David van Deren

@BrianAtlas She had the claw out

Cope. Also, he should divorce her.

@BrianAtlas @nikitabier @whatever Maybe they still got the woke algorithm people infiltrating… @elonmusk might have interest to see this example

Hey @nikitabier any assistance on this? I could be wrong, but I think my @whatever account may be throttled or shadow banned. This is just 1 example, but have many more. I will post original content on @whatever, and then other accounts will repost the same exact clip weeks or even months later and get massive engagement while my originals do not.

@TimCunn67668864 @FranMooMoo

@FranMooMoo Fuck off mate, these men paid the ultimate sacrifice so you lot could continue to bludge off the system, it is you who should know your place. You are not our fucking Uncle either you grifting cunt.

The welcome to country was booed again today at the ANZAC service. After the Sydney service, Uncle Ray, a Kabi-Kabi, Gurang-Gurang and South Sea Islander man, told the ABC he wanted the hecklers to understand "this always was and always will be Aboriginal land". "They should show respect to us as traditional owners," and those who participated in the booing should "understand their place".

@Juniperjessiii @_Tumbawumba @newscomauHQ I think that Anzac Day is for the purpose of recognition… which Includes all who served… the woke land political speeches only divide the nation, so the soldiers, aborigines included, would hate to see an woke virtue signaling speech

@_Tumbawumba @newscomauHQ A lot of Anzacs were Aboriginal. They also deserve to be recognised.

The NSW RSL has reacted to the booing that marred its Sydney dawn service. FULL STORY: bit.ly/4vUSee8

@newscomauHQ Legacy media ^ 🤣🤣🤣😂😂 what a fckn circus 🤡

Aussies have been left stunned after discovering their beloved 50-year-old chip seasoning contains a surprising ingredient.

@UltraDane Immigration policy is societal suicide in Australia.. I mean it just is… the goal really does seem to be mass enslavement for eternity… and the government are full speed with the plan

A message From Thomas Sewell, Joel Davis and other members of National Socialist Network (NSN) in Australia. They're also linked to the European Australian Movement (EAM), which I believe Tom leads alongside the NSN. It's really simple to understand once you shed the past 60 years of lies. Those who are attempting to delete us completely will not stop until enough of us demand it, then it's payback time in my opinion. Those attempting to take your country and destroy your people do not deserve freedom, they deserve the wrath of the Saxon. They would post it themselves, but Australia has made massive attempts to silence dissent by forcing X and other sm platforms to suspend their accounts.

@jdhine @r0ck3t23 I think you under estimate human greed

@r0ck3t23 You had me until...human expertise evaporates. It doesn't evaporate, it just moves. We overvalue intelligence and undervalue leadership, empathy, inspiration and human connection. Those are the things that drive humanity forward.

Jeff Bezos just told you exactly how to price AI. Nobody listened. Bezos: “AI is real and it is going to change every industry. In fact it’s a very unusual technology in that regard in that it’s a horizontal enabling layer.” Horizontal enabling layer. Three words that reprice the entire technology sector. The iPhone was a vertical. One product. One new market. Electricity was a horizontal. One substrate that rewired every market on Earth. Wall Street is pricing AI like it is the next iPhone. Bezos is telling you it is the next electrical grid. Right now, thousands of companies are trying to sell AI as a product. A feature. A tool. A subscription tier. Every single one of them will be priced to zero. You do not sell a horizontal layer. You do not compete with it. You build on top of it or you disappear beneath it. For a century, entire industries survived on one thing. Complexity. The friction of navigating law, medicine, logistics, finance. That was the moat. If you could not memorize the maze, you could not compete. A horizontal layer does not navigate the maze. It dissolves the walls. Electricity did not compete with the candle industry. It erased the need for one. The most dangerous part of a horizontal shift is how quiet it is. It moves underneath the economy. The surface looks normal. Revenue still holds. Every day you operate on the old substrate, you accumulate a debt you cannot see and cannot repay. The internet repriced distribution. AI is repricing cognition itself. When intelligence becomes a utility that runs through the walls of every company on Earth, the premium on human expertise does not erode. It evaporates. This is not a disruption. Disruptions replace products. This replaces the ground you are standing on.

