TowardSHm

Can we get a Protestant on Tucker who actually represents us accurately without the strawmen? Jay Dyer (Orthodox) reduces the Calvinistic/Reformed view of salvation to "mere mental assent" — with the only change being God's disposition toward a person. That's not what any Protestant teaches, other than the hyper free-grace OSAS antinomian fringe. We teach justification by faith alone in Christ: a sinner goes from hating God to repenting and trusting Him. This is a real spiritual regeneration by God's grace alone, not just rubber-stamping an individual as "saved" and sending him on his way. Yes, we are legally declared righteous at the moment of faith: Romans 8:1 There is therefore now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus. But Scripture also teaches sanctification — not as a means to achieve salvation, but as a byproduct of becoming a new creation in Christ: 2 Corinthians 5:17 Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation. The old has passed away; behold, the new has come. Those whom God justifies in Christ, He will also glorify: Romans 8:30 And those whom he predestined he also called, and those whom he called he also justified, and those whom he justified he also glorified.

Jay Dyer on Tucker Carlson: How Medieval Philosophy Nominalism created modern transgender ideology: “Nominalism is the idea that there are only names to things, not essences. So there’s no human nature. No dog nature. The ancient world believed things have real essences. Words described metaphysical reality. Occam started denying that. It influenced Luther. Then Hume, Kant, the Enlightenment… If things don’t have essences, then they don’t have genders objectively — everything is just a name. So I can just name myself he, him, Zer, Z. That’s the logical train from medieval philosophy to postmodern gender ideology. It flies in the face of lived experience. You basically have to be indoctrinated to believe it.”

Hey Ben, maybe get back to me when your channel grows a bit. Keep working hard and I’m sure eventually people will watch your videos bud. Hang in there 👍

Care to explain where you disagree with Nate on this one? And could you clarify what Nate says about soft points being designed NOT to fragment (I presume so you don’t get lead frag in your meat?)- is he correct about that? And also do you care to just clarify that it is your belief that .30-06 soft points would commonly stop in something like a human neck? You’re saying that’s a common event and you think that entrance wound only as it appears is what you would expect from this round?

What a fucking idiot. Literally shows a soft point. I hate these people.

So lemme get this straight: Lance Twiggs's DNA was on the towel & screwdriver; Lance has the same pair of converse as Tyler; Lance has access to the Discord and Tyler's computer; Lance allegedly "found" the confession note (which no longer exists) from an 11 PM automated/scheduled text from a Tyler (lolololol); and now we also find out the dremel that Tyler allegedly used to engrave the bullets was Lance's?! Did I hear that right? Oh, and Lance also said that Tyler NEVER TALKED ABOUT CHARLIE KIRK. 🤯😭 Will someone please tell me how this can't be interpreted as a frame job? Lol

Here are images of the text messages exchanged between Tyler Robinson and Lance Twiggs which includes his confession and attempt to retrieve his rifle.