Dev Ittycheria

1.7K posts

Dev Ittycheria banner
Dev Ittycheria

Dev Ittycheria

@dittycheria

Entrepreneur, Investor, Operator. Most recently was CEO @MongoDB. Views my own.

NYC Katılım Mayıs 2008
1K Takip Edilen8.9K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Dev Ittycheria
Dev Ittycheria@dittycheria·
Someone asked me today what's the most motivating thing I've ever read. It's this quote: "The definition of hell--on your last day on earth, the person you became met the person you could have become." The most profound regret is not about things you did but about the things you didn’t do—the missed opportunities, the untapped talents, the unlived dreams. It serves as a powerful reminder to live fully and intentionally and to be the version you could have been if you had not been held back by fear, doubt, shame or complacency.
English
8
44
297
53.7K
Dev Ittycheria
Dev Ittycheria@dittycheria·
@ProbyShandilya Numbers feel trivial in hindsight. The real takeaway is that pairing a strong product with a super distribution engine, particularly direct sales, produces outsized outcomes. Not many know that BladeLogic produced ~40 CROs for other amazing software companies.
English
0
0
23
806
Proby Shandilya
Proby Shandilya@ProbyShandilya·
Easy to forget how exceptional of a business BladeLogic was at IPO time: - reached ~$50M+ of ARR having only raised $23M - growing revenue 100% - 84% gross margins, elite for infra software - near breakeven operating income cc @dittycheria - biggest lessons from the co?
English
1
0
6
1.1K
Dev Ittycheria retweetledi
Whitecaps FC 2
Whitecaps FC 2@wfc2·
Ittycheria put it in the net for his first professional goal!🔥 Congratulations Danny! 👊 #VWFC | #WFC2
English
0
2
19
2.1K
Dev Ittycheria retweetledi
Abhishek Malani
Abhishek Malani@abhishekm1636·
“When you leave the room, what does your team say about you?” @dittycheria of @MongoDB shared this self-awareness test at a recent @sequoia Scaler Session. Even “he’s a pain on this topic” is fine, as long as it is intentional. 1/ Truth-telling is the bottleneck to speed. Org quality equals speed plus quality of decisions. What slows companies is not complexity. It is leaders avoiding hard conversations. As a first-time CEO, Dev said he had to stop trying to be the answer man. Saying “I don’t know” unlocked his team. 2/ His 3-step accountability framework: 1. Set clear expectations and explain why they matter 2. First miss, take the onus ("I didn't do a good job setting expectations") 3. Second miss, hold them to it Most leaders do not lack authority. They lack clarity upfront and speed of feedback.
English
2
5
19
9.3K
Zaggy
Zaggy@zagnut·
@dittycheria Their stock is down 70% since 2019. They are not a good business. An “excellent quarter” doesn’t mean your business is good. The longer term trend is poor leadership obviously. Years matter more than months.
English
1
0
0
104
Dev Ittycheria
Dev Ittycheria@dittycheria·
When most of us read that Block is laying off 40% of staff, we reflexively assumed the business was in trouble. It wasn’t. The company just reported an excellent quarter. There’s a broader lesson here. The optimal moment to make difficult structural decisions is when performance is strong. Yet many leaders defer action until results deteriorate, even when the underlying issue has been obvious for months. By then, the decision is no longer strategic. It is reactive. If you wait for a downturn to force your hand, you are negotiating from a position of weakness. Make the hard calls when you have momentum, cash, credibility, and optionality. That is when you can be deliberate instead of being desperate. The discipline to act early is what separates good leadership from poor management.
Dev Ittycheria@dittycheria

Wow. This is an aggressive move. Layoffs totally suck, and I feel for everyone affected. I do respect the effort to avoid making continual cuts year over year and instead make one deep cut and be done. This tells everyone left in the co that you don’t need to look over your shoulder. Time will tell if @jack is right, or if AI comes after more jobs.

