intelligence
English
0
0
0
6
Data Artist
Data Artist@data4rtist·
@predict_addict Yea and everyone does the former and then we wonder why nobody gets it
English
0
0
0
18
Valeriy M., PhD, MBA, CQF
Valeriy M., PhD, MBA, CQF@predict_addict·
Two very different ways to teach arithmetic. One says: “Here is the rule. Memorize it.” The other says: “Here is the definition. Here is why the rule follows.” That difference looks small. It is not. It is the difference between performing math and understanding math.
English
5
1
19
1.2K
Aella
Aella@Aella_Girl·
Imagine a circle, with a little spinner on it that you can flick. The circle is 80% red and 20% yellow, like a yellow pie slice. You flick the spinner. It spins, and slowwwly stops. Where did it land?
English
441
403
5.4K
886.1K