David

31 posts

David

David

@dingyibvs

California, USA Katılım Haziran 2017
88 Takip Edilen9 Takipçiler
David
David@dingyibvs·
@rejiretu @clashreport Nobody's talking about what the reporter said, we're talking about what Trump said.
English
0
0
0
16
レジ列
レジ列@rejiretu·
@clashreport He's a reporter for TV Asahi. TV Asahi is left-leaning, anti-Trump, and anti-Takaichi. Its viewers are mainly left-leaning elderly people over 60. Therefore, you don't need to take what he says seriously.
English
2
0
0
212
Clash Report
Clash Report@clashreport·
Reporter: Why didn’t you inform allies before attacking Iran? Trump: We wanted surprise—who knows better about surprise than Japan? Why didn’t you tell me about Pearl Harbor?
English
635
2.3K
10K
3M
Sandy Petersen 🪔
Sandy Petersen 🪔@SandyofCthulhu·
1) We have fought wars against Chinese equipment and it has NOT stood up. 2) if we haven't fought a peer, neither has China. In even longer. In fact the last "peer to peer" war either of us had was against each other, in Korea. 3) we have captured and examined Russian targeting, radar, and electronics from shot-down planes in Ukraine. China uses the same systems. So we know all about Chinese electronics. Thanks, Zelensky! 4) even if the Chinese are a peer-to-peer opponent quality wise, the US has 13,000 military aircraft. China has about 3500. We used to hear a LOT about how "quantity has a quality all its own" and how the Chinese vast numbers would overwhelm us. Well, in case of a confrontation in the recent future, we would be the "vast number" opponent. 5) we have indomitable allies we can rely on. Taiwan, South Korea, Japan, for example. Hell, even Vietnam(!) has said they'd let us use their naval bases in an anti-Chinese conflict. That's how hated China is.
Sandy Petersen 🪔 tweet media
China Uncensored@ChinaUncensored

Something to keep in mind is that the US hasn’t actually fought a war with a peer competitor in a looooong time. That would all change if the US and China go to war over Taiwan. It would be a mistake to judge the success of that against military action in the Middle East.

English
288
344
5K
362.9K
David
David@dingyibvs·
@True_Patriot776 @SandyofCthulhu How do you figure that? They're pretty good in cutting edge software as you can see with their AI models, except unlike AI models they don't have a disadvantage in hardware. In fact, they're the leader in power semiconductors due to their extensive use in EVs, renewables, etc.
English
0
0
0
16
True Patriot
True Patriot@True_Patriot776·
@SandyofCthulhu Chinese radar systems are easily jammable, meanwhile, we test our own radar systems against our very own jammers to make OUR radars highly jam-resistant.
English
3
0
3
376
David
David@dingyibvs·
@martianwyrdlord Somehow Vietnam managed to do it under similar situations.
English
0
0
0
111
John Carter
John Carter@martianwyrdlord·
You don't get to reconsider geography. Canada shares North America with the US: by far our most important trading partner; a close cultural sibling; and a military superpower that can conquer us by next Tuesday without noticing. The only reason the US hasn't annexed us yet is that we've been a good, friendly neighbor who didn't threaten them and at least made encouraging noises about continental security. Inviting Hemispheric Adversary Number One to massively expand trade with us while becoming security partners is extremely stupid, as well as dishonourable. The Laurentians deserve everything that's going to happen to them.
John Ibbitson@JohnIbbitson

I have read this thread carefully, and as a former Washington bureau chief for the Globe and Mail, I find it puzzling. The Canadian government didn’t act in anger. It and all of us were compelled against our will to reconsider our trading and security relationships. 1/4

