zooko🛡🦓🦓🦓 ⓩ

148.2K posts

zooko🛡🦓🦓🦓 ⓩ banner
zooko🛡🦓🦓🦓 ⓩ

zooko🛡🦓🦓🦓 ⓩ

@zooko

Freedom maximalist. Good vibes only.

Boulder, Colorado, USA, Earth Katılım Mart 2008
2.6K Takip Edilen111.3K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
zooko🛡🦓🦓🦓 ⓩ
Zcash is winning. @zooko/48579b89770e" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">medium.com/@zooko/48579b8… ⤵️
English
15
217
1.4K
823.5K
zooko🛡🦓🦓🦓 ⓩ retweetledi
Jason
Jason@followjason·
I agree. I also think that people being unsure about the model initially is a fair take, and one that leads to deeper research into the history and critical thinking about the pros/cons - and also healthy discourse within the community. The alternative would be blind tribalism. Willingness to respectfully disagree, debate and talk through ideas in the open is one of my favorite aspects of the ZEC community.
English
1
2
3
506
zooko🛡🦓🦓🦓 ⓩ retweetledi
Brian Armstrong
Brian Armstrong@brian_armstrong·
"If—" is a poem by English poet Rudyard Kipling If you can keep your head when all about you Are losing theirs and blaming it on you; If you can trust yourself when all men doubt you, But make allowance for their doubting too: If you can wait and not be tired by waiting, Or being lied about, don't deal in lies, Or being hated don't give way to hating, And yet don't look too good, nor talk too wise; If you can dream—and not make dreams your master; If you can think—and not make thoughts your aim, If you can meet with Triumph and Disaster And treat those two impostors just the same: If you can bear to hear the truth you've spoken Twisted by knaves to make a trap for fools, Or watch the things you gave your life to, broken, And stoop and build 'em up with worn-out tools; If you can make one heap of all your winnings And risk it on one turn of pitch-and-toss, And lose, and start again at your beginnings ⁠And never breathe a word about your loss: If you can force your heart and nerve and sinew To serve your turn long after they are gone, And so hold on when there is nothing in you ⁠Except the Will which says to them: 'Hold on!' If you can talk with crowds and keep your virtue, Or walk with Kings—nor lose the common touch, If neither foes nor loving friends can hurt you, If all men count with you, but none too much: If you can fill the unforgiving minute With sixty seconds' worth of distance run, Yours is the Earth and everything that's in it, ⁠And—which is more—you'll be a Man, my son!
English
130
69
627
58K
zooko🛡🦓🦓🦓 ⓩ retweetledi
Chairman Birb Bernanke
Chairman Birb Bernanke@Bonecondor·
just a thought, but many people who are about to be wildly liquid could perhaps engage in noblesse oblige and breathe life into the spark of a new renaissance / enlightenment era. that could happen next, if you wanted
English
7
5
52
2K
zooko🛡🦓🦓🦓 ⓩ retweetledi
nicole
nicole@digitlartifacts·
gorgeous ceramics from artist hedy yang
nicole tweet medianicole tweet medianicole tweet medianicole tweet media
English
3
8
59
3.4K
zooko🛡🦓🦓🦓 ⓩ retweetledi
Dean W. Ball
Dean W. Ball@deanwball·
One of my favorite abstract qualities of the universe is that beauty often really is a good heuristic for truth
English
9
2
31
5.2K
Junyang Lin
Junyang Lin@JustinLin610·
anything interesting recently in the opensource community?
English
5
0
23
4.3K
zooko🛡🦓🦓🦓 ⓩ
@gdb @emollick Speaking as one who hasn’t tried it yet (I’m still the chatbot Stone Age)… how about a short video showing the complete process end to end, with a visual result (like a newly created video game)?
English
0
0
2
382
Ethan Mollick
Ethan Mollick@emollick·
Very few people know the amount of useful work that the current models can do in Code/Codex/etc. with the right setup This is not a "rah rah you are so early" post, this is a "AI companies are doing a really bad job explaining what their systems actually do in a clear way" post.
English
64
28
781
43.4K
zooko🛡🦓🦓🦓 ⓩ retweetledi
banteg
banteg@banteg·
we are officially at a point when a thought of "why is there no x?" is just one sol ultra prompt away from a polished version of x.
banteg tweet media
English
4
3
46
3.5K
zooko🛡🦓🦓🦓 ⓩ
Satnam Singh@satnam6502