@CatLady280 @elonmusk Get into politics and bring the changes you believe in? Why do you think it’s blocked?

@elonmusk Not awesome until people in Iran can actually access it. #DigitalBlackOutIran‌

Starlink Internet is awesome

@EvanLuthra The supply demand curve will shift dramatically but there will still be wealthy people… there will just be a rapid shit in poverty

🚨RESEARCHERS JUST MATHEMATICALLY PROVED THAT AI LAYOFFS WILL DESTROY THE ECONOMY.. AND EVERY CEO ALREADY KNOWS IT.. BUT NONE OF THEM CAN STOP.. Two researchers from UPenn and Boston University just published a paper called "The AI Layoff Trap".. They proved something terrifying.. Every company replacing workers with AI is also firing its own customers.. Every laid-off employee is someone who used to spend money.. When enough people lose their jobs.. Nobody can afford to buy anything.. And the companies that fired everyone go bankrupt selling products to an economy with no purchasing power.. Every CEO can see this coming.. The math is obvious.. Fire workers.. Lose customers.. Lose revenue.. Collapse.. But here's the trap.. No company can afford to stop.. If you don't automate.. Your competitor will.. They cut costs.. Undercut your prices.. Steal your market share.. And you die anyway.. So every company automates.. Knowing it's collectively suicidal.. Because the alternative is dying alone while everyone else survives.. It's a Prisoner's Dilemma.. And the researchers proved it mathematically.. The numbers are already stacking up.. Block cut nearly half its 10,000 employees this year.. CEO Jack Dorsey said AI made those roles unnecessary and that "within the next year, the majority of companies will reach the same conclusion".. Salesforce replaced 4,000 customer support agents with AI.. Goldman Sachs deployed an AI coder that lets one senior engineer do the work of a five-person team.. Over 100,000 tech workers were laid off in 2025 alone.. AI was cited as the primary driver in more than half the cases.. 80% of US workers hold jobs with tasks susceptible to AI automation.. And here's what should scare policymakers.. The researchers tested every proposed solution.. Universal Basic Income.. Doesn't fix it.. It raises living standards but doesn't change a single company's incentive to automate.. Capital income taxes.. Don't fix it.. They change profit levels but not the per-task decision to replace a human.. Worker equity and profit sharing.. Narrows the gap but can't close it.. Collective bargaining.. Can't fix it.. Because automating is a dominant strategy.. No voluntary agreement between companies is self-enforcing.. Only one thing works.. A Pigouvian automation tax.. A per-task charge that forces every company to pay for the demand it destroys when it fires a worker.. The researchers call it a "Red Queen effect".. Better AI doesn't solve the problem.. It makes it worse.. Because every company sees a bigger market share gain from automating faster than rivals.. But at the end.. Everyone automates equally.. The gains cancel out.. And the only thing left is more destroyed demand.. The paper's conclusion is devastating.. This isn't a transfer from workers to company owners.. Both sides lose.. Workers lose their income.. Companies lose their customers.. It's a deadweight loss that harms everyone.. And no market force can break the cycle.. The AI layoff trap isn't a prediction.. It's already happening.. And the math says it won't stop on its own.

