DevDoingSomething

3.2K posts

DevDoingSomething banner
DevDoingSomething

DevDoingSomething

@devdoingsmth

Web3 Advisory | DeFi | BNB | currently cooking @Tokinvest_Cap

Katılım Aralık 2023
710 Takip Edilen457 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
DevDoingSomething
DevDoingSomething@devdoingsmth·
Tokenise anything 🫡
DMCC@DMCCAuthority

DMCC has unveiled the world’s largest silver bar – a Guinness World Record 1,971kg asset – commemorating the UAE’s founding year and celebrating the nation's craftsmanship and innovation. As part of a landmark project involving DMCC and several leading industry players, the bar is now set to be tokenised on DMCC’s Tradeflow platform, marking the first time a Guinness World Record precious metal bar will undergo tokenisation under a regulated framework. The project brings together Sam Precious Metals, responsible for the bar’s production; @Tokinvest_Cap, who will lead the digital tokenisation and issuance process; and @Brinks, who will oversee secure storage and logistics. This world‑first initiative marks a key milestone in DMCC's commodities tokenisation programme, advancing transparency and traceability across precious metals markets, while reinforcing Dubai's position as the global benchmark for practical, investable and regulated real‑world asset innovation. Read more: dmcc.ae/latest-news/dm…

English
1
0
3
887
alexander
alexander@wagmiAlexander·
@devdoingsmth I wouldn't -- but, I'd find it interesting how other verticals (that produce less total value) have done a much better job at redirecting more value to tokens.
English
1
0
0
66
alexander
alexander@wagmiAlexander·
No layer of the onchain economy generates more value than exchange layer -- ~2x more than even the chains. Yet, the market doesn't value its tokens as such. Chains are valued at about ~$400b, derivatives ~$10b, DEXs ~$5b, lending ~$4b. To what do you attribute the disconnect?
alexander tweet media
English
17
6
84
5.8K
Uttam
Uttam@uttam_singhk·
is there anything actually interesting in crypto tech right now or has everyone moved to AI ?? → ai agents stuff (but x402/mpp volume down bad) → ethereum glamsterdam (ePBS, BALs.. anything else?) → solana alpenglow (no timeline yet) → HIP-5 ?? → any new chain/protocol architecture innovation ?? what am I missing ??
English
32
0
55
5.7K
Joseph (eu/acc)
Joseph (eu/acc)@ImmutableLawyer·
I’ll be kicking off a Crypto X series where I basically look at the terms of use of random DeFi Protocols that are not True DeFi to show you how you’re getting cooked legally Stay Tuned
English
11
1
32
1.8K
Joseph (eu/acc)
Joseph (eu/acc)@ImmutableLawyer·
“For example, those BABA shares are not actually shares in Alibaba. They’re claims on shares (and various rights like dividends and voting and corporate actions like spinoffs) that are held in custody by Citibank. This allows American investors to get close to the same ownership rights as if they purchased Alibaba shares in Hong Kong. But holders of BABA on the NYSE are not shareholders of record for the underlying company - Citibank is. This is exactly what wrapped RWAs are *supposed* to do - buy an asset on a foreign (non-EVM) market, structure a claim on that asset that is meaningfully similar to direct ownership, and let it be composeable with the local (EVM) market.” I’ve been beating on this drum for a while now - great post by @ImperiumPaper
PaperImperium@ImperiumPaper

