deadlygraphics

1.1K posts

deadlygraphics banner
deadlygraphics

deadlygraphics

@deadly_graphics

3D Design and animation inspired by the 1980's

sites.google.com/site/deadlygraphicsportfolio Katılım Ocak 2013
496 Takip Edilen60 Takipçiler
deadlygraphics
deadlygraphics@deadly_graphics·
@ImKingGinger Pulp Novels, B-Movies and Youtube were never about quality. Video games have always been as celebrated as denigraded. the only slop around here is you posting empty meaningless engagement slop all day long insed of actually acting like a filmmaker as you "allege"
English
1
0
1
12
deadlygraphics
deadlygraphics@deadly_graphics·
@ImKingGinger This simply is untrue. Comic books began in the visual history of newspapers and have always been a much respected, even the ones known as the Tijuana bibles. Which you'd know if you researched.
English
3
0
2
99
Marcus Pittman
Marcus Pittman@ImKingGinger·
Every piece of entertainment you love started as what others called slop. Comic books were considered trash for kids. Pulp fiction was printed on the cheapest paper money could buy. B-movies were unwatchable garbage that gave us Scorsese and James Cameron thanks to Roger Corman. YouTube was cat videos. Wrestling was fake fighting for rednecks. Video games were a waste of time rotting your brain. Every single one of those became billion dollar culture. AI slop is just artists starting something new and testing the market. I'm going live soon to talk about this. Join the chat.
Marcus Pittman tweet media
English
29
14
108
3K
deadlygraphics
deadlygraphics@deadly_graphics·
@PurzBeats @purz this was the perfect moment to remind me about datamoshing - my first vibed' custom node was a "datamosh model" node, and I need to dust it off now that my inferred videos are not looking datamoshed natually. cheers pal!
English
1
0
1
101
Purz.ai
Purz.ai@PurzBeats·
Claude got busy simulating the SNES PPU at the hardware level then corrupting it just to give lil' old me some nostalgic SNES glitches for my CRT display.
English
24
40
341
13.1K
deadlygraphics
deadlygraphics@deadly_graphics·
@ImKingGinger you probably need to see the arseholes all over this platform saying "VFX IS COOKED". they have open disdain for tradional work.
English
0
0
5
78
Marcus Pittman
Marcus Pittman@ImKingGinger·
I have noticed that AI filmmakers have a deep respect for traditional filmmaking. I haven't met a single AI filmmaker who has a disdain for the challenge and craft of traditional work. The same cannot be said for traditional filmmakers. But I believe this is only temporary.
English
56
7
132
4.5K
deadlygraphics
deadlygraphics@deadly_graphics·
@tvaziri @anishmoonka Folks pretending CGI is live action / practical should be banished to Mars in a current generation billionaires rocketshop. They get the choice to the rocket is practical or CGI.
English
0
0
0
15
Todd Vaziri
Todd Vaziri@tvaziri·
@anishmoonka You wrote: “Then there's Rocky. He's the alien co-lead, and he's not CGI.” That is not accurate. “Half of Rocky’s performance is CG animation.” Director Phil Lord.
English
8
8
270
6.1K
Anish Moonka
Anish Moonka@anishmoonka·
You're watching a $248 million film and not a single green or blue screen was used. The alien is a handmade puppet. The cockpit physically rotates to simulate gravity. I looked at the production tech behind this 95% score, and the engineering is wild. Phil Lord and Chris Miller, directing their first live-action movie in 12 years, built the entire Hail Mary spacecraft as a real set at Shepperton Studios in England. Not a miniature. Not a digital model. A full-size ship interior you can walk through. Production designer Charlie Wood studied the International Space Station, Russia's Mir station, and the Boeing 747 cockpit to get the look right. He deliberately made the panels mismatched, because real spacecraft are assembled from parts made by different companies. Nothing matches perfectly. That's what makes it feel real. The cockpit is only about 8 feet wide. It sits on a mechanical platform that can tilt, spin, and shake, so when the ship changes direction or enters different gravity conditions, the whole set moves. Chairs end up on walls. Ladders flip direction. Gosling was suspended inside a spinning ring so he could float and move through the ship for real, reacting to actual hardware around him. No guessing where a wall might be added later. Then there's Rocky. He's the alien co-lead, and he's not CGI. Neal Scanlan, the creature designer who built the Porgs for Star Wars, spent a full year on this character. Over 300 designs before they landed on the final look. Rocky is a thin, hollow shell, 3D-printed from a digital sculpture, then hand-painted in see-through layers so light passes through him like skin. His arms pop off and swap out depending on the scene: one set has a closed fist for walking, another has tiny motorized fingers strong enough to pick up objects. Five puppeteers (nicknamed the "Rockyteers") operated him in every scene. James Ortiz, an award-winning puppet designer from New York theater, voiced Rocky and controlled him on set. When Scanlan met him, he told