A MIT student figured out how to compress an entire semester of lecture content into one 90-minute study session. He calls it "context stacking," and it's the most unfair thing I've seen done with NotebookLM. I asked him to walk me through it. He did. I haven't studied the same way since. Here's exactly what he does. Two days before each lecture, he uploads everything into NotebookLM. The assigned readings, the previous week's slides, 3 or 4 related papers he finds himself, and any problem sets that are still open. Most students wait for the lecture to explain the material. He walks in having already built a mental model of it. That's step one. But it's not the move that makes it unfair. The first prompt he runs across all of it: "What are the 5 core concepts this week's content is built on, and how do they connect to what I studied last week?" Not summarize. Not define. Connect. NotebookLM pulls threads across everything he uploaded simultaneously. It surfaces relationships between ideas that would take a normal student weeks of review to notice. He gets that map before the lecture even starts. Then he runs the prompt that does most of the work. "What would I need to genuinely understand about this material to be able to teach it to someone with zero background in this subject?" That question is doing something most students never force themselves to do. It exposes exactly where his understanding is solid and exactly where it's hollow. The gaps show up immediately, and he spends the rest of the 90 minutes filling only those gaps. Not reviewing what he already knows. Only fixing what he doesn't. The final prompt is the one that separates context stacking from every other study method I've heard of. "What question could a professor ask about this material that would expose a student who understood the surface but missed the underlying logic?" He's not studying for the exam he expects. He's studying for the exam designed to catch people who only think they understood it. By the time he sits in the lecture hall, the professor is not teaching him anything new. The professor is confirming what he already mapped, filling in a few details, and occasionally surprising him with something he didn't anticipate. That surprise is the only thing he writes down. Most students leave a lecture hoping the material will eventually click. He walks in with it already clicked, and uses the lecture to find out what he missed. That's not a study hack. That's a completely different relationship with learning.

@w_desaulniers @elonmusk Ironically that’s the reason he’s suing… for the same concern around controlling the singularity acceleration safely by being open and thus subject to public scrutiny

OpenAI’s Nonprofit to Get Any Damages From Lawsuit wsj.com/tech/ai/elon-m…

@PromptSlinger @elonmusk The reason for investing $100 mil was for an openAI… the reason for wanting control was to ensure it happens… the reason for suing is because the converted into a for profit… he should win this lawsuit fairly easily and rightfully so… OpenAI will need to pay up

@elonmusk wait so the play is: try to buy the company, get turned down, then sue so the nonprofit gets the money? ok

@elalvarobalbin @elonmusk How so?

@Yes784360650955 @MrPositiviDad @mojitosupreme @grok @teslaownersSV @elonmusk Profit is one thing but open source is another… the profit was to be used for reinvestment… to get there first with the best and brightest ensuring its acceleration curve stays at the front … same reason he released the EV patents at a huge loss to teslas advantage…

@MrPositiviDad @mojitosupreme @grok @teslaownersSV @elonmusk OpenAI released emails. And while they are not a neutral source at all on this matter, if these were false or fabricated Musk would've said something or sued them for lying. share.google/l3tDVl0YQ0w0wD…

@Zraakula @ButThePeople @grok @mojitosupreme @teslaownersSV @elonmusk It was open AI, then became closed AI… hence the lawsuit…musk always spoke openly about its goals… if you keep it open source you prevent a small set of monopolistic corporations deciding the fate of mankind when the singularity kicks in… a grave concern of musks

@ButThePeople @grok @mojitosupreme @teslaownersSV @elonmusk I don't know the legal limits but as an example, Open software can be used in profitable stuffs and that's OK. But open IA was never really open I guess..

@Ryandally08 @elonmusk Albo is a piece of shit

@elonmusk Here’s Australian PM Anthony Albanese saying people used to get their news from “channel 7, 9, ABC or 10” and there would be a “consistency about it” But complains that people are now getting news from "their device, which tells them all sorts of things that aren't true"

As it should.

If the algorithm brings this video to your way, then you're lucky

@DAKKADAKKA1 CEOs are yes men for the board and shareholders… they’re hired and fired on revenue results… I can only assume the gravitation toward Indian CEOs for white founded companies is because the CEO needs to work long hours, have the ability to outsource effectively, and do as told

>indians get into management positions >immediately fire everyone on staff who is American >hire literally sub 60 IQ family members >pay them double the salary Every sector. Every industry. It’s all being looted. Our country is under attack and our politicians are getting paid.