Moksh.hl

23.4K posts

Moksh.hl

Moksh.hl

@dmoksh1

https://t.co/GvaKZhme2U $hype $btc $hypurr

Decentralised galaxy Katılım Ekim 2019
380 Takip Edilen1.9K Takipçiler
Moksh.hl
Moksh.hl@dmoksh1·
@Uncle_Jed_1 @zilliqa simply login to Ledger live app on your PC. Open up live manager and you can uninstall any apps you have installed in past.
English
1
0
0
80
Budman
Budman@Uncle_Jed_1·
@zilliqa How to uninstall the Zilliqa App appearing in a Ledger device but not in Ledger Wallet?
English
4
5
7
986
Moksh.hl retweetledi
Zilliqa
Zilliqa@zilliqa·
We have published a dedicated Ledger Incident Hub with the latest confirmed information on the signing flaw affecting the Zilliqa Ledger application for Legacy accounts. Legacy Zilliqa transactions remain paused as a precaution. Zilliqa EVM is not affected. The hub explains: • what happened • who may be affected • what is currently paused • what action users should take • how the recovery work is progressing You do not need to take any action right now. The Zilliqa team will never contact you first or ask for your seed phrase, private key or recovery phrase. Read the Incident Hub: zilliqa.com/ledger-inciden…
Zilliqa tweet media
Zilliqa@zilliqa

Nonce-Generation Vulnerability in the Zilliqa Ledger App: A critical vulnerability has been identified in the Zilliqa Ledger application affecting the generation of Schnorr signatures for native (non-EVM) Zilliqa transactions. The vulnerability causes signatures to be generated with a predictably weakened ephemeral nonces, from which an attacker can recover the signer’s private key using only publicly available on-chain data. Protective measures are already in place to prevent further loss, and a coordinated remediation plan is being finalised. Users who have signed native Zilliqa transactions with a Ledger device should await official guidance before taking any action. Impact: The vulnerability affects private keys used to sign native Zilliqa transactions with a Ledger device. Any account that has broadcast approximately five or more native transactions signed through the Zilliqa Ledger app should be considered compromised. Its private key can be reconstructed from signatures already recorded on-chain, regardless of any subsequent software update. The issue is confined to the Ledger app’s native signing path. EVM transactions are unaffected. Zilliqa software development kits, including zilliqa-js, gozilliqa-sdk and pyzil, generate nonces correctly and are not affected. Root cause: Zilliqa native transactions are authenticated using EC-Schnorr signatures over secp256k1. Each signature requires a fresh, uniformly random 256-bit ephemeral nonce, (k). The secrecy and full-width randomness of (k) are essential, as any systematic bias can allow the private key to be recovered. The signing routine generated 40 bytes of randomness and reduced them modulo the curve order, correctly producing a uniform 256-bit value. However, when copying this value into the nonce buffer, the code copied the wrong 32 bytes of the 40-byte output. This retained the eight zero-padding bytes introduced by the reduction and discarded eight bytes of entropy. As a result, the most significant 64 bits of every generated nonce were fixed at zero, meaning (k < 2^{192}). A nonce with 64 known bits leaks information about the private key with each signature. With five or more affected signatures, the private key can be recovered in seconds using commodity hardware by solving the resulting Hidden Number Problem through lattice reduction - a well-documented technique for attacking biased-nonce signatures. Because the affected transactions are permanently recorded on-chain, this exposure cannot be reversed by updating the signing application. The affected keys must be retired. Timeline 2019-2026: The defect was present in every released version of the Zilliqa Ledger app across all supported devices. 19 July 2026: On-chain activity consistent with active exploitation was observed. 21 July 2026: The root cause was isolated to the app’s nonce-handling code and confirmed by reproducing the issue against on-chain signatures. Ongoing: A corrected version of the app is being prepared in coordination with Ledger. Release details will be announced separately. Remediation: As soon as the issue was identified, native (non-EVM) transactions were suspended as a protective measure. This has halted further draining of affected accounts while a solution is prepared. Affected accounts cannot be secured through an ordinary transfer. Because their private keys can be derived from data already recorded on-chain, an attacker with access to the same key could attempt to front-run a legitimate transfer as soon as transactions resume. Advising users simply to move their funds would therefore be ineffective and potentially unsafe. A corrected build of the Ledger app has been prepared, restoring full-width nonce generation and preventing further weakened signatures from being produced. However, this does not protect keys that have already been used to sign affected transactions. Those keys must ultimately be retired. A coordinated remediation plan to secure affected balances is being finalised and will be published separately. Until then, users who have signed native Zilliqa transactions with a Ledger device should take no independent action and should rely solely on official Zilliqa channels for instructions. Users who hold or transact with ZIL exclusively through EVM-compatible tooling are not affected. Acknowledgments: @kucoincom played a key role in pinpointing the root cause in the Zilliqa Ledger app nonce generation, recovered affected private keys from publicly available on-chain signatures, and confirmed ongoing exploitation. KuCoin’s timely reporting and responsible collaboration enabled rapid protective measures, helping safeguard users, ecosystem participants, and the broader Zilliqa ecosystem while the remediation plan was being developed. We sincerely appreciate the KuCoin team’s professionalism, technical expertise, and cooperation throughout this process.

