Debilex

@Alpha_MEXC @MEXC_DEX @MEXCVietnam @MEXC @MEXC_SouthAsia @MEXC_Japan @MEXCDerivatives [Other languages are below PL, ZH, FR, ES] Dear MEXC Team, We are contacting you on behalf of $DBLX holders whose assets and funds were frozen following the closure of the MEXC DEX+ service. Based on numerous reports received from our community, MEXC has continued to delay the resolution of this matter, provide evasive responses, and fail to present any effective mechanism for reimbursing the affected users. Holders are being passed between departments, while responsibility is being shifted onto the token’s low market capitalization, limited liquidity, SunPump, or the Debilex project itself. This conduct is entirely unacceptable. The $DBLX token was launched through SunPump and remains in the bonding curve phase, meaning that it cannot currently be freely transferred. As the entity that allowed users to purchase $DBLX through DEX+, MEXC should have been fully aware of the token’s technical characteristics and transfer restrictions. Despite this, MEXC enabled users to purchase $DBLX, accepted their funds, and subsequently closed the DEX+ service without providing effective and sufficiently advanced notice that holders needed to withdraw, sell, or otherwise secure their assets. According to the information provided to us by affected users, they received no prior email notification clearly warning them that the closure of DEX+ could result in the loss of access to their tokens or the complete freezing of their invested capital. As a result, holders have been deprived of the ability to: – withdraw their $DBLX tokens; – freely control the assets they purchased; – sell their tokens on their own terms; – recover funds corresponding to the current value of their assets. This is not merely a technical issue or a matter of limited liquidity. It is the direct result of MEXC’s actions and omissions concerning the closure of DEX+ and its failure to provide users with proper and sufficiently advanced notice. We therefore demand that MEXC reimburse every affected holder not merely for the amount originally invested, but for the full current value of the $DBLX tokens held on their account, calculated according to the token price applicable at the time the reimbursement is executed. Returning only the historical purchase amount would not constitute full compensation. The token price has changed since the purchases were made. Reimbursing holders only for their original investment would mean that, should they attempt to repurchase $DBLX, they could receive significantly fewer tokens than the number they originally acquired and can no longer access due to MEXC’s handling of this matter. MEXC deprived these holders of the ability to control their assets. Therefore, the risk of price fluctuations during the period in which the tokens have been withheld cannot be transferred to the affected users. We will also not accept any solution involving the simultaneous liquidation of the frozen $DBLX tokens by MEXC. Such an operation could cause a severe price collapse, destroy available liquidity, and completely destabilize the Debilex project. This would transfer the consequences of MEXC’s failures not only to the affected holders, but also to every other token holder and the entire Debilex community. We have also received reports from affected holders that MEXC is making the further processing of their cases conditional upon the submission of additional identity materials, including a photograph of the holder’s face together with a photograph of their identity document. At the same time, MEXC is requiring holders to provide a statement in which they consent to the sale of their $DBLX tokens and acknowledge that they may suffer financial losses due to the price instability of a token that remains in the SunPump bonding curve phase. Even if additional identity verification may form part of MEXC’s security procedures, combining it with a requirement to accept the sale of the tokens and the risk of financial loss raises extremely serious concerns. In practice, an affected user seeking to regain access to their assets is being placed in a position where they must provide further identity materials and sign a statement that may be used to shift responsibility for the financial consequences of MEXC’s proposed solution onto the user. The holders did not cause the closure of DEX+, did not voluntarily surrender access to their tokens, and should not be forced to accept a potential financial loss merely for MEXC to begin resolving their claims. We demand a clear explanation of: – why a photograph of the user’s face together with an identity document is required from users whose identities may already have been verified; – why the resolution of these cases is being made conditional upon consent to the sale of the tokens; – on what basis holders are expected to accept the risk of losses resulting from a course of action proposed by MEXC; – how, for how long, for what purpose, and by which entity the submitted facial photographs and identity documents will be stored and processed; – whether the required statement is intended to limit or exclude MEXC’s responsibility. We will not accept any attempt to use these statements to transfer responsibility for potential losses onto the holders or to release MEXC from responsibility for the situation created following the closure of DEX+. MEXC’s actions have also caused substantial reputational damage to the Debilex project. We informed our community that $DBLX could be purchased through MEXC DEX+ because we had reasonable grounds to believe that MEXC was a reliable platform capable of ensuring that users retained access to the assets they purchased. Following the closure of DEX+, however, users were deprived of access to their tokens and invested capital, while responsibility for a situation created by MEXC began to be unfairly directed toward our project. Immediately before publishing this statement, we posted a message concerning this matter in the official “MEXC English (Official)” Telegram group. The message was removed in its entirety by the group’s administration almost immediately, without any response and without any attempt to substantively address the situation. We consider the deletion of a public message concerning frozen user assets to be an attempt to silence the matter and prevent the community from obtaining information about MEXC’s handling of its customers’ funds. Rather than responding to serious allegations concerning withheld assets, the administration of MEXC’s official channel chose to remove an inconvenient message. This is precisely why we are now publishing this statement on X. Since an official MEXC communication channel is deleting messages and questions concerning user funds, we have been left with no alternative but to bring this matter into the public domain and present the community with the full circumstances of the case. Every further deletion, attempt to suppress the matter, procedural delay, or failure to provide a concrete response will be documented and made public. We formally demand that MEXC immediately: 1. determine the exact number of $DBLX tokens belonging to every affected user; 2. calculate their full current value according to the price applicable at the time the reimbursement is executed; 3. pay that value to affected users in USDT, USDC, or another mutually agreed liquid asset; 4.disclose the transparent methodology, pricing source, and exact valuation timestamp used for the calculation; 5. provide a specific and binding deadline for the completion of all reimbursements; 6. cease proposing the mass sale of the frozen tokens as a solution; 7. explain the basis for requiring facial photographs, identity documents, and statements consenting to the sale of the tokens and accepting the risk of potential losses; 8. confirm that the required statements will not be used to limit MEXC’s responsibility or deprive holders of any claims available to them. At present, our holders’ funds and tokens are being withheld without an effective basis, a workable solution, or a specific reimbursement deadline. In our assessment, this constitutes the unjustified withholding of user assets and may amount to the misappropriation of funds belonging to MEXC customers. We will not accept any further automated responses, superficial explanations, procedural delays, or attempts to shift responsibility onto the holders, the token’s liquidity, SunPump, or the Debilex project. Unless MEXC immediately provides a binding plan for reimbursing the full current value of the affected $DBLX holdings, we will proceed with further legal, regulatory, media, and public action to protect our community and document how MEXC handles assets belonging to its users. The time for polite requests, evasive responses, and the deletion of inconvenient questions is over. We demand the immediate reimbursement of the full current value of every affected holder’s $DBLX tokens. We expect a public and substantive response from MEXC, a specific resolution plan, and the commencement of reimbursements without any further delay. Sincerely, The Debilex Team

