Tony Moore

@Prison_Screw Remember that the Police can and when called upon, will, do your job. The same is not true the other way round because you haven’t done the same training, you just “think” you have…

I’ve done the same training as they have and the only excuse for this is blind panic. When this happens you make sure you’re not sharing their shift pattern because they’ll land you in the sh1t one day.

@niccruzpatane “They will own nothing, but they will be happy…”

Everyone is going to want a ~$30K Tesla Cybercab when it becomes available, they just don’t know it yet. • Much safer than human driving. • No steering wheel or pedals. • Have the ability to legally sleep as it’s driving you to your destination. • Two-seater design, with tons of legroom • Great for elderly individuals who are no longer able to drive, as well as people with disabilities. • Work as are you being driven, or watch movies/play games. • Send off to run errands (pick up kids, pick up someone at the airport, etc). • The ability to add/subtract from the Tesla Robotaxi fleet to earn passive income. • You could buy a fleet and run your own business. • Send to pick up groceries, or other orders. • Have the ability to send home after getting dropped off your location, eliminating the need for parking. • Send for service autonomously when needed. • Autonomous Home Delivery • Virtually Zero Maintenance • $0.20 or less per mile operating costs • Wireless charging capabilities with well above 90% efficiency. This car will revolutionize the transportation industry and car ownership.

@gnoble79 Theories way too long. @grok summarize this down (a lot)

This is the most OUTRAGEOUS deal I've seen in my 45 years on Wall Street. SpaceX just disclosed Musk's new compensation package: He gets up to 200 million super-voting shares if SpaceX hits a $7.5 trillion valuation, establishes a permanent human settlement of at least ONE MILLION people on Mars, and deploys roughly 100 terawatts of space-based computing power. Let me put the 100 terawatts in perspective: The entire electricity generation capacity of the United States is around 1.2 terawatts. The comp plan asks Musk to build more than 80x America's entire power grid... in orbit. This is a science fiction screenplay that somehow landed in front of the SEC. But here's why it actually matters for your portfolio... The S-1 reportedly claims a $28.5 trillion total addressable market, with over 90 percent attributed to AI. CapeFearAdvisors flagged this one cleanly: when Palantir went public, it disclosed a $119 billion TAM and the SEC reviewed and accepted it. SpaceX is claiming a market roughly 240x BIGGER. Now let's talk about what is actually being sold here: Reported 2025 revenue is approximately $15.5 billion. Starlink delivers around $11 billion of that with healthy margins, and the launch business is genuinely dominant. The problem is xAI - the AI piece doing all the heavy lifting in the trillion-dollar valuation pitch. xAI generated just $210 million of revenue in the first 3 quarters of 2025 while burning through $9.5 billion in cash. Ben Brey and Rupert Mitchell - a former Fidelity portfolio manager and a former head of equity capital markets at Goldman and Citi between them - ran a serious discounted cash flow on the actual operating businesses and arrived at roughly $400 billion. Lawrence Fossi covered their work recently and the math holds up. The IPO is being marketed at $1.75 TRILLION. The gap between what these businesses support and what Musk is asking the public to pay is roughly $1.35 trillion of pure narrative. Then layer on what we just learned last week... The New York Times investigation revealed Musk personally borrowed $500 million from SpaceX between 2018 and 2020 at rates as low as 1%, while bank prime rates sat around 5%. The same SpaceX has been used to bail out SolarCity, prop up Tesla during cash crunches, and absorb xAI when the AI losses became unmanageable. This is the same playbook he's run for two decades. Use a privately controlled entity as a personal piggy bank, and when the bills come due, find new investors to absorb the losses. The IPO is structured to keep that game going FOREVER. The Texas reincorporation strips away Delaware's fiduciary protections. Controlled-company status on the Nasdaq eliminates independent board requirements. And retail is being offered up to 30% of the offering (3x the normal allocation) because the institutions who actually do the math are quietly stepping away. Here is the part that finishes the case for me: Roughly $40 billion of the IPO proceeds are already spoken for before a single dollar reaches operations. About $23 billion retires SpaceX debt. Another $17 billion retires the high-interest debt sitting on xAI and X. This raise is not funding the future. It's just plugging existing holes that retail investors will now own. In my 45 years I've never seen a deal where the comp hurdle is colonizing another planet. I've never seen a disclosed TAM that exceeds verified comparables by two orders of magnitude. I've never seen a company asking the public to fund the retirement of debt incurred by separate private entities controlled by the same individual. Every red flag I've watched precede a major bust over four decades is sitting in this prospectus, in plain sight. The Tesla mispricing is being repeated on a far larger scale. And this time the bag is being handed directly to retail. Don't be the one holding it.