English
3
0
26
9.8K
Dev Ittycheria retweetledi
Josh Wolfe
Josh Wolfe@wolfejosh·
Mamdani could learn a lesson in INCENTIVES FedEx's Memphis hub was a nightly disaster: packages had to be sorted + reloaded in hours but the sort always ran late. They tried everything. Then someone noticed: they paid workers by the hour. The longer it took, the more they earned. So they switched to paying by the shift, same pay, go home when you're done! Problem solved overnight! INCENTIVES MATTER.
signüll@signulll

zohran mamdani gave out $35 per hour to shovel snow to any person, so naturally each side walk intersection is now being shoveled by like 7 ppl. this is exactly how the government operates: without thinking about any second order affects & also because spending other ppl’s money (tax) is super duper easy. show me the incentives & i will show you the outcome.

English
52
128
2.2K
213.3K
Dev Ittycheria
Dev Ittycheria@dittycheria·
Wow. This is an aggressive move. Layoffs totally suck, and I feel for everyone affected. I do respect the effort to avoid making continual cuts year over year and instead make one deep cut and be done. This tells everyone left in the co that you don’t need to look over your shoulder. Time will tell if @jack is right, or if AI comes after more jobs.
jack@jack

we're making @blocks smaller today. here's my note to the company. #### today we're making one of the hardest decisions in the history of our company: we're reducing our organization by nearly half, from over 10,000 people to just under 6,000. that means over 4,000 of you are being asked to leave or entering into consultation. i'll be straight about what's happening, why, and what it means for everyone. first off, if you're one of the people affected, you'll receive your salary for 20 weeks + 1 week per year of tenure, equity vested through the end of may, 6 months of health care, your corporate devices, and $5,000 to put toward whatever you need to help you in this transition (if you’re outside the U.S. you’ll receive similar support but exact details are going to vary based on local requirements). i want you to know that before anything else. everyone will be notified today, whether you're being asked to leave, entering consultation, or asked to stay. we're not making this decision because we're in trouble. our business is strong. gross profit continues to grow, we continue to serve more and more customers, and profitability is improving. but something has changed. we're already seeing that the intelligence tools we’re creating and using, paired with smaller and flatter teams, are enabling a new way of working which fundamentally changes what it means to build and run a company. and that's accelerating rapidly. i had two options: cut gradually over months or years as this shift plays out, or be honest about where we are and act on it now. i chose the latter. repeated rounds of cuts are destructive to morale, to focus, and to the trust that customers and shareholders place in our ability to lead. i'd rather take a hard, clear action now and build from a position we believe in than manage a slow reduction of people toward the same outcome. a smaller company also gives us the space to grow our business the right way, on our own terms, instead of constantly reacting to market pressures. a decision at this scale carries risk. but so does standing still. we've done a full review to determine the roles and people we require to reliably grow the business from here, and we've pressure-tested those decisions from multiple angles. i accept that we may have gotten some of them wrong, and we've built in flexibility to account for that, and do the right thing for our customers. we're not going to just disappear people from slack and email and pretend they were never here. communication channels will stay open through thursday evening (pacific) so everyone can say goodbye properly, and share whatever you wish. i'll also be hosting a live video session to thank everyone at 3:35pm pacific. i know doing it this way might feel awkward. i'd rather it feel awkward and human than efficient and cold. to those of you leaving…i’m grateful for you, and i’m sorry to put you through this. you built what this company is today. that's a fact that i'll honor forever. this decision is not a reflection of what you contributed. you will be a great contributor to any organization going forward. to those staying…i made this decision, and i'll own it. what i'm asking of you is to build with me. we're going to build this company with intelligence at the core of everything we do. how we work, how we create, how we serve our customers. our customers will feel this shift too, and we're going to help them navigate it: towards a future where they can build their own features directly, composed of our capabilities and served through our interfaces. that's what i'm focused on now. expect a note from me tomorrow. jack