@Cointelegraph Nothing says “community-owned” like firing staff right before the tokens unlock.

@Cointelegraph Tether quietly turned stablecoin fees into one of the strongest balance sheets in crypto.

🔥 BIG: Tether reported $1.5 billion in Q2 net operating profit, increased its reserve buffer to $4.11 billion, and expanded its physical gold holdings to more than 146 tons.

@elonmusk Great movie, but think Spain isnt happy about this

Wow, the situation in Spain looks crazy!

Dear MEXC Support Team, we are under the impression that our formal demand was not read in full, as your response does not address the substance of the matter we raised. We therefore urge you to assign this case to a competent representative who will carefully review our entire statement, examine the situation of all affected $DBLX holders, and provide a clear and substantive response. This is not an individual inquiry concerning a single account. It is a serious matter affecting multiple MEXC DEX+ users. We expect it to be treated with the appropriate level of attention and escalated to the relevant department.

Hello, MEXCer, We understand that this situation may be worrying and frustrating for you, and we’ll do our best to help. To protect your account’s security and privacy, we’ve sent you a DM. Please check your inbox. We look forward to your reply. Thank you for your patience and support—we’ll do our best to serve you better.

@Alpha_MEXC @MEXC_DEX @MEXCVietnam @MEXC @MEXC_SouthAsia @MEXC_Japan @MEXCDerivatives [Other languages are below PL, ZH, FR, ES] Dear MEXC Team, We are contacting you on behalf of $DBLX holders whose assets and funds were frozen following the closure of the MEXC DEX+ service. Based on numerous reports received from our community, MEXC has continued to delay the resolution of this matter, provide evasive responses, and fail to present any effective mechanism for reimbursing the affected users. Holders are being passed between departments, while responsibility is being shifted onto the token’s low market capitalization, limited liquidity, SunPump, or the Debilex project itself. This conduct is entirely unacceptable. The $DBLX token was launched through SunPump and remains in the bonding curve phase, meaning that it cannot currently be freely transferred. As the entity that allowed users to purchase $DBLX through DEX+, MEXC should have been fully aware of the token’s technical characteristics and transfer restrictions. Despite this, MEXC enabled users to purchase $DBLX, accepted their funds, and subsequently closed the DEX+ service without providing effective and sufficiently advanced notice that holders needed to withdraw, sell, or otherwise secure their assets. According to the information provided to us by affected users, they received no prior email notification clearly warning them that the closure of DEX+ could result in the loss of access to their tokens or the complete freezing of their invested capital. As a result, holders have been deprived of the ability to: – withdraw their $DBLX tokens; – freely control the assets they purchased; – sell their tokens on their own terms; – recover funds corresponding to the current value of their assets. This is not merely a technical issue or a matter of limited liquidity. It is the direct result of MEXC’s actions and omissions concerning the closure of DEX+ and its failure to provide users with proper and sufficiently advanced notice. We therefore demand that MEXC reimburse every affected holder not merely for the amount originally invested, but for the full current value of the $DBLX tokens held on their account, calculated according to the token price applicable at the time the reimbursement is executed. Returning only the historical purchase amount would not constitute full compensation. The token price has changed since the purchases were made. Reimbursing holders only for their original investment would mean that, should they attempt to repurchase $DBLX, they could receive significantly fewer tokens than the number they originally acquired and can no longer access due to MEXC’s handling of this matter. MEXC deprived these holders of the ability to control their assets. Therefore, the risk of price fluctuations during the period in which the tokens have been withheld cannot be transferred to the affected users. We will also not accept any solution involving the simultaneous liquidation of the frozen $DBLX tokens by MEXC. Such an operation could cause a severe price collapse, destroy available liquidity, and completely destabilize the Debilex project. This would transfer the consequences of MEXC’s failures not only to the affected holders, but also to every other token holder and the entire Debilex community. We have also received reports from affected holders that MEXC is making the further processing of their cases conditional upon the submission of additional identity materials, including a photograph of the holder’s face together with a photograph of their identity document. At the same time, MEXC is requiring holders to provide a statement in which they consent to the sale of their $DBLX tokens and acknowledge that they may suffer financial losses due to the price instability of a token that remains in the SunPump bonding curve phase. Even if additional identity verification may form part of MEXC’s security procedures, combining it with a requirement to accept the sale of the