David Duclos

@CiancioloAndrew @JakeSherman He's saying I had relations but nothing nonconsensual would be my guess

@JakeSherman Why is everything “I’m sorry for everything I did, I did not do these things.”

🚨SWALWELL resigning.

@menotmewhatever @BarefootStudent @RepMariaSalazar So.... representative salazar who is defending the bill... Well she's a republican

@BarefootStudent @RepMariaSalazar Republicans should take out what they don't like and begin bargaining. It's a starting point not the finish line.

READ. THE. BILL. BEFORE. YOU. OPEN. YOUR. MOUTH. Calling the DIGNITY Act “amnesty” isn’t just wrong. It’s a deliberate distortion and it exposes just how little you know about the bill. This is enforcement first: zero tolerance for criminals, permanent border security, and hard, earned requirements to step forward and face the law, so American workers are protected, not undercut. Amnesty is the chaos you’ve defended, millions in the shadows, no control, no accountability, and a system that stopped working a long time ago. No shortcuts. No giveaways. No blanket forgiveness. That’s law and order. That’s DIGNITY.

@BowTiedKong Well it's legal because our constitution says it is. Like anything else in our constitution it can be repealed through another amendment, but just because you don't like a law doesn't make it any less of a law.

I have no idea how birthright citizenship is legal I also have no faith the Supreme Court is going to do the right thing We are headed towards some uncomfortable and inevitable conversations and decisions If you really look at the Constitution, its basically worthless. It doesn't stop infringement on any of your rights Yes you have the right to a trial, but you have to spend $30k for that right - does the constitution cover reimbursement for being arrested for nothing? It is what it is. I hope the SC does the right thing but if not...

@seanmdav They didn't fire for Christianity. They fired him for saying homophobic things. Christianity says love thy neighbor. Christianity says "judge not, that you be not judged." A true Christian would be kind and let God perform any judgment if it were necessary

The conduct they are claiming is detrimental is Christianity. They fired Jaden Ivey for being Christian. Worth noting the Bulls didn’t fire Ronnie Brewer after he was arrested for DUI. Or Joakim Noah after he was arrested for possession of drugs. When Jameson Curry was arrested for public urination and then resisted arrest, the Bulls suspended him for one game, but also refused to fire him for his conduct. Christianity is apparently where the Chicago Bulls draw the line.

@MorosKostas Except the 24th amendment eliminated poll taxes. There hasn't been a similar amendment as it relates to gun ownership as far as I'm aware

Elizabeth Banks says requiring a passport as an alternative way to vote is not OK, because getting a passport costs $100 and a lot of people can't afford that. We have sued Santa Clara County because a carry permit from them costs $2,000 in total expense, 20x what she complains about in this video. We look forward to working with Elizabeth Banks to prepare a promotional video in opposition to that far worse unconstitutional burden on the Second Amendment.

@KrowbarG @K1ngNazJets @gunhillbain @Tommy_W1587 The path with fewest assumptions is she tweaked something in the match or in training and got it checked out and it was more serious than she expected. Pregnant in an of itself is you making a massive assumption.

So they had Ronda Rousey show up unannounced and unadvertised for a PPV to tease a match with a woman who’s going to be out of the action for the rest of the year. WCW 2000-level incompetence.

@Matt_Pinner Tennis

This is hard

@FortunateFolk Meow

Umm… switch 2 and pokopia giveaway cuz why not, might double the reward if lots of people join Only requirement is comment

@naruto180 @davemeltzerWON 21 months is the expected time frame for the expiration of the current tv deal

@davemeltzerWON Real Question: How do you know what AEW financial cushion would be?

The No. 2 promotion has a far greater need to protect its top money players. WWE as a business is idiot-proof, not saying the people are runnin it are, they are very much not. But if they were, the financial cushion is there. AEW does have 21 months of a financial cushion as well, but they are not idiot-proof in the slightest.