This article by @avi_press describes why he switched some of his company's (new) code from Haskell to Python, and he makes a lot of great points. The relative value of the Haskell type system has diminished in this AI world, and the slow build times hurt more than ever. It would be interesting to imagine a world where they had switched instead to Lean, retaining many of the advantages of Haskell but now gaining significantly more value from the type system e.g. being able to use AI theorem provers to prove formal properties about your code (or aid the AI synthesis of code with formal properties). Build times may still be an issue, but I suspect sufficient mitigations could be developed. And before you kick my head in, I've been using Haskell for 36 years and I am a huge fan. avi.press/posts/2026-07-…

ZXX
0
0
2
1.4K
zooko🛡🦓🦓🦓 ⓩ retweetledi
rene garcia
rene garcia @regar11561·
@Jinx_Yxurself Frontload Ironwood, tachyon and crosslink. This is the play
English
1
1
5
1.2K
zooko🛡🦓🦓🦓 ⓩ retweetledi
Aws Albarghouthi
Aws Albarghouthi@awsTO·
It took me a few hours to write a Lean formalization of the theorems and proofs in a recent paper of ours. I used Fable + 5.6 Sol. I found the exercise shockingly eye opening. I don't think we should publish papers without Lean proofs at this point.
English
1
5
41
4.4K
zooko🛡🦓🦓🦓 ⓩ retweetledi
Frank Braun
Frank Braun@thefrankbraun·
Solid arguments against Lightning's privacy. In the early days of Lightning people predicted it will end up as a hub and spoke system with centralized liquidity and got a ton of abuse for it. You cannot meme an inherently bad architecture into a good one.
ddadybayo@ddadybayo

This is the kind of narrative that gets pushed while the actual architecture centralizes and leaks. Onion routing hides the full path. That part is real. But the protocol has built in leaks that have been known and documented for years: - Same payment hash on every hop →trivial correlation. - Balance probing recovers up to 89% of public channel balances. - Timing analysis: the single most central node can observe timing on 50% of payments. Top 4 nodes cover 72%. 
Meanwhile the “decentralized L2” part: - Public capacity hovers between 2.7k–5.6k BTC.
- Top 10 nodes control 62% of all public liquidity.
- Gini coefficient for node capacity: 0.97. - Top 10% of nodes hold 80% of the locked bitcoin. This is not decentralization. This is a hub and spoke system with a few very powerful hubs. 
Who runs these hubs? Mostly exchanges and LSPs: Bitfinex, ACINQ, Binance, Kraken, OKX, Wallet of Satoshi and similar. If you’re not running your own full node and managing your own liquidity, you’re almost certainly routing through these entities. They see sender, receiver and amounts. Privacy collapses. 
This isn’t a bug. It’s the predictable result of a design that prioritizes routing efficiency and capital efficiency over actual decentralization and strong privacy. Powerful adversaries (state level or well resourced) don’t even need to break onion routing perfectly. They just sit on or near the big hubs and watch. 
Lightning can move small payments faster and cheaper than on-chain. That’s its actual use case. But calling it incredible privacy by default while the liquidity and routing are this concentrated and while these attacks exist, is dishonest. Real privacy requires an additional layer on top (Chaumian ecash like Cashu is one attempt). The base Lightning protocol does not deliver it. 
Bitcoin was supposed to be a tool for financial sovereignty and resistance to control. When the dominant scaling solution creates new centralized chokepoints that are easy to monitor and potentially censor, we’ve traded one set of problems for another that serves power better. Data doesn’t lie. Narratives do.

English
2
2
18
2.2K
zooko🛡🦓🦓🦓 ⓩ retweetledi
Séb Krier
Séb Krier@sebkrier·
found an old screenshot of a conversation with Sydney
Séb Krier tweet media
English
10
39
617
27.8K