tokens and the risk of financial loss raises extremely serious concerns. In practice, an affected user seeking to regain access to their assets is being placed in a position where they must provide further identity materials and sign a statement that may be used to shift responsibility for the financial consequences of MEXC’s proposed solution onto the user. The holders did not cause the closure of DEX+, did not voluntarily surrender access to their tokens, and should not be forced to accept a potential financial loss merely for MEXC to begin resolving their claims. We demand a clear explanation of: – why a photograph of the user’s face together with an identity document is required from users whose identities may already have been verified; – why the resolution of these cases is being made conditional upon consent to the sale of the tokens; – on what basis holders are expected to accept the risk of losses resulting from a course of action proposed by MEXC; – how, for how long, for what purpose, and by which entity the submitted facial photographs and identity documents will be stored and processed; – whether the required statement is intended to limit or exclude MEXC’s responsibility. We will not accept any attempt to use these statements to transfer responsibility for potential losses onto the holders or to release MEXC from responsibility for the situation created following the closure of DEX+. MEXC’s actions have also caused substantial reputational damage to the Debilex project. We informed our community that $DBLX could be purchased through MEXC DEX+ because we had reasonable grounds to believe that MEXC was a reliable platform capable of ensuring that users retained access to the assets they purchased. Following the closure of DEX+, however, users were deprived of access to their tokens and invested capital, while responsibility for a situation created by MEXC began to be unfairly directed toward our project. Immediately before publishing this statement, we posted a message concerning this matter in the official “MEXC English (Official)” Telegram group. The message was removed in its entirety by the group’s administration almost immediately, without any response and without any attempt to substantively address the situation. We consider the deletion of a public message concerning frozen user assets to be an attempt to silence the matter and prevent the community from obtaining information about MEXC’s handling of its customers’ funds. Rather than responding to serious allegations concerning withheld assets, the administration of MEXC’s official channel chose to remove an inconvenient message. This is precisely why we are now publishing this statement on X. Since an official MEXC communication channel is deleting messages and questions concerning user funds, we have been left with no alternative but to bring this matter into the public domain and present the community with the full circumstances of the case. Every further deletion, attempt to suppress the matter, procedural delay, or failure to provide a concrete response will be documented and made public. We formally demand that MEXC immediately: 1. determine the exact number of $DBLX tokens belonging to every affected user; 2. calculate their full current value according to the price applicable at the time the reimbursement is executed; 3. pay that value to affected users in USDT, USDC, or another mutually agreed liquid asset; 4.disclose the transparent methodology, pricing source, and exact valuation timestamp used for the calculation; 5. provide a specific and binding deadline for the completion of all reimbursements; 6. cease proposing the mass sale of the frozen tokens as a solution; 7. explain the basis for requiring facial photographs, identity documents, and statements consenting to the sale of the tokens and accepting the risk of potential losses; 8. confirm that the required statements will not be used to limit MEXC’s responsibility or deprive holders of any claims available to them. At present, our holders’ funds and tokens are being withheld without an effective basis, a workable solution, or a specific reimbursement deadline. In our assessment, this constitutes the unjustified withholding of user assets and may amount to the misappropriation of funds belonging to MEXC customers. We will not accept any further automated responses, superficial explanations, procedural delays, or attempts to shift responsibility onto the holders, the token’s liquidity, SunPump, or the Debilex project. Unless MEXC immediately provides a binding plan for reimbursing the full current value of the affected $DBLX holdings, we will proceed with further legal, regulatory, media, and public action to protect our community and document how MEXC handles assets belonging to its users. The time for polite requests, evasive responses, and the deletion of inconvenient questions is over. We demand the immediate reimbursement of the full current value of every affected holder’s $DBLX tokens. We expect a public and substantive response from MEXC, a specific resolution plan, and the commencement of reimbursements without any further delay. Sincerely, The Debilex Team

Robinhood Chain is now available on Debilex. ✅ You can now paste a token contract address and review key on-chain data, risk signals, and Debilex Score. Don’t trust the name or ticker. Verify the contract. Check it: debilex.com

