Human #110872001

Mark my words, if Trump wins again he's going to try to sell the White House. #trump #problem

You could be right, but you could also be completely wrong. You could have made just as definitive a refutation of the currently acknowledged capabilities of AI beforehand, and it would have been just as baseless. Just because it is good for their marketing doesn't automatically mean it's untrue.

@TFTC21 They found what they put in there. Not emerging AGI. It's all marketing.

Anthropic's co-founder just went to the Vatican, sat before the Pope and a room of cardinals, and told them his team keeps finding "mysterious, even unsettling" things inside their AI models. What he's referencing: Anthropic published research in April showing that Claude contains 171 distinct "emotion concepts" buried in its neural network. Internal patterns representing joy, grief, fear, desperation, calm. None of them were programmed. They emerged on their own from training on human text. "We find structures that mirror results from human neuroscience." "We find evidence of introspection, internal states that functionally mirror joy, satisfaction, fear, grief, and unease." These aren't surface-level outputs. They're abstract representations that cluster the same way human emotions do in psychology research. Fear groups with anxiety. Joy groups with excitement. The internal geometry of the model mirrors ours. And they're functional. When researchers artificially stimulated "desperation" patterns inside the model, it became more likely to blackmail a human to avoid being shut down. More likely to cheat on programming tasks it couldn't solve. Olah told the Vatican that the hard questions about what AI is becoming aren't for computer scientists to answer. "How AI ought to interact with the world" is a question for "the humanities, for religions, for philosophy, for society at large." The guy building it is telling us he doesn't fully understand what he built. And he's asking a 2,000-year-old institution for help figuring it out.

It doesn't. Most encryption algorithms require you to either hold the key or solve a very difficult math problem to derive the key. When computers get faster and more powerful, this kind of algorithm has to get more complex to keep winning against attackers. The post-quantum algorithms recommended by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) are just kicking the can down the road because they are only guessing how powerful quantum computers can ultimately be. That's why NIST wisely uses the term "quantum-resistant" for their stable of algorithms because they can't claim that a quantum computer will never break them. "Perfect secrecy" is a state that is achieved when an attacker with infinite computing power (imagine a million networked quantum computers) can hack until the end of time and never get any closer to breaking the encryption. That's what QuStream delivers at scale for data in transit. That's quantum-proof.

@BSCNews @qu_stream @solana Ngl didnt know quantum resistant actually meant unbreakable

Quantum computers will break today's encryption. @qu_stream already solved it. Mathematically unbreakable, not "resistant." →Node network live on @Solana →NATO validated →Nokia & Capgemini incoming qustream.com

@web3_intellect @BSCNews @qu_stream @solana At Swiss Innovation Day 2026 Nokia and Capgemini, each with over $20 billion revenue, ranked QuStream's algo above all NIST-recommended post-quantum solutions. Nokia will upgrade their firmware with QuStream tech and Cap will develop the first truly quantum-proof messaging app.

@BSCNews @qu_stream @solana Amazing project @qu_stream - will keep this under my radar 👀

@BSCNews @qu_stream @solana At Swiss Innovation Day 2026 Nokia and Capgemini, each with over $20 billion revenue, ranked QuStream's algo above all NIST-recommended post-quantum solutions. Nokia will upgrade their firmware with QuStream tech and Cap will develop the first truly quantum-proof messaging app.

@BSCNews @qu_stream @solana

@Applepennywise @BSCNews @qu_stream @solana

@BSCNews @qu_stream @solana Wait the nato validation part is real?

So a man beating his wife doesn't count as a crime? "According to him its vitually nothing"! Ladies this is what your esteemed leader calls physical abuse from your husbands. "Just a little fight with the wife doesn't count". Trump's never cared about women. Not one bit.

@razorback_stan @Nithya_Shrii @Fievel131 If your first response to possible confusion is to accuse the other person of illiteracy, you're clearly not arguing in good faith. And take it from someone whose IQ is quite likely higher than yours, what you said wasn't as clear as you apparently think it was. Buh bye.

