L.^_^

@Xenoimpulse I wonder if the latency gain from having everything in one place is large enough to justify all the social uproar. They should be working on architectures for small interconnected data centers.

@seld_on The Chinese understand that Trump and MAGA are desperate for any media win even if it's disconnected from reality. They're just giving a baby his bottle.

Chinese really don't understand American psychology. They see gestures like this as signs of weakness and submission, not openness and friendship.

@muzystar15 Por qué no señalar a los venezolanos MAGA bros y dejar de hacerse pajas mentales sobre el determinismo racial? Además, eres del bendito Perú. Medio continente te acusa de lo mismo.

Definitivamente los caribeños son lo más bajo de este continente. Su idiosincracia es literalmente vivir en la mediocridad absoluta parasitando a otro pais mas desarrollado sin trabajar y sin aportar. Con esa mentalidad que tienen, entiendes como Chavez y Maduro llegaron al poder tan facilmente.

@COTM_2 No soy de los que pide que todos los episodios sean sobre locura y farmear aura pero ya todo estaba contado! Homelander hace atrocidades, solo que sientes que todavía no termina de explotar.

¿Alguien sí le avisó a los guionistas de The Boys que solo les queda 1 capítulo para avanzar la trama?

@NomoriDude @Ap_Archlord @plasticblues_ Dudo que pase, pero sería algo como que toda la industria quiebre, desaparezca la publicidad que la sostenía y queden versiones de Onlyfans descentralizados de verdad. y si pasa hay un millón de incentivos para que todo vuelva a lo mismo

@david1lz @Ap_Archlord @plasticblues_ Fuf, como sería porno indie?

@Ap_Archlord @plasticblues_ ? pero hace rato. lo revolucionario sería volverlo indi.

@plasticblues_ Van a normear el porno, con esta mamada.

El camarógrafo del YouTuber qué hace bromas actuadas

@RiverBalija 8 years of boring summits about the "rebirth of friendly relations" and then back to your regularly scheduled programming

so what even happens when putin dies

@lumbogg Many have become just as insufferable as the AI bros. They are convinced they are the evangelists of salvation day, where all AI will disappear forever. The awakening will be very harsh

“Someone IRL told me they used ChatGPT and I cut them off” no you didn’t bro 😭😭😭

@YouAndYourBS @emollick I don't think the administration is enthusiastic about participating in an Anthropic PR stunt. They haven't even retracted the Pentagon's statement and are passing resolutions with legal loopholes to avoid contradicting themselves.

@emollick I think this is all just marketing from Anthropic. They obviously don't have the compute to release something like Mythos. They can't even keep up with Opus 4.7. So they do this big show about how it's too powerful to release. Cmon.

Mythos seems to be a very capable model based on available information, but it is not a cybersecurity model - it is an advanced general purpose model that happens to be good at cyber because it is good at a bunch of things. Anthropic stated that they were worried about cybersecurity risk, and their efforts mean it is a restricted model with lots of government attention. OpenAI and Google will pass the same threshold soon (and may already have with unreleased models). and the question is whether they are as worried about cybersecurity risks, or whether they think their guardrails will hold. Currently, the degree to which models have cyberrisk is entirely self-reported and not regulated. That means that OpenAI and Google could release Mythos-class models if they want, by assessing the risk differently and making different decisions. Does that mean Anthropic is at a disadvantage because it can't release its equivalent model? Will OpenAI and Google also be somehow restricted from releasing their Mythos competitor. It all seems pretty unclear right now.

@tomas_morton Trump siempre tuvo un cartel pegado en la frente. x.com/i/status/19365…

No, no puede decirse que EEUU ganó la guerra "militarmente". Además, guerra y política son un continuo fluido. Si hubiese ganado, podría imponer términos y condiciones - hoy Irán no se quiere sentar a negociar, y EEUU no quiere volver al intercambio directo. Basta con esto.

@IranDefense @clashreport Nah, Cuba is Venezuela 2.0. Castro's son will sell out Diaz Canel on a silver platter

@clashreport Give the Cubans UUVs & USVs

Iranian Navy Chief: Soon, we’ll reveal a weapon they deeply fear—right on their doorstep. Hope it doesn’t give them a heart attack!

@phl43 Y le hizo la pregunta al modelo de 4b porque sabe que es tonto y lo pude manipular para hacer el tweet que quiere.

This kind of stuff is funny, but I have yet to see a good argument that it has any practical relevance. It's not as if a is_taiwan_a_country function would actually be useful for any real project, so unless the people who come up with those contrived examples can make the case that using Chinese models for coding will have adverse consequences that outweigh their cost benefits, it says more about their China derangement syndrome than anything else.

@JavierBlas Supongo que no tiene que ver con Irán y es porque aún siguen dolidos por la paliza que les dio Arabia Saudita en Yemen. algo parecida está a punto de pasar en Sudán.

🚨🚨🚨🚨FULL STATEMENT: UAE says it's leaving the OPEC oil cartel from May 1. "... Following its exit, the UAE will continue to act responsibly, bringing additional production to market in a gradual and measured manner, aligned with demand and market conditions..."

@PromptSin @DotCSV Jajaja ni siquiera han publicado la api del modelo nuevo. Las métricas deben ser horribles.

@DotCSV Lo que les falta. Últimamente a Mark no le sale nada bien. Pueden volver al Multiverso 😂

Ojo! CTRL+Z a la adquisición de Manus por parte de Meta, tras bloquear China el acuerdo

@ChrisRMcGuire If a Chinese company had bought a U.S. laboratory, you would be talking about how blocking the sale represents a strategic move that any serious country would make.