ES Estimado equipo de MEXC: Nos dirigimos a ustedes en representación de los titulares de tokens $DBLX cuyos activos y fondos quedaron bloqueados como consecuencia del cierre del servicio MEXC DEX+. Según las numerosas denuncias recibidas de nuestra comunidad, MEXC lleva un periodo prolongado retrasando la resolución de este asunto, proporcionando respuestas evasivas y sin presentar ningún mecanismo efectivo para compensar a los usuarios afectados. Los titulares están siendo remitidos de un departamento a otro, mientras MEXC intenta trasladar la responsabilidad a la baja capitalización del token, su limitada liquidez, la plataforma SunPump o incluso al propio proyecto Debilex. Esta forma de actuar es completamente inaceptable. El token $DBLX fue lanzado a través de SunPump y continúa en la fase de bonding curve, lo que significa que actualmente no puede transferirse libremente. Como entidad que permitió a los usuarios adquirir $DBLX mediante DEX+, MEXC debía conocer perfectamente las características técnicas del token y las restricciones relativas a su transferencia. A pesar de ello, MEXC permitió a los usuarios comprar $DBLX, recibió sus fondos y posteriormente cerró el servicio DEX+ sin informarles de manera efectiva, clara y con suficiente antelación de que debían retirar, vender o proteger sus activos de cualquier otra forma. De acuerdo con la información proporcionada por los usuarios afectados, estos no recibieron previamente ningún correo electrónico que advirtiera claramente que el cierre de DEX+ podía provocar la pérdida de acceso a sus tokens o el bloqueo completo del capital invertido. Como consecuencia, los titulares han sido privados de la posibilidad de: – retirar los tokens $DBLX que legítimamente les pertenecen; – disponer libremente de los activos adquiridos; – vender sus tokens según sus propias decisiones y condiciones; – recuperar los fondos correspondientes al valor actual de sus activos. No se trata de un simple problema técnico ni de una cuestión que pueda atribuirse únicamente a una liquidez limitada. Esta situación es el resultado directo de las acciones y omisiones de MEXC relacionadas con el cierre de DEX+, así como de su incapacidad para proporcionar a los usuarios una comunicación adecuada, clara y suficientemente anticipada. Por lo tanto, exigimos que MEXC compense a cada titular afectado no solo por el importe originalmente invertido, sino por el valor actual íntegro de los tokens $DBLX que poseía en su cuenta, calculado conforme al precio vigente en el momento en que se efectúe el reembolso. La devolución exclusiva del importe histórico de compra no constituiría una compensación completa. El precio del token ha cambiado desde que se realizaron las adquisiciones. Si MEXC devolviera únicamente el capital inicialmente invertido, los titulares podrían adquirir una cantidad considerablemente inferior de $DBLX en caso de intentar recomprar los tokens que originalmente adquirieron y a los que actualmente no pueden acceder debido a la forma en que MEXC ha gestionado esta situación. Fue MEXC quien privó a los titulares de la posibilidad de controlar y administrar libremente sus activos. Por consiguiente, el riesgo derivado de las fluctuaciones de precio durante el periodo de retención de los tokens no puede trasladarse a los usuarios afectados. Tampoco aceptaremos ninguna solución basada en la venta simultánea y masiva por parte de MEXC de los tokens $DBLX bloqueados. Una operación de este tipo podría provocar un colapso grave del precio, destruir la liquidez disponible y desestabilizar por completo el proyecto Debilex. Esto supondría trasladar las consecuencias de los errores y deficiencias de MEXC no solo a los titulares directamente afectados, sino también a todos los demás titulares del token y a toda la comunidad de Debilex. Asimismo, hemos recibido información de titulares afectados según la cual MEXC condiciona la continuación de la tramitación de sus casos a la entrega de materiales adicionales de identificación, incluida una fotografía del rostro del titular junto con una fotografía de su documento de identidad. Al mismo tiempo, MEXC exige que los titulares presenten una declaración mediante la cual autoricen la venta de sus tokens $DBLX y reconozcan que pueden sufrir pérdidas económicas debido a la inestabilidad del precio de un token que continúa en la fase de bonding curve de SunPump. Aunque una verificación adicional de identidad pueda formar parte de los procedimientos de seguridad de MEXC, vincularla a la obligación de aceptar la venta de los tokens y el riesgo de una posible pérdida económica genera preocupaciones extremadamente graves. En la práctica, un usuario afectado que intenta recuperar el acceso a sus activos se encuentra obligado a proporcionar materiales adicionales de identificación y a firmar una declaración que podría utilizarse para trasladarle la responsabilidad por las consecuencias económicas de la solución propuesta por MEXC. Los titulares no provocaron el cierre de DEX+, no renunciaron voluntariamente al acceso a sus tokens y no deberían ser obligados a aceptar una posible pérdida económica únicamente para que MEXC comience a tramitar sus reclamaciones. Exigimos una explicación clara sobre los siguientes puntos: – por qué se exige una fotografía