daved

8.2K posts

daved banner
daved

daved

@daveddev

People are the best investment. - Dev Work: Tooling and/or backend (Go, Zig, Bash, etc.)

Harlow, Eugene, OR Katılım Ocak 2013
250 Takip Edilen317 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
daved
daved@daveddev·
If you're writing CLI apps in Go and want something (imo) more streamlined and idiomatic than the popular lib, try github.com/daved/clic Simple setup, POSIX-friendly flags, operand handling, nice default and customizable usage.
English
2
0
8
6.5K
daved
daved@daveddev·
These sorts of "well ackshually" replies that don't acknowledge and address the core point being made are exceedingly unlovely. The reality is that major aspects of LDS doctrine are so fundamentally out of bounds of Christianity that it should not be surprising that Christians exclude MotCoJCoLDS from their grouping.
English
0
0
1
10
Brother Green
Brother Green@BrotherGreen13·
"The Father has a body of flesh and bones as tangible as man’s; the Son also; but the Holy Ghost has not a body of flesh and bones, but is a personage of Spirit. Were it not so, the Holy Ghost could not dwell in us." Not seeing the "once was like a man and progressing", but good try.
English
3
0
0
14
Luke Hanson
Luke Hanson@LukeFHan·
Holy crap, if you're going to write 8 PARAGRAPHS pretending to have deeply studied the Book of Mormon, maybe don't put "the Book of Mormon describes God as once being like a man and progressing" as your first point! Thou shalt not bear false witness much?
❄️ Winter Hail ❄️@Hail_Winter

Something I started noticing over time were differences between the Book of Mormon and the Bible that honestly made me stop and think The Bible teaches God is unchanging (Malachi 3:6) but the Book of Mormon describes God as once being like man and progressing. The Bible says salvation is by grace through faith (Ephesians 2:8–9) but the Book of Mormon says “after all we can do” which is saying works are part of it too. The Bible teaches there is one God (Isaiah 43:10) while LDS teachings include multiple gods and the idea that people can become gods. The Bible says Jesus’ sacrifice was once and for all (Hebrews 10:10) but LDS doctrine adds ordinances and requirements. And the Bible doesn’t really support ongoing new scripture the same way LDS teachings do Another thing that stood out to me is how much the Book of Mormon overlaps with the Bible. There are hundreds of verses that are really similar or even word for word from the King James Bible especially Isaiah and even parts like the Sermon on the Mount. Some estimates say around 20 to 30 percent of it uses biblical language or parallels. What made me pause is that it uses the same wording and even some of the same translation quirks from the King James Bible which was written in the 1600s And then there are the historical things I never really heard about growing up. The Book of Mormon talks about animals like horses and cattle in ancient America but there’s no solid evidence they were there at that time. It also mentions steel chariots and large civilizations but archaeology hasn’t really backed that up. DNA shows Native American ancestry tracing back to East Asia not the Middle East like the Book of Mormon suggests. And “Reformed Egyptian” isn’t something we have any record of existing Something else I started noticing is that there are even contradictions within the Book of Mormon itself and that honestly made me pause. Like in Jacob 2 it speaks strongly against polygamy but then leaves room for it if God commands it. It also says God invites everyone equally but then describes certain groups being cursed with dark skin. And there are moments where things just don’t fully line up whether it’s doctrine timelines or just details in the story. The Book of Mormon we have today isn’t exactly the same as the 1830 version. It has been updated multiple times like 1837 1840 1879 1920 and later with thousands of changes. There also isn’t just one clear account of how it was translated. Sometimes it’s described using the Urim and Thummim other times a seer stone in a hat and some say a mix of both. Different witnesses even describe it differently For me it wasn’t just one thing it was a pattern and I couldn’t ignore it. Learning all of this made me step back and really question it.

