XRP D 🇱🇦

Telcoin is thrilled by the final passage of the GENIUS Act, a true watershed moment for crypto and stablecoins in the US. With federal regulations set to become law upon @POTUS’s signature tomorrow, we’re moving forward with our Nebraska charter for Telcoin Digital Asset Bank.

After significant studying, and in keeping with President Trump’s vision to make the United States the crypto capital of the world, today I ordered the Great Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to prepare their businesses to count cryptocurrency as an asset for a mortgage. SO ORDERED

🚨 Big News U.S! We’ve launched Direct Deposit, and it comes with rewards. 💸 Get 4% $XRP-back for every salary-linked Direct Deposit of $250 or more. ✅ Seamless ✅ Automated ✅ Straight into your Uphold account Additional T&C Apply. Learn more: uphold.com/en-us/xrp-cash…

🚨 JUST ANNOUNCED! You wanted it. You waited. It's happening. The Uphold Card is officially coming back to the U.S. We’ve been working behind the scenes, and it’s almost time. Details coming soon. 🇺🇸💳👀

As excited as I am about my other holdings and their upside potential in the coming months, there is still no other alt-coin in this space that has lower timeframe impulsive structure as clean as $XRP has had off of it's lows. The chop/consolidation we are seeing on $XRP in the $2 range is not a cause for concern- the longer we chop in this tight range the more explosive the next leg up will be. From a wave perspective the next leg up on XRP is akin to the wave up we saw on $BTC that took us from 25k to 74k (Wave 3), so a tight consolidation prior to this massive move up is to be expected/welcomed.

Big picture. $XRP

Elon Musk just called out Bill Gates and his ties to Jeffrey Epstein. The crowd goes wild. Listen: “Who does Gates think he is to make comments about the welfare of children? He was very close with Epstein.. Wouldn't want that guy to babysit my kid”

HOLY SH*T 🚨 Governor Greg Abbott signs a bill Constitutionally ban Capital Gains Taxes in Texas This is a MASSIVE Win for America 🔥

Golden hour hits different in #Houston 🌇🤘🎥 @t.texastyler

2025 is the year of moving forward.

RFK JR: "The soda industry knocked on our door and said the SNAP program is not supposed to be about nutrition. We pointed out that there is no nutrition in a soda. They said it's not about nutrition. We said the name of the program is 'Supplemental Nutrition Assistance.'"

I’ve seen white washing before but this one takes the frickin🎂 The IG is claiming that even if Hinman owned ETH when he gave the speech, it would not have constituted a violation, or even a conflict of interest. GTFOH I challenge her to find an ethics lawyer who will support her statement. She won’t find one. The statute states that it even if there isn’t an actual conflict but a federal employee allows the mere appearance of a conflict, it constitutes a violation. Here’s a few points off the top of my head that proves the IG is either incompetent or something else is at play. 1) The SEC’s Ethics officer sternly warned Hinman that he was violating the statute every time he met with his partners at Simpson Thacher. The SEC’s Ethics division informed Hinman that he wasn’t even allowed to email his partners, let alone continue to have lunch and dinner with them, while they had major business dealings being reviewed by the SEC (eg Canaan IPO), including being reviewed by the division he was in charge of. After this stern warning, Hinman met, at least 3 more times, with those same partners, including his China Partner in charge of the Canaan IPO (which made ETH mining equipment). This, according to the SEC’s own ethics experts, violated the statute. 2) The IG said Hinman stated that the speech was a collaborative effort, which is inconsistent with his deposition testimony and sworn affidavit in the Ripple case, stating the speech was his personal opinion - that he was the one who wrote it, with others checking for grammar and other minor corrections. 3) The IG said others at the SEC wanted ETH to be included in the speech. This is objectively a false statement and there is proof. In the Ripple case, the Hinman emails were made public. First, Hinman called the speech the “Ether Speech”. No other SEC officials lobbied to have ETH included in the speech. In fact, the opposite is true. The Office of General Counsel RECOMMENDED NOT including ETH in the speech. The GC argued that Hinman should NOT give ETH a free pass because it could limit the SEC from taking a different position later - which we saw play out with Gary Gensler. Thus, the IG claiming others wanted ETH included in the speech is objectively false. 4) The IG claims that even if Hinman owned ETH at the time of the speech it would not have constituted a conflict of interest. 🤯 Then why did the SEC institute a policy that members of the SEC could not own tokens? The reason was to PREVENT a conflict of interest. I predicted that the IG Report would conclude that no intentional wrongdoing was committed and that there was no quid pro quo type of smoking gun, but that the IG would have to conclude a real Conflict existed and likely make recommendations on how to avoid such appearances of impropriety in the future. It’s kind of hard to imagine an IG report like this one, when SEC ethics officers said the opposite, while it was happening. According to this IG, Paul Atkins could buy a crypto token and give a very favorable speech regarding that crypto and no conflict would exist. Give me a break. All I’ll say is, let’s see where this IG lands her next job!

🚨 Ripple and the SEC have jointly requested a pause on the appeal, signaling that a settlement is in motion. Final approval from the commission is pending. #XRP #XRPArmy #XRPCommunity #XRPHolders

ICYMI, earlier this week, Ripple partnered with @BCG to bring you the latest in tokenization research – forecasting incredible growth (a $18.9T market!) by 2033, and what’s going to get us to that point -- global standards, investment and robust custody infrastructure. The message is clear for FIs - embedding token-based models into their operations now can unlock new revenue streams, reach new client segments, and stay relevant to the most advanced users in the market. Read more below:

The Fork in America's Financial Future: From Globalization to Sovereignty sec.gov/files/the_fork…

@allenanalysis Sure and Nike is America first also meanwhile they employ 450,000 workers overseas with 130 factories there and none in the USA. Gtfoh

Nike just lost nearly $10 billion in market cap in under an hour—because Trump slapped a 46% tariff on Vietnam, where Nike has over 450,000 workers and 130 factories. The stock cratered nearly 7%, and investors hit the panic button. That’s not “America First.” That’s tanking American companies while pretending it’s patriotism.

This is it – the moment we’ve been waiting for. The SEC will drop its appeal – a resounding victory for Ripple, for crypto, every way you look at it. The future is bright. Let's build.

Today, Ripple moves forward—stronger than ever. This landmark case set a precedent for the domestic crypto industry. With the SEC dropping its appeal, Ripple is now in the driver's seat and we’ll evaluate how best to pursue our cross appeal. Regardless, today is a day to celebrate this victory.

Day 6 of Crypto In America being sentenced to @X jail for no apparent reason. 😢 Our first episode comes out tomorrow morning. @elonmusk @lindayaX

🚨SCOOP: Two well-placed sources tell me that the @SECGov vs. @Ripple case is in the process of wrapping up and could be over soon. My understanding is that the delay in reaching an agreement is due to Ripple's legal team negotiating more favorable terms regarding the August district court ruling, which imposed a $125M fine on the company and included a permanent injunction preventing the company from selling $XRP to institutional investors. The argument, I’m told, is that if the new SEC leadership is wiping the enforcement slate clean for all previously-targeted crypto firms because it believes regulatory clarity will resolve the underlying issue, why should Ripple still be penalized? Accepting the Torres ruling as it stands would mean that Ripple is essentially agreeing to admit to wrongdoing — but now the SEC itself is seemingly unsure whether any wrongdoing occurred. There’s no real playbook for this kind of thing which could explain why this case is taking longer to resolve than the rest. Stay tuned.