del rostro junto con un documento de identidad a usuarios cuya identidad posiblemente ya ha sido verificada; – por qué la resolución de estos casos se condiciona al consentimiento del usuario para vender los tokens; – sobre qué fundamento se espera que los titulares acepten el riesgo de pérdidas derivadas de una actuación propuesta por MEXC; – de qué manera, durante cuánto tiempo, con qué finalidad y por qué entidad serán almacenadas y tratadas las fotografías faciales y los documentos de identidad presentados; – si la declaración exigida tiene como objetivo limitar o excluir la responsabilidad de MEXC. No aceptaremos ningún intento de utilizar estas declaraciones para trasladar a los titulares la responsabilidad por posibles pérdidas ni para eximir a MEXC de su responsabilidad por la situación creada tras el cierre de DEX+. Las acciones de MEXC también han causado un grave daño reputacional al proyecto Debilex. Informamos a nuestra comunidad de que $DBLX podía adquirirse a través de MEXC DEX+ porque teníamos razones legítimas para creer que MEXC era una plataforma fiable, capaz de garantizar a los usuarios un acceso continuo a los activos adquiridos. Sin embargo, después del cierre de DEX+, los usuarios quedaron privados del acceso a sus tokens y al capital invertido, mientras que la responsabilidad por una situación creada por MEXC comenzó a atribuirse injustamente a nuestro proyecto. Inmediatamente antes de publicar esta declaración, enviamos un mensaje relacionado con este asunto al grupo oficial de Telegram denominado “MEXC English (Official)”. El mensaje fue eliminado íntegramente por la administración del grupo casi de inmediato, sin que se proporcionara respuesta alguna y sin que se intentara abordar el problema de manera sustantiva. Consideramos que la eliminación de un mensaje público relativo a activos bloqueados de los usuarios constituye un intento de silenciar este asunto e impedir que la comunidad obtenga información sobre la forma en que MEXC gestiona los fondos de sus clientes. En lugar de responder a las graves acusaciones relativas a los activos retenidos, la administración del canal oficial de MEXC decidió simplemente eliminar un mensaje incómodo. Precisamente por este motivo estamos publicando ahora esta declaración en la plataforma X. Dado que un canal oficial de comunicación de MEXC está eliminando mensajes y preguntas relacionados con los fondos de los usuarios, no nos queda otra alternativa que hacer público este asunto y presentar a la comunidad todas las circunstancias del caso. Toda nueva eliminación de mensajes, intento de silenciar el asunto, retraso injustificado del procedimiento o ausencia de una respuesta concreta será documentada y publicada. Requerimos formalmente a MEXC que adopte inmediatamente las siguientes medidas: 1. determinar la cantidad exacta de tokens $DBLX pertenecientes a cada usuario afectado; 2. calcular su valor actual íntegro conforme al precio vigente en el momento de efectuarse el reembolso; 3. abonar dicho valor a los usuarios afectados en USDT, USDC o cualquier otro activo líquido acordado por las partes; 4. revelar de forma transparente la metodología utilizada para determinar el precio, la fuente de los datos y el momento exacto empleado para efectuar la valoración; 5. proporcionar un plazo concreto, vinculante y definitivo para completar todos los reembolsos; 6. dejar de proponer la venta masiva de los tokens bloqueados como solución; 7. explicar el fundamento de la exigencia de fotografías faciales, documentos de identidad y declaraciones de consentimiento para la venta de los tokens y aceptación del riesgo de posibles pérdidas; 8. confirmar que las declaraciones exigidas no serán utilizadas para limitar la responsabilidad de MEXC ni para privar a los titulares de los derechos y reclamaciones que les correspondan. Actualmente, los fondos y tokens de nuestros titulares continúan retenidos sin que se haya comunicado una base efectiva, sin una solución aplicable y sin un plazo concreto para su reembolso. En nuestra valoración, esta situación constituye una retención injustificada de los activos de los usuarios y podría considerarse una apropiación indebida o una malversación de los fondos y activos pertenecientes a los clientes de MEXC. No aceptaremos más respuestas automáticas, explicaciones superficiales, retrasos procedimentales ni intentos de trasladar la responsabilidad a los titulares, a la liquidez del token, a SunPump o al proyecto Debilex. Si MEXC no presenta inmediatamente un plan vinculante que contemple el reembolso del valor actual íntegro de los tokens $DBLX pertenecientes a los usuarios afectados, iniciaremos nuevas acciones legales, regulatorias, mediáticas y públicas para proteger a nuestra comunidad y documentar la forma en que MEXC trata los activos pertenecientes a sus usuarios. El tiempo de las solicitudes educadas, las respuestas evasivas y la eliminación de preguntas incómodas ha terminado. Exigimos el reembolso inmediato del valor actual íntegro de los tokens $DBLX pertenecientes a cada titular afectado. Esperamos una respuesta pública y sustantiva por parte de MEXC, la presentación de un plan concreto para resolver este asunto y el inicio inmediato de los reembolsos, sin más demoras. Atentamente, El equipo de Debilex

