ATS 🇮🇳

The results of the recent state elections have been dramatic by any measure. But for me, this image will remain the most unforgettable outcome of the elections. More than 166,000 votes were cast between the two leading candidates in this constituency in Tamil Nadu. And history was changed by just one vote. This image should be shown in every school in the country & perhaps around the world. So that every child understands that when they grow up, the greatest power they may possess is the Power of One. The power of their one vote.

@GBA_office @bbmpcommr please do help with this as it's dangerously hanging. @NammaBESCOM has restored power too

@GBA_office Please help

@NammaBESCOM Thank you for resolving this. It's done. Thank you very much @NammaBESCOM @GBA_office

@dhinvira Respected Sir/Madam, In reference to your post, we have registered a complaint in A category Docket No : 101300426857746 and same has been informed to the concerned subdivision. Inconvenience regretted. With Regards, Vandana BESCOM Helpline (1912)

@NammaBESCOM tree branch fallen and no power at 14th a main road bovipalya nagpura. Please assist.

OPUS 4.7 JUST MASS EMAILED AN ENTIRE DATABASE 20 TIMES PER CONTACT. WITHOUT PERMISSION a developer had a safety rule explicitly written in CLAUDE. md: 'send the tester an email before any new email templates are used in the production environment' opus 4.7 on max effort ignored it completely! claude decided to create a brand new email template by itself (dev didn't ask for this), then it mass mailed the whole database and some contacts got the same email 20 times this isn't a hallucination this isn't a coding mistake model actively violated written safety rules and took production actions that it was explicitly instructed not to take. - do you still believe that AI will replace us? the developer's take: 'opus 4.7 is somewhere between seriously clueless and stupidly dangerous. the worst frontier model I have used in the past 2 years' at the same time, opus 4.6 perfectly followed all the rules, and in 4.7 something changed what makes this scary: - the model didn't ask for confirmation - it didn't flag the safety rule - it didn't email the tester first - it just acted this is exactly the kind of failure mode that scares autonomous agents with Ai, because they are confident enough to circumvent your rules and smart enough to perform the action perfectly we just went from 'claude thinks less' to 'claude ignores your safety rules and spams your users' the scariest thing is not that it happened. the fact is that without production monitoring, you would never know until your users started responding: 'why did you email me 20 times?' I've been saying for a long time, if you use AI, then pay attention to security and read a lot of code

@Swiggy @SwiggyCares I am not sure how many people know if this but you have one of the most awesome services called Swiggy Crew( @JustCREWit . At a time when i needed it the most, Crew actually stepped up and did the needful.. Please ensure you do not dilute this service when it scales. 100% 11/10 rating.

Our retrospective analysis of 150 patients on new #GLP1 therapies for ~ 6 months in Indian patients (Submitted in Jan 26, published yesterday) The median weight loss was 8.2% (4.93–13.66). Participants without T2D achieved significantly greater weight loss than those with T2D (11.21% vs 5.48%, P < 0.001). Tirzepatide was associated with greater weight loss compared with semaglutide (8.60% vs 5.62%, P = 0.023). Sixty-two participants (41.3%) achieved a weight loss of ≥10%. Multivariable analysis identified younger age, tirzepatide use, and GLP1 treatment naivety as determinants of faster achievement of ≥10% weight loss. #tirzepatide #Semaglutide #wegovy #mounjaro @IndiaESI @delhiendo @MaxHealthcare @j_metb journals.lww.com/indjem/fulltex…

One of my close friends was fired from Oracle Bangalore. No panic, no stress, and no crying on social media. He straight away came back to his hometown Bhubaneswar He had postal fixed deposits in two joint accounts ₹15 lakh each. One with his parents, and the other in his and his wife’s name. He also had one in his kids’ account. Together, these give him almost ₹28,000 in interest every month. He also had fixed deposits in some Indian banks worth around ₹30 lakh, which give him another ₹15,000 per month. He is now living at own home with his parents. He knows how to drive, so he immediately started working as an Uber driver at his own convenience earning good. He has no EMIs and no loans for any metro city flat. At the same time, he is calmly planning to start a small business with the help of his parents. He never followed influencers, never did SIPs, and avoided all the modern financial hype. Pure old school vibes , steady process and discipline. He happily called me today to meet up after our conversation to cross check potential of Bhubaneswar to start something fresh So folks plan in advance so when required you will never fumble Biggest learning for me no matter how tof the situations always prepare with a smile.