@TedFromThePWO For me it's not that it's too long. It's too late for a Sunday. I love aew but if the ppv is on Sunday it needs to be a bit earlier. I can't be going to bed at 1am and have to wake up for work at 5.

Elimination chamber was 3 hours long and had 4 matches on it. Revolution was 4 and a half hours long and had 10. The show wasn’t too long yall just don’t like wrestling 😂

@CMFo23 @Emoney1937 @AEW To be fair most wrestling events could never be a sell out then because the stage and gorilla usually take up a portion of the arena

@Emoney1937 @AEW Didn’t need to learn something I already knew, it’s a paper sell out not an actual sell out of every seat in the building

What I learned about @AEW this week: -AEW maintained 615K+ viewership (not including MAX) amongst the NBA and the World Baseball Classic - Double or Nothing 2026 has 8K+ tickets distributed with zero matches announced - AEW Revolution may break its record with 11.7K+ attendance, a $1M+ gate and is officially SOLD OUT - MyAEW.com is a gamechanger for the international market and free to the US market. Like this post if you'e for Positivity and Pro Wrestling 🤘

@kdl6785 @ThePoliticalHQ @AndrewDesiderio The save act does not currently restrict mail ballots

@ThePoliticalHQ @AndrewDesiderio Dumbass it’s going to end… look at the SAVE ACT. No more mail in ballots except for military, disabled…

Amendments will be at a 60-vote threshold during this phase of the process Also, Republicans are divided on Trump’s calls to significantly restrict mail-in ballots

@EGrsic @davemeltzerWON This week also had the love is blind reunion drop at 9pm

@davemeltzerWON Were there premonitions the last two weeks before then? And isn’t Wednesday usually more higher rates competition like Survivor, Masked Singer, & more NBA games? It’s more impressive given all of that how they still draw more.

They are not in competition. Second, using Tuesday's NXT number is disingenuous due to the preemeptions.

@DrEggPricing @KToropin @bresreports @AP Even if what you said was correct, this is not a discussion of troop movement, this is a casualty report

@KToropin @bresreports @AP You need to retract this. Discussions of US troop movements can be considered treason. Especially since liberals have decided to go all in on supporting Iraq. EVIL

🚨🚨BREAKING: WASHINGTON (@AP) — About 140 US troops have been wounded in the Iran war, including 8 severely and 108 who returned to duty, Pentagon says.

@officialimicca @ZacksJerryRig @elonmusk It's also provided nationally for free in most of those countries even the impoverished ones.

If requiring ID to vote is racist/sexist, as they falsely claim, then so is requiring ID for anything else, which they do all the time. The same people saying no ID for voting are the ones who demanded vaccination ID!

@shy_ferg @SCOTUSblog The statute says a president can regulate imports. It does not specifically state that includes tariffs. Historically if a constitutional duty is being delegated the language must be specific

@dduclos2 @SCOTUSblog No they arent. Theyre essentially saying a court can sentence someone to death but not prison for a crime. The statutue LITERALLY SAYS the Prez can embargo WITHOUT Congress. That math aint mathin

The Supreme Court on Friday issued its highly anticipated ruling on tariffs. Here's Amy's initial opinion analysis, which will be updated throughout the day. scotusblog.com/2026/02/suprem…

@kellyannwashbu1 @SCOTUSblog That's not what the court said at all. The court said that, per the constitution, it is congress's power to impose tariffs. They can absolutely attempt to pass them through congress and it would be lawful.

@SCOTUSblog So it’s cool for countries who’d rather have the boot on the neck of their people than be prosperous with capitalism to PARASITE 🦠 off of the successful capitalistic United States????

@shy_ferg @SCOTUSblog They aren't. They are simply stating that the Constitution explicitly delegates the right to impose tariffs to congress.

@SCOTUSblog YOU FUCKING MORONS. So you're setting foreign policy now? Tipple dipped in moron sauce deep fried RETARDS.