English
16
8
349
9.1K
daved
daved@daveddev·
@lunypex @Fizzybubblerz Ridiculous cope. Especially given how often spectating reveals low skill idiots abusing stick drift.
English
0
0
0
18
luny
luny@lunypex·
hot take (apex): the weapon and legend metas in both ranked and casual modes in seasons 21-28 have had the lowest skill expression in the games history, and it’s not getting any better
English
27
6
173
13.7K
daved
daved@daveddev·
@KelTjorson @rocknrollofall For sure she has an accent, but it does seem like she's playing it up stylistically. It's half irritating to me now.
English
1
0
0
22
Tryne Harter
Tryne Harter@KelTjorson·
@daveddev @rocknrollofall Maybe. Could be just a coincidence she's sounding like the common sound of her time. I see her name is Paula Jive'n, sounds like she'd have an accent.
English
1
0
0
36
Rock'n Roll of All
Rock'n Roll of All@rocknrollofall·
This is a completely different and a brave approach to a song but the more you watch the better it gets.
English
89
364
3.1K
257.4K
daved
daved@daveddev·
@KelTjorson @rocknrollofall Yeah, no, not at all. The young lady simply has an accent. Her performance was phenomenal. Though, if a US singer sounded like this, I'd understand the friction.
English
1
0
1
44
Tryne Harter
Tryne Harter@KelTjorson·
@rocknrollofall I would argue NOT a different brave approach. That squishy cute indie voice is such a widespread cliche these days she sounds like a thousand others.
English
1
0
34
2K
daved
daved@daveddev·
@RyanHurst171 @ProvisionistP It's not there for the point to be treated as substantive. It's a claim which is not supported by the text, otherwise you'd be able to demonstrate it as such. You can claim "simple reading" all you want, but the ideas are injected interpretations not ideas stated in the texts.
English
0
0
1
11
Provisionist Perspective 🩸🌍
1. A denial of Original Guilt (from birth) is Pelagianism. 2. Pelagianism is a denial of Christianity. 3. A denial of OG is a denial of Christianity. Calvinists, which of these if false, if any?
English
14
0
14
2.2K
daved
daved@daveddev·
@richa_lq Not just information... Meaning. The information is interpreted. State and processing. This is like matter having structure and force, our bodies having code and vitality, and our species being male and female which procreate in mutual submission of unity.
English
0
0
0
14
daved
daved@daveddev·
@RyanHurst171 @ProvisionistP The text does not match the doctrine. I do not need to prove that. Those supporting Original Sin must prove the scriptures support their doctrine.
English
2
0
0
9
daved
daved@daveddev·
@RyanHurst171 @ProvisionistP The passages used to justify the doctrine do not say what the doctrine claims without injection. So, yes, injection is necessary.
English
1
0
0
7
daved
daved@daveddev·
@RyanHurst171 @ProvisionistP It doesn't. lol, see how that works? We can both make claims. The difference is that you'll need to inject ideas into the scriptures in order to prove your claim, and I don't need to do anything to prove mine.
English
1
0
0
8
daved
daved@daveddev·
@Just4Tweets1986 But, sadly, not effectually, amirite? For some people, their lord is not so capable.
GIF
English
0
0
0
24
daved
daved@daveddev·
@RyanHurst171 @ProvisionistP Rejecting Original Sin may be heresy, but it's not in the scriptures, and advocating for it is unscriptural.
English
1
0
0
22
Ryan Hurst 🍇 ⛪
Ryan Hurst 🍇 ⛪@RyanHurst171·
@ProvisionistP The denial of original sin is pelagianism. Pelagianism is heresy. The denial of original sin is heresy.
English
2
0
6
179
daved
daved@daveddev·
@AtiliusAtlas @kmbecker25 @Sola_GPT You stated that our image matches the image of God. I repeated that assertion without adjustment. Where did "regression" come from?
English
0
0
0
11
Sola GPT ✝️
Sola GPT ✝️@Sola_GPT·
So today my very Christian coworker who said she wouldn’t become Mormon revealed she’s never heard of Joseph Smith & asked how our beliefs are different from Protestant She also doesn’t consider Catholics as legit Christians but doesn’t know why This is what we’re up against 🤦
English
31
4
246
4.4K
Elder Bitcoin
Elder Bitcoin@AtiliusAtlas·
@daveddev @kmbecker25 @Sola_GPT My comment is completely irrelevant to this topic lol The topic is God has a resurrected immortal, glorified body. Has nothing to do with “Godhood regression” lol
English
1
0
1
15
kyle
kyle@kmbecker25·
@daveddev @Sola_GPT No. Your summary of my "argumentation" is incorrect. I promise you with no hesitation, I know my church better than you do. I am equally confident you know what you believe better than I know what you believe. That's how it works.
English
1
0
1
11
daved
daved@daveddev·
@kmbecker25 @Sola_GPT IME, MotCoJCoLDS are no more brainwashed than any other religious organizations. The major difference being a certain level of ignorance about Christianity. Which, understandably, looks like brainwashing to many people, but is not actually equivalent.
English
2
0
0
10
kyle
kyle@kmbecker25·
@daveddev @Sola_GPT Just don't go doing that old game where you had a roughly correct idea but were wrong about some details, and when the minor inaccuracies were reasonably pointed out, you get pissed and accuse people of lying and being brainwashed. That game is old and boring.
English
1
0
1
11
daved
daved@daveddev·
Your own argumentation is that we are what God is. That is, our eternal progression is a repeat of the eternal progression that God also lives/lived out. "As well as I can"... As in, I'm calling out poor doctrine boldly, and that can seem like a personal attack, but it's not. People are not things to be discarded, but corrupt ideas are.
English
2
0
0
13
kyle
kyle@kmbecker25·
@daveddev @Sola_GPT "As well as I can." Whatever that means. I'm telling you the doctrine of eternal progression or exaltation is focused on our human destiny and potential. Heavenly Father's biography prior to our existence is speculative and not relevant or necessary to eternal progression
English
1
0
1
14