deeptas

@breakoutprop Big move — respecting user feedback enough to rebuild from scratch is rare. Does the new terminal support MT5 EA integration for fully automated strategies?

Worst reviews we ever got were about our trading terminal. So we burned it down and started over. New terminal and mobile app are live in beta. US, Netherlands, and France first. Global rollout coming shortly.

@FundedNext Thanks for the breakdown. Does @FundedNext have any restrictions on EAs/automated strategies running 24/5 across multiple pairs simultaneously?

Stellar 1-Step → 3% daily loss limit, 6% overall max Stellar 2-Step → 5% daily loss limit, 10% overall max Stellar Lite → 4% daily loss limit, 8% overall max Stellar Instant → no daily limit, 6% overall max Eight rules. All published before purchase. All visible in your dashboard while you trade.

@dmartin_nq Congrats on the first live payout! Always a milestone. We also run EAs on FTMO — curious, did you hit any issues with the consistency rule or daily drawdown tracking during the run

Got my first payout from Algo trading. This one was completely unexpected. I just put my algos on my 100K FTMO Account and risked $50 with each of them, just to see if they are working fine under live conditions. Had no plans to take a payout. They traded well and ran the account up to $270 in profits. Yesterday was my withdrawal day, so I just requested a full payout given that I'm planning to go normal risk next week, might as well just withdraw 🤷‍♂️

@traderinbcn @FeelVolumeWave Muy interesante propuesta. ¿Vais a explorar trading sistemático/algorítmico en futuros episodios?

⏰NUEVO PODCAST: TRADING ENTRE AMIGOS 🎯 Un nuevo formato donde dejamos de hablar… y empezamos a operar en directo con nuestros invitados. 🔴 EP. 1: Operando en directo con @FeelVolumeWave youtube.com/live/3ZsAqga0G… #podcast #TradingLife #tardingroom

@the5erstrading Thanks for the update. Does the 1:25 leverage on metals apply retroactively to existing funded accounts or only new ones going forward?

The5ers has updated the leverage on metals and indices to 1:25 on all account sizes.

Most quant systems stop at backtesting. We run 10 validation layers. No exceptions. The last one — White's Reality Check — exists because a follower asked the right question: what if the best survivor is just the luckiest? deeptas.com/blog/the-full-… #algotrading #quant #deeptas

We don't look for the best backtest. We look for strategies that survive what backtests can't measure. 7 independent filters. Every candidate. No exceptions. The full validation pipeline — explained for both beginners and quants deeptas.com/blog/the-full-… #algorithmictrading #quant

Week 3 live on @DarwinexZero Balance: +€1,779 realized ✅ New all-time high. 48 strategies. Zero manual intervention. #algorithmictrading #quant #darwinex

Week 2 closed on @DarwinexZero Balance: +€1,647 realized ✅ 48 strategies. Zero manual intervention. Best week so far. Tomorrow: XAUUSD + XAGUSD GPU results. Portfolio expansion incoming. #algorithmictrading #quant #darwinex

Most G=1440 systems use midnight UTC as the daily break. That's an artificial boundary — no institution trades around it. Testing alternative break times: NY close, London close, Tokyo open. Same strategies. Different bar definition. Different results? #algotrading #quant #forex

GPU backtest complete for XAUUSD G=1440 653 filter-passing candidates Best ratio: 30x Amt/DD R² up to 0.98. WR above 70%. Portfolio expansion incoming 👀 #xauusd #quant #deeptas

Week 2 live on @DarwinexZero Balance: +€1,359 realized ✅ Equity: €100,748 48 strategies. Zero manual intervention. New post: 5 Validation Layers Before Any Strategy Goes Live 👇deeptas.com/blog/5-validat… #algorithmictrading #quant #darwinex

Week 2 live on @DarwinexZero Balance: +€1,189 realized ✅ Equity: €100,396 48 strategies running. Zero manual intervention. Expanding to XAUUSD — GPU backtest complete, 653 candidates #algorithmictrading #quant #darwinex

@jantolip @XTraderdotnet Totalmente de acuerdo con la distinción. Backtest OOS de 84 meses con parámetros fijos es más preciso. Y sí, los sintéticos son entonces la herramienta correcta para lo que busco. Gracias por la claridad, Jaume. 🙏

@deeptas_fx @XTraderdotnet Si en los 84 meses utilizas los mismos parámetros, es un backtest de 84 meses. Si utilizas diferentes parámetros en cada periodo de test, es reentreno. Lo que necesito es validar el set concreto que voy a utilizar en real, ¿de qué me serviría testear otros sets diferentes?

Mi artículo para @XTraderdotnet sobre sobreoptimización.

@jantolip @XTraderdotnet En mi caso los coeficientes son fijos — se calculan en el período de entrenamiento y no se reoptmizan en cada ventana de test. El WF valida las mismas reglas sobre 84 meses OOS consecutivos sin reentrenamiento. ¿Cambia eso tu valoración del método?

@deeptas_fx @XTraderdotnet WF implica reentreno: en cada test testeas un set paramétrico diferente. A mi lo que me interesa es testear unas reglas con unos parámetros concretos, no ir probando diferentes sets.

@jantolip @XTraderdotnet Entendido — el WF reduce la varianza del estimador pero no el sesgo de camino único. Los sintéticos atacan el problema desde otra dimensión. ¿Has visto diferencias significativas entre estrategias que pasan WF pero fallan en sintéticos?

@deeptas_fx @XTraderdotnet WF no lo resuelve: son varios trozos de un único camino.

@AlphaCapitalUK This is why I went fully systematic. No sizing up. No overtrading. No pressure. 48 quantitative strategies decide everything. The system doesn't know it's being evaluated. That's the point. 🤖

7. The Real Takeaway To be fair, he’s still profitable. 5 evaluations passed. $5.5K in payouts. But consistent traders focus on longevity. Passing a challenge quickly means nothing if the habits behind it keep resetting the account.

One trader passed 5 prop firm evaluations and pulled $5.5K in payouts. Solid strategy. Real profits. But one habit kept blowing up his accounts. If you’re trying to pass a challenge, learn this lesson first:

@DarwinexZero Challenge accepted — 4 days ago. 48 quant strategies live on Darwinex Zero. Sharpe 10.92. Calmar 41.98. Max DD 0.13% — 84 months walk-forward verified. No Lambos. No courses. No mentorship fees. Just raw data on your platform. 📊

Let’s get one thing straight: Trading is brutally difficult. It is a lifelong pursuit of acquiring skill, managing your psychology, and surviving drawdowns. There is no magic formula and there are no shortcuts. If a "mentor" or influencer is sitting in a rented Lambo telling you trading is easy, they aren't making money from the markets. They are making money from YOU. The toxic "get-rich-quick" illusion is shattering, and it's about time. There must be a baseline standard for anyone charging retail traders for education, courses, or mentorship: A continuous, mathematically verifiable track record. So here is our public challenge to every trading "guru" and influencer on this app: Put your execution where your mouth is. We challenge you to build a public track record on Darwinex Zero. Let our institutional risk engine audit your entire career. No hidden challenge reset fees. No cherry-picked winning days. No deleting your account when you blow up. Just your raw, risk-adjusted data on a level playing field. If your strategy cannot survive our risk engine, you have absolutely no business teaching anyone else how to trade. Stop selling the dream and show everyone the data.

Day 4 live on Darwinex Zero. Balance: +€846 in 3 days. Running at 70% of backtest projected pace — exactly within normal variance. 48 strategies. No drawdown. No intervention. The architecture works. 🏗️ deeptas.com/blog/how-i-bui…