English
19
22
110
19.4K
Moksh.hl retweetledi
Cointelegraph
Cointelegraph@Cointelegraph·
⚡ LATEST: Tokenized RWAs just became Hyperliquid's biggest market, surpassing all crypto trading categories combined.
Cointelegraph tweet media
English
60
37
302
65.8K
Moksh.hl
Moksh.hl@dmoksh1·
@coinbureau Wtf is Triple A wallet? cousin of triple 😂 just glad i never heard it's name before so never used it
English
0
0
12
1.3K
Coin Bureau
Coin Bureau@coinbureau·
⚠️ALERT: Triple-A wallets are under an apparent active exploit with over $9.7M drained. Onchain analyst Specter has flagged suspicious outflows from Triple-A hot wallets across TRON, Ethereum, Polygon, and Arbitrum, with the stolen assets consolidated into 5,227 ETH. Triple-A has yet to acknowledge the incident, while deposits are still live and newly deposited funds continue to be drained.
Coin Bureau tweet mediaCoin Bureau tweet media
English
45
57
236
62.2K
Moksh.hl
Moksh.hl@dmoksh1·
@0xCryptoSam how many traders use HL frontend to trade RWA markets vs how many use TradeXYZ frontend to trade RWA markets. answer to whether TradeXYZ will launch it's own token and whether HL & TradeZYZ are most aligned team lies in there somewhere. Kudos to those who will figure it out.
English
0
0
3
256
Sam
Sam@0xCryptoSam·
As a HYPE bull during the Cambrian explosion of RWA perps, you should ask yourself the following questions: 1) if TradeXYZ left Hyperliquid tomorrow and launched their own exchange, where would you go to trade RWA perps? 2) if TradeXYZ launched a stock/token, how would you value HYPE differently? 3) what is the likelihood of #1 and #2? I don’t intend to be a bear, but I’m pretty confident in my answers to #1 and #2 and I’m not naive enough to say I (or seemingly any major allocator) knows the answer to #3. And before the .hl’s whine in my comments, this is not meant to slight either protocol, it’s to state a fact: TradeXYZ holds a large and growing amount of leverage over Hyperliquid.
Lorenzo Valente@LorenzoARK

We are entering a new era for DeFi. For the first time ever, @HyperliquidX generated more volume from RWAs than crypto in a single week. RWAs accounted for 54% of total trading volume. An even more interesting trend: since June, single stocks have overtaken indices and commodities on HIP-3. Today, 61% of all RWA trading volume is in individual equities. I’m no longer convinced RWA trading will naturally aggregate on the same venue as crypto. There will likely be category leaders within RWA, and owning BTC/ETH/SOL flow may become far less important than many people assume. To put this into perspective: Total DEX perpetual volume last week: $79B Hyperliquid: $50B Of that, $26B was HIP-3 RWA trading In other words, Hyperliquid’s RWA market alone was larger than the combined crypto perpetual volume of every other DEX. If you’re still only focused on crypto token trading, I think you’re focusing on the wrong market. data from @Blockworks