English
102
339
3.5K
160.4K
David
David@dingyibvs·
@clashreport I also looked at a globe, and found that the Czech Republic lies right between Russia and Germany. Therefore it stands to reason that the Czech Republic should be given to Germany, as it once was in the early 40's.
English
0
0
1
186
Clash Report
Clash Report@clashreport·
Czech Prime Minister Andrej Babiš: I bought a globe so I could see exactly where Greenland is. The Oreshnik would fly from Russia to the White House in 26 minutes, and the eleventh minute would be exactly over Greenland. So Donald Trump’s arguments about China and Russia are relevant…
English
483
1.8K
11.1K
1.5M
Paul
Paul@WomanDefiner·
People don't fully understand what is happening but We're kicking China out of our hemisphere. This isn't about Russia, its about China. Maduro was about China, Colombia is about China, Greenland is about China, Mexico will also be about China. I suspect by the end of Trumps term China will have zero property in the US.
Rapid Response 47@RapidResponse47

.@POTUS: "If we don't take Greenland, Russia or China will — and I'm not letting that happen."

English
257
711
10.7K
1.2M
David
David@dingyibvs·
@RushDoshi Mr. Doshi, it doesn't matter what your intent is. China clearly sees high tech manufacturing as key to avoid the middle income trap. As such, export controls are viewed by them as an attempt to keep the entire country from advancing to developed status.
English
0
0
2
504
Rush Doshi
Rush Doshi@RushDoshi·
Lot of PRC bots in the replies. Here’s the reality: - No US export control action threatened China’s entire economy. - China’s export control action threatens the entire US manufacturing ecosystem. There is no equivalence. I’m not making a moral point but an empirical one.
Rush Doshi@RushDoshi

Grateful to offer @lilkuo a few thoughts for her terrific @nytimes story on China's rare earth export controls. This is a loaded gun pointed at US manufacturing. It's quite unlike anything the U.S. has levied against China - with significant implications for future coercion.