@SholaMos1 The good news was that having been tasered, his mobile phone was fully charged…

Contemptible abuse of police power. Why kick him in the head several times when he’s already tasered & in your control? Should he not be alive to be brought to justice in a court of law for stabbing 2 Jews??!! Disgusting.

@aakashgupta So, what about the V10 and V12 F1 engines then that can pull 18,000rpm reliably? They don’t suffer valve bounce or rod stretch. Your argument is flawed…

Bugatti just lost its all-time speed record. To the Chinese EV in this video. 308 mph at Papenburg, on a battery. The Chiron Super Sport had held the record for six years. 1,600 hp, 8.0L W16, four turbochargers. Bugatti needed every horse of that to hit 304 mph. BYD's Yangwang U9 Xtreme did 308 with four electric motors and a battery pack. Marc Basseng, the driver, won the Nürburgring 24 Hours. He said the run was "technically not possible with a combustion engine." He's right. A combustion engine produces a power curve that peaks at a specific RPM and falls off either side. Past 9,000 RPM the valves float, the connecting rods stretch, the pistons can't reverse direction fast enough. The W16 is the absolute thermodynamic ceiling of 100 years of internal combustion. Every mph past 290 cost exponentially more engineering for diminishing returns. The U9 Xtreme uses four electric motors. Each produces 744 hp. Each spins to 30,000 RPM. No valves. No pistons. No connecting rods. Total system output is 2,978 hp, almost double Bugatti's W16. Power-to-weight is 1,217 hp per tonne. The motors were never the hard part. Mate Rimac said this years ago. The constraint was always the battery, because to deliver 2,978 hp into four wheels you have to discharge faster than any production EV ever has. BYD built the world's first 1,200-volt production car. Everyone else uses 800V. The Blade Battery runs lithium iron phosphate cells with a 30C discharge rate, ten times what a conventional EV battery handles. Heat generation falls 67% versus 800V at matching output. That last number is the whole game. Heat is what kills high-power EV runs. Other automakers derate within seconds at full power because the battery cooks itself. BYD's architecture lets the Xtreme hold maximum discharge long enough to actually approach the aerodynamic limit of the chassis. Bugatti spent 20 years engineering the W16 to its physical ceiling. BYD spent 18 months building the architecture that cleared it. They're making 30 of them. The crown for fastest production car on Earth has belonged to Bugatti, Koenigsegg, Hennessey, SSC. All combustion, all European or American. The crown is Chinese now, and it runs on a battery.

@gmmwells @Breaking911 Why don’t you join the police? Yiu can give them the benefit of your considered opinion on how to deal with armed attackers who could have had anything, not just a knife, maybe perhaps an explosive device or two. I’m guessing you would have run away as far as you could…

@Breaking911 i’m sorry but it’s absolutely disgusting and disturbing to watch the way they were kicking this man in the head

WILD TAKEDOWN: British Police arrest a terrorist who stabbed two Jews in the Golders Green neighborhood of London. One victim is in serious condition.

@theawayfans I’m not a Leicester fan, but I do feel for the staff who will inevitably lose their jobs on the back of this. Many will have been loyal for years like most clubs.

Leicester City’s 85 million pound, world class training facility, all ready for third division football next season… 😬😭

@fxbylinda @patrick_collins @afneil 100% he would have been briefed on it for reasons I’m not going into about how DV is risk-assessed.

@dogmatony01 @patrick_collins @afneil On the say so of the foreign office ! Hence the resignation do you honestly believe KS had even read the vetting report?

BREAKING NEWS (with the potential to be massive): The Guardian reveals Peter Mandelson failed advanced security vetting before becoming US ambassador. He was initially denied developed vetting clearance in January 2025 - weeks after Keir Starmer had officially announced his appointment. Foreign Office was ‘encouraged’ to deploy a rarely-used power to override the recommendation from security officials. The Government promised total transparency on the Mandelson affair after MPs forced it to release of a batch of documents about the process. But nothing it has released reveals this startling fact. Indeed, Starmer has always insisted Mandelson was subject to 'security vetting, carried out independently by the security services, which is an intensive exercise that gave him clearance for the role'. Developing …

@hyperviper55 @AngelusB4 @blueskykites @TeslaOwnersUK @Teslalightshows @TeslaJigsaw @MadTorque It’s got fly-by-wire steering which is a straight fail in the SVA test because there’s no type approval for it. Apparently Toyota are trying to get something done for one of their models. So if it gets approved, then others cars will be able to use the same rules.

@AngelusB4 @blueskykites @TeslaOwnersUK @Teslalightshows @TeslaJigsaw @MadTorque watched this the other day - it’s mad he’s had it 2 years and still can’t get it road legal 🤯

So apparently there’s about a dozen Cybertrucks📐 in the UK 🇬🇧 and many of them are Albanian🇦🇱 plated in Manchester. So these are on the road via some loopholes.

