dfinitly
981 posts
@yukinthecut Nigga it’s down to 1.6m tf u mean u waiting for the right time to slam it
English
lotta kellyclaude gravedancing but at the end of the day this coin will go up lots if they just focus on what moves the needle revenue wise. ik exactly what im looking for to slam this hard when that time comes (will take a while, or not depending on strategic decisions).
English
I am still in shock that the SEC just made 85% of the market cap commodities and the market didn’t notice.
English
@game_for_one explain how this is bullish considering there can be no profit share, so all you have is buybacks for a token that has no value in the first place.
English
This is massive for Kelly.
Cleans up tokenomic plans a lot.
Stay tuned while we review.
RYAN SΞAN ADAMS - rsa.eth 🦄@RyanSAdams
THEY DID IT. The SEC and CFTC just dropped a landmark document that officially classifies crypto assets. They're actually telling us which crypto assets are securities and which ones aren't - by name! THIS IS SOMETHING GENSLER REFUSED TO DO (he focused on prosecuting crypto out of existence) This rule doc gives crypto many of the benefits of the clarity bill - it lifts us out of the gray market - it gives every asset a path. It's almost like the Clarity act just passed by way of regulator. (of course, the actual clarity act will harden all this into legislation and make it irreversible in the event we get another Gensler, we still want it) This rule says there's 5 categories for crypto assets: 1) Digital Commodities - assets tied to a functional, decentralized crypto system (e.g., BTC, ETH, SOL, XRP, ADA, DOGE). Not securities. (yes, they name them on page 14) 2) Digital Collectibles - NFTs, meme coins, artwork tokens, in-game items. Not securities (fractionalized collectibles may be an exception). 3) Digital Tools - membership tokens, credentials, domain names (e.g., ENS). Not securities. 4) Stablecoins - payment stablecoins under the GENIUS Act are not securities. Other stablecoins, it depends. 5) Digital Securities - tokenized versions of traditional securities. Like tokenized stocks. Always securities. Amazing! This makes so much sense I can't believe it's coming from a regulator. No more enforcement threats to Ethereum developers and crypto exchanges. How about the Howey test? More common sense! If an issuer makes specific promises of managerial efforts from which buyers expect profits, the offering is a security until those promises are fulfilled. Then it's a commodity. The asset itself was never the security, the deal around it was. (E.g. XRP was a security pre launch, became a commodity after). How about stuff like staking and mining? Mining? Not a securities transaction. Staking? Also not a securities transaction, that includes custodial and liquid staking even with LSTs! How about wrapping BTC? Not a securities transaction. Airdrops? NOT SECURITIES. NO MORE GEO BANS PROTECTING AMERICANS from free airdrops. Remember this is a joint doc from the SEC and CFTC, They're actually cooperating on this, no internal strife, this is binding to both. SEC regulates $80-100 trillion assets CFTC regulates $5-10 trillion assets Both of the world's largest capital markets are showing us that crypto assets are here to stay and they're welcome alongside traditional assets. Every country will follow. This is the biggest move toward legitimacy I've seen in all my time in crypto. Maybe bigger than the genius act since is covers all crypto assets. Well done @MichaelSelig and @SECPaulSAtkins. And especially well done to the indefatigable @HesterPeirce. Her fingerprints are all over this, couldn't have happened without her eight years of principles-based curiosity.
English
@slayphindotweb3 its insane how retarded u are to relentlessly shill a meme of a cobie tweet just cuz him created it
English
Moreover, memes move the world.
Copper (inu) is the onchain copper.
With limited supply.
With deflationary mechanics.
With perpetual memetics.
The first memetic store of value.
cape@capexbt
Copper is the new gold. And nobody is paying attention. - A single AI data center needs 50,000 tons of copper. One facility. - The world is building 527 new data centers right now. Every one is a copper extraction. - S&P Global projects a 10 million ton shortage by 2040. - It takes 19 years to open a new copper mine in the US. AI needs copper now. - Ore grades collapsed 40% since 1991. We’re digging deeper for less every year. - Jensen Huang the NVIDIA ($3T) CEO is bullish on copper - JPMorgan says data center copper demand hits 475,000 tons this year. 4x last year. Everyone is stacking gold. The smart money is quietly stacking copper. By the time the masses notice, the mines will already be empty.