FR Madame, Monsieur, Nous vous contactons au nom des détenteurs de jetons $DBLX dont les actifs et les fonds ont été bloqués à la suite de la fermeture du service MEXC DEX+. D’après les nombreux signalements reçus de notre communauté, MEXC continue depuis longtemps à retarder le règlement de cette affaire, à fournir des réponses évasives et à ne présenter aucun mécanisme efficace permettant d’indemniser les utilisateurs concernés. Les détenteurs sont renvoyés d’un service à l’autre, tandis que MEXC tente de rejeter la responsabilité sur la faible capitalisation du jeton, sa liquidité limitée, la plateforme SunPump ou le projet Debilex lui-même. Un tel comportement est totalement inacceptable. Le jeton $DBLX a été lancé sur la plateforme SunPump et se trouve toujours dans la phase de bonding curve, ce qui signifie qu’il ne peut actuellement pas être transféré librement. En tant qu’entité ayant permis aux utilisateurs d’acheter des jetons $DBLX par l’intermédiaire de DEX+, MEXC devait parfaitement connaître les caractéristiques techniques du jeton ainsi que les restrictions relatives à son transfert. Malgré cela, MEXC a permis aux utilisateurs d’acheter des jetons $DBLX, a accepté leurs fonds, puis a fermé le service DEX+ sans les informer de manière efficace, claire et suffisamment anticipée qu’ils devaient retirer, vendre ou autrement sécuriser leurs actifs. D’après les informations qui nous ont été transmises par les utilisateurs concernés, ceux-ci n’ont reçu aucun courrier électronique préalable les avertissant clairement que la fermeture de DEX+ pouvait entraîner la perte d’accès à leurs jetons ou le blocage complet du capital investi. En conséquence, les détenteurs ont été privés de la possibilité de : – retirer les jetons $DBLX qui leur appartiennent ; – disposer librement des actifs qu’ils ont achetés ; – vendre leurs jetons selon leurs propres décisions et conditions ; – récupérer les fonds correspondant à la valeur actuelle de leurs actifs. Il ne s’agit pas d’un simple problème technique ni d’une question pouvant être attribuée uniquement à une liquidité limitée. Cette situation résulte directement des actions et omissions de MEXC dans le cadre de la fermeture de DEX+, ainsi que de l’absence d’une information correcte, claire et suffisamment anticipée adressée aux utilisateurs. Nous exigeons donc que MEXC indemnise chaque détenteur concerné non seulement à hauteur du montant initialement investi, mais à hauteur de la valeur actuelle intégrale des jetons $DBLX détenus sur son compte, calculée sur la base du prix du jeton applicable au moment où le remboursement est effectivement exécuté. Le remboursement du seul montant historique de l’achat ne constituerait pas une indemnisation complète. Le prix du jeton a évolué depuis la réalisation des achats. Si MEXC remboursait uniquement le montant initialement investi, les détenteurs pourraient, en tentant de racheter des jetons $DBLX, obtenir une quantité nettement inférieure à celle qu’ils avaient réellement achetée et à laquelle ils n’ont aujourd’hui plus accès en raison de la manière dont MEXC a géré cette situation. C’est MEXC qui a privé les détenteurs de la possibilité de contrôler et de gérer librement leurs actifs. Le risque lié aux fluctuations de prix pendant la période de blocage des jetons ne peut donc pas être transféré aux utilisateurs concernés. Nous n’accepterons pas non plus une solution reposant sur la vente simultanée et massive des jetons $DBLX bloqués par MEXC. Une telle opération pourrait provoquer un effondrement brutal du prix, détruire la liquidité disponible et déstabiliser entièrement le projet Debilex. Cela reviendrait à transférer les conséquences des manquements de MEXC non seulement aux détenteurs directement concernés, mais également à tous les autres détenteurs de jetons et à l’ensemble de la communauté Debilex. Nous avons également reçu des informations de la part de détenteurs concernés indiquant que MEXC conditionne la poursuite du traitement de leurs dossiers à la transmission de documents d’identification supplémentaires, notamment une photographie du visage du détenteur accompagnée d’une photographie de sa pièce d’identité. Dans le même temps, MEXC exige des détenteurs qu’ils fournissent une déclaration dans laquelle ils consentent à la vente de leurs jetons $DBLX et reconnaissent qu’ils peuvent subir des pertes financières en raison de l’instabilité du prix d’un jeton se trouvant toujours dans la phase de bonding curve sur SunPump. Même si une vérification d’identité supplémentaire peut faire partie des procédures de sécurité de MEXC, le fait de l’associer à l’obligation d’accepter la vente des jetons ainsi que le risque de perte financière soulève de très sérieuses préoccupations. En pratique, un utilisateur concerné qui cherche à récupérer l’accès à ses actifs est placé dans une situation où il doit fournir des données d’identification supplémentaires et signer une déclaration susceptible d’être utilisée pour lui transférer la responsabilité des conséquences financières de la solution proposée par MEXC. Les détenteurs n’ont pas provoqué la fermeture de DEX+, n’ont pas volontairement renoncé à l’accès à leurs jetons et ne devraient pas être contraints d’accepter une perte financière potentielle uniquement pour que MEXC commence à traiter leurs réclamations. Nous exigeons une explication claire concernant les points suivants : – pourquoi une photographie du visage accompagnée d’une