Ortiz, "You're Frank Oz, and I'm making Yoda for you." Every reaction Gosling gives to the alien is to something physically in front of him. Greig Fraser, who won the Oscar for shooting Dune, filmed the space scenes in the larger IMAX format (that taller image you see in IMAX theaters) and the Earth flashbacks in regular widescreen. Then the team did something unusual: they took the digital footage and printed it onto real film strips, twice, using two different types of film stock. Then they scanned those strips back into digital. It sounds redundant, but it adds a texture and warmth that you can only get from physical film. Fraser used the same technique on Dune and The Batman. Drew Goddard spent six years writing this screenplay. His last adaptation of Andy Weir's novel, The Martian, earned him an Oscar nomination. He described the challenge this way: a screenplay gets about 5% of a novel's word count. The lead is alone for most of the runtime. When he finally gets a co-star, that co-star doesn't speak English, communicates through sounds closer to whale song, and has no face. Goddard called it a screenwriter's nightmare, then said that difficulty was the whole point. He and the directors fought studio pushback to keep Weir's original ending intact. 95% from 212 critics. 98% from over 2,500 audience ratings. And the lead isn't a superhero, a cop, or a soldier. He's just an ordinary middle school science teacher.
English
416
9.7K
126.5K
8.5M
deadlygraphics
deadlygraphics@deadly_graphics·
@popupipapo @DiscussingFilm 100% this. in fairness not just directors. There's now a team of auteurs to explode a VFX budget because planning has gone out the window. Could there be a correlation between @JamesGunn 's "no greenlight until finished script" and the fact noone bemoaned Superman's VFX?
English
0
0
0
4
tenshen
tenshen@popupipapo·
@DiscussingFilm Note that modern CG problems come from a combination of fucked up deadlines...and directors customizing fully photoreal lighting and effects into cartoons to "elevate the subject" until release. It's not CGI that got worse, it's directors. Even no-CGI shots are worse than ever.
English
2
0
36
5.5K
DiscussingFilm
DiscussingFilm@DiscussingFilm·
Gore Verbinski reacts to CGI getting worse in modern blockbusters. “I was watching something... it was CG ships in the ocean and I was like, ‘Really? That is literally a video game. That’s not a movie. Those effects are not final, how are they ending up in the final movie?’”
DiscussingFilm tweet media
English
240
1.8K
34.8K
2M
deadlygraphics
deadlygraphics@deadly_graphics·
@JoeWilliams010 @motionbynick Surely not on your own profile? AI Bro's need deeply to learn the definition of 'consistient'. lesson 2 can be on 'art'. I'm not remotely anti generative art (currently) but shitting on artists when your own 'content' is inferior EVEN WITH AI,.. not smart, not cool.
English
0
0
0
71
Joe Williams
Joe Williams@JoeWilliams010·
@motionbynick 20k for this crap?! I’ve seen much better AI stuff made for MUCH less.
English
12
0
41
4.3K
Nick Greenawalt
Nick Greenawalt@motionbynick·
AI artists are COOKED. This entire video was made in just a few weeks by a small team of skilled artists for just $20k:
English
188
767
8.5K
307.2K
deadlygraphics
deadlygraphics@deadly_graphics·
@doctorwasif shite like this gives Generative AI Art a bad name. more feckless snakeoil marketeers hocking slop for engagement. AI is not the scourge you shameless parasites are.
English
0
0
0
8
deadlygraphics
deadlygraphics@deadly_graphics·
@doctorwasif 1). what is 'a Matrix-style Scene'? 2). where are you getting your $10M cost from? show your workings. 3). why does your 2mins one prompt facimile the actual fight from the matrix? by your logic thats 10M+ the costs of your prompt + legal costs when your'e sued.
English
0
0
0
13
deadlygraphics
deadlygraphics@deadly_graphics·
@greenmoon2 @Sheldon056 "actually moves people" - surely you're not talking about the gravity defying spiderman clip here? I hope you're right but it shure as slop won't be with eyes closed generation of meme content.
English
0
0
4
191
Pavel Muntyan
Pavel Muntyan@greenmoon2·
@Sheldon056 Exactly. Studios spend millions on committee-approved mediocrity while one creator with Seedance makes something that actually moves people. The middlemen are becoming irrelevant. The future belongs to those who can dream and build without permission.
English
36
0
12
17.9K
Duet | AI
Duet | AI@Sheldon056·
Generated with Seedance 2.0 from a single prompt. Hollywood isn’t the future of filmmaking. Creators are.
English
1.4K
377
5.5K
3.5M
deadlygraphics
deadlygraphics@deadly_graphics·
@vikare06 I think the most striking part it demonstrates is that its understood the seminal art direction (that someone made) not the seminal animation (that somone made). "You come at the king, you better not miss." These marketers should choose lower hanging fruit.
English
1
0
2
1K
deadlygraphics
deadlygraphics@deadly_graphics·
@Theybannedme4 @KingSpyke_ My friend you have dedicated more grey matter to this slosh than the person who generated it. the user who inferred this did not even realise hands going through shields, shield being held backwards, the green man jumping from one side of the street to the other.