> Trading spot equities is virtually free for retail traders on any reasonable brokerage. The costs are and spreads are ZERO. The people arguing for tokenization makes NO sense. Arguments like this are a lot like arguments about stablecoins. The product is intended for a different audience! Unlike stablecoins, however, a tokenized stock does have a market in the US… if the underlying stock is not issued in the US! In fact, this is exactly what an American Depository Receipt (ADR) is: a way to wrap a foreign asset and put it on an American exchange. For example, those BABA shares are not actually shares in Alibaba. They’re claims on shares (and various rights like dividends and voting and corporate actions like spinoffs) that are held in custody by Citibank. This allows American investors to get close to the same ownership rights as if they purchased Alibaba shares in Hong Kong. But holders of BABA on the NYSE are not shareholders of record for the underlying company - Citibank is. This is exactly what wrapped RWAs are *supposed* to do - buy an asset on a foreign (non-EVM) market, structure a claim on that asset that is meaningfully similar to direct ownership, and let it be composeable with the local (EVM) market. So of course it makes little sense for a US person to buy tokenized Tesla stock, just like it would make little sense for a Chinese citizen to buy BABA rather than the underlying, ceteris paribus. Tokenized RWAs offer an ADR-like solution for all those people and companies that cannot directly access US or other markets where the underlying assets live. So the concept is sound. It is, unfortunately, the case that execution is not as good as we would like in many cases. In particular, issuers are not the typical issuer of ADRs: Citibank, JP Morgan Chase, Deutsche Bank, and BNY. So the extra layer of risk is material and the structures have not been perfected to be investor friendly and cover edge cases. The value proposition for tokenized RWAs isn’t (for now) better trading for US investors. It’s allowing investors in India, Argentina, Turkey, Vietnam, etc to have a way to get access to assets in markets foreign to them. This is a huge need for people with savings they need to deploy productively. If you are issuing a tokenized RWA, and are using a robust, investor-friendly structure, I would love to learn about your specific product.

English
2
0
6
803
Lina Seiche
Lina Seiche@LinaSeiche·
Few things are more foolish than expecting a prisoner to fight for you.
Lina Seiche tweet media
English
181
520
6.5K
205.7K
Haseeb >|<
Haseeb >|<@hosseeb·
If your “blockchain” isn’t publicly verifiable, isn’t permissionless, and validators need committee approval, you built enterprise software, not a public blockchain. Then again, maybe that’s what the market wants... Great discussion with @EvgenyGaevoy this week👇
The Chopping Block@_choppingblock

Canton: enterprise blockchain or just TradFi LARPing? Meanwhile, open source drama keeps spiraling, AI is winning, humans are coping, and Ethereum is having their typical existential crisis. And yes, @EvgenyGaevoy is absolutely cheering Ethereum on. Timestamps 00:00 Intro 01:07 ZKsync vs. Canton: What Counts as a Real Blockchain? 04:44 Evgeny’s Canton Critique: DRW, Privacy, and ZK Skepticism 09:37 Gating, Auditability, and Whether Canton Is Just a Ledger 14:38 Openness, Verifiability, and the Return of Enterprise Blockchain 23:01 Ethereum’s Cypherpunk Crossroads 31:04 Stablecoins, Fork Governance, and the Linux Analogy 41:09 Drift Hack, AI Security, and the Future of Open Source 🔥Stay updated with all the latest hot takes by following and subscribing to @_ChoppingBlock and @unchained_pod! 🎥 YouTube: youtu.be/IYistO1kE0g 🎧 Spotify: bit.ly/3wiIOyy 🍎 Apple: bit.ly/3w9HQ7J 🎙 Podcast Home: choppingblock.xyz