English
94
21
319
301.2K
Peggy
Peggy@Sakrexer·
Quick update on HYPE: We were initially positioned to reload sub-$17 to get ready for next cycle. But the framework has now materially changed. From a game theory perspective, the magnitude of the upside deviation should ultimately be mirrored by the magnitude of the downside reversion. In other words, the more reflexive and overextended the move becomes on the way up, the higher the probability of a violent overshoot to the downside. Our base case now is that HYPE cannot just revisit the $17-20 range anymore at this stage sadly, it will ultimately overextend well below $10 before establishing a true long-term cycle low. More importantly, the entire structure has now shifted. The $17-20 region is no longer looking like the optimal reload zone for the next expansion phase. Instead, there’s an increasing probability that this range ultimately becomes the distribution ceiling of the next cycle itself. We’ve seen this exact reflexive pattern play out before, EOS during the post-2018 unwind, LINK after its macro euphoric expansion. What once looked like “value accumulation” eventually became lower-high exit liquidity in the following cycle. Very interesting. So essentially, remove your HYPE orders around $17. That level is too obvious now after the expansion, which means you will get front-run by the market before any meaningful reversal materializes. We will keep you posted once HYPE forms a new bottom sub $10 (probably around $7-8) We will find the bottom together, and there should be a nice long to do, until the relief back to $17-20. Not guaranted that HYPE bounces back to $20, but highly highly likely This sould be an easy 2-2.5x at least And with leverage, we could probably pull a 10x Please be patient, we will revert in a few months For now, short only
Peggy tweet media
English
51
11
187
55.2K
Moksh.hl
Moksh.hl@dmoksh1·
if you are an active @HyperliquidX trader & staked $hype, chances are you will receive loot chests from @playcambria TGE is in august 2026 & these will give airdrop. i earned 22 loot chests - 15 common, 6 epic, 1 legendry chest is pretty decent i guess. check yours 👇
Moksh.hl tweet mediaMoksh.hl tweet media
Cambria@playcambria

Included in Snapshot: @AbstractChain @Polymarket @PlayKintara @Pumpfun @Ronin_Network @apecoin @fantasy_top_ @HyperliquidX @onchainheroes @pudgypenguins @Azuki @moonbirds @rektguy @PirateNation @AxieInfinity @AxiomExchange @pumpcade @goblintown @GLHFers @Mocaverse_xyz and more

English
3
0
7
597
Moksh.hl
Moksh.hl@dmoksh1·
@DeanTTraining I do fasted lift because I don't feel like training after having my food. However i keep slipping whey protein mixed in water while training. And I feel perfect. Not heavy nor empty stomach.
English
0
0
0
33
Dean Turner
Dean Turner@DeanTTraining·
It’s not that you can’t make gains if you train fasted It’s that you will never make the BEST gains you could possibly make training fasted If you’re cool with that/don’t care….have at it! If you want the BEST gains possible….you know the drill: CARB UP PRIOR TO EVERY LIFT!
Dean Turner tweet mediaDean Turner tweet mediaDean Turner tweet mediaDean Turner tweet media
Francis Melia@CoachFHM

Seen this countless times. A client comes to me after years of believing the “fasted” training myth. We start placing a good amount of carbs pre training. Oatmeal, fruit (whatever digests well for them) They might be skeptical for a week or so. But once the wheels are spinning…they feel strong as fuck in the gym while dropping body fat. Carbs are rocket fuel. Better training performance = better physique. Hands down.

