Sabitlenmiş Tweet
pepephewww
1.1K posts

pepephewww
@drschranz
a kind of troll programmer (lamer) i can also work 🌐 https://t.co/GnipJD2YHi
Katılım Mayıs 2010
82 Takip Edilen11 Takipçiler

@5eniorDeveloper @grok quiero instrucciones relevantes para esto en router microtik, sabes? 🫶🏻
Español

¿Ustedes también segmentan la red de su casa? Yo la tengo así:
1. Main: dispositivos de confianza (computadoras y celulares).
2. Invitados: solo internet con ancho de banda limitado.
3. IoT: Tvs, lavadora, etc. Sin acceso a la intranet.
4. Seguridad: Cámaras sin acceso a la intranet.
5. Una vlan con VPN siempre activo.
Todo el tráfico pasa por pi-hole y tengo algunas reglas de firewall para que mis dispositivos de main puedan ver las tvs y cámaras.
¿Qué me falta?
Español

¡Google acaba de hacer DESIGN.md de código abierto!
Un formato para decirle a la IA cómo debe diseñar tu UI.
Colores, tipografías, espacios, componentes y reglas visuales...
Para que la IA genere interfaces siguiendo tu estilo:
→ github.com/google-labs-co…

Español

@NoNonsenseND I'm a programmer and an author and I have a YouTube channel. I restore PDP-11 computers. I have four kids and a wife and two dogs. I still have my first car and blue is my favorite color.
What else do you need to know? Should I have said I have autism? I don't, usually.
English

Una mala decisión en tu base de datos que te explota 16 años después. Eso es justo lo que le ha pasado a Wise.
El fundador usó un entero de 32 bits para las IDs de transferencias. Eso da 2.147.483.647 valores posibles.
Claro, hace 16 años era difícil imaginar que llegarían a esa cifra.
Si hubiera usado un long de 64 bits, habría tenido 9.223.372.036.854.775.807 valores posibles.
Y no, tampoco es una tragedia. Ojalá toda la deuda técnica fuera consecuencia de haber crecido tanto.
Kristo Käärmann@kaarmann
Now that we're soon running out of 32-bit namespace for transfer IDs at @Wise, the engineers are annoyed with me choosing int over long when I wrote the first lines of code in 2010. But why don't they appreciate the $17 of savings in storage cost over years!? 🤷
Español

@javilop Static analisis, memoria, instinto, patrones prácticos, buen teclado son los real vibes para mi, el junior y doctorado s +9k tokens/s es increible no mentiré, toca balancear 🤔 hay "trades"
Español

@awesomekling i have a poors man fixed pipeline with just explore+solve to reduce the tokens on average, and the mf ♊ drops cool patches and posts, sometimes fails, acceptable ratios and results 🤯
English

"simple software" is a fairy tale every engineer likes to tell themselves.
In reality, simple software is either dysfunctional, or satisfactory to at most 5 people on the entire planet.
You simply cannot make software simple, because software is not a single math equation you apply to everything equally - the range of functionality and usecases of (realistically) any important piece of software is so great the code cannot be "simple".
This entire idea on linux stems from dwm, (in my opinion) one of the stupidest marketing tricks that worked on dumb linux users.
DWM is a barely functional, glorified lua script for barebones tiling, that only works because it runs on top of a fucking million line of code behemoth that is Xorg which does everything for it. DWM accomplishes nothing of value and that's why it can be 2k LOC.
It's even more hilarious once you look at the wayland spiritual successor - dwl. It's purely dysfunctional, even with the 80k-or-so LOC wlroots (plus deps) powering it. Once you go past "I need to open 2 terminals" everything starts falling apart.
The idea of "less lines of code = faster and more readable code bro" is something I'd expect a first year CS student to say, not an actual experienced programmer. The linux kernel is 50 million lines or whatnot and I don't see you complaining that AMD just added 10k more lines because a new gpu came out and they need to add driver support for it.
No, patching code for functionality is terrible and is a braindead method of adding features that doesn't even work in most cases.
No, more features do not make your computer slower. If you don't use it, the code doesn't fuckin run. You will never notice that 4ns branch ran 2x a minute dear linux user.
No, more LOC doesn't mean slower. Hell, in some cases, more LOC means faster, because we can do intelligent things and not the fast-and-dirty methods.
But that's just an opinion, of course. What do I know.
vaxry@vaxryy
the suckless philosophy is so deeply flawed and stupid I almost want to call my software suckmore instead of hypr
English