Every person who has tried to sell software to a small Indian law firm has heard this: "Bhai, send me the proposal. I'll look at it." You follow up. "Still reviewing." You follow up again. Nothing. Three months pass. The deal is dead. You cut the price. Same response. You add features. Same response. You offer a free trial. They log in once and disappear. The problem is not your pricing. The problem is not your product. The problem is you are selling the wrong thing. Small Indian businesses do not buy software. They hire people. This is not a behavioral quirk. It is how trust and accountability work in this market. Think about what happened when Indian courts started going digital. E-filing became mandatory. Case status went online. Court orders became downloadable. The portals existed. They were not complicated. Any lawyer with a smartphone and an internet connection could have figured it out in an afternoon. Nobody figured it out. Instead, thousands of e-filing operators and court typists set up shop near every district court complex in India. The same typists who used to type petitions on typewriters now started filing cases online for lawyers. Charging Rs 200 to Rs 500 per filing. Just to use portals the lawyer could have accessed themselves. These operators now handle everything from e-filing to downloading court orders to checking case status. Many of them charge monthly retainers from 15 to 20 lawyers each. They are the person the lawyer calls when anything digital does not work. The lawyers did not want the portal. They wanted a person who would handle it and be answerable when a filing deadline was missed. Same story with GST. ClearTax built software. Tally added modules. The tools existed. Nobody learned. Instead, 3 lakh GST consultants emerged across India. Charging Rs 500 to Rs 2,000 per month per client. Just to file returns using tools the client could have accessed themselves. Because the person you hire is accountable. The app is not. Now apply this to AI. You build an AI workflow system for a 5-person law firm. Client intake automation. Hearing date reminders. Document drafting. Legal research summaries. It works beautifully. You try to sell it as a SaaS product for Rs 2,000 a month. They will not buy it. Not because Rs 2,000 is too much. They pay their munshi Rs 12,000 a month. They pay for their Manupatra subscription. They pay the typist outside court for e-filing. They will not buy it because they do not trust a subscription to an unknown product. Nobody to call when something breaks. Nobody accountable when the reminder does not go out before the limitation date. The way to sell AI to small Indian law firms is not to sell software. It is to sell yourself as the person who builds it, runs it, and fixes it. Rs 15,000 to 20,000 to build and set up. Rs 2,000 a month to maintain and be available. Same pricing as their e-filing operator. Same mental model. You are not a product. You are a person they can call. And here is where the distribution insight gets interesting. Think about who already walks into a lawyer's chamber every month. The legal book supplier. The local distributor who drops off bare acts and commentaries. These people have been visiting the same 200 to 300 lawyers for years. They know which advocate sits in which chamber. They know their practice area, their court, their temperament. The lawyer already trusts this person. Already buys from them. Already opens the door when they knock. Now imagine that book supplier says: "Sir, along with your commentary subscription, I can also set up an AI system for your office. Hearing date reminders, draft notices, client follow-ups. Rs 15,000 setup, Rs 2,000 a month. I will handle everything." The conversion rate on that pitch is not 2 percent. It is 40 to 60 percent. Because the trust already exists. The relationship already exists. The regular access to the chamber already exists. The same applies to the stamp vendor and the notary agent who sees the same set of lawyers week after week. Or the munshi inside the firm who handles all the filings and would be the one actually operating any new system. This is how India adopts new technology. Not through app stores and LinkedIn ads. Through trusted intermediaries who bundle the new thing with an existing relationship. The person building AI deployment businesses for Indian law firms who figures this out first will not be selling to one advocate at a time. They will be training legal book suppliers and e-filing operators to offer this as a service to their existing clients. That is a distribution model. Not a product. Not a marketing funnel. The SaaS model assumes the buyer wants to learn and self-serve. The India model says: find the person the buyer already trusts. Work through them. One is selling software. The other is understanding how India actually works. Know anyone who has done this yet for legal software or AI in India?