English
380
64
348
271.1K
David
David@dingyibvs·
@Gobos_ @SecScottBessent I thought innovation can only happen with free thinkers in a democracy, what tech could a communist country possibly develop that we'd want?
English
3
0
1
460
Germain
Germain@Gobos_·
@SecScottBessent Rather than tariffs, we should flip the script on China - if you want market access, you have to transfer advanced manufacturing to our countries with 51% domestic ownership.
English
21
1
5
6.8K
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent@SecScottBessent·
President Trump is asserting American sovereignty and leading our allies to push back against China’s economic coercion. We do not seek to decouple from China, but we will not let a command-and-control economy dictate terms to the United States.
English
1.4K
1.3K
7.4K
566.1K
BAY AREA STATE OF MIND
BAY AREA STATE OF MIND@YayAreaNews·
An Earthquake just struck the Bay Area Did you feel it?
BAY AREA STATE OF MIND tweet media
English
241
235
1.4K
156.4K
Leading Report
Leading Report@LeadingReport·
BREAKING: Elon Musk says he will apologize profusely to President Trump once there is a “full dump” of the Epstein files.
English
1.1K
1.2K
13.7K
884K
TIRED OF ALL THIS 💩
TIRED OF ALL THIS 💩@lyndaarizona·
@CatWorkers @JepthaCreed What pretty sisters! And what a wonderful heart you have for giving them a home - and meaningful employment 😂. Just as an FYI, it is rare to find an orange female cat - to have four, and as sisters, is extraordinary. I hope they have brought a spark of magic to your distillery.
English
1
0
41
1.6K
David
David@dingyibvs·
@TempusTactica @unusual_whales It's a power semiconductor company, which is used in anything that uses a lot of electricity and is digitally controlled (e.g. EVs, high power radars, etc.). It was the world leader in this field, and in fact I think still leads the world in production capacity.
English
0
0
0
206
unusual_whales
unusual_whales@unusual_whales·
Wolfspeed $WOLF is filling for bankruptcy. To say options sentiment was bearish on this is an understatement. Today's net premium, NEGATIVE $3.7 MILLION! Most active chains $WOLF $3 puts expiring 07/18/2025. People have been trading the companies downfall for a while, but WENT INCREDIBLY HEAVY today, before the news. People knew, and kept trading it.
unusual_whales tweet mediaunusual_whales tweet mediaunusual_whales tweet mediaunusual_whales tweet media
English
72
58
382
483.9K
Mark Coleman
Mark Coleman@thecolemanthe·
@zzaurav @mattyglesias There are massive inefficiencies in Chinese manufacturing. Why buy a robot/machine when people are cheap. A large chunk of world manufacturing, not just the US, has been shifting to Vietnam and Thailand over the past few years. The CN workers started to cost too much.
English
8
0
3
1.5K
David
David@dingyibvs·
@burlapDD @YTortamis @PJ11819211 Way ahead of you there here in America! Economic indicators not passing the vibe test is how the Dems lost the election.
English
0
0
16
357
burlap
burlap@burlapDD·
@YTortamis @PJ11819211 Yeah dont look at any economic metrics at all Just dickride the CCP on vibes lmao 🤡
English
4
0
5
2.6K
PJ
PJ@PJ11819211·
I have never sympathized more with Xi as now, I get why he liquidated his fintech/software sector in 2021-2023, these are unbelievable stupid egotistical people that will burn the rest of society down if anyone insulted their competence.
English
47
1.6K
21.3K
535.7K
David
David@dingyibvs·
@GlennLuk @DanCollins2011 Right, and the execution requires investing heavily in education and infrastructure, things that cost a lot for a long time with little direct ROI for the investors. That's how it worked for other East Asian countries as well.
English
0
0
0
15
Dan Collins
Dan Collins@DanCollins2011·
China built the world’s most powerful economy behind high tariff trade walls, import substitution and localization rules combined with low taxes. Trump is instinctively copying this model. I’m impressed.
English
34
10
107
8.1K
David
David@dingyibvs·
@Hi5FromBriGuy @christianbora @AISafetyMemes @DarioAmodei Doesn't it actually prove his argument? China can freely purchase Airbus or Boeing's best and latest aircrafts, and this lack of constraint probably contributes to their slow progress in developing their own civilian aircraft manufacturing industry.
English
1
0
0
29
David
David@dingyibvs·
@4intheflames @rwang07 @kakashiii111 Hint: look at the Key areas and strategic goals sections. DS is just one LLM, to accomplish its goals you'll need other LLMs, other models, and numerous other industries working together.
English
0
0
1
580
Ray Wang
Ray Wang@rwang07·
China's New AI Industry Development Action Plan (中国银行支持人工智能产业链发展行动方案) Will Provide 1 trillion yuan ($ 137 billion) to support its AI industry over the next five years 🇺🇸🇨🇳 This might be the most important Chinese AI policy initiative in 2025 so far. /1
Ray Wang tweet media
中文
84
590
2.7K
1.1M
David
David@dingyibvs·
@Feraligamr @ShortsMVP @InfernoOmni Never played either game, watched both shows. Fallout was good, Arcane was legendary (pardon my pun). After finishing Fallout I thought it was pretty enjoyable, after finishing Arcane I immediately wanted watch it again and tell everyone I know about how amazing it is.
English
1
0
1
31
Ferali
Ferali@Feraligamr·
@ShortsMVP @InfernoOmni I’m not saying there’s anything wrong with Arcane, but people who aren’t in gaming spaces are not going to watch Arcane. They will watch Fallout. That simple
English
3
0
0
288
Omni ☕️
Omni ☕️@InfernoOmni·
HOW THE HELL DID FALLOUT BEAT ARCANE FOR BEST GAME ADAPTATION AIN’T NO WAY
English
357
540
9.6K
222.6K
David
David@dingyibvs·
@1iverbird97 @DeepRobotics_CN Efficiency is the biggest reason. Air travel is less efficient than ground which is less efficient than sea, assuming the same payload and vehicles designed for that payload. You can also see things an aerial vehicle may not be able to see, though the vice versa is also true.
English
0
0
0
166
1iverb1rd97
1iverb1rd97@1iverbird97·
@DeepRobotics_CN Often wondered why all that callisthenics when smaller drones can just fly at a minuscule of a cost
English
2
0
5
2.6K
David
David@dingyibvs·
@7digitalHelp I needed to download the Bleachers album in a hurry, but download speed was at an abysmal ~50 kb/s. I ended up purchasing from a different vendor. I'd like a refund.
English
1
0
0
86