pièce d’identité est exigée de la part d’utilisateurs dont l’identité peut déjà avoir été vérifiée ; – pourquoi le règlement de leur dossier est conditionné à leur consentement à la vente des jetons ; – sur quel fondement les détenteurs devraient accepter le risque de pertes résultant d’une solution proposée par MEXC ; – de quelle manière, pendant combien de temps, à quelles fins et par quelle entité les photographies du visage et les documents d’identité transmis seront conservés et traités ; – si la déclaration exigée est destinée à limiter ou à exclure la responsabilité de MEXC. Nous n’accepterons aucune tentative visant à utiliser ces déclarations pour transférer la responsabilité des pertes potentielles aux détenteurs ou pour exonérer MEXC de sa responsabilité dans la situation créée à la suite de la fermeture de DEX+. Les actions de MEXC ont également causé un préjudice important à la réputation du projet Debilex. Nous avions informé notre communauté que les jetons $DBLX pouvaient être achetés par l’intermédiaire de MEXC DEX+, car nous avions des raisons légitimes de croire que MEXC était une plateforme fiable capable de garantir aux utilisateurs un accès continu aux actifs qu’ils avaient achetés. Après la fermeture de DEX+, les utilisateurs ont toutefois été privés de l’accès à leurs jetons et au capital investi, tandis que la responsabilité d’une situation créée par MEXC a commencé à être injustement attribuée à notre projet. Immédiatement avant la publication de la présente déclaration, nous avons publié un message concernant cette affaire dans le groupe Telegram officiel « MEXC English (Official) ». Ce message a été intégralement supprimé presque immédiatement par l’administration du groupe, sans qu’aucune réponse ne soit apportée et sans aucune tentative de traiter le problème sur le fond. Nous considérons que la suppression d’un message public relatif aux actifs bloqués des utilisateurs constitue une tentative de faire taire cette affaire et d’empêcher la communauté d’obtenir des informations sur la manière dont MEXC traite les fonds de ses clients. Au lieu de répondre aux graves accusations concernant les actifs retenus, l’administration du canal officiel de MEXC a choisi de supprimer un message dérangeant. C’est précisément pour cette raison que nous publions désormais la présente déclaration sur la plateforme X. Dès lors qu’un canal officiel de communication de MEXC supprime les messages et les questions concernant les fonds des utilisateurs, nous n’avons plus d’autre choix que de rendre cette affaire publique et de présenter à la communauté l’ensemble des circonstances. Toute nouvelle suppression de message, tentative d’étouffer l’affaire, prolongation injustifiée de la procédure ou absence de réponse concrète sera documentée et rendue publique. Nous mettons formellement MEXC en demeure de prendre immédiatement les mesures suivantes : 1. déterminer le nombre exact de jetons $DBLX appartenant à chaque utilisateur concerné ; 2. calculer leur valeur actuelle intégrale sur la base du prix applicable au moment de l’exécution du remboursement ; 3. verser cette valeur aux utilisateurs concernés en USDT, USDC ou dans un autre actif liquide convenu entre les parties ; 4. communiquer de manière transparente la méthode de détermination du prix, la source des données ainsi que l’heure exacte utilisée pour l’évaluation ; 5. fournir un délai précis et contraignant pour l’achèvement de l’ensemble des remboursements ; 6. cesser de proposer la vente massive des jetons bloqués comme solution ; 7. expliquer le fondement de l’exigence concernant les photographies du visage, les documents d’identité et les déclarations de consentement à la vente des jetons et d’acceptation du risque de pertes potentielles ; 8. confirmer que les déclarations exigées ne seront pas utilisées pour limiter la responsabilité de MEXC ni pour priver les détenteurs des droits et recours dont ils disposent. À l’heure actuelle, les fonds et les jetons de nos détenteurs continuent d’être retenus sans fondement clairement communiqué, sans solution applicable et sans délai précis de remboursement. Selon notre appréciation, cette situation constitue une rétention injustifiée des actifs des utilisateurs et pourrait être considérée comme une appropriation illicite ou un détournement des fonds et actifs appartenant aux clients de MEXC. Nous n’accepterons plus aucune réponse automatique, explication superficielle, prolongation procédurale ou tentative de rejeter la responsabilité sur les détenteurs, la liquidité du jeton, SunPump ou le projet Debilex. Si MEXC ne présente pas immédiatement un plan contraignant prévoyant le remboursement de la valeur actuelle intégrale des jetons $DBLX détenus par les utilisateurs concernés, nous engagerons de nouvelles actions juridiques, réglementaires, médiatiques et publiques afin de protéger notre communauté et de documenter la manière dont MEXC traite les actifs appartenant à ses utilisateurs. Le temps des demandes polies, des réponses évasives et de la suppression des questions dérangeantes est désormais révolu. Nous exigeons le remboursement immédiat de la valeur actuelle intégrale des jetons $DBLX appartenant à chaque détenteur concerné. Nous attendons de MEXC une réponse publique et substantielle, la présentation d’un plan concret de règlement de cette affaire ainsi que le lancement immédiat des remboursements, sans aucun nouveau retard. Cordialement, L’équipe Debilex