English
4
0
25
26.8K
Dev Ittycheria
Dev Ittycheria@dittycheria·
The best CEOs are contrarians by nature. When the stock is up and the investors are happy, they pump the brakes, keeping egos in check, addressing small red flags before they become big problems, and saying no to anything off-strategy. When results disappoint and the Street is skeptical, they push the other way, steadying the organization, reinforcing the long-term thesis, and reframing setbacks as learning. The job is to be the counterweight to whatever the room is feeling, whether that room is the exec team, the board, or investors.
English
1
0
16
2.1K
Harry Stebbings
Harry Stebbings@HarryStebbings·
I have interviewed 150 Public company CEOs. I have never met a matter a happy one.
English
75
2
224
91.4K
Dev Ittycheria
Dev Ittycheria@dittycheria·
Per capita spending = best metric for govt efficiency. Easy to benchmark across time & geography. If $/resident rises faster than inflation or peers, mayors & governors must justify spending or raising taxes.
Yogi@Houseofyogi

NYC taxes explained for people who don't pay attention: Property tax. Income tax. Sales tax. Unincorporated business tax. Commercial rent tax. Hotel tax. Mortgage recording tax. Mansion tax. Utility tax. Congestion pricing. Twenty-plus taxes. And the mayor wants more. Let me show you what that actually feels like. You're 26. First real job. $85,000. You feel rich. Then you see your paycheck. Federal takes a cut. Fine. Then New York State takes 6%. Then New York City takes another 3.5%. Then there's a "metropolitan commuter mobility tax" you've never heard of. Your $85K is now $54K before rent. You grab coffee. 8.875% sales tax. You take an Uber to the airport. Congestion pricing just added $9. Your landlord raised rent, he's passing along a property tax increase you'll never see on a bill but you're paying every month. You're not rich. You're not even comfortable. You're just surviving. But fine. It's New York. You chose this. Now here's the part nobody talks about. In 2000, NYC's budget was $40 billion for 8 million people. That's about $5,000 per person. Today it's $121 billion for 8.5 million people. $14,244 per person. Population grew 6%. Inflation was 82%. Spending per person nearly tripled. So things must be three times better, right? In 2017, 51% of New Yorkers rated quality of life as good. Today it's 34%. Only 12% think the city spends money wisely. Only 22% feel safe on the subway at night. Felony assaults hit a 24-year high. They spend $31,000 per student on education. Less than half kids can read at grade level. They tripled the spending. Everything got worse. Where'd the money go? Pensions up 115%. Outsourced contracts up $7 billion. A brand new $5 billion asylum seeker expense that didn't exist three years ago. Social services doubled. 302,000 city employees. Debt ballooning. And the new mayor doesn't look at this and say "we need to spend better." He says "we need to tax more." A 2% income tax hike that would push the combined state and city rate to 16.8% -> the highest in the entire country. Tax increases that impact everyone. His supporters chant "tax the rich" at rallies. The top 1% already pay 40% of the city's income tax. And they're leaving anyway. NYC's share of the nation's millionaires dropped from 7% to 4%. They have accountants. They have Florida. You know who can't leave? Your uncle with the restaurant. Your parents in that house. You, watching your paycheck disappear into twenty taxes before you can save a dollar. You need to make $312,000 in New York to live the same lifestyle as someone making $125,000 in Houston. Houston spends $2,850 per person. No state income tax. No city income tax. Population growing. NYC spends five times more. Worse results. NYC is a Netflix subscription that keeps raising the price while the product gets worse. And you can't cancel. $40 billion wasn't enough. $60 billion wasn't enough. $80 billion. $100 billion. Now $121 billion. It will never be enough. Because the problem was never revenue. There is enough money. There has always been enough money. They don't need more of yours. They need to do better with what they already take. I hope you understand what's at stake.

