Dayer
827 posts

Sabitlenmiş Tweet

Covenant leaving doesn’t weaken @bittensor, it demonstrates exactly why the network matters.
Bittensor isn’t any single team or subnet. It’s an open system. The code is public, the incentives are aligned, and the work continues; with or without any one group.
Within hours, the project was already moving forward. That’s resiliency. That’s antifragility.
Covenant is one subnet. There are 100+ others building, experimenting, and pushing the network forward. More will break out. That’s the design.
Zoom out. The signal here isn’t disruption, it’s proof.
Keep building.
English

@MattDevin6 @trenchmaxi Network effects apply to the ecosystem, not the individual participants. Bitcoin's network effect is dominant precisely because the miners are replaceable mercenaries. The protocol outlasts the people.
English

@dayerguy @trenchmaxi Network effect means you have some level of social stickiness and competitors can’t easily replicate your human capital. To say they are replaceable is the opposite of network effects.
English

@MattDevin6 @trenchmaxi miners are definitely mercs. some may leave. others will replace them. network effects.
English

@dayerguy @trenchmaxi So the question is if, it dangles a lot of money elsewhere, why wouldn’t miners come? Miners are the most merc communities out there in crypto. They just follow where the buck goes.
English

@MattDevin6 @trenchmaxi The moat is the network effect. You can copy the code, but you can’t copy the compute power, convincing miners to mine your subnet, or the distribution overnight.
English

@dayerguy @trenchmaxi You are literally saying funding these things has no moat and you are bragging about it. It is literally crazy how you guys brainwash ppl to donate their money to fund startups. There are much better ways to allocate your money towards charity initiatives.
English
Dayer retweetledi

Exploits are what teach a system its weak spots.
The quicker you find them the faster you learn.
The outcome of this eventful evening is that Bittensor will invent lock-based subnet ownership -- specifically: ownership of a subnet determined by a team's long term economic commitment to the project.
This will mean: 1) investors see long in advance if an owner has unlocked their tokens, 2) be able to reprice the subnet before the owner and 3) liquidly direct their own conviction to another team, or agent, to manage the system.
Thank you @DistStateAndMe for helping further Bittensor's decentralization and develop a solution to one of cryptos oldest problems: founders who rug their token holders.
Looking forward to training some 1T param models with the miners who are experts in this unique field.
"What is dead can never die"
Distributed State@DistStateAndMe
To the guy about to scam me $700 dollars on a token2024 ticket. I just lost 5k on a meme coin this morning. You can't hurt me. What is dead can never die.
English

@dayerguy @markjeffrey So are you doubling down on Templar? Thats what I’ve been debating on, this could be a huge entry opportunity
English

@muststopmax many great teams building. important reminder that we have to evaluate the founder as much as the idea
English

@Julian4crypto @markjeffrey of course. the code is open source. miners will stay. we'll be fine
English

@dayerguy @markjeffrey Okay this is what I’ve been wondering. So it can be continued? Same subnet?
English
Dayer retweetledi

And I wouldn't worry about bittensor's position in the decentralized training space. x.com/jon_durbin/sta…
Stay tuned.
Jon Durbin@jon_durbin
Half a million (soon million) blackwell GPUs in a single DC doing 10t! param models. Hopper/blackwell GPUs are also very difficult to source right now, even if you wanted to pay extra. GPU scarcity, power costs rising, closed AI labs ramping up... This is what the open source community is up against. We need a step-change in our approach to decentralized training.
English

@dayerguy Your biggest subnet left and rugged because they don’t have confidence in your blockchain…. That’s not just let’s move on type of thing. That’s bad
English

@trenchmaxi unfortunately for the naysayers this is open source ai. someone will just pick it up and make it better. miners will stay and continue to build decentralized ai training runs.
English

@dayerguy only reason tao was bought was because of sam i will simple wait for sam to launch his own token thats decentralized instead
English

@dayerguy Sam is a scammer who made millions and left and to hide his crime he decided to blame to whole ecosystem what a moron 😂
English

@markjeffrey preach. this is what makes bittensor great. one dude crashes out. we continue on with others that are cooking
English

@markjeffrey some people are going to make a bunch of money here. you know const or others are going to resurrect this subnet idea, build upon it, make it better
English

@RecklessGhost03 @abcampbell play it out. if the financial system blows up you think some digits on a screen is going to be honored?
English

@dayerguy @abcampbell Coz you can only hold gold by physically buying it?
English



I'm debating @Jason next week about TAO
What is everything I need to know about TAO going into the debate? Give me the good, the bad, and the ugly please!
English

The emission haters should just come and take it. FAFO $tao
Algod@AlgodTrading
And if you think its easy money as a subnet Come and compete, be a miner, be a subnet owner, be a fucking trader If you think you can do better the network will reward you heavily, thats how fucking markets work
English