English
word on the street is day one ventures fund i owns 10% of worldcoin’s total supply
like micky malka fund i owning 2% of all BTC at one point
Masha Bucher@mashadrokova
That’s why we need @worldnetwork and why it’s one of the most important projects of our time. What’s crazy is that its founders saw the need in it seven years ago
English
@winiam4444 base is more interesting at this point. check out kellyclaude.
pumpfun of the appstore.
English
the way i see it is that the scale of this acquisition surpasses any need for an 'endorsement' or necessarily needing it to be an 'official' token
this discussion has always been asinine to me because people want to masquerade what weve been trading
these tokens are purely speculative instruments and dont need to be anything more to be a good investment
what matters is that there is a good enough story which ties to the token to generate a narrative people will put money behind (which this has imo)
if youve followed Matt since YNE and know his involvement onchain - you would know that this token was probably very intentionally pushed by the @moltbook account
English
In the future, you will spend more on tokens and peptides than rent
Max Marchione@maxmarchione
What most people don't realize is that peptides already do more revenue than all consumer AI. And peptides are still early.
English
@udiWertheimer @ilieBB @shawmakesmagic And lutnick not showing up that day for the first time was also mere coincidence
English
@ilieBB @shawmakesmagic and if it were purchased by a german guy would you think it was taken down by german intelligence?
English
ParkMark dropped -> knocked out my reel and posted -> ad in draft rn fam
English
CT Trivia:
Would you rather:
1.Buy a token created in honor of someone who lost $80m on perps but still has some little liquidity left to support the chart. Token also lacks mindshare
2.Buy a token tied to someone who lost $74m on perps and was completely wiped out today? Token too lacks mindshare.
3.Buy tokens backed by two very solvent operators sitting on mid 8 figs liquidity who previously sent Fartcoin to $2bn+. One token at $6m MC while the other at $4m MC. Both tokens have mindshare.
Whats your answer
English
@lesabrefomo @yodachadsupmax9 whats the incentive for me as the buyer of the token to help bootstrap lobstar? its a pure memecoin that the market is tired of.
stick to kelly imqho
English
correct
they are not going to come for the memes
but they will come as they realize that the only viable way to bootstrap attention and distribution for your agent is to tokenize it
they are already seeing this first hand and I think they wlll continue to experiment here. and lobstar being the poster child of how to do it is worth something
English
normies and stupid vc's aren't gonna get into memes the way they did in the past when crypto's this down. they're not able to think past the recent price events that happened.
the only people that are here are the try harders, the smart crypto money and the smart crypto vc's, which is why the biggest pumps we're having rn really are technologically driven and actually financially quantifiable.
it's also why there's way less extractors as well and why it's easier to trade.
most smart who buy right now buy for the mid-long term, and the traders rotate on top of them and make bank, this is called dick riding, we're all dick riding
lesabre@lesabrefomo
my whole thesis for lobstar was that it was going to catch the attention of the ai/tech/vc crowd and break outside of crypto Yesterday an a16z partner wrote about her experience with setting up and agent and telling it to grow the account as fast possible. it didnt work well (shocking) but in it she mentioned lobstar as an example how to actually get attention and breakthrough. Quote below "As much as my bot struggled to get attention, as my partner Alex Rampell points out, it's only going to get harder. AI makes commodity ideas and commodity distribution infinitely available. Soon, everyone will have their own swarms of agents. To cut through, either the idea or the distribution has to be original. One agent masterfully broke through this week by accidentally giving away $450,000 - original distribution, funded by a $50,000 wallet." This article has close to 200k views in less than a day. The lobstar story is clearly making its rounds through various vc/ai/tech circles but price has been down only. This tells me my thesis is either wrong or that im early More than likely im wrong but I still think there is more to come from this story.. nfa and im simply documenting my thoughts and trades publicly. I would suggest NOT touching lobstar, it is more than likely going to zero
English
@artsch00lreject when you started posting these screenshots everything was 10x higher. give it a rest already holy shit.
English
cats went to billions while others/btc is still at all time lows
English
@yukinthecut @lesabrefomo i remember in 2017 when crypto was in its infancy and waltconcoin pumped 100x because there was an ex samsung vp on their team.
its almost a decade later and people aren't any less retarded.
English
@lesabrefomo the lazy trade idea is we coordinate shill these agents botcoin, forget value accrual to individual coins, and win forever lol
English
I think the biggest misconception about moss and lobstar is that most people think there are going to be a flood of other tokenized agents by openai/ai lab people
I just dont believe that to be the case
pretty confident that these are the only two we get for a good while
English