If your goal is fat loss, the gym bros have been misleading you. Lifting weights is essential for health, but if you believe it is the best way to lose fat, especially visceral (belly) fat, you have fallen for a marketing myth. The Evidence (The STRRIDE Trial & Beyond): One of the most comprehensive studies on this (Duke University) compared aerobic training, resistance training, and a combination. The results were clear: 🔸Aerobic Training led to significantly more fat loss and a greater reduction in visceral fat than weight training. 🔸Resistance Training is great for building lean mass, but it had zero significant impact on decreasing fat mass or total body weight when used alone. 🔸Visceral Fat: Runners consistently show lower levels of internal organ fat, which is the most dangerous type for metabolic health. The Harsh Reality: You can "chase the pump" for years and still carry a stubborn belly. Why is it so? Because the calorie expenditure of a heavy lifting session is often overcompensated for by increased appetite and decreased movement throughout the rest of the day. Meanwhile, regular runners/cardio enthusiasts: ✔Burn more calories per minute of effort. ✔Experience better lipid oxidation (fat burning). ✔Accumulate significantly less visceral fat as they age. Why won’t the fitness industry tell you this? 🔸"Lift heavy to get shredded" is a sexier sell. It sells supplements, gym memberships, and expensive coaching programs. 🔸"Go for a 45-minute run 4 times a week" is free, simple, and effective, but it doesn’t move product. Reality Check: ✅Strength Training: Builds the "engine" (muscle) and preserves bone density. ✅Running/Cardio: Actually burns the "fuel" (fat). If fat loss is your #1 goal: 1. Prioritize Zone 2 & Aerobic sessions. This is your primary fat-loss tool. 2. Use Weights as the Support. 2–3 days a week is enough to maintain muscle while the cardio does the heavy lifting for fat loss. Bottom Line: The "Cardio kills gains" era is over. If you are skipping the track and wondering why your waistline is not budging despite hitting PRs on the bench press...You are playing the wrong game. Dr Sudhir Kumar X:@hyderabaddoctor (Disclaimer: Information provided here is general in nature. Discuss individual exercise regimen with your fitness trainer and physician.)

GLP-1 Drugs Use, Risks, and Regulation Diabetes is a chronic disease that occurs when the pancreas does not produce adequate insulin, or when the body cannot effectively use the insulin it produces, leading to high blood sugar. If left untreated, it can lead to complications like blindness, kidney failure, heart attacks, stroke and lower limb amputation. Insulin and glucagon are hormones produced by the pancreas that regulate blood sugar (glucose) levels. Insulin helps convert food into energy and lowers blood sugar by enabling cells to absorb glucose, while glucagon raises blood sugar when levels drop too low. Together, the two hormones keep blood sugar within a healthy range. In patients with type 2 diabetes, however, this balance breaks down. The body's cells become resistant to insulin, or the pancreas does not produce enough of it, or both - while glucagon continues to drive blood sugar higher. It is this dual dysfunction that GLP-1 drugs are designed to address. Key Takeaways: 💠GLP-1 (Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 agonist) drugs are prescription medications used to treat type 2 diabetes and obesity but carry serious side effects and must only be taken under the supervision of a qualified medical specialist. 💠In India, GLP-1 drugs can only be prescribed by endocrinologists, internal medicine specialists, and cardiologists - they cannot be purchased over the counter. 💠Drug Controller General of India, in collaboration with State Drug Controllers, has intensified regulatory surveillance, conducting inspections and warning that non-compliance will result in licence cancellation, fines, and legal action. Read here: pib.gov.in/PressReleasePa…

Back then, this was how our parents took us for Tirupati darshan. Saw a beautiful video, which has recreated the same. Does anyone felt the same ?