@jpd272 @DerrickEvans4WV On the other hand it wouldnt make sense for the Democrats to nuke the filibuster while trump or any Republican holds the white house since the president still carries veto power.

From Grok: From Grok: Historically, Democrats have sought to reform or eliminate the legislative filibuster to pass priority agendas, such as voting rights and economic legislation, during periods of unified control. In 2021-2022, when Democrats held a narrow Senate majority, nearly all members supported carving out exceptions or abolishing it outright, but Senators Joe Manchin (D-WV) and Kyrsten Sinema (I-AZ, formerly D) blocked these efforts, citing concerns about minority protections and long-term institutional stability. Their opposition preserved the rule, preventing major Democratic initiatives from advancing without Republican support. Manchin retired in 2024, and his West Virginia seat flipped to Republican Jim Justice, reducing Democratic moderates in the caucus. Sinema, who became an independent in 2022, did not seek reelection; her Arizona seat was won by Democrat Ruben Gallego, who has expressed support for filibuster reform to enable progressive policies. With these key holdouts gone, the current Democratic Senate caucus—now in the minority with 47 seats (as of February 2026)—is more ideologically cohesive and progressive, lacking similar internal barriers to reform. As of February 2026, Republicans hold a 53-47 Senate majority under Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD), alongside control of the House and the presidency under Donald Trump. Recent debates, including over the SAVE America Act (requiring voter ID and citizenship proof) and funding bills, have seen Democrats leverage the filibuster to block Republican priorities, prompting Trump and some GOP senators to advocate for its elimination. However, Thune and other Republicans have resisted, arguing it lacks sufficient support within their conference and warning that Democrats would exploit its absence upon regaining power. Expert analyses and political commentary suggest a high likelihood—estimated by observers at 70-90% based on polling and historical patterns—that Democrats would nuke the filibuster if they regain a Senate majority (potentially after the 2026 midterms, where they have a plausible path to flipping seats in states like Texas, Florida, and Ohio). This assessment stems from: • Party Unity: Post-Manchin/Sinema, Democratic leaders like Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and progressives have reiterated support for reform to enact policies on voting rights, climate, and healthcare, which were stymied previously. • Precedent: Democrats eliminated the filibuster for most judicial nominations in 2013; Republicans extended this to Supreme Court nominees in 2017. Both parties have incrementally eroded the rule, indicating a trajectory toward full abolition. • Strategic Incentives: In minority status, Democrats benefit from the filibuster, but in majority, it hinders their agenda amid GOP obstruction. Recent statements from Democrats and allied think tanks emphasize readiness to act, viewing the rule as an antidemocratic relic. • Public and Internal Pressure: Over 70% of Democratic voters favor elimination, per surveys, and the party’s base increasingly demands it for urgent issues. However, risks could temper this: Potential backlash from swing-state voters valuing bipartisanship, or internal divisions if new moderates emerge. Some Democrats, like Senator Jon Tester (D-MT, facing reelection in 2026), have expressed caution, though they lack the veto power Manchin and Sinema held. In summary, absent Manchin and Sinema, the structural and ideological shifts within the Democratic Party make filibuster elimination probable upon regaining control, enabling streamlined passage of their legislative priorities. This outlook aligns with bipartisan warnings that the rule’s days are numbered regardless of which party acts first.

🚨 Dan Bongino calls on Senate Republicans to eliminate the 60-vote filibuster and pass the SAVE America Act immediately. “If the Democrats take power in the Senate, they are going to drop the filibuster… we might as well do it now!”

@Daystarz01 @LeVeonBell A lawyer such as Bondi would know that testimony or claims are considered evidence. She didn't say we weighed the evidence and found it not credible. She said there was no evidence. As someone who went to the same law school as her, she was taught better than that.

@LeVeonBell Because she didnt lie. There is no EVIDENCE of wrongdoing. Only claims. That were investigated.

having NO CONSEQUENCES for lying under oath, just seems like a really big problem ..