English
2
0
5
1.1K
Dev Ittycheria
Dev Ittycheria@dittycheria·
The tweets that matter are the ones you can’t stop thinking about. This is one.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ The distance someone will travel to experience something tells you exactly what it’s worth.
English
0
0
7
871
Dev Ittycheria retweetledi
Mark Suster
Mark Suster@msuster·
Another example of socialist being taught economics 101 by somebody who has learned the hard way. Ask anybody in Argentina, Venezuela or any other place where gov’ts have mismanaged economies in the name of populism. Ask anybody in Russia about “free” groceries, transportation or housing. Find me anybody dying to flee the US to move to Cuba.
Tudor Dixon@TudorDixon

AOC in Munich giggles excitedly when asked if she will impose a wealth tax as president. Moments later, her ignorance is exposed by Argentinian politician Daiana Fernández Molero, who has actually seen the destruction caused by a wealth tax.

English
15
47
529
36.4K
Dev Ittycheria
Dev Ittycheria@dittycheria·
“I'm a lawyer. I have a special practice. I handle one client.” “Mr. Corleone never asks a second favor once he's refused the first, understood?” "Can't do it, Sally." "Why do you hurt me, Michael? I've always been loyal to you." RIP Robert Duvall
English
0
0
6
997
Dev Ittycheria
Dev Ittycheria@dittycheria·
@critical_codger Still doesn’t mean new users should be directed to download the deprecated version. Makes no sense especially when you install s/w and get a notification that Classic is no longer supported.
English
0
0
6
353
Jonny Gato (水猫 )
Jonny Gato (水猫 )@critical_codger·
@dittycheria Business customers have a lot of inertia and can take quite a while to transition to current software. So just because it isn't supported doesn't mean it's not useful.
English
1
0
1
460
Dev Ittycheria
Dev Ittycheria@dittycheria·
I’m genuinely perplexed by MSFT. I needed Teams since some orgs use it instead of Zoom or Meet. Went to the Microsoft site, downloaded it, installed it, then got told Teams Classic is no longer supported. Why allow users to download deprecated software at all? How is this acceptable UX?
English
53
20
2K
109.6K
Dev Ittycheria
Dev Ittycheria@dittycheria·
A wise investor once said “ "be fearful when others are greedy, and be greedy when others are fearful."  Perhaps it’s time to get greedy.
English
3
0
12
778
Ram Parameswaran
Ram Parameswaran@_ram_·
@dittycheria You've clearly not have fun yet dealing with classic outlook and the new outlook
English
5
1
331
12K
Dev Ittycheria
Dev Ittycheria@dittycheria·
"We have distributed AI touchpoints across multiple vendors with no single point of failure." 😂
IT Unprofessional@it_unprofession

I'm pretty sure everyone at my company saw this article and now they all think we're in an AI crisis. We're not in an AI crisis. We use Claude to summarize Slack threads. But here's what's actually interesting: this whole panic reveals something nobody wants to admit. Every company in America has been bullshitting about their "AI strategy" for two years. We all saw the hype. We all knew we had to say something. So we rebranded our existing automation as "AI-powered" and called it a day. My company isn't special. We're all doing the same thing. The problem is now the executives actually believe their own bullshit. They think we have "significant AI exposure" because they've been telling investors we're "AI-first." I just got pulled into an emergency meeting. Six executives asking me to explain our "AI dependency matrix." There is no AI dependency matrix. There's Claude for meeting summaries, there's some sentiment analysis in our support tickets that came free with Zendesk, and there's whatever Gmail is doing when it autocompletes my sentences. But I can't say that in a room full of people who told their boards we're "transforming the business through AI." So I said we have "distributed AI touchpoints across multiple vendors with no single point of failure." Which is technically true. We use a bunch of different services that all have AI features we mostly ignore. The CFO asked if we should "hedge our AI exposure." I have no idea what that means. Neither does he. What am I going to do: nothing. Because in three weeks, Anthropic will say something reassuring, the stocks will recover, and everyone will forget this happened. But I'll have documentation showing I recommended a "risk assessment" that mysteriously never got prioritized. The funniest part is that half these executives probably don't even know what Anthropic is. They just saw "AI" and "crash" in the same headline. We're all pretending. The whole industry is pretending. And articles like this just remind everyone how fragile the pretending is.

English
0
2
5
3.3K