English
9
4
92
21.5K
Moksh.hl retweetledi
Matt Hougan
Matt Hougan@Matt_Hougan·
The next bull market in crypto will be less about hype and more about HYPE.
English
43
40
686
33.3K
Moksh.hl
Moksh.hl@dmoksh1·
@KathEthereum @RealAZKicks @Evan_ss6 What do you mean? Hyperliquid is indeed only venue to get deepest liquidity, KYC or not, except Binance maybe for some assets. Show me another venue with better liquidity depth than Hyperliquid.
English
0
0
0
31
Kath L
Kath L@KathEthereum·
@RealAZKicks @Evan_ss6 bc HYPE will no longer be the only place to get deep no-KYC exposure to US equities via perps
English
2
0
0
256
GalleonCrypto
GalleonCrypto@GalleonCrypto·
@mlmabc @Sakrexer Due to the size, we will always know when they sell as the funds will have to leave Coinbase Custody then
English
2
0
1
395
Peggy
Peggy@Sakrexer·
Why do whales deposit their tokens to exchanges (like coinbase) to sell even though hype is the most liquid on hyperliquid?
English
16
3
97
33.1K
Moksh.hl
Moksh.hl@dmoksh1·
full profit taking while they are already hedged somewhere else, price will keep plummeting before token unlocks as other try to front run multicoin. multicoin will make profits on short and dump once token unlocks fully to rebuy lower (price pumps again) to deploy for Trasia win win for multicoin, while retail trying to front run will be left with no $hype at the end. i will buy more spot while my another bag is staked for multi years and will continue chilling.
English
0
0
1
32
Louis.hl
Louis.hl@louisdives·
My take: it’s probably a mix. The number is too big to be purely for Trasia. A deployer needs 500k, they pulled 1.96M. So my read is part of it funds Trasia’s HIP-3 deployer stake, and part of it is Multicoin taking some profit or rotating capital elsewhere. Not fully bullish, not fully bearish. Just a large fund doing two things at once, and only one of them is about Trasia. What do you think? Deployer stake, profit-taking, or both?
English
2
0
3
593
Louis.hl
Louis.hl@louisdives·
Multicoin Capital unstaked 1.96M $HYPE (~$121M) to become a HIP-3 deployer through Trasia? Quick context: @trasiaxyz is a new Asia-first, non-custodial trading platform that just raised a $1.75M seed from Multicoin. It runs on Hyperliquid’s HIP-3 and plans to bring Asian markets on-chain, AI, robotics, and regional equities, with a mobile app that feels like Binance or OKX. Basically, Trasia = tradeXYZ, but for Asia. Now here’s the interesting part. At the same time Multicoin funded Trasia, they’re unstaking a massive amount of HYPE: 1.07M, 683.2K, and 211.5K across separate transactions. Two big moves from the same firm, same window. So what’s actually happening?
Louis.hl tweet media
English
19
7
79
7.1K
Moksh.hl
Moksh.hl@dmoksh1·
@SenorPandaHere @Sakrexer they are good at one thing - calling. execution is not their forte. Later they will be calling for 30s, 20s, only to be left on sideline again while $hype goes to $100.
English
1
0
2
63
PandaTrades
PandaTrades@SenorPandaHere·
@Sakrexer If we do tap 53, everyone who wanted to buy low 50’s will start calling for 40’s
English
1
0
2
231
Peggy
Peggy@Sakrexer·
Preferably we tap 53ish and v reverse over the next week or so
English
7
0
26
4K
Moksh.hl
Moksh.hl@dmoksh1·
$hype down over 2% on a day when $btc is up by over 2%, this is what happens when big guys invest & their wallets are known, it is a double edged sword because them buying can send token to moon & them simply unstaking (not selling) can turn the token into dumpster. @mlmabc posted @multicoin unstaked 1.96m Hype worth $120m across 3 wallets and everyone is going crazy. multicoin unstaking does not mean they are selling but market loves to front run as usual 😂
Moksh.hl tweet media
English
1
1
5
594
Moksh.hl
Moksh.hl@dmoksh1·
@Sakrexer Multicoin spoiling the $hype party, not for long though
English
0
0
3
188
Peggy
Peggy@Sakrexer·
Bids between 60 and 54
Peggy tweet media
English
3
0
3
842
Moksh.hl retweetledi
rip.xyz
rip.xyz@ripdotxyz·
Nfts are everywhere on the TL again Hypurrs are irrelevant until they arent Cat brothers and sisters, we will have our time It may have been an extrmely dark period, but we will have our time to shine Hypurrliquid is inevitable
English
10
2
31
964
Moksh.hl
Moksh.hl@dmoksh1·
they already generating a revenue many blockchain companies can only dream of. absolutely no reason for them to launch a token, be under constant pressure to keep it up in value, be comfortable locking it for a year or couple, only to watch it evaporate once it is unlocked. Too much pressure if you ask me with launching a token. so better to keep doing what TradeXYZ is doing right now & not bother about launching a token.
English
0
0
0
43
r
r@ruslan55x·
Unpopular opinion: TradeXYZ is never doing airdrop
English
51
2
228
19.4K