We’ve just finished adding another network to our system, @RobinhoodCrypto, so we decided to check whether @vladtenev’s token @vladhood_ is worth paying attention to. 😉 DEBILEX SCORE for $VLAD — 88/100 · PROBABLY OK. Check the token before you ape 👇 debilex.com/onchain/tokens…

@PhilKonieczny Ciekawe tylko czy doczekamy sie kolejnych wyborow, bo juz widac, ze kombinuja z kolejna rakieta co da nas wpadla z kierunku ukr...

Tusk przegra następne wybory przez uchodźców z Ukrainy tak samo jak przegrał wcześniej przez uchodźców islamskich gdy Kopacz chciała nam ich tu ściągać. W tej kwestii niezależnie od miłości politycznych większość Polakow ma takie samo zdanie.

@MEXC_CST We call on MEXC to reimburse our holders in full for all funds they invested in our token through your DEX+ platform. What you are doing—stalling, delaying the process, and manipulating the situation—is completely unacceptable in the crypto industry. We will not tolerate our holders being treated this way. And this is likely not limited to our community alone. We believe there are many holders of other tokens who are facing the same situation as our Debilexies. Therefore, if MEXC wants to come out of this situation with any credibility left, it must urgently reimburse our holders for the funds they invested through its platform. Be honest and do the right thing, because this is starting to look more and more like a scam.

@MEXC_CST @MEXC No they can't. You didn't transfer @debilexofficial because of liquidity. I don't buy it. Just give back money to holders what they invest. You started migration and you should fix it.

100 days ago, one tap changed everything. More markets. Lower barriers. More opportunities for everyone. And this is only the beginning. ♾💙

@copper_inu DEBILEX SCORE for $COPPERINU — 82/100 · LOOKS SAFE. Check the token before you ape 👇 debilex.com/onchain/tokens…

@WikiLeaksQ Fake, but whoever wrote this definitely understood the assignment.

🚨 A hacker group announced at 3:00 AM: "We have locked all Starlink ground stations worldwide. Pay $500 million in Bitcoin, or the world goes offline!" 🚀 Elon Musk replied at 3:01 AM: "Check your firmware. While you were writing that ransom note, Neural-Auto-Patch released a micro-update that routed your entire operation through a dead-end satellite in deep orbit. Thanks for testing our hotfix."

@PeckShieldAlert @SolidoMoney @Gate Another reminder that audits mean little if access controls and treasury security fail in practice.

#PeckShieldAlert @SolidoMoney reported an exploit that resulted in ~293.7M $SUPRA being drained. ~220M $SUPRA was deposited into a suspected @Gate deposit address. The report states that ~90% of the affected funds reportedly belonged to the foundation. x.com/SolidoMoney/st…

@saylor @Strategy Orange is officially overleveraged.

We’re gonna need another color.

@binance We know the w e ekend is here

can’t believe it’s the w̵̨̛̥̪̫̼̯̜̦͕̯̥̦̝̤̠̯͎̜̟͍̜̭̱̅́̄̐̾͆̎͊̑̓̃͂͆̚͘͜͜͜͜ͅe̵̛̪͆͗̅̿͂̓̍̇̈̿̎͒̎̂͑̔̋̽͛͘̕͠͝e̷̢̘̠̔̽̋̒̄̈͐͐͆̎́͛̊̂͂̃͊͑͗̊͋̈̆̊͊͝k̴̨̡̨͙̫͚̤̹̪̭̲̣͈̫̮͇͙̙͚̩̥̪̅̋̌͑̈́́͠ͅé̵͖̼̻̹̇̍̋̽̑ͅn̶̛̹̣͎̫̝̱̪̭͇̲̔̂̅̄̃͆̅̐͐̇͗͗̈́̏̀̉̆̀͐́̀̎͒̈́͜͠͝ḑ̸̛̩̻̮͍̦̣̝̈̓̈́̏͒̀̀

@DefiWimar “If confirmed” is doing a lot of work here. Geopolitical escalation first, market panic second.

🚨 BREAKING 🇮🇷 IRAN JUST TARGETED THE U.S. CONSULATE IN ERBIL WITH AN EXPLOSIVE DRONE. IRAQI AIR DEFENSES INTERCEPTED AND DESTROYED THE DRONE BEFORE IT REACHED THE COMPOUND. NO CASUALTIES OR DAMAGE HAVE BEEN REPORTED. THIS IS A DIRECT ATTEMPT TO STRIKE A U.S. DIPLOMATIC SITE. THIS IS EXTREMELY BAD FOR MARKETS...

@AshCrypto 2026: fundamentals matter, but apparently gravity matters more.

2013: Anything will pump. 2017: Anything with a whitepaper will pump. 2021: Anything with VC backing will pump. 2026: Anything, no matter how good, will dump -80%.