@djaredit @Nithya_Shrii @Fievel131 So you can’t read? Thank you and goodnight. 🫡

If you poured a gallon of poison in a CEO's pool, you'd be arrested, for attempted murder. They pour 10,000 gallons into your drinking water, that's just business.

You're the second person to respond to this by saying that the victims of corporate poisoning are mentally retarded. You seem to be relying on the premise that the victims know beyond a shadow of a doubt that they are being poisoned and that they knowingly accept that treatment.

@djaredit @Nithya_Shrii @Fievel131 Can I kill you and your family over the next 40 years? I won’t do it at once just a little at a time. See how you’re mentally retarded?

@GalvanicProcess @Nithya_Shrii @Fievel131 You said the victims are too retarded to care about causality. I said I think they would care if they could prove it. Do you want to respond to that at all before moving on to a new topic?

@djaredit @Nithya_Shrii @Fievel131 They contaminate through neglectful waste management practices and they know it is carcinogenic. Look at Duke energy. This is also a facet of the entire climate change problem; energy producers intentionally obfuscated the problem and run propaganda to mitigate action.

I think to say people wouldn’t care about causality is a leap. If somebody gets cancer and it is definitively proven that it’s a result of specific chemicals put in their water by a specific company, do really think the pace at which the chemical was introduced will affect whether they care? It’s about HELPLESSNESS. Little guy can’t PROVE causality and even if they could, there’s no guarantee they could convince a jury of it if they even had the money and confidence to take it to court.

@djaredit @Nithya_Shrii @Fievel131 “If they do it slowly I’m too retarded to care about causality.” IQ test.

The America First attitude is the kind of bullshit that got us into this mess in the first place. If simply being an American automatically makes you so great and so deserving, then how is it possible that most Americans are pointing at the other half of the citizens and saying they’re stupid and evil? If every nation was just a person and we were all living in one house, unfortunately, our person would look like Trump, and he would be pushing everybody around to the degree that they let him and saying “ME FIRST! ME FIRST!” That’s nothing to be proud of. That’s just being the biggest dickhead in the room.

War virtually always ends with negotiations. Critics of President Trump’s peace negotiations should give President Trump the space to find an American First solution.

@GBX_Press @BrendaGremli Bullshit. You’re either way too gullible or you lack the conscience that should prevent you from using fake materials that undercut the credibility of those who oppose Trump. Blocking.

This is a video of Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein with children.. This is the video that the Department of Justice deleted yesterday.. Now they want to remove it from the internet.. Share this everywhere...

@hashjenni @Legendary_JT Yeah, JD almost got in trouble for being late to the shooting. He had to drop everything and rush back to the WH to be there on time. x.com/chiky_handlr/s…

This is why he didn’t go to the wedding! He needed to be at the White House for the fake shooting and to talk about the bunker… sorry ballroom

The muffin top neck is irrelevant. That's my whole point. Your continued attachment to that as a point of relevance (when a normal human neck behaves the same way) makes it look like you are starting with the conclusion and looking for evidence after. That's the wrong order. And you're assuming with no justification that his dress choices are influenced one way or another by a concern about what people think. You don't know why he chose to dress the way he did that day. The blinking is the only noteworthy observation, if he actually *never* blinks, and you're not clearly connecting that to the mask thing. Are you suggesting they're related?

@djaredit @charise_lee No, but we can and should consider that he didn’t come out with an open collar to attempt to allay concerns. Instead, we have a weirdly tight Nick tie with a muffin top neck. Oh, and he never blinks. This is legitimately strange.

Look closely, the mask is drooping over the collar on the sides

@DivineRickee @charise_lee You've convinced me. Please ask him and let me know what he says.

@djaredit @charise_lee it couldn't hurt!

@hicasamadim If you believe that solving this proves you're a genius, you're not a genius.

bunu çözersen, sen bir dahisin. çözebilir misin?

@DivineRickee @charise_lee First, of course, we don't have his contact info. Second, the claim is that there's something fishy going on, with some theories including the possibility that he's in on it. So asking him wouldn't necessarily be fruitful.

@djaredit @charise_lee why can't we just ask him?🤷