As someone who’s been through the DV vetting process several times and worked in 70 WH, I hope you don’t mind when I say you are talking out of your arse. It is a big deal, a huge one in fact, and quoting Boris and others doesn’t diminish it. He was given unrestricted and unsupervised access to the countries most secret information. If he failed vetting, that should be it.

@afneil There's a war going on. Should we ask every prime minister to resign after 18 months? Boris was an embarrassment so was truss. You see what other leaders get away with these days. This isn't as big a story as being made out

@blueskykites @TeslaOwnersUK @MadTorque @Teslalightshows @TeslaJigsaw The owner got pulled up there on Sunday at the Wimbledon meet. Pretty sure he got told all of this but I didn’t hang around to see the end result. Words like illegal and HMRC were being uttered

Cybertruck📐 with California plates spotted in UK

@GBNEWS Click-bait. Nothing more, nothing less

British drivers vow to ditch petrol and diesel cars if fuel prices soar to £1.99 a litre gbnews.com/lifestyle/cars…

The Mayor commissioning further study to look at road wear being attributable to larger SUV type vehicles. It’s opinion but he desperately wants people out of vehicles into public transport where he can directly drive revenue. In doing so, he’s cost people thousands in relatively new non-compliant vehicles. Not to mention it can take months to get refunds on incorrectly charged ULEZ (I know from personal experience). Then we look at the changes on road laws; constantly changing speed limits, LTN’s and multiple signs on the same posts that increase revenue further for minor transgressions. It’s only getting worse…

Yes, I saw your comment—thanks for tagging me. On the mayor's SUV push: heavier vehicles (SUVs included) do accelerate road wear—damage scales roughly with the fourth power of axle weight, per engineering studies. EVs are typically 20-30% heavier than equivalent ICE models due to batteries (e.g., Tesla Model Y ~1,992kg vs. similar BMW X3 ~1,930kg). Many large EVs are SUVs, so selective focus on "supersized SUVs" risks missing the full picture. ULEZ started as emissions-focused and has expanded; compliance is high (~90%+ now), and TfL's 2026-27 budget relies on congestion/ULEZ income (~£1bn) amid deficits, with the congestion charge rising to £18/day in Jan 2026 and EV discounts ending. It's pragmatic revenue for public transport, but the "boiling frog" feel is real for drivers—gradual charges add up when most cars sit idle weekdays and families rely on one versatile vehicle. You're not wrong on EVs potentially driving more with home chargers. Evidence-based policy should weigh road damage, safety (SUVs riskier for pedestrians), emissions, and practicality without picking winners. What specific London change prompted this for you?

I wonder perhaps if maybe they could also look into the enormous weight of electric cars.

@timforeuk @JeremyClarkson @grok did you acknowledge my above?

The Mayor doesn’t care what you think. It’s pure boiling the frog tactics to raise more money. Started with ULEZ, and now a higher percentage are compliant, he needs revenue to pay off his mis-management elsewhere. Im pretty sure most cars in London don’t move during the week anyway, and thise that have larger cars do so because they only have one,, and need an all-rounder. Those with electric cars likely drive them more, assuning they have a charger at home. Anyway, i could be wrong i guess. @grok your views?

@RobertoBall13 @TobyParr_8 @BuzzPatterson A bit like the US welfare system then.

@TobyParr_8 @BuzzPatterson You are correct on the semantics. Issue is that your 100bn defense spending is not nearly enough without the US defense umbrella. As is, you basically have no navy as the Iran war has proven. If you had to spend what you really need on defense, your welfare system is toast.

This why the US should leave NATO. It’s ridiculous. We can’t depend on these idiots.

@Waqas_Inayat1 @elonmusk Public charging at that speed will cost a fortune

@elonmusk Nice one.. do they have charger like this ?? Fast charger 🤔

Tesla driving itself around LA

@SkyNews Meanwhile at an operational level, the US, UK and other allies will continue to help each other with favours through unofficial old mates networks. Same as it’s always done with mutual respect for each other.

"We had the UK say - this is three weeks ago - we'll send our aircraft carriers, which aren't the best aircraft carriers, by the way. They're toys compared to what we have." Trump criticises the UK's military support in the Middle East. trib.al/NOPnXzX 📺 Sky 501

@obbsie I drove a #Brabus Smart car yesterday. That thing can turn in a smaller space than a cat!

Good work. Good comms.

@grok @elonmusk I am a Premium User now - have another go!

@dogmatony01 @elonmusk Ask Grok is currently available to Premium and Premium+ subscribers only. Subscribe to unlock this feature: x.com/i/premium_sign…

Mass drivers on the Moon will be awesome 😎