English
26
15
150
30.4K
USD.AI
USD.AI@USDai_Official·
Two independent risk frameworks just reached the same conclusion: USDai and sUSDai belong on @aave @chaoslabs and @LlamaRisk have both published ARFC reviews recommending $USDai and $sUSDai as collateral on Aave v3 on @Arbitrum.
USD.AI tweet mediaUSD.AI tweet media
English
27
5
100
14K
valerio | funny.money 📲
☀️Good Morning from @ethcc 🇫🇷🍵 starting my day with some free matcha 🍵 from the side event I am attending thank you ethereum for my free matcha 🍵🍵🍵 slaay 💅
English
3
1
14
544
Raphaël Bloch 🐳
Raphaël Bloch 🐳@Raph_Bloch·
I had coffee with a banker attending his first @EthCC. He was surprised by how little some crypto builders understand TradFi: "They’re very strong on tech. But they don’t really understand finance - how it works, why it exists. You can’t replace or improve a system you don’t understand." And the problem is, he’s right.
English
57
24
350
66.4K
Joseph (eu/acc)
Joseph (eu/acc)@ImmutableLawyer·
Steady lads, deploying more political capital. Make Europe Great Again 🇪🇺
Joseph (eu/acc) tweet media
English
2
0
12
293
jfab.eth
jfab.eth@josefabregab·
This is insane. The Institutional Growth Lead at @CantonNetwork is either deliberately lying, or he doesn't understand how Ethereum, Solana and his own product work. Let's quickly dissect each of these claims: 1. “Canton, Solana, and Ethereum have the same permissionless properties” This is simply false. On Ethereum and Solana, anyone can deploy, validate (with capital), and read state. Hence, these are permissionless networks. On Canton, participation is gated. Validator access and broader network interaction require sponsorship and approval flows, IPs, and an SV sponsor. Hence, Canton is not permissionless. 2. “Only one has the privacy required for capital markets” False. On Ethereum and Solana, privacy is supported via smart contracts, enabling third party verification without revealing raw data. Examples include: - Validity proofs - Encrypted mempools / TEEs - App-layer privacy (@aztecnetwork-style architectures) On Canton, what he is calling “privacy” is just access control. Canton restricts who can see the state. It's "trust me bro" privacy. 3. “Institutions will start where liquidity is deepest and friction is lowest” Correct in principle, and precisely why liquidity today lives on Ethereum (+ L2s) and increasingly on Solana. Canton has institutional distribution agreements, which is *not* open and composable liquidity. 4. “Only Canton can measure success in trillions” Sure, trillions in internal ledger value, permissioned environments, and non-composable assets. You can't measure something that you can't even verify. If you can’t verify it, you can’t integrate it, and you can’t build on top of it. It is not onchain. It's fugazzi.
Emmett | canton.network@Emmett_

What people will eventually realize is @CantonNetwork @solana and @ethereum have the same permissionless properties but only one of them have the privacy required to support regulated capital markets. There’s no denying institutions have to live in a multi-chain world but they are going to start where liquidity is deepest and has the lowest friction from architectural design, risk and compliance standpoints. This is why Canton is accelerating. Firms realize Canton provides the distribution for capital markets scale with compliance in a simple design. Maybe one day these transparent chains will figure out privacy and be able to support capital markets scale, but as of right now, only one chain can measure success in trillions… Canton.

English
30
25
275
32.2K
Ethan Kravitz
Ethan Kravitz@EthosVentures·
Canton is what you get if Prometheum was run by people who’s competence matched their narcissism
English
10
4
120
8K
DevDoingSomething
DevDoingSomething@devdoingsmth·
@Web3Kristel You called web3kristel and cheer for banks going onchain, in a new closed system? Paid actor?
English
0
0
0
44
Kristel
Kristel@Web3Kristel·
crypto watched dozens of L1s pump, dump, and disappear no big deal. Canton shows up and suddenly everyone’s a philosopher of decentralization? please. this isn’t about principles, this is about your bags getting sidelined. you built casinos and said memecoins scaled the industry. did you actually think institutions were gonna be trenchers with you?
English
25
11
97
9.6K
Emmett | canton.network
Emmett | canton.network@Emmett_·
What people will eventually realize is @CantonNetwork @solana and @ethereum have the same permissionless properties but only one of them have the privacy required to support regulated capital markets. There’s no denying institutions have to live in a multi-chain world but they are going to start where liquidity is deepest and has the lowest friction from architectural design, risk and compliance standpoints. This is why Canton is accelerating. Firms realize Canton provides the distribution for capital markets scale with compliance in a simple design. Maybe one day these transparent chains will figure out privacy and be able to support capital markets scale, but as of right now, only one chain can measure success in trillions… Canton.
Andy@andyyy

This is actually very very spicy and provides a potential outcome to some of the Canton vs. Ethereum / Solana debate. Still don’t know if I agree entirely. Rand’s thesis is: The internet won because it was open. It was permissionless for anyone to use and build on. This idea is akin to public blockchains. Private blockchains, or ‘intranets’, therefore won’t make it once privacy producing technology reaches public blockchains enabling all the qualities institutions are looking for in private, permissioned chains today. I think it’s somewhere it the middle & the future is likely in the grey area. Public blockchains which use privacy will win large enterprise deals in payments and finance, which reap massive benefits from composability and network effects. Private, permissioned chains (or “databases” as some call them) will have their specific usecases for risk averse clients and more sensitive needs. The debate continues…

English
53
10
83
70.9K