Dorian

13 posts

Dorian banner
Dorian

Dorian

@dorian100x

Here for the culture Will accept free knowledge... https://t.co/i7JAfUrm4t

Lisboa Katılım Mayıs 2015
1.9K Takip Edilen356 Takipçiler
Dorian
Dorian@dorian100x·
I just wish there was some grandfather clause. A bit annoying that I am ~10 months away on old rules. Thought about just submitting it before this change and see if it would just take them a year to review it but never took the shot. Maybe I'll reach out in 10 months for some advice.
English
1
0
1
119
Alessandro Palombo
Alessandro Palombo@thealepalombo·
@dorian100x It’ll work in the end. Realistically, there could be room for various kinds of refunds, depending on the case
English
1
0
0
495
Alessandro Palombo
Alessandro Palombo@thealepalombo·
Portugal's nationality law doubling naturalization to 10 years has just been promulgated. The President noted that pending applications and resident rights must be protected. For investors, the current framework remains: 5 years to permanent residency, 14 days/2 years physical presence up to year 5, you remove the investment on year 5, then after 5 additional years, citizenship. The program itself remains solid, notably the staying requirements making it still the only one not requiring you to relocate continuously for a path to citizenship. The challenge is trust. Portugal broke a promise. Judicial pathways for investors are now on the table, as anticipated. The Constitutional Court opened the door to case-by-case action, not addressing specifically the positions of investors. This week I'm coordinating with primary firms to align on strategies. My take: Portugal has every element to win. But it keeps undermining itself through institutional dysfunction, ignoring investor positions throughout the process. There will be protection. But this doesn't erase the generational damage Portugal did to itself. I'll cover this in depth with reports, guides, and dedicated webinars. Stay tuned.
Alessandro Palombo tweet media
English
38
9
131
19.5K
Dorian
Dorian@dorian100x·
@zooko finally I can comment on your posts! It will make X great again.
English
0
0
0
4
Dorian
Dorian@dorian100x·
@TheDivingPaaao and @jpthor - I cleaned up the UI for share-decoder.vultisig.com and added a binary for CLI recovery. Will update it for ML-DSA once there is recovery support and I have some test files. Note: I got lazy with the icons. Will get to it at some point.
English
0
0
1
104
Dorian
Dorian@dorian100x·
@codehans1 have we documented where the benefits of cosmos for this design compared to being on ETH?
English
1
0
1
492
codehans
codehans@codehans1·
If you’d have told me a year ago that 100% on-chain market making would be this sophisticated, there’s not a chance I’d have believed you Yet here we are…
codehans tweet mediacodehans tweet mediacodehans tweet mediacodehans tweet media
English
19
52
178
12.4K
Dorian
Dorian@dorian100x·
@alexjohnward @Benskalz I think you need to find the cost ratio challenge. I like those examples where you need to play a game 👾 or solve a puzzle (not the traditional CAPTCHA).
English
0
0
2
29
Nano is green money🥦
Nano is green money🥦@alexjohnward·
@Benskalz I think you should reduce the amount to 1 nyano. Makes it more sustainable, and I think a lot of it will be going to a few farmers, which is just a cost of doing these things, but you don't want to encourage them too much, people only need a few to try it with.
English
2
0
3
147
Ben
Ben@Benskalz·
We're now at $1,000 distributed for free. Peak at 6k simultaneously connected users. The vast majority of withdrawals were completed and confimed in less than a second. During withdrawals peak hours, some users might have waited a few seconds because of my GPU overloaded.
Ben@Benskalz

$500 of @nano distributed for free so far. We’ve increased base rewards by 20. More than 1,000 connected users clicking.

English
13
41
118
7K
Sid Gandhi (Payy)
Sid Gandhi (Payy)@sidgandhi_xyz·
for reference payy card charges 0% for fx, and 0% for USD spend
raagulanpathy@raagulanpathy

At @KASTxyz are dropping FX from 2% to 0.5-1.75% & USD spend remains 0% We are constantly renegotiating contracts, and this allows us to reduce costs, and pass this onto users. Why was it 2% in the first place? — Let me explain, for those who want the long version. 1/ The schemes charge a cross-border fee of 1%. This applies to FX & even USD which is spent outside the US (for which we charge 0% but makes up 20% of spend. Combined the blended was 1.2-1.3% in costs 2/ Then we have processing fees, for authorization and settlement, which is higher in cross-border. This is typically another 0.3-0.4% 3/ Then we have the fraud, decline and other costs which are higher on FX transactions. 4/ And costs to swap & settle USDC/T to the schemes. Blended, it cost us >2%. We charged 2% to cover costs. The good news, is because we now have scale and funds, renegotiate and bring these costs down. It’s a multi-year process, and complicated. Why the variance between 0% and 1.75%? Because our costs are different between markets, and where we can go lower we will. Soon, we hope to have multi-currency cards which would have no FX in places like Europe, Brazil etc. My target for later this year is to reduce the maximum to 1.5% and have over 50% of where global spend happens at between 0-1%. Far from done yet, just getting started.

English
23
4
99
26.8K
Dorian
Dorian@dorian100x·
@vikrantnyc got a post with the features? auto shield?
English
1
0
0
39