After China's cancellation of Meta's purchase of Manus, why would any founder start an AI company in China if they had a choice? In China you have access to less compute, less capital, and salaries are lower than in the West. And if you are so successful that a non-Chinese firm tries to acquire you for billions of dollars, the Chinese government will lure you back to Beijing, ban you from leaving the country, and take your profits by canceling the acquisition. Manus did everything right. They even moved their entire business to Singapore to comply with U.S. outbound investment restrictions. Their only mistake was that they originally founded the company in China. It's not even clear what it means for China to force Meta to unwind the transaction. Is it going to force Manus's researchers to return to China and place exit bans on them too? Is it going to force Manus's founders and shareholders to pay back $2 billion to Meta? This is what happens when you regulate by fiat rather than rule of law. Ultimately, this is a much larger defeat for the Chinese AI ecosystem than for the United States. Meta will be fine without Manus. But Chinese nationals looking to found AI companies will increasingly just start them overseas. The message from the Chinese government here is that every AI company founded in China will forever remain subject to Chinese government regulatory pressure and manipulation, regardless of its legal status or location. Lastly, given the Chinese government clearly believes that the US and Chinese AI ecosystems should be completely separate, we should stop helping their ecosystem succeed! China's AI companies remain extremely reliant on US compute, AI models, and chipmaking tools. If we tighten the screws on China's access to US tech, the Chinese ecosystem will be even less attractive to founders, and more will just start companies overseas.

@cosasmilitares0 Esa cuenta solo pública basura para cobrar el cheque de Elon.

Eing?

@Colin_P_A_Jones @Handre @elonmusk Como siempre, la vida real tiene más matices que los usuarios de twitter obsesionados con presentar un caso perfecto para su trinchera política.

I worked on one stage of the JR privatization and this is greatly oversimplifies what actually happened and ignores some important realities. First, three of the seven JR companies (Hokkaido, Shikoku, Cargo) are still 100% government owned, and were probably never expected to be viable as public enterprises. I was surprised that JR Kyushu was successfully privatized completely - and got Shinkansen - because at the time I was involved (in another company) the conventional wisdom was that only the Honshu companies could succeed as private enterprises. Second, the privatization also involved parking a large chunk of liabilities in a special entity that was NOT privatized. In fact the part of the privatization I worked on was delayed because the government unilaterally decided the new JR companies had not taken enough of the JNR pension liabilities on their books and added some more. Probably one of the most significant aspects of the privatization was the public service workforce reduction it entailed but that was a problem for the government, not the JR companies. Third, the JR companies became private (but first government-owned) companies with valuable assets (the commuter and HSR rail networks) build with public funds as well as a portfolio of highly desirable real estate (high traffic train stations) in choice locations. Fourth, as far as I know any new HSR train lines built since the privatization were publicly funded, since new JR company could afford to build them on a commercially viable basis otherwise. Fifth, train fares are still regulated, and JR East only recently increased fares for the first time in decades… Thus, rather than a simplistic public > private transformation, the whole exercise involved a rebalancing of assets, liabilities and risks between the public and private sector, but both remain important to the whole construct. In any case there was serious planning and government decisions around what was necessary to have at least three commercially-viable JR companies (East, West and Tokai) as a result. So probably more an example of a successfully executed privatization with continuing government involvement, rather than a “private enterprise good, government bad” story.

The Japanese railway privatization of 1987 stands as one of the most devastating defeats ever dealt to statist transportation mythology. The government split the bloated Japan National Railways into seven regional companies, sold them off, and watched private ownership transform a bankruptcy-bound disaster into the world's most efficient rail system. JNR hemorrhaged money for decades before privatization. By 1987, the state railway carried debt equivalent to $200 billion in today's money while delivering mediocre service plagued by strikes and inefficiency. Politicians treated it as a jobs program rather than a transportation service. The predictable result: chronic losses, deteriorating infrastructure, and customer service that reflected government monopoly arrogance. Private ownership changed everything overnight. The new JR companies slashed operating costs by 40% within five years while dramatically improving service quality. JR East alone now generates annual profits exceeding $3 billion. These companies invest billions in cutting-edge technology, maintain punctuality rates above 99%, and operate the world's most advanced high-speed rail networks. They achieved this without a single yen of operational subsidies. The transformation reveals a core dynamic of transportation infrastructure: private companies must satisfy customers to survive, while government monopolies need only satisfy politicians. JR companies diversified into real estate, retail, and hospitality around their stations, creating integrated profit centers that cross-subsidize rail operations. Government railways never innovate this way because bureaucrats face no market pressure to generate returns. Meanwhile, Amtrak burns through $2 billion in annual subsidies while delivering third-world service across most routes, and European state railways require massive taxpayer bailouts every few years to stay solvent.

@TurkOrthodox Tell me more hahahaha

Müslüman ve Sosyalist diye pazarlanan bu şahıs, siyonist emperyalizmin ne kadar korkunç projesi varsa destekliyor. 🔸Atatürk düşmanı, 🔸Ramazan ayında LGBTQ+ ofisi açtı, sözde onur yürüyüşüne katıldı. 🔸"İstanbul'u yeniden geri alacağız", "Türkleri kovacağız" diyen bölücü ırkçı Yunanlarla sarmaş dolaş poz verdi. 🔸Şimdi de Ermeni Soykırımı yalanını destekliyor. Bu şahıs Türkiye'de yakın zamanda konferans yapacak. İptal edilmeli.