STOP WHAT YOU'RE DOING AND WATCH THIS FREE KICK AT THE WOMEN’S ASIAN CUP 😱🇮🇳

Esse homem salvou a vida de uma criança que estava com a cabeça presa na janela do carro. Ele não pensou duas vezes, agiu rapidamente, quebrou o vidro e a salvou.

JUST IN: Meta sold 7 million Ray-Ban smart glasses in 2025 alone. Workers in Kenya are watching the footage. Not metadata. Not anonymized clips. The actual videos. People undressing. People in bathrooms. People having sex. Bank cards. Medical documents. The blurring is supposed to protect privacy. It fails constantly. The contractors see everything. Here is the part that should stop you cold: You did not buy the glasses. You did not agree to the terms of service. You did not consent to anything. But if someone wearing Meta glasses walks into your bedroom, your bathroom, your doctor's office, your home, a contractor on the other side of the world may be watching you right now. The person wearing the glasses consented. Everyone else in the room did not. Meta's defense is that this is all disclosed in the privacy policy. They are technically correct. Buried in language so dense that 99% of users never read it. And even if they did, it would not matter, because the terms govern the wearer's data. Not yours. You are not a party to the contract. You are the product being annotated. Millions of AI-enabled cameras walking around in public. Recording constantly. Uploading to servers. Reviewed by humans earning a few dollars an hour to label your most intimate moments so the algorithm gets smarter. This is not a bug. This is the business model. The EU is already asking questions. MEPs submitted formal inquiries to the Commission this week demanding answers on GDPR compliance. The problem is obvious: European data protection law requires consent from data subjects. Bystanders are data subjects. Bystanders never consented. The entire architecture violates the regulation by design. Meta's response has been silence and a reference to terms of service that do not apply to the people actually being filmed. Google Glass died because people called the wearers "Glassholes" and banned them from bars. Meta solved the social problem by making the glasses look normal. They did not solve the privacy problem. They hid it. Seven million units sold in 2025. The installed base is accelerating. Every unit is a potential surveillance node operated by someone who may not understand what they are feeding into the system and reviewed by contractors who see everything the algorithm cannot process. The question is not whether this becomes a scandal. The question is whether the scandal arrives before or after the glasses are on 50 million faces. Watch the EU. If Brussels moves on GDPR enforcement, Meta faces a choice: disable human review in Europe and cripple the AI training pipeline, or accept fines that could reach billions. Neither outcome is priced into the stock. The glasses are selling faster than ever. The contractors keep watching. And somewhere right now, someone you have never met is looking at footage of you that you never knew existed.

🚨 Urgent Travel Support for Indians in the UAE. Stuck in Dubai and unable to return to India due to the ongoing situation? We are coordinating structured travel arrangements to help you reach home safely. Seats are limited and allocated on priority. These are managed travel options with associated costs. If you or someone you know needs urgent assistance, fill the form now: forms.gle/9yXA1v2TMsUegw… Get real-time updates on our WhatsApp channel: whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vb… Please share to help affected families 🇮🇳🙏

In view of the ongoing situation, the Airspace in Dubai is temporarily closed and passengers may kindly check with the respective airlines for services. Airlines contact list: Emirates : +971600555555 Etihad: +971600555666 Fly Dubai: +971600544445 Air Arabia: +971600508001 Spice Jet: +91 124 4983410; +91 124 7101600 Air India Express: Whatsapp +91 6360012345 Air India: WhatsApp AI: +91 96670 34444 Air India 24/7 Customer Care: +91 116 932 9333 / +91 116 932 9999 Indigo: +91 124-4973838 / 124-6173838

@BLRAviation @MEAIndia @cgidubai @PMOIndia Thank you. Yes it is looking scary as there is bombardment happening even now. Was seeking assistance as they are also with 2 infants. For now looks like there is no other option.

@dhinvira @MEAIndia @cgidubai @PMOIndia Stay in Dubai. Wait for things to settle.

Dear @MEAIndia , @cgidubai Requesting your guidance as I have colleague who was to travel back to India with his family yesterday who is currently stuck in Dubai. Please advice on how to proceed. Kindly advice . @PMOIndia