English
0
0
0
19
Bruce Fulani Hausa
Bruce Fulani Hausa@Theybannedme4·
@KingSpyke_ This is an interesting one. MCU cap is a lot stronger than Comic cap. I don’t think Spider-Man is that much stronger than movie cap .
English
27
0
28
43K
KING SPYKE
KING SPYKE@KingSpyke_·
Okay this is dope Toby Spider-Man vs Captain America Steve 👀
English
437
1.5K
22.1K
2.2M
deadlygraphics
deadlygraphics@deadly_graphics·
@KingSpyke_ the midair hovering,the physics defying slide on top of a car, the disappering green man in the background. The punching of an ubreakably strong shield without injury. The horrible edit as the two (eventually) decide gravity means they should be on the ground. not dope, DOPEY
English
0
0
0
832
deadlygraphics
deadlygraphics@deadly_graphics·
@NACHOS2D_ I readily believe it was made by AI. no human brainwork whatsoever went into an original idea, framing the characters, adhering to the 180 degree rule, or consistient backgrounds In fact while on still frame this might pass, the animation on arkane is sublime, this anim is shit
English
0
0
1
145
nachos2d
nachos2d@NACHOS2D_·
This was made 100% by artificial intelligence. I know it’s hard to believe, but it was created with Seedance 2.0 — a Chinese AI, with no censorship, already released in China and coming globally in the future. Everything is extremely smooth, with almost no errors. We’re starting the year with a major shift in the internet as we know it. This is the future.
English
576
408
5.9K
2.1M
Roberto Nickson
Roberto Nickson@rpnickson·
Man how the hell did they pull this off in 1991
English
50
4
153
30.7K
deadlygraphics
deadlygraphics@deadly_graphics·
@LinusEkenstam oh wow, you can get a different sportscar and spaceship in every scene!!! this might be a problem if your story isn't a medieval battle set on an alienspacehip planet with car battles jumping around world to world like a trailer. but i'm sure you're thought of this one Linus.
English
0
0
0
5
Linus ✦ Ekenstam
Linus ✦ Ekenstam@LinusEkenstam·
People still arguing if Hollywood being cooked? LMFAO
English
173
82
799
90.4K
deadlygraphics
deadlygraphics@deadly_graphics·
@PJaccetturo @JJTorrijos yes, and this in between is what people are calling slop. soulless, devoid of artistc merit or intent and vapid. you need to put something in to get something out, and if meme level is your highest aspiration don't be surprised when its regarded as vapid & soulless
English
0
0
0
20
PJ Ace
PJ Ace@PJaccetturo·
@JJTorrijos Sure but the reality is most AI films will exist in the gray area in between. I’d even wager that Sora videos, which are completely automated are art because it’s just mimicking the training data, which is art. It’s what we do as humans
English
9
0
14
4.2K
PJ Ace
PJ Ace@PJaccetturo·
This is such a low-IQ take. When your child draws a picture of your family, it makes you feel something. Not because of the crayon's quality, but because we resonate with the message. The tools used do not matter. They never have. Art has always been subjective, and the medium has never stopped humans from ascribing meaning. From cave paintings to fertility sculptures to film cameras, and now generative cameras. I just spent a week in Hollywood watching my friend generate new sequences based on real footage because they didn't have the budget to film 100,000 soldiers on location. He then recorded performances of the actors using the same motion capture tools that they used on Avatar, but now AI lets him map the performance on the characters for a 1/10th of the time and cost. I couldn't actually tell that it was AI; it looked incredible. Because it was driven by a real filmmaker, with real actors. The paintbrush does not matter. The reason AI films don't make you feel emotion right now is due to technical shortcomings and talent scarcity. That will change very soon as mass adoption occurs.
Matt Walsh@MattWalshBlog

People debate whether AI will ever be able to create good art. The answer is no. It’s impossible. If AI progresses exponentially for 100 years it still won’t be able to create any art, even bad art. That’s because art by definition is an expression of the human heart. It’s a language that can only be spoken or understood by beings with rational souls. AI can create spectacle. It can create distraction. In that sense it can create “entertainment” in its cheapest and most worthless form. But you can only confuse the machine’s soulless bullshit with art if you have made yourself nearly as numb and soulless as the machine itself.

English
308
41
603
450.3K
deadlygraphics
deadlygraphics@deadly_graphics·
@EHuanglu really helpful if you dont need a consistent performance. its over for grifters like you. where's next and hows the NFT portfolio going?
English
0
0
0
7
el.cine
el.cine@EHuanglu·
we are so cooked AI now can replace actor from any film.. talking, acting, emotion and any subtle details can be copied perfectly.. its over for Hollywood here's how to do in 5 mins:
English
123
99
801
121.3K