
daved
8.2K posts

daved
@daveddev
People are the best investment. - Dev Work: Tooling and/or backend (Go, Zig, Bash, etc.)
Harlow, Eugene, OR Katılım Ocak 2013
250 Takip Edilen317 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet

If you're writing CLI apps in Go and want something (imo) more streamlined and idiomatic than the popular lib, try github.com/daved/clic
Simple setup, POSIX-friendly flags, operand handling, nice default and customizable usage.
English

These sorts of "well ackshually" replies that don't acknowledge and address the core point being made are exceedingly unlovely. The reality is that major aspects of LDS doctrine are so fundamentally out of bounds of Christianity that it should not be surprising that Christians exclude MotCoJCoLDS from their grouping.
English


@lunypex @Fizzybubblerz Ridiculous cope. Especially given how often spectating reveals low skill idiots abusing stick drift.
English

@KelTjorson @rocknrollofall For sure she has an accent, but it does seem like she's playing it up stylistically. It's half irritating to me now.
English

@daveddev @rocknrollofall Maybe. Could be just a coincidence she's sounding like the common sound of her time. I see her name is Paula Jive'n, sounds like she'd have an accent.
English

@KelTjorson @rocknrollofall Yeah, no, not at all. The young lady simply has an accent. Her performance was phenomenal. Though, if a US singer sounded like this, I'd understand the friction.
English

@rocknrollofall I would argue NOT a different brave approach. That squishy cute indie voice is such a widespread cliche these days she sounds like a thousand others.
English

@RyanHurst171 @ProvisionistP It's not there for the point to be treated as substantive. It's a claim which is not supported by the text, otherwise you'd be able to demonstrate it as such. You can claim "simple reading" all you want, but the ideas are injected interpretations not ideas stated in the texts.
English

@daveddev @ProvisionistP We have proven it. You need to argue against the points we have made.
English

Any student of physics is forever haunted by the same questions about this universe.

Richa Sharma@richa_lq
EVERYTHING IS INFORMATION: Ever since Demis' Lex interview, I haven't been able to shake this idea--information isn't just in the universe. It is the universe. More fundamental than matter or energy. And it has a wild implication most people miss: P=NP is actually a physics question. If the universe runs on information processing, then the limits of computation are the limits of reality itself-- what the universe can and cannot do.
English


@RyanHurst171 @ProvisionistP The text does not match the doctrine. I do not need to prove that. Those supporting Original Sin must prove the scriptures support their doctrine.
English

@daveddev @ProvisionistP So the plain reading of the text is wrong. Got it. Can you substantiate that claim?
English

@RyanHurst171 @ProvisionistP The passages used to justify the doctrine do not say what the doctrine claims without injection. So, yes, injection is necessary.
English

@daveddev @ProvisionistP I don't have to inject any ideas at all actually
English

@RyanHurst171 @ProvisionistP It doesn't.
lol, see how that works? We can both make claims. The difference is that you'll need to inject ideas into the scriptures in order to prove your claim, and I don't need to do anything to prove mine.
English

@daveddev @ProvisionistP The entire church disagrees with you.
English

@RyanHurst171 @ProvisionistP It's simply not in the scriptures. It can be read into the scriptures, but it's just not there.
English

@Just4Tweets1986 But, sadly, not effectually, amirite?
For some people, their lord is not so capable.
GIF
English

@daveddev @ProvisionistP Original sin is actually in scripture.
English

@RyanHurst171 @ProvisionistP Rejecting Original Sin may be heresy, but it's not in the scriptures, and advocating for it is unscriptural.
English

@ProvisionistP The denial of original sin is pelagianism. Pelagianism is heresy. The denial of original sin is heresy.
English

@AtiliusAtlas @kmbecker25 @Sola_GPT You stated that our image matches the image of God. I repeated that assertion without adjustment. Where did "regression" come from?
English

@daveddev @kmbecker25 @Sola_GPT My comment is completely irrelevant to this topic lol
The topic is God has a resurrected immortal, glorified body.
Has nothing to do with “Godhood regression” lol
English

@kmbecker25 @Sola_GPT Sorry, the reply I was thinking of was from someone else, so you may be correct if you disagree with the other member.
x.com/AtiliusAtlas/s…
Elder Bitcoin@AtiliusAtlas
@daveddev @Sola_GPT So God lied when He said He made us in His image and in His likeness? 🤔
English

@kmbecker25 @Sola_GPT IME, MotCoJCoLDS are no more brainwashed than any other religious organizations. The major difference being a certain level of ignorance about Christianity. Which, understandably, looks like brainwashing to many people, but is not actually equivalent.
English

Your own argumentation is that we are what God is. That is, our eternal progression is a repeat of the eternal progression that God also lives/lived out.
"As well as I can"... As in, I'm calling out poor doctrine boldly, and that can seem like a personal attack, but it's not. People are not things to be discarded, but corrupt ideas are.
English

@daveddev @Sola_GPT "As well as I can."
Whatever that means.
I'm telling you the doctrine of eternal progression or exaltation is focused on our human destiny and potential. Heavenly Father's biography prior to our existence is speculative and not